Validation of the Polish versions of the Lower Limb Task Questionnaire, Lower Limb Functional Index, and Lower Limb Functional Index-10.

BACKGROUND: Physicians who treat patients with lower limb diseases should pay attention not only to the patients' clinical condition but also to their individual needs and expectations. For this purpose, many different questionnaires can be employed. This study aimed to validate the Lower Limb Task Questionnaire (LLTQ), Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI), and Lower Limb Functional Index-10 (LLFI-10) for their use in Polish conditions and to perform a mutual comparison and analysis of differences in subjective assessments by patients who undergo hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: The LLTQ, LLFI, and LLFI-10 were translated into Polish. A total of 103 patients who qualified for hip or knee arthroplasty at a University Hospital in from 2019 to 2021 were included in this study. The patients were asked to complete the Polish versions of the LLTQ, LLFI, LLFI-10, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and Short Form-36 four times - twice before and twice after their surgeries. RESULTS: The Polish versions of the LLTQ, LLFI, and LLFI-10 had good psychometric properties. One year after surgery, the Cohen's standard response mean revealed high improvement of limb functionality and thus quality of life among all patients. We observed better treatment outcomes among patients who had hip osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaires were validated and can be used both in everyday health practice and in further research in Poland.

The Polish version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, construct validity, and measurement error.

The aims of this study were to translate the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire into the Polish language and to test the measurement properties of its quality criteria. A total of 120 patients with hand complaints completed the Polish Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire on the first assessment, along with the grip test, pinch test, and pain sore assessed using a visual analogue scale during activity. After 7 days, 76 patients completed the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire the second time. The Cronbach alpha of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire subscales ranged from 0.79 to 0.96. The intraclass correlation coefficient varied from 0.82-0.97, and the Bland-Altman method indicated the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire total score limit of agreement was -13.2-12.3 and -9.18-9.62 for the right and left hand, respectively. The construct validity revealed a moderate to strong correlation between every subscale of the Polish Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, but they only correlated with the grip test and the visual analogue scale, and neither correlated with the pinch test. The study demonstrated properties similar to the original version, validating the belief that the use of this questionnaire in medical practice in Poland is justified.

Incorrect osteosynthesis as a cause of bone union disturbances.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of bone union disturbances is one of the most difficult therapeutic challenges in any orthopaedic and trauma department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analysis of causes of bone union disturbances in a series of 136 patients treated between 1999 and 2005 at the Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department of Jagiellonian University's Collegium Medicum is presented with particular regard to the type of primary stabilisation. RESULTS: An inappropriate primary stabilisation technique was the cause of bone union disturbances in nearly all of the patients. All errors identified in the series, such as wrong classification of fracture, failure to account for fracture biomechanics, wrong implant choice, incorrect reduction of bone fragments, wrong implant positioning and brutal surgery technique, were associated with primary stabilisation of the fractures. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Operator errors committed during primary fracture stabilization are the most common cause of bone union disturbances. 2. Elimination of errors committed during primary stabilization is the most effective prophylaxis of bone union disturbances.

Treatment of femoral shaft union disturbances with intramedullary nailing. Treatment failure.

BACKGROUND: The paper contains an analysis of the treatment outcomes of intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft non-union. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients were treated between 1999 and 2005 with locked intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft non-union. The average age was 38.2 years (range 17-79). The study group comprised 20 males and 2 females. The right femur was affected in 12 patients, and the left in 10 patients. All patients had undergone multiple operations to treat the non-union. At the time of the study, non-union had been present for a period ranging from 9 months to as much as 10 years. Stabilisation with an intramedullary nail was preceded by reaming of the medullary cavity. Nails of different diameter were used (11-16 mm, usually 11 or 13 mm). Both static and dynamic locking was used. Surgery was confined to stabilization with an intramedullary nail in 13 patients, and 9 patients additionally underwent the Judet-Forbes decortication procedure, bone grafting or internal plate fixation and osteomuscular decortication. RESULTS: The non-union healed in 19 patients and was not achieved in the remaining 3. A detailed analysis was performed in 9 cases in which the bone union was not achieved despite reaming the medullary cavity, nailing and additional procedures, which did not lead to bone healing in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being an acknowledged method of treatment for delayed union of long-bone shafts, intramedullary nailing following reaming of the medullary cavity did not result in bone healing in all of our patients and additional procedures were often required. Therefore, the use of this procedure for femoral shaft pseudoarthroses should be decided on a case-by-case basis.

[The evolution of AO/ASIF views on fracture treatment]. / Ewolucja zasad leczenia zlaman wedlug Fundacji AO.

The evolution of AO/ASIF views on fracture treatment, which has occured within last 50 years, is described in the present paper. In that time AO principles has been changed from mechanical approach to fracture care to methods considering first of all the biological aspects of injury. It has been manifested in invention of new implants of lower affect on bone tissue and emphasizing of soft tissue and atraumatic surgery technique importance. Described changes were based on careful analysis of obtained treatment results, creation of trauma centers collecting the large numbers of trauma patients and on broad experimental researches on bone biology, it's vascularisation and healing as well as on bone pathology.

[Monitoring of the early stages of bone healing process based on serum osteocalcin level changes]. / Monitorowanie wczesnych faz zrostu kostnego na podstawie zmian poziomu osteokalcyny w surowicy krwi.

The aim of this paper was assessment of utility of serum osteocalcin levels in monitoring early stages of bone healing and early detection of bone healing disorders. Serum osteocalcin level and alkaline phosphatase activity was assessed with acute long bone fractures and with delayed bone union and pseudoarthroses. 25 patients underwent the trial. The analysis of the results confirmed the utility of serum osteocalcin level as a prognostic factor in early detecting of union disorders and its correlation to radiological examination.