Psychiatric morbidity in the chronic fatigue syndrome: are patients with personality disorder more physically impaired?

OBJECTIVE: The long-term consequences of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) include substantial impairment in physical functioning and high levels of work disability. In the absence of a medical explanation for this impairment, some have speculated that it may be due to comorbid psychiatric illness or personality disorder. We addressed this possibility by comparing the functional status of three CFS groups: no psychiatric diagnosis, psychiatric illness only, psychiatric illness and personality disorder. A second aim of the study was to determine whether a continuous measure of psychological distress could provide a better account of impairment than psychiatric diagnosis. METHOD: The study sample consisted of 84 consecutive female referrals with CFS. All participants satisfied the case definition and completed an assessment protocol consisting of: physical examination, psychiatric interview and self-report questionnaires. RESULTS: Psychiatric illness, either alone or in combination with a comorbid personality disorder, was not associated with physical impairment or disability in female participants. A regression model of physical functioning found that psychological distress accounted for 6% and symptom severity for 41% of the variance (P=.06 and <.01, respectively). In the case of disability, the corresponding percentages were 2% and 18% (NS and P<.01, respectively). The modest effects of psychological distress could not be attributed to symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS: Although psychiatric illness and personality disorder was prevalent, neither could explain the effects of CFS on physical functioning and disability. As yet, there is no psychological or medical explanation for the behavioral consequences of CFS.

A natural setting behavior management program for persons with acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of a behavior management program delivered in the natural community setting for persons with brain injury and their caregivers. DESIGN: Three-group randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Homes and other community settings. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven persons with traumatic and other acquired brain injury and their caregivers. INTERVENTIONS: Natural Setting Behavior Management (NSBM) involving education and individualized behavior modification program versus education only versus control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in frequency of targeted problematic behaviors. Subscale in Questionnaire on Resources and Stress, Maslach Burnout Inventory, and the Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory. RESULTS: While no significant effects were detected at termination of education only (P<.075) or of NSBM (P<.56), significant treatment effects were found at the main outcome point 3 months after termination of services (P<.002). Rates of disruptive or aggressive behaviors declined significantly in the NSBM group. Differences in caregiver-rated stress, burden, and aggression were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A program of caregiver education and individualized behavior management in natural settings can decrease the frequency of disruptive behavioral challenges. Larger studies are needed to clarify the duration and intensity of education and individualized treatment required to diminish behavioral challenges and to understand relationships with general stress and burden experienced by caregivers.

Changes in ratings of caregiver burden following a community-based behavior management program for persons with traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the use of a community-delivered behavior management program for persons with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers and its effect on reduction of ratings of caregiver burden. DESIGN: A control group was compared with an education only and education plus behavior management group with random assignment to conditions. PARTICIPANTS: Total number of participants was 27 persons with brain injury and their caregivers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dependent measures were subscales of the Questionnaire on Resources and Stress (QRS) and an adapted version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). RESULTS: An analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline burden and stress ratings showed no significant change in these measures associated with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in terms of the potential modifiability of caregiver burden, the small sample size, and the sensitivity of current measures of caregiver stress and burden to detect clinically meaningful change.

Neuropsychological deficits in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

The degree of neuropsychological dysfunction across multiple domains was examined in individuals suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). In this descriptive study, a similar series of neuropsychological tests was administered to a group of CFS patients and healthy participants. More specifically, CFS patients (n = 141) who met the 1994 Case Definition criteria were compared to 76 healthy control participants on tests of memory, attention (concentration), speed of information processing, motor speed, and executive functioning. On the 18 measures administered, CFS patients scored 1 standard deviation below the healthy mean on nine measures and scored 2 standard deviations below the healthy mean on four of the measures. Moreover, results indicated that CFS patients were more likely than healthy controls to fail (1.6 SD below the healthy mean) at least one test in each of the following domains: attention, speed of information processing, and motor speed, but not on measures of memory and executive functioning. Finally, CFS patients demonstrated a greater total number of tests failed across domains.