Defining Benchmarks for Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: A Multicentre Analysis of Patients with Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To establish globally applicable benchmark outcomes for pelvic exenteration (PE) in patients with locally advanced primary (LARC) and recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), using outcomes achieved at highly specialised centres. BACKGROUND DATA: PE is established as the standard of care for selected patients with LARC and LRRC. There are currently no available benchmarks against which surgical performance in PE can be compared for audit and quality improvement. METHODS: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing PE for LARC or LRRC at 16 highly experienced centres between 2018 and 2023. Ten outcome benchmarks were established in a lower-risk subgroup. Benchmarks were defined by the 75th percentile of the results achieved at the individual centres. RESULTS: 763 patients underwent PE, of which 464 patients (61%) had LARC and 299 (39%) had LRRC. 544 patients (71%) who met predefined lower risk criteria formed the benchmark cohort. For LARC patients, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤44%; comprehensive complication index (CCI): ≤30.2; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤4.3%; R0 resection rate: ≥79%. For LRRC patients, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤53%; CCI: ≤34.1; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤6%; R0 resection rate: ≥77%. CONCLUSIONS: The reported benchmarks for PE in patients with LARC and LRRC represent the best available care for this patient group globally and can be used for rigorous assessment of surgical quality and to facilitate quality improvement initiatives at international exenteration centres.

Impact of Intraoperative Decision-Making on Pathological Margin Status in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A key component of preoperative preparation for pelvic exenteration surgery is the development of an operative plan in a multidisciplinary setting based on the extent of local tumor invasion on preoperative imaging. Changes to the extent of resection or operative plan may occur intraoperatively based on intraoperative findings. OBJECTIVE: To report the frequency and extent of intraoperative deviation from the planned extent of resection during pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer and determine whether this resulted in a more or less radical resection. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTINGS: A high-volume pelvic exenteration center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer between January 2015 and December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency and extent of intraoperative deviation from the planned extent of resection, R0 resection rate. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients underwent pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer, of whom 110 (81%) had R0 resection margins. Twelve patients were excluded because of missing information, and 49 patients (40%) had a change to the operative plan. Operative changes were major in 30 patients (61%), more radical in 40 patients (82%), and margin relevant in 24 patients (49%). In patients in whom there was a change to the operative plan and R0 resection was achieved, the median distance to a relevant margin was 2.5 mm (range, 0.1-10 mm). Of 8 patients with a change in operative plan and R1 resection, 3 were margin relevant, of whom all were considered major, and 2 were more radical and 1 was less radical. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability outside of specialist units may be limited. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative changes to the planned extent of resection occur commonly and most often result in an unanticipated major or more radical resection. Such changes may contribute to high rates of R0 resection margins in specialist pelvic exenteration units that use an ultraradical approach in these patients. See Video Abstract . IMPACTO DE LA TOMA DE DECISIONES INTRAOPERATORIA SOBRE EL ESTADO DEL MARGEN PATOLGICO EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A EXENTERACIN PLVICA POR RECURRENCIA LOCAL EN CNCER DE RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:Un componente clave de la preparación preoperatoria para exenteración pélvica es el desarrollo de un plan quirúrgico en un entorno multidisciplinario, basado en el grado de invasión tumoral local en las imágenes preoperatorias. Es posible que se produzcan cambios intraoperatorios en la extensión de la resección o en el plan quirúrgico según los hallazgos intraoperatorios.OBJETIVO:Informar la frecuencia y la extensión de la desviación intraoperatoria de la extensión planificada de la resección durante la exenteración pélvica para el cáncer de recto localmente recurrente, y si esto resultó en una resección más o menos radical.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Un centro de exenteración pélvica de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a exenteración pélvica por cáncer de recto localmente recurrente entre enero de 2015 y diciembre de 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Frecuencia y extensión de desviación intraoperatoria de la extensión planeada de resección, tasa de resección R0.RESULTADOS:136 pacientes fueron sometidos a exenteración pélvica por cáncer de recto localmente recurrente, de los cuales 110 (81%) tuvieron márgenes de resección R0. 12 pacientes fueron excluidos por falta de información y 49 pacientes (40%) tuvieron un cambio en el plan quirúrgico. Los cambios operatorios fueron mayores en 30 pacientes (61%), más radicales en 40 pacientes (82%) y con relevancia sobre márgenes en 24 pacientes (49%). En los pacientes en los que hubo un cambio en el plan quirúrgico y se logró la resección R0, la distancia mediana hasta un margen relevante fue de 2.5 mm (rango 0.1-10 mm). De ocho pacientes con un cambio en el plan quirúrgico y resección R1, tres tuvieron relevancia sobre márgenes de los cuales todos se consideraron mayores, dos fueron más radicales y uno fue menos radical.LIMITACIONES:La generalización fuera de las unidades especializadas puede ser limitada.CONCLUSIONES:Los cambios intraoperatorios en la extensión planificada de la resección ocurren comúnmente y con mayor frecuencia resultan en una resección mayor imprevista y más radical. Dichos cambios pueden contribuir a altas tasas de márgenes de resección R0 en unidades especializadas en EP que emplean un enfoque ultrarradical en estos pacientes. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Outcome Heterogeneity in Prehabilitation Trials-Are We Comparing Apples and Oranges?

INTRODUCTION: Over the last decade, the number of prehabilitation randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has increased significantly. Therefore, this review aimed to describe the outcomes reported in prehabilitation RCTs in patients undergoing cancer surgery. METHODS: A search was conducted in Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to July 2021. We included RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of preoperative exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in adult oncology patients who underwent thoracic and gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The verbatim outcomes reported in each article were extracted, and each outcome was assessed to determine whether it was defined and measured using a validated tool. Verbatim outcomes were grouped into standardized outcomes and categorized into domains. The quality of outcome reporting in each identified article was assessed using the Harman tool (score range 0-6, where 0 indicated the poorest quality). RESULTS: A total of 74 RCTs were included, from which 601 verbatim outcomes were extracted. Only 110 (18.3%) of the verbatim outcomes were defined and 270 (44.9%) were labeled as either "primary" or "secondary" outcomes. Verbatim outcomes were categorized into 119 standardized outcomes and assigned into one of five domains (patient-reported outcomes, surgical outcomes, physical/functional outcomes, disease activity, and intervention delivery). Surgical outcomes were the most common outcomes reported (n = 71 trials, 95.9%). The overall quality of the reported outcomes was poor across trials (median score: 2.0 [IQR = 0.00-3.75]). CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation RCTs display considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting, and low outcome reporting quality. The development of standardized core outcome sets may help improve article quality and enhance the clinical utility of prehabilitation following cancer surgery.

Variation in outcome measurement and reporting in studies of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review.

AIM: There is increasing research interest in pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting can prevent meaningful interpretation and valid synthesis of pooled data and meta-analyses. The aim of this study was to assess homogeneity in outcome measures in the current pelvic exenteration literature. METHOD: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Scopus databases were searched from 1990 to 25 April 2023 to identify studies reporting outcomes of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. All reported outcomes were extracted, merged with those of similar meaning and assigned a domain. RESULTS: Of 4137 abstracts screened, 156 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2765 outcomes were reported, of which 17% were accompanied by a definition. There were 1157 unique outcomes, merged into 84 standardized outcomes and assigned one of seven domains. The most reported domains were complications (147 studies, 94%), survival (127, 81%) and surgical outcomes (123, 79%). Resection margins were reported in 122 studies (78%): the definition of a clear resection margin was not provided in 45 studies (37%), it was unclear in 11 studies (9%) and not specified beyond microscopically 'clear' or 'negative' in 31 (28%). Measurements of 2, 1, 0.5 mm and any healthy tissue were all used to define R0 margins. CONCLUSION: There is significant heterogeneity in outcome measurement and reporting in the current pelvic exenteration literature, raising concerns about the validity of comparative or collaborative studies between centres and meta-analyses. Coordinated international collaboration is required to define core outcome sets and benchmarks.

Patients' and carers' views on research priorities in prehabilitation for cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The views of patients and carers are important for the development of research priorities. This study aimed to determine and compare the top research priorities of cancer patients and carers with those of multidisciplinary clinicians with expertise in prehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed patients recovering from cancer surgery at a major tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia, and/or their carers between March and July 2023. Consenting patients and carers were provided a list of research priorities according to clinicians with expertise in prehabilitation, as determined in a recent International Delphi study. Participants were asked to rate the importance of each research priority using a 5-item Likert scale (ranging from 1 = very high research priority to 5 = very low research priority). RESULTS: A total of 101 patients and 50 carers participated in this study. Four areas were identified as research priorities, achieving consensus of highest importance (> 70% rated as "high" or "very high" priority) by patients, carers, and clinical experts. These were "optimal composition of prehabilitation programs" (77% vs. 82% vs. 88%), "effect of prehabilitation on surgical outcomes" (85% vs. 90% vs. 95%), "effect of prehabilitation on functional outcomes" (83% vs. 86% vs. 79%), and "effect of prehabilitation on patient reported outcomes" (78% vs. 84% vs. 79%). Priorities that did not reach consensus of high importance by patients despite reaching consensus of highest importance by experts included "identifying populations most likely to benefit from prehabilitation" (70% vs. 76% vs. 90%) and "defining prehabilitation core outcome measures" (66% vs. 74% vs. 87%). "Prehabilitation during neoadjuvant therapies" reached consensus of high importance by patients but not by experts or carers (81% vs. 68% vs. 69%). CONCLUSION: This study delineated the primary prehabilitation research priorities as determined by patients and carers, against those previously identified by clinicians with expertise in prehabilitation. It is recommended that subsequent high-quality research and resource allocation be directed towards these highlighted areas of importance.

Patient-Reported Bowel, Urinary, and Sexual Outcomes After Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial (ALaCart).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported urinary, bowel, and sexual functioning of ALaCaRT Trial participants randomized to open or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The primary endpoint, noninferiority of laparoscopic surgical resection adequacy, was not established. METHODS: Participants completed QLQ-CR29 at baseline, 3, and 12 months post-surgery. Additionally, women completed Rosen's Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI). Men completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and QLQ-PR25. We compared the proportions of participants in each group who experienced moderate/severe symptoms/dysfunction at each time-point and compared mean difference scores from baseline to 12 months between groups. All analyses were intention-to-treat. Sexual functioning analyses included only the participants who expressed sexual interest at baseline. RESULTS: Baseline PRO compliance of 475 randomized participants was 88%. At 12 months, a lower proportion of open surgery participants experienced moderate-severe fecal incontinence and sore skin, compared to Laparoscopic participants, and a lower proportion of men randomized to open surgery experienced moderate-severe urinary symptoms. There were no differences at 3 months for bowel or urinary symptoms. Sexual functioning among sexually interested participants was similar between groups at 3 and 12 months; however, a lower proportion of women reported moderate to severe sexual dissatisfaction at 3 months in the open as compared to the laparoscopic group, (Rebecca.mercieca@sydney.edu.au., 95% CI 0.03-0.39). DISCUSSION: Despite the slightly lower proportions of open surgery participants self-reporting moderate-severe symptoms for 3 of 16 urinary/bowel domains, and lack of differences in sexual domains, it remains difficult to recommend one surgical approach over another for rectal resection.

Oncovascular surgery for advanced pelvic malignancy.

BACKGROUND: The number of units with experience in extended radical resections for advanced pelvic tumours has grown substantially in recent years. The use of complex vascular resections and reconstructive techniques in these units is expected to increase with experience. This review aimed to provide a cutting-edge overview of this evolving surgical approach to complex pelvic tumours with vascular involvement. METHODS: This was a narrative review of published data on major vascular resection and reconstruction for advanced pelvic tumours, including preoperative evaluation, techniques used, and outcomes. Advice for treatment decisions is provided, and based on current literature and the personal experience of the authors. Current controversies and future directions are discussed. RESULTS: Major vascular resection and reconstruction during surgery for advanced pelvic tumours is associated with prolonged operating time (510-678 min) and significant blood loss (median 2-5 l). R0 resection can be achieved in 58-82 per cent at contemporary specialist units. The risk of major complications is similar to that of extended pelvic resection without vascular involvement (30-40 per cent) and perioperative mortality is acceptable (0-4 per cent). Long-term survival is achievable in approximately 50 per cent of patients. CONCLUSION: En bloc resection of the common or external iliac vessels during exenterative pelvic surgery is a feasible strategy for patients with advanced tumours which infiltrate major pelvic vascular structures. Oncological, morbidity, and survival outcomes appear comparable to more central pelvic tumours. These encouraging outcomes, combined with an increasing interest in extended pelvic resections globally, will likely lead to more exenteration units developing oncovascular experience.

En bloc resection of the common or external iliac vessels during exenterative pelvic surgery is a feasible strategy for patients with advanced tumours. The risk of major complications is similar to that of extended pelvic resection without vascular involvement (30­40 per cent), and the risk of mortality or limb loss is very low in contemporary practice (0­4 per cent and 0 per cent, respectively). Oncological and survival outcomes appear comparable to more central pelvic tumours. The choice of interposition grafts remains contentious. Where the common or external iliac vein is chronically stenosed or occluded, ligation without reconstruction can be safely performed and avoids the risk of thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Comparative long-term data on pre-emptive extra anatomical reconstruction versus intraoperative anatomical reconstruction is required.

Pelvic Exenteration for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: Oncological, Morbidity, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Salvage surgery is the only potentially curative treatment option for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Where adjacent pelvic viscera, soft tissues, and bone are involved, pelvic exenteration with a wide perineal excision may be required to ensure clear surgical margins and increase the likelihood of long-term survival. OBJECTIVE: To report oncological, morbidity, and quality-of-life outcomes of pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN: Cohort study with retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a high-volume pelvic exenteration center. PATIENTS: Those who underwent pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma between 1994 and 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local recurrence-free and overall survival, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, R0 resection rate, and long-term quality-of-life outcomes. RESULTS: Of 958 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration, 66 (6.9%) had anal squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-two patients (48.5%) were male and the median age was 57 years (range, 31-79). Ten patients (15%) had primary anal squamous cell carcinoma, 49 (74%) had a recurrent tumor, and 7 (11%) had a re-recurrent tumor. Twenty-two patients (33%) and 16 patients (24%) had a major complication and unplanned return to the operating theater, respectively. Of the 62 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration with curative intent, 50 (81%) had R0 resection, and the 5-year overall and local recurrence-free survival rates were 41% and 37%, respectively. R0 resection was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival (50% vs 8%, p < 0.001). The mental health component scores and several individual quality-of-life domains presented improved trajectories postoperatively (all p values <0.05). LIMITATIONS: The generalizability of the findings outside specialist pelvic exenteration centers may be limited. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity, long-term survival, and quality-of-life outcomes after pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma are comparable to published outcomes of pelvic exenteration for other tumor types. EXENTERACIN PLVICA POR CARCINOMA EPIDERMOIDE DE ANO RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS, DE MORBILIDAD Y DE CALIDAD DE VIDA: ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía de rescate es la única opción de tratamiento potencialmente curativa para el carcinoma de células escamosas del ano recurrente. Cuando están involucradas vísceras pélvicas, tejidos blandos y huesos adyacentes, puede ser necesaria una exenteración pélvica con una escisión perineal amplia para asegurar márgenes quirúrgicos claros y aumentar la probabilidad de supervivencia a largo plazo.OBJETIVO:Informar sobre los resultados oncológicos, de morbilidad y de calidad de vida de la exenteración pélvica por carcinoma anal de células escamosas.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes con análisis retrospectivo de datos recogidos prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de exenteración pélvica de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Aquellos que se sometieron a exenteración pélvica por carcinoma anal de células escamosas entre 1994 y 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Supervivencia global y libre de recidiva local, tasas de complicaciones intraoperatorias y posoperatorias, tasa de resección R0 y resultados de calidad de vida a largo plazo.RESULTADOS:De 958 pacientes que se sometieron a exenteración pélvica, 66 (6,9%) tenían carcinoma anal de células escamosas. 32 pacientes (48,5%) eran varones y la mediana de edad fue de 57 años (rango 31-79). 10 pacientes (15%) tenían carcinoma anal primario de células escamosas, 49 (74%) tenían un tumor recurrente y 7 (11%) tenían una segunda recurrencia. 22 (33%) y 16 pacientes (24%) tuvieron una complicación mayor y regreso no planificado al quirófano, respectivamente. De los 62 pacientes que se sometieron a una exenteración pélvica con intención curativa, 50 (81%) tuvieron una resección R0, las tasas de supervivencia global y libre de recidiva local a los 5 años fueron del 41% y el 37%, respectivamente. La resección R0 se asoció con una mayor supervivencia general a los 5 años (50% frente a 8%, p < 0,001). Las puntuaciones del componente de salud mental y varios dominios de calidad de vida individuales presentaron trayectorias mejoradas después de la operación (todos los valores de p < 0,05).LIMITACIONES:La generalización de los hallazgos fuera de los centros especializados en exenteración pélvica puede ser limitada.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados de morbilidad, supervivencia a largo plazo y calidad de vida después de la EP para el carcinoma anal de células escamosas son comparables a los resultados publicados de la exenteración pélvica para otros tipos de tumores. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

What Constitutes a Clear Margin in Patients With Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration?

OBJECTIVES: To determine what constitutes a clear resection margin (R0) in patients with LRRC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: R0 is the most important predictor of survival in patients with LRRC. However, it is not clear what constitutes an R0. A 1-2 mm margin is often used to define R0 but this is based on primary rectal cancer studies. The same definition of R0 is likely inappropriate considering the anatomy and etiology of local recurrences. METHODS: A prospective maintained database was reviewed. A R2 margin was defined as macroscopic residual disease. R1 was defined as a microscopically involved margin (0 mm margin) and R0 as at least a 0.1 mm margin. Associations between R status and local recurrence was explored using X2 test. Associations between margins and overall survival and local recurrence free survival were explored using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: There were 210 patients eligible for inclusion for analysis. Of these, 165 (78.6%), 35 (16.7%), and 10 (4.8%) patients had R0, R1, and R2 margins, respectively. Overall survival was significantly different between patients with R0 versus R1 margins but wider resection margins do not confer a survival benefit [57 months (95% confidence interval 38.5-75.5) vs 33 months (95% confidence interval 20.3-45.7), P = 0.03]. Local recurrence free survival was significantly different between patients with R0 versus R1 margins (2- and 5-year local recurrence free survivals of 53.5% and 20.4% vs 25.9% and 14.8%, respectively, P = 0.001 for both). Margins >0.5 mm were not predictive of local recurrence free survival. CONCLUSIONS: A microscopically clear resection margin is most important in predicting overall survival. Margins up to 0.5 mm offers a local recurrence benefit but does not confer survival benefit.

Long-term surgical complications following pelvic exenteration: Operative management of the empty pelvis syndrome.

AIM: Pelvic exenteration (PE) has become the standard of care for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The high short-term morbidity reported from this procedure is well established; however, longer term complications of such radical surgery and their management have not been fully addressed. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, indications and outcomes of long-term (more than 90-day) reoperative surgery in this group of patients, with a focus on the empty pelvis syndrome (EPS). METHODS: Clinical data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database, with additional data pertaining to indications, operative details and outcomes of reoperative surgery obtained from electronic medical records. Patients were excluded if reoperative surgery was endoscopic or radiologically guided, was for the investigation or treatment of recurrent disease, or was clearly unrelated to previous surgery. RESULTS: Of 716 patients who underwent PE, 75 (11%) required 101 reoperative abdominal or perineal procedures, 52 (51%) of which were in 40 (6%) patients for complications of EPS. This group were more likely to have undergone a total PE (65% vs. 43%; P < 0.01) with either major bony (70% vs. 50%; P < 0.01) and/or nerve (40% vs. 25%; P = 0.03) resections at index exenteration. The patho-anatomy, surgical management and outcomes of these patients are described herein, considering separately complications of entero-cutaneous fistula, entero-perineal fistula, small bowel obstruction and local management of perineal wound complications. CONCLUSION: Six per cent of PE patients will require re-intervention for the management of EPS. Reliable strategies for preventing EPS remain elusive; however, surgical management is feasible with acceptable short-term outcomes with the optimum strategy to be selected on an individual patient basis.

Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Resection During Extended Radical Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Tumours: Long-term Survival, Functional, and Quality-of-life Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To report survival, functional, and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after extended radical resection for advanced pelvic tumors with en bloc sciatic or femoral nerve resection. BACKGROUND: Advanced pelvic tumors involving the sciatic or femoral nerve have traditionally been considered inoperable. Small studies have suggested acceptable functional outcomes can be achieved after pelvic exenteration with en bloc sciatic nerve resection. METHOD: Consecutive patients who underwent extended radical pelvic surgery with en bloc resection of the sciatic or femoral nerves at a single center were included. RESULTS: Of 713 radical pelvic resections, 68 patients (9.5%) had en bloc sciatic or femoral nerve resection. Complete sciatic, partial sciatic, and complete femoral nerve resection was performed in 26 (38%), 38 (56%), and 4 patients (6%), respectively. Overall and major postoperative complication rates were 63% and 40%, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 65% of patients, which translated to 55% and 76% overall and local recurrence-free 5-year survival in those with colorectal cancer. Twenty-two (96%) and 25 (92%) patients could mobilize independently after complete and partial sciatic nerve resection, respectively. Physical QoL was significantly lower at 6 months after surgery compared with baseline (P = 0.041), but returned to baseline at 12 months (P = 0.163). There was no difference in mental or overall QoL at 6 or 12 months compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: En bloc sciatic and femoral nerve resection can be performed during extended radical pelvic resections with morbidity and survival outcomes comparable with existing exenteration literature, including in patients with recurrent rectal cancer. Physical QoL may be impaired after surgery, but returns to baseline by 12 months.

Excellent Outcomes After Extended Radical Pelvic Resection for Locally Advanced and Recurrent IBD-Associated Anorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal cancer arising in IBD can be challenging to manage. There is a paucity of reports describing locally advanced and recurrent anorectal cancer in this setting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe patients who underwent extended radical pelvic resection for locally advanced and recurrent IBD-associated anorectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of extended radical pelvic resection. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a quaternary pelvic malignancy referral center. PATIENTS: All of the patients who underwent extended radical pelvic resection for IBD-associated anorectal cancer between September 1994 and September 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, operative, and oncologic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Ten patients (1.3%) were identified of 765 (6 men; median age = 51 y). The average time from the diagnosis of IBD to cancer was 23 years. Five patients had surgery for primary cancer previously. All of the patients had previous complex abdominal and perineal surgical interventions. There were 7 adenocarcinomas and 3 squamous cell carcinomas. Nine underwent pelvic exenteration and 1 rectal resection with radical vaginectomy. The median operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and blood transfusion were 698 minutes, 1.8 L, and 4.5 units. The median hospital stay was 24 days. The operative mortality and morbidity rates were 0% and 60%. At a median follow-up of 51.3 months, 7 patients remained alive and free of cancer. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study of a small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Extended radical pelvic resection offers a potential cure for locally advanced and recurrent IBD-associated anorectal cancer with acceptable operative mortality and morbidity rates. A high index of suspicion is required to achieve early diagnosis. Multiple factors need to be considered in the multimodal treatment of such complex patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B418. EXCELENTES RESULTADOS DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN PLVICA RADICAL EXTENDIDA POR CNCER ANORRECTAL RECURRENTE Y LOCALMENTE AVANZADA, ASOCIADA A ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL: ANTECEDENTES:Cáncer anorrectal surgiendo de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, puede ser difícil de manejar. Hay escasez de informes que describan el cáncer anorrectal localmente avanzado y recurrente en este contexto.OBJETIVO:El estudio tiene como objetivo, describir a los pacientes que se sometieron a resección pélvica radical extendida por cáncer anorrectal recurrente y localmente avanzada, asociada con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.DISEÑO:Esta es una revisión retrospectiva, de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente de resección pélvica radical extendida.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en un centro de referencia cuaternaria en malignidad pélvica.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron a todos los pacientes sometidos a resección pélvica radical ampliada por cáncer anorrectal, asociada a enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal entre septiembre de 1994 y septiembre de 2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron los resultados demográficos, quirùrgicos y oncológicos.RESULTADOS:Diez pacientes (1.3%) fueron identificados de 765 (seis masculinos; mediana de edad 51 años). El tiempo promedio desde el diagnóstico de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal hasta el cáncer, fue de 23 años. Cinco pacientes fueron previamente sometidos a cirugía por cáncer primario. Todos los pacientes tuvieron previamente, intervenciones quirúrgicas abdominales y perineales complejas. Hubo siete adenocarcinomas y tres carcinomas de células escamosas. Nueve se sometieron a exenteración pélvica y una a resección rectal con vaginectomía radical. La mediana del tiempo de operación, pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria y transfusión sanguínea, fueron 698 minutos, 1.8 litros y 4.5 unidades respectivamente. La mediana de la estancia hospitalaria fue de 24 días. Las tasas de mortalidad y morbilidad operatoria fueron 0% y 60% respectivamente. En una mediana de seguimiento de 51,3 meses, siete pacientes permanecieron vivos y libres de cáncer.LIMITACIONES:Es un estudio retrospectivo con número pequeño de pacientes.CONCLUSIONES:La resección pélvica radical extendida, ofrece una cura potencial para el cáncer anorrectal recurrente y localmente avanzada, asociada a0 enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y con tasas aceptables de mortalidad y morbilidad operatoria. Se requiere un alto índice de sospecha para obtener un diagnóstico temprano. Se deben considerar múltiples factores en el tratamiento multimodal de pacientes tan complejos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B418. (Traducción-Dr Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Can MRI pelvimetry predict the technical difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?

PURPOSE: Selection of an open or minimally invasive approach to total mesorectal excision (TME) is generally based on surgeon preference and an intuitive assessment of patient characteristics but there consensus on criteria to predict surgical difficulty. Pelvimetry has been used to predict the difficult surgical pelvis, typically using only bony landmarks. This study aimed to assess the relationship between pelvic soft tissue measurements on preoperative MRI and surgical difficulty. METHODS: Preoperative MRIs for patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection in the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial (ALaCaRT) were retrospectively reviewed by two blinded surgeons and pelvimetric variables measured. Pelvimetric variables were analyzed for predictors of successful resection of the rectal cancer, defined by clear circumferential and distal resection margins and completeness of TME. RESULTS: There was no association between successful surgery and any measurement of distance, area, or ratio. However, the was a strong association between the primary outcome and the estimated total pelvic volume on adjusted logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.99, P = 0.01). For each cubic centimeter increase in the pelvic volume, there was a 1% decrease in the odds of successful laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Intuitive prediction of unsuccessful surgery was correct in 43% of cases, and correlation between surgeons was poor (ICC = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: A surgeon's intuitive assessment of the difficult pelvis, based on visible MRI assessment, is not a reliable predictor of successful laparoscopic surgery. Further assessment of pelvic volume may provide an objective method of defining the difficult surgical pelvis.

Outcomes following repeat exenteration for locally advanced pelvic malignancy.

AIM: This study aims to assess surgical outcomes and survival following first, second and third pelvic exenterations for pelvic malignancy. METHOD: Consecutive patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancy at a quaternary referral centre from January 1994 and December 2017 were included. Demographics and surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent first, second and third pelvic exenterations by generalized mixed modelling with repeated measures. Survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier plots. RESULTS: Of the 642 exenterations reviewed, 29 (4.5%) were second and 6 (0.9%) were third exenterations. Patients selected for repeat exenteration were more likely to have asymptomatic local recurrences detected on routine surveillance (P < 0.001). Postoperative wound complications increased with repeat exenteration (6%, 17%, 33%; P = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, postoperative length of stay increased from 27 to 38 and 48 days, respectively (P = 0.004). Median survival from first exenteration was 4.75, 5.30 and 8.14 years respectively amongst first, second and third exenteration cohorts (P = 0.849). Median survival from the most recent exenteration was 4.75 years after a first exenteration, 2.02 years after a second exenteration and 1.45 years after a third exenteration (P = 0.0546). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that repeat exenteration for recurrent pelvic malignancy is feasible but is associated with increased complication rates and length of admission and reduced likelihood of attaining R0 margin. Moreover, these data indicate that repeat exenteration does not afford a survival advantage compared with patients having a single exenteration. These data suggest that repeat exenteration for recurrent pelvic malignancy may be of questionable therapeutic value.

Pelvic exenteration combined with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases.

AIM: The aim was to report early outcomes of six patients who underwent combined pelvic exenteration (PE), cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer with colorectal peritoneal metastases at a single centre. The literature contains limited data on the safety and oncological outcomes of patients who undergo this combined procedure. METHODS: Six patients who underwent combined PE, CRS and HIPEC at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, between January 2017 and February 2020 were identified and included. Data were extracted from prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS: Three patients underwent surgery for advanced primary rectal cancer, while two patients had recurrent sigmoid cancer and one had recurrent rectal cancer. All patients had synchronous peritoneal metastases. Two patients required total PE and two patients had a central (bladder-sparing) PE. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 6 (range 3-12) and all patients underwent a complete cytoreduction. The median operating time was 702 min (range 485-900) and the median blood loss was 1650 ml (range 700-12,000). The median length of intensive care unit and hospital stay was 4.5 and 25 days, respectively. There was no inpatient, 30-day or 90-day mortality. Three patients (50%) experienced a major (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) complication. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range 2-18 months), two patients died with recurrent disease, one patient was alive with recurrence, while three patients remain alive and disease-free. Of the three patients who developed recurrent disease, one had isolated pelvic recurrence, one had pelvic and peritoneal recurrences and one had bone metastases. CONCLUSION: Early results from this initial experience with simultaneous PE, CRS and HIPEC suggest that this combined procedure is safe and feasible; however, the long-term oncological and quality of life outcomes require further investigation.

Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Early Results from a Prospective Cohort Study of 115 Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe short- and medium-term longitudinal quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC were recruited. The primary outcome was QoL, measured using the short-form 36 questionnaire and expressed as a physical component score (PCS) and a mental component score (MCS), with higher scores representing better QoL. Data were collected prospectively at baseline and before discharge, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Trajectories of the PCS and MCS were described for the study period and grouped according to a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) (≤ 12 vs. ≥ 13) and a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (CC0 vs. CC1-CC3). RESULTS: Overall, 117 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and 115 (98.3%) of the 117 patients participated in the study. The main primary pathology was colorectal in 52 (45%) of the 115 patients and appendiceal in 27 (23.5%) of the 115 patients. The median baseline PCS [48.16; interquartile range (IQR), 38.6-54.9] had decreased at pre-discharge (35.34; IQR, 28.7-41.8), then increased slightly at 3 months (42.54; IQR, 37.6-51.6), before returning to baseline within 6 months (48.35; IQR, 39.1-52.5) and remaining unchanged 12 months after surgery (48.55; IQR, 40.8-55.5). The MCS remained unchanged during the study period. The patients with a PCI of 13 or higher had worse PCS and MCS during the postoperative period than the patients with a PCI of 12 or lower. CONCLUSIONS: The CRS and HIPEC procedures impaired PCS, with scores returning to baseline within 6 months after surgery, whereas MCS remained unchanged. The patients with a lower PCI had better postoperative QoL outcomes. For patients with peritoneal malignancy, CRS and HIPEC can be performed with acceptable short- to medium-term QoL outcomes.