Conjoined thoracodorsal perforator-supercharged dorsal intercostal artery perforator propeller flap for reconstruction of a complex upper back defect: Case report and review of the literature on supercharged pedicled perforator flaps.

The reported complications' rate of perforator propeller flaps is variably high, but the etiology of distal flap necrosis, potentially linked to vascular insufficiency, is yet to be clarified. Vascular augmentation procedures have been previously described involving an extra anastomosis of a superficial vein, while a perforator-to-perforator supercharging approach has been only sporadically documented in literature. We present a case of perforator-to-perforator vascular supercharging of an extended dorsal intercostal artery perforator (DICAP) propeller flap to provide a salvage option for pedicled flap complicated by venous congestion. A 71-year-old male patient underwent Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans resection in the upper back, leading to a 17 × 17 cm defect with bone exposure. A 30 × 9 cm DICAP propeller flap was planned, with the distal third of the flap designed over the adjacent Thoracodorsal artery perforasome, in a conjoined fashion. Considering the small DICAP pedicle caliber and the flap lateral extension, a thoracodorsal artery perforator vein was dissected and included in the distal flap. Once the flap was raised on its main pedicle, the skin paddle turned blue, showing signs of venous insufficiency. Indocyanine green angiography (ICG) showed a viable proximal half of the flap. Hence, after rotating the skin paddle to reach the upper margin of the defect, an additional anastomosis between the perforating thoracodorsal vein and the perforating vein of the dorsal scapular pedicle was performed according to the perforator-to-perforator approach. Doing so, both clinical and ICG examinations showed a well perfused flap, with normal capillary refill. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient obtained a good oncological and reconstructive result 4 months postoperatively. The second Vasconez law ("all of the flap will survive except the part that you need") is often encountered in propeller flaps surgery. Our case shows that it is possible to prevent or overcome this problem by planning appropriate vascular augmentation procedures according to the perforator-to-perforator approach, being guided by advanced vascular imaging tools like ICG.

"Extra-anatomical Pedicle Rerouting" An alternative technique to obtain new recipient vessels for microsurgical reconstruction in unfavorable clinical situations.

BACKGROUND: Lack of adequate recipient vessels in certain anatomically unfavorable locations or in complex clinical situations is still a limitation to successful microsurgical transfer. To address such complex cases, advanced microsurgical techniques should be applied. In this paper, the authors describe their experience with the Extra-anatomical Pedicle Rerouting (EPR) technique, an alternative approach that was used in selected cases throughout the body to obtain healthy recipient vessels for microsurgical reconstruction in unfavorable clinical situations where suitable recipient vessels were difficult to find. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with defects of variable etiology (oncological resection, trauma, previous surgeries) located in the trunk or upper and lower extremities received EPR free flap reconstruction at our Institution. Operative data, postoperative course, and complications were recorded. Clinical and photographic follow-ups were also documented. RESULTS: A total of 15 flaps (6 antero-lateral thigh (ALT), 6 latissimus dorsi/thoracodorsal artery perforator flap (LD/TDAP), 3 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP)) were transferred adopting the EPR technique for oncological (11) and post-traumatic (4) defects. According to the different clinical scenarios, the rerouted vessels were the thoraco-acromial, posterior circumflex humeral, thoracodorsal, deep inferior epigastric, lateral circumflex femoral, anterior tibial, and medial sural pedicles. Mean length of the rerouted vascular conduits was 6.53 cm. Mean operative time was 420 minutes. No major complications were registered. Minor wound dehiscence was observed and managed conservatively in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The EPR technique proved to be useful in a reliable and reproducible manner in different regions of the body as an alternative solution to obtain healthy recipient vessels in anatomically and surgically unfavorable clinical situations.

Lower Abdominal vs. Lateral Thigh Perforator Flaps in Microsurgical Sarcoma Reconstruction: The Aesthetics of Donor Site Matters.

Introduction: Sarcoma resection often leaves patients with big defects only amenable through microsurgical reconstruction. In such cases, it is hard for the surgeon to uphold low donor-site morbidity with an aesthetic result. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome and the patient's perception regarding the donor site in a cohort of patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction with lateral thigh and lower abdominal perforator flaps. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of all patients who underwent sarcoma reconstruction with flaps harvested from the lower abdominal region (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap) or lateral thigh region (anterolateral thigh perforator flap and its variations) was performed. Only patients with defects greater than 100 cm2 were included. Patient demographics and operative variables were recorded, together with complications. Patient satisfaction and quality of life with the donor site were registered using the SCAR-Q questionnaire, which was administered at least six months post-operatively. Results: Eighteen anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flaps and twenty-two deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap procedures were performed. The two groups were homogeneous for major post-operative complications (p > 0.999). Patient satisfaction with the donor site measured using the SCAR-Q questionnaire showed significantly higher scores in the DIEP/SCIP group when compared with the thigh group (p < 0.001), indicating a superiority of the lower abdominal area as an aesthetic donor site. Conclusions: The DIEP and SCIP flaps are a versatile option for reconstructing large soft-tissue defects following sarcoma resection. Therefore, flaps harvested from the lower abdomen yield a higher patient satisfaction with the donor site, which is a feature worth considering when planning a reconstructive procedure.

Total autologous breast reconstruction with the Kiss Latissimus Dorsi Flap.

INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting breast actinic damage or implant-related complications require an autologous approach to breast reconstruction. However, when they are not good candidates for microsurgical procedures, alternative solutions must be sought. Latissimus dorsi (LD) is a workhorse flap in breast reconstruction, but often the amount of skin and volume achievable are insufficient. Taking inspiration from the Kiss flap concept, the authors hereby describe the "Kiss" LD flap to achieve totally autologous breast reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective service evaluation of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction with Kiss LD flap between 2018 and 2020 was performed. Patient demographics and operative variables were recorded, together with early and late complications. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were registered using the latest BREAST-Q reconstruction module, which includes specific LD scales. The questionnaire was administered to patients preoperatively and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent total autologous breast reconstruction with Kiss LD flap. Breast cancer and breast sarcoma resection were followed by reconstruction. The timing of reconstruction was immediate in 3 cases and delayed in 27 cases. No major complications nor total flap loss were registered. BREAST-Q scores postoperatively were significantly higher than the preoperative ones in every domain (p<0.0001) except for the physical well-being of back and shoulder, where the scores differed slightly and non-significantly (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Kiss LD flap allows to harvest a large amount of skin to restore the breast envelope and a considerable volume to reconstruct the breast mound in a completely autologous procedure.