Development and initial validation of the polyhandicap severity scale.

OBJECTIVES: Providing a new tool, based on the point of view of experts in polyhandicap, which assesses the global severity of the health status of polyhandicapped persons is necessary. We present herein the initial validation of the polyhandicap severity scale (PSS). METHODS: The initial development of the tool was undertaken in two steps: item selection and validation process. The final set included 10 items related to abilities and 17 items related to comorbidities and impairments. The patient selection criteria were as follows: age>3 years, age at onset of cerebral lesion under 3 years old, with a combination of motor deficiency and profound intellectual impairment, associated with restricted mobility and everyday life dependence. External validity, reproducibility (20 patients), responsiveness (38 patients), and acceptability were explored. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 875 patients were included. Two scores were calculated: an abilities score and a comorbidities/impairments score (higher score, higher severity). The 2 scores were higher for: older patients, patients with a progressive etiology, patients with more devices and more medications, patients with higher dependency and lower mobility. Indicators of reproducibility and responsiveness were satisfactory. The mean time duration of fulfilling was 22minutes (standard deviation 5). CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying the health severity of polyhandicapped persons is necessary for both healthcare workers and health decision makers. The polyhandicap severity scale provides the first reliable and valid measure of the health severity status for children and adults.

Health issues in polyhandicapped patients according to age: Results of a large French cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: A better understanding of the natural course of the health status of patients with polyhandicap may optimize preventive and curative care management. From a large sample of patients aged from 3 to 25 years, we reported the description of their health status. METHODS: This was an 18-month cross-sectional study including patients aged from 3 to 25 years with a combination of severe motor deficiency and profound intellectual impairment. The patients were recruited from 4 specialized rehabilitation centers, 9 residential facilities, and a pediatric/neurological department. The following data were collected: polyhandicap etiology, health status (impairments, comorbidities, and neurodevelopmental status), medical devices, and rehabilitation procedures. RESULTS: A total of 545 patients were included (n=80 [3-5 years], n=166 [6-11 y], n=155 [12-17 y], and n=144 [18-25 y]). The etiology of polyhandicap was unknown for 11.5% of the cases. Behavioral disorders and (orthopedic and digestive) comorbidities were more frequent in the oldest age classes. The neurodevelopmental status of the patients was close to those of a 5- to 7-month-old child without progression across age. Gastrostomy was the most frequent device needed by the patients. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Early detection and management of impairments and comorbidities may improve the disease course of the patients.

Aetiologies, comorbidities and causes of death in a population of 133 patients with polyhandicaps cared for at specialist rehabilitation centres.

AIM: This study concerns the aetiologies, comorbidities and places and causes of death of a population of persons with severe polyhandicap (PLH). METHODS: Based on the medical files of all deceased PLH patients, who were cared for between 2006-2012. Data collected were aetiological diagnosis of the polyhandicap, duration and type of hospitalization, age, place and cause of death, comorbidities: chronic respiratory insufficiency, recurrent attacks of pulmonary infections, urinary infections, active epilepsy, scoliosis, chronic digestive disorders and behavioural problems. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients died, 70 children and 63 adults. The sex ratio was 84 men to 49 women. The average stay in these institutions was 10 years 4 months. The average age at the time of death was 21 years, in 60% of cases the place of death was in the specialist rehabilitation centres. The causes of death in decreasing order were: pulmonary infections (63.2%), sudden death (18%) and status epilepticus (6.8%); 79.7% of patients suffered from chronic respiratory insufficiency, 60.2% suffered serious scoliosis, 66.9% drug-resistant epilepsy and 78.9% had digestive disorders. The main aetiologies of the polyhandicap were: pre- and perinatal encephalopathies (31.6%), metabolic encephalopathies (18%) and convulsive encephalopathies (11.3%). CONCLUSION: The main comorbidity and main cause of death in patients with severe PLH is respiratory failure.

Impact of an intensive multimodal educative program on behavioral disorders of polyhandicapped patients: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized children and young adults with polyhandicap (PLH) often present with behavioral and relational disorders that are mainly related to their difficulties in communicating and interacting with their environments. Educational support is rarely provided to these patients. An intensive multimodal educative program could help in reducing behavioral disorders and in improving the quality of life of healthcare workers, including nurses and auxiliary nurses. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial compared the impact of the usual practice of an educative program (1 h a week) to a multimodal intensive educative program (5 h a week) at 12 months. Patients aged 3-25 with PLH defined by the combination of five criteria (motor deficiency, severe-to-profound mental impairment, daily life dependence, restricted mobility, onset of cerebral lesion at younger than 3 years, and at least one behavioral disorder per week [withdrawn behavior, unexplained crying, teeth grinding, self-injury, aggression, stereotypy, or merycism]) were included. The primary outcome was the evolution of the predominant behavioral disorder between study inclusion and 12 months. Healthcare workers completed questionnaires about chronic stress, coping strategies, and quality of life at study inclusion and at 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 60 patients were included. Despite a tendency toward reduced teeth grinding, withdrawn and self-injury behaviors, the intervention was not significantly effective: The median duration of continuous behavioral disorders (stereotypy, unexplained crying, withdrawn behavior, and teeth grinding) did not differ between groups. The median frequency of the discontinuous behavioral disorders (self-injury) did not differ between groups. Considering each disorder separately, there was a decrease in teeth grinding, self-injury, and autistic-like traits in the intervention group, although it did not reach statistical significance. This study also suggested decreased depersonalization feelings by healthcare workers. CONCLUSION: Although the study did not show a significant reduction in behavioral disorders in patients with PLH, these results encourage further evaluation of educational management, particularly in regard to patients with self-injury and with withdrawn and teeth-grinding behaviors.