Delayed introduction of sirolimus in paediatric intestinal transplant recipients: indications and long-term benefits.

To review our experience using sirolimus in a single centre paediatric intestinal transplantation cohort. Intestinal transplant patients with more than 3 months follow-up were divided into two groups according to their immunosuppression regimen: tacrolimus, (TAC group, n = 45 grafts) or sirolimus (SRL group, n = 38 grafts), which included those partially or completely converted from tacrolimus to sirolimus. The indications to switch were tacrolimus side effects and immunological complications. Survival and complications were retrospectively analysed comparing both groups. SRL was introduced 9 months (0 months-16.9 years) after transplant. The main cause for conversion was worsening renal function (45%), followed by haemolytic anaemia (21%) and graft-versus-host-disease (16%). Both groups showed a similar overall patient/graft survival (P = 0.76/0.08) and occurrence of rejection (24%/17%, P = 0.36). Immunological complications did not recur after conversion. Renal function significantly improved in most SRL patients. After a median follow-up of 65.17 months, 28/46 survivors were on SRL, 26 with monotherapy, with good graft function. Over one-third of our patients eventually required SRL conversion that allowed to improve their kidney function and immunological events, without entailing additional complications or survival impairment. Further trials are warranted to clarify the potential improvement of the standard tacrolimus maintenance by sirolimus conversion or addition.

Upside-down kidney placement: An alternative in pediatric renal transplantation.

PURPOSE: "Upside-down" kidney placement has been reported as an acceptable alternative in cases of technical difficulty in kidney transplantation but there are few reports in the pediatric population. The aim of our study is to analyze whether the placement of the upside-down kidney could affect graft outcome or produce more complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of pediatric kidney transplants performed in our center between 2005 and 2017 with at least 6 months' follow-up. Epidemiological and anthropometric data, type of donor (deceased/living), graft position (normal/upside-down), reason for the upside-down placement, early, medium and long-term complications and renal function were analyzed and compared with patients transplanted in the same period with a normal graft placement. RESULTS: From 181 transplants, 167 grafts were placed in a normal position (mean age: 10 y and mean weight: 30 kg) and 14 were placed upside-down (10 y, 37 kg) mainly because of vessel shortness after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Male predominance was observed in both groups. 57% of grafts from the control group and 64% of those from study group came from a living donor. Four vascular and two ureteral re-anastomoses were recorded in the control group and two vascular and one ureteral re-anastomosis in the study group (p > 0.05). In the latter group, no grafts have been lost due to vascular or urological causes and no patients have required dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: When necessary, an upside-down placement for the renal graft is a safe alternative in the pediatric population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.