Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nature ; 2022 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35595990
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(7): 1217-1223, 2022 09 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35100614

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) frequently contaminate hospital environments. We performed a multicenter, cluster-randomized, crossover trial of 2 methods for monitoring of terminal cleaning effectiveness. METHODS: Six intensive care units (ICUs) at 3 medical centers received both interventions sequentially, in randomized order. Ten surfaces were surveyed each in 5 rooms weekly, after terminal cleaning, with adenosine triphosphate (ATP) monitoring or an ultraviolet fluorescent marker (UV/F). Results were delivered to environmental services staff in real time with failing surfaces recleaned. We measured monthly rates of MDRO infection or colonization, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridioides difficile, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and MDR gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) during a 12-month baseline period and sequential 6-month intervention periods, separated by a 2-month washout. Primary analysis compared only the randomized intervention periods, whereas secondary analysis included the baseline. RESULTS: The ATP method was associated with a reduction in incidence rate of MDRO infection or colonization compared with the UV/F period (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.876; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.807-0.951; P = .002). Including the baseline period, the ATP method was associated with reduced infection with MDROs (IRR 0.924; 95% CI, 0.855-0.998; P = .04), and MDR-GNB infection or colonization (IRR 0.856; 95% CI, 0.825-0.887; P < .001). The UV/F intervention was not associated with a statistically significant impact on these outcomes. Room turnaround time increased by a median of 1 minute with the ATP intervention and 4.5 minutes with UV/F compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive monitoring of ICU terminal room cleaning with an ATP modality is associated with a reduction of MDRO infection and colonization.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Adenosina Trifosfato , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Vancomicina
3.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 24(5): e13903, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36254518

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs) have unique risks for infections, but providers are often hesitant to apply the principles of antimicrobial stewardship to this patient population due to perceived excess risk. The methods of implementation science may move the field forward to simultaneously improve patient outcomes and patient safety. METHODS: Perspective piece on implementation science in SOT patients. RESULTS: Herein, we provide explanation of implementation science as it relates to SOT patients. In addition, we provide examples of how implementation science can be applied to antimicrobial stewardship in SOT patients. CONCLUSION: Implementation science may offer insights and solutions to the challenges of implementing evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship interventions in patients with SOT, including uptake of new practices and the de-implementation of outdated or low-value practices.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Ciencia de la Implementación , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes
4.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 43(1): 3-9, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172354

RESUMEN

Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) are a common reason for hospital admission. Severe SSTIs, particularly necrotizing infections, often require intensive care. Source control (often with surgical debridement) and broad-spectrum antimicrobials are paramount for minimizing significant morbidity and mortality. Rapid diagnostic tests may help in selection and de-escalation of antimicrobials for SSTIs. Besides early source control and early effective antimicrobial therapy, other patient-level factors such as comorbidities and immune status play a role in clinical outcomes. Intravenous immunoglobulin continues to be studied for severe SSTI, though recruitment in trials continues to be an issue. Severe SSTIs are complex to manage, due in part to regional variation in predominant pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns, as well as variations in host immune responses. This review includes descriptions of source control, antimicrobial therapies, intravenous immunoglobulin, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy, as well as host factors in severe SSTIs.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(1): 218-225, 2020 06 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608379

RESUMEN

Dissemination and implementation science seeks generalizable knowledge about closing the gap between clinical discovery and actual use in routine practice and public health. The field of infectious diseases enjoys an abundance of highly efficacious interventions (eg, antimicrobial agents, human immunodeficiency virus treatment) which are not adequately used in routine care, thereby missing critical opportunities to improve population health. In this article, we summarize salient features of dissemination and implementation science, reviewing definitions and methodologies for infectious diseases clinicians and researchers. We give examples of the limited use of dissemination and implementation science in infectious diseases thus far, suggest opportunities for application, and provide resources for interested readers to use and apply to their own research and practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Ciencia de la Implementación , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Salud Pública
6.
Med Mycol ; 58(5): 593-599, 2020 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613365

RESUMEN

Candida infective endocarditis (CIE) is a rare but serious complication of candidemia. Incidence and risk factors associated with CIE among candidemic patients are poorly defined from small cohorts. Identification of clinical predictors associated with this entity may guide more judicious use of cardiac imaging. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all inpatients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with candidemia at our institution. CIE was diagnosed by fulfilling two of the major Duke criteria: specifically a vegetation(s) on echocardiogram and positive blood cultures for Candida spp. We used univariable and multivariable regression analyses to identify risk factors associated with CIE. Of 1,873 patients with candidemia, 47 (2.5%) were identified to have CIE. In our multivariable logistic model, existing valvular heart disease was associated with a higher risk for CIE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.95-19.84). Predictors that demonstrated a decreased risk of CIE included infection with C. glabrata (aOR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.69), hematologic malignancy (aOR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68), and receipt of total parenteral nutrition (aOR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91). The 90-day crude mortality for CIE was 48.9%, similar to the overall non-CIE mortality of 41.9% (P = .338). We identified a set of clinical factors that can predict the presence of CIE among patient with candidemia. These findings may reduce the need for unnecessary expensive and invasive imaging studies in a subset of patients with a lower risk profile for endocarditis and alternative infection source.


Asunto(s)
Candidemia/epidemiología , Endocarditis/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Candidemia/complicaciones , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 40(4): 454-464, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31585472

RESUMEN

Antibiotic resistance is recognized as a key determinant of outcome in patients with serious infections influencing empiric antibiotic practices especially for critically ill patients. Within the intensive care unit (ICU), nosocomial infections and increasingly community-onset infections are caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Escalating rates of antibiotic resistance adds substantially to the morbidity, mortality, and cost related to infections treated in the ICU. Both gram-positive organisms, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter species, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and extended spectrum ß-lactamase producing organisms, are urgent threats. The rising rates of antimicrobial resistance have resulted in routine empiric administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics by clinicians to critically ill patients even when bacterial infection is microbiologically absent. Moreover, new broad-spectrum antibiotics are a challenge to use effectively while avoiding emergence of further resistance. Use of rapid diagnostic technologies (RDTs) will likely provide an important methodology for achieving this important balance. There is an urgent need for integrating the administration of new and existing antibiotics with RDTs in a way that is safe, cost-effective, applicable in all countries, and sustainable.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/instrumentación , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción
8.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 31(2): 113-119, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278528

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the salient features of the management of severe skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), including toxic shock syndrome, myonecrosis/gas gangrene, and necrotizing fasciitis. RECENT FINDINGS: For severe SSTIs, intensive care, source control, and broad-spectrum antimicrobials are required for the initial phase of illness. There is an increasing focus on the utility of rapid diagnostic tests to help in selection and de-escalation of antimicrobials for SSTIs. In addition, clinical prediction scores have shown promise in helping predict patients who do not require antimicrobials directed against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Immune status has been shown to be important in clinical outcomes of some, but not all types of SSTIs. The debate for benefits of intravenous immunoglobulin continues to be waged in the recent literature. SUMMARY: Severe SSTIs are common and their management complex due to regional variation in predominant pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns, as well variations in host immune responses. Unique aspects of care for severe SSTIs are discussed including the role of surgical consultation and source control. The unique features of SSTIs in immunocompromised hosts are also described.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/terapia , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodos
9.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(9): 5546-53, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27401565

RESUMEN

Despite the increasing incidence of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) infections, few studies have examined the impact of delay in receipt of appropriate antimicrobial therapy on outcomes in VISA patients. We examined the effects of timing of appropriate antimicrobial therapy in a cohort of patients with sterile-site methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and VISA infections. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we identified all patients with MRSA or VISA sterile-site infections from June 2009 to February 2015. Clinical outcomes were compared according to MRSA/VISA classification, demographics, comorbidities, and antimicrobial treatment. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was modeled with Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MVLRA) was used to determine odds ratios for mortality. We identified 354 patients with MRSA (n = 267) or VISA (n = 87) sterile-site infection. Fifty-five patients (15.5%) were nonsurvivors. Factors associated with mortality in MVLRA included pneumonia, unknown source of infection, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, solid-organ malignancy, and admission from skilled care facilities. Time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy was not significantly associated with outcome. Presence of a VISA infection compared to that of a non-VISA S. aureus infection did not result in excess mortality. Linezolid use was a risk for mortality in patients with APACHE II scores of ≥14. Our results suggest that empirical vancomycin use in patients with VISA infections does not result in excess mortality. Future studies should (i) include larger numbers of patients with VISA infections to confirm the findings presented here and (ii) determine the optimal antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients with MRSA and VISA infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Resistencia a la Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/microbiología , Neumonía/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Crit Care Med ; 43(8): 1580-6, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25855900

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of sepsis classification and multidrug-resistance status on outcome in patients receiving appropriate initial antibiotic therapy. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1,250-bed teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Individuals with Enterobacteriaceae sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock who received appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy between June 2009 and December 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical outcomes were compared according to multidrug-resistance status, sepsis classification, demographics, severity of illness, comorbidities, and antimicrobial treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 510 patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia and sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock. Sixty-seven patients (13.1%) were nonsurvivors. Mortality increased significantly with increasing severity of sepsis (3.5%, 9.9%, and 28.6%, for sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, respectively; p < 0.05). Time to antimicrobial therapy was not significantly associated with outcome. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II was more predictive of mortality than age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index. Multidrug-resistance status did not result in excess mortality. Length of ICU and hospital stay increased with more severe sepsis. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, African-American race, sepsis severity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, solid-organ cancer, cirrhosis, and transfer from an outside hospital were all predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support sepsis severity, but not multidrug-resistance status as being an important predictor of death when all patients receive appropriate initial antibiotic therapy. Future sepsis trials should attempt to provide appropriate antimicrobial therapy and take sepsis severity into careful account when determining outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/mortalidad , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Enterobacteriaceae , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/clasificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(5): ofae218, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798892

RESUMEN

Medical librarians participating as infectious disease rounding team members add value by facilitating knowledge acquisition and dissemination and by improving clinical decision making. This pilot study implementing medical librarians on infectious disease rounding teams was a well-received and beneficial intervention to study participants.

15.
J Telemed Telecare ; : 1357633X221149461, 2023 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36659820

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine infectious diseases consultations (tele-ID consults) improves access to healthcare for underserved/resource-limited communities. However, factors promoting or hindering implementation of tele-ID consults in low-resource settings are understudied. This study sought to fill this gap by describing perceived barriers and facilitators tele-ID consults at three rural hospitals in southeastern Missouri. METHODS: Twelve in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposively sampled group of information-rich hospital stakeholders from three rural, southeastern Missouri hospitals with partial or no on-site availability of ID physicians. Our literature-informed interview guide elicited participants' knowledge and experience with tele-ID consults, perceptions on ID consultation needs, and perceived barriers to and facilitators of tele-ID consults. Interview transcripts were coded using an iterative process of inductive analysis to identify core themes related to barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Perceived barriers to adopting and implementing tele-ID consults included logistical challenges, technology and devices, negative emotional responses, patient-related factors, concerns about reduced quality of care when using telemedicine, lack of acceptance or buy-in from physicians or staff, and legal concerns. Key facilitators included perceived need, perceived benefits to patients and physicians, flexibility and openness to change among staff members and patients, telemedicine champions, prior experiences, and enthusiasm. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that rural hospitals need tele-ID consults and have the capacity to implement tele-ID consults, but operational and technical feasibility challenges remain. Adoption and implementation of tele-ID consults may reduce ID-physician shortage-related service gaps by permitting ID physician's greater geographic reach.

16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771748

RESUMEN

Objective: To determine the relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), and mortality. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Three St. Louis, MO hospitals. Patients: Adults admitted ≥48 hours from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2020. Methods: Hospital-acquired infections were defined as those occurring ≥48 hours after admission and were based on positive urine, respiratory, and blood cultures. Poisson interrupted time series compared mortality trajectory before (beginning January 1, 2017) and during the first 6 months of the pandemic. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify risk factors for mortality in patients with an HAI before and during the pandemic. A time-to-event analysis considered time to death and discharge by fitting Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 6,447 admissions with subsequent HAIs, patients were predominantly White (67.9%), with more females (50.9% vs 46.1%, P = .02), having slightly lower body mass index (28 vs 29, P = .001), and more having private insurance (50.6% vs 45.7%, P = .01) in the pre-pandemic period. In the pre-pandemic era, there were 1,000 (17.6%) patient deaths, whereas there were 160 deaths (21.3%, P = .01) during the pandemic. A total of 53 (42.1%) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients died having an HAI. Age and comorbidities increased the risk of death in patients with COVID-19 and an HAI. During the pandemic, Black patients with an HAI and COVID-19 were more likely to die than White patients with an HAI and COVID-19. Conclusions: In three Midwestern hospitals, patients with concurrent HAIs and COVID-19 were more likely to die if they were Black, elderly, and had certain chronic comorbidities.

17.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(3)2023 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36978404

RESUMEN

Studies comparing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic microbiology culture yields and antimicrobial resistance proportions in low-to-middle-income and high-income countries are lacking. A retrospective study using blood, respiratory, and urine microbiology data from a community hospital in India and two community hospitals (Hospitals A and B) in St. Louis, MO, USA was performed. We compared the proportion of cultures positive for selected multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) listed on the WHO's priority pathogen list both before the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2017-December 2019) and early in the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-October 2020). The proportion of blood cultures contaminated with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CONS) was significantly higher during the pandemic in all three hospitals. In the Indian hospital, the proportion of carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumoniae in respiratory cultures was significantly higher during the pandemic period, as was the proportion of CR Escherichia coli in urine cultures. In the US hospitals, the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures was significantly higher during the pandemic period in Hospital A, while no significant increase in the proportion of Gram-negative MDROs was observed. Continuity of antimicrobial stewardship activities and better infection prevention measures are critical to optimize outcomes and minimize the burden of antimicrobial resistance among COVID-19 patients.

18.
Am J Infect Control ; 2023 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37263419

RESUMEN

In this retrospective cohort from 3 Missouri hospitals from January 2017 to August 2020, hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infections were more common during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic at the tertiary care hospital. Risk factors associated with hospital-onset C difficile infection included the year of hospitalization, age, high-risk antibiotic use, acid-reducing medications, chronic comorbidities, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(12): 1966-1971, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37381734

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We compared the individual-level risk of hospital-onset infections with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospitalized patients prior to and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We also quantified the effects of COVID-19 diagnoses and intrahospital COVID-19 burden on subsequent MDRO infection risk. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. SETTING: Patient admission and clinical data were collected from 4 hospitals in the St. Louis area. PATIENTS: Data were collected for patients admitted between January 2017 and August 2020, discharged no later than September 2020, and hospitalized ≥48 hours. METHODS: Mixed-effects logistic regression models were fit to the data to estimate patients' individual-level risk of infection with MDRO pathogens of interest during hospitalization. Adjusted odds ratios were derived from regression models to quantify the effects of the COVID-19 period, COVID-19 diagnosis, and hospital-level COVID-19 burden on individual-level hospital-onset MDRO infection probabilities. RESULTS: We calculated adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19-era hospital-onset Acinetobacter spp., P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae spp infections. Probabilities increased 2.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-5.73) times, 1.44 (95% CI, 1.03-2.02) times, and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.00-1.58) times relative to the prepandemic period, respectively. COVID-19 patients were 4.18 (95% CI, 1.98-8.81) times more likely to acquire hospital-onset MDRO S. aureus infections. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the growing body of evidence indicating that the COVID-19 pandemic has increased hospital-onset MDRO infections.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Estudios de Cohortes , Prueba de COVID-19 , Staphylococcus aureus , COVID-19/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Atención a la Salud , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple
20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36714284

RESUMEN

Objective: To use interrupted time-series analyses to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We hypothesized that the pandemic would be associated with higher rates of HAIs after adjustment for confounders. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study of HAIs in 3 hospitals in Missouri from January 1, 2017, through August 31, 2020, using interrupted time-series analysis with 2 counterfactual scenarios. Setting: The study was conducted at 1 large quaternary-care referral hospital and 2 community hospitals. Participants: All adults ≥18 years of age hospitalized at a study hospital for ≥48 hours were included in the study. Results: In total, 254,792 admissions for ≥48 hours occurred during the study period. The average age of these patients was 57.6 (±19.0) years, and 141,107 (55.6%) were female. At hospital 1, 78 CLABSIs, 33 CAUTIs, and 88 VAEs were documented during the pandemic period. Hospital 2 had 13 CLABSIs, 6 CAUTIs, and 17 VAEs. Hospital 3 recorded 11 CLABSIs, 8 CAUTIs, and 11 VAEs. Point estimates for hypothetical excess HAIs suggested an increase in all infection types across facilities, except for CLABSIs and CAUTIs at hospital 1 under the "no pandemic" scenario. Conclusions: The COVID-19 era was associated with increases in CLABSIs, CAUTIs, and VAEs at 3 hospitals in Missouri, with variations in significance by hospital and infection type. Continued vigilance in maintaining optimal infection prevention practices to minimize HAIs is warranted.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA