Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Card Fail ; 2024 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39074777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting data on the association between pre-orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) amiodarone use and post-OHT graft dysfunction (GD) leading to heterogeneity in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with meaningful increases in the incidence of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. Studies were identified by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI95) for each endpoint. RESULTS: 17 retrospective studies were identified that included 48,782 patients. 14 studies (n = 48,018) reported GD as an outcome. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of GD (OR 1.3, CI95 1.2-1.5, p < 0.001). 10 studies (n = 45,875) reported 30-day mortality based on amiodarone use. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (OR 1.4, CI95 1.2-1.5, p < 0.001). 5 studies (n = 41,404) reported 1-year mortality based on amiodarone use. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of 1-year mortality (OR 1.2, CI95 1.1-1.4, p < 0.001). The increase in absolute risk of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality for patients with pre-OHT amiodarone use was 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pre-OHT amiodarone exposure was associated with increased odds of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. The increase in absolute risk for each endpoint was modest, and it is unclear to what extent, if any, pre-OHT amiodarone use should influence assessment of OHT candidacy.

2.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 67(3): 523-537, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37540340

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the primary technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear whether adjunctive therapies in addition to PVI can reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) compared to PVI alone in patients with AF. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing PVI plus an adjunctive therapy (autonomic modulation, linear ablation, non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation, epicardial PVI [hybrid ablation], or left atrial substrate modification) to PVI alone was conducted. The primary outcome was AAR. Cumulative odd's ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each treatment type. RESULTS: Forty-six trials were identified that included 8,500 participants. The mean age (± standard deviation) was 60.2 (±4.1) years, and 27.2% of all patients were female. The mean follow-up time was 14.6 months. PVI plus autonomic modulation and PVI plus hybrid ablation were associated with a relative 53.1% (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.69; p < 0.001) and 59.1% (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.75; p = 0.003) reduction in AAR, respectively, compared to PVI alone. All categories had at least moderate interstudy heterogeneity except for hybrid ablation. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive autonomic modulation and epicardial PVI may improve the effectiveness of PVI. Larger, multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of these therapies.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Venas Pulmonares , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA