The management of differentiated thyroid cancer using 123I for imaging to assess the need for 131I therapy.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up of 131I whole-body scanning after 131I ablation is associated with potential stunning. Previous studies have suggested that, for scanning, 123I is more sensitive than 131I in identifying thyroid tissue, but its specificity when positive is less certain. AIM: The use of 123I as an imaging agent in place of serial 131I imaging has been evaluated in the surveillance and treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. RESULTS: A total of 186 studies in 136 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma were evaluated after total or near total thyroidectomy followed by 131I ablation. In 125 studies 123I scanning was negative and no 131I therapy was given; four patients were positive on 123I scanning but for other reasons no 131I therapy was given. In 48/49 patients a positive 123I scan was followed by positive 131I therapeutic uptake. Only one patient failed to show positive uptake of I when first treated and she subsequently demonstrated uptake on a second therapy. CONCLUSION: High-dose 123I imaging is the correct predictor of the 131I post-therapy scan findings in most cases, at an administered activity that avoids stunning. As a diagnostic agent it is preferable to 131I in differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

The comparison of two gated SPET protocols: adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin and treadmill exercise Tc-99m MIBI.

BACKGROUND: The effect of adenosine and exercise on gated SPET left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end diastolic volume (EDV) and end systolic volume (ESV) has not been fully investigated. The aim of the study was to compare functional measurements obtained in one-day adenosine rest and two-day stress-rest protocols in relation to ischaemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of 226 consecutive patients examined with submaximal treadmill stress-rest 700 MBq Tc-99m MIBI, 26 were chosen to match those subjected to adenosine (140 micro g/kg/min) enhanced by a low level exercise protocol (300 MBq and 700 MBq Tc-99m tetrofosmin for stress and rest respectively). All images were acquired on a double head system and were gated using 8 frames, 25 s per frame. RESULTS: ED and ES volumes increased after adenosine but decreased after treadmill resulting in the post-stress LVEF being significantly greater than after adenosine, 60 +/- 11 v. 51 +/- 13% (p < 0.01). This was caused by the smaller post-stress ESV in the treadmill group 40 +/- 20 v. 51 +/- 34, p < 0.05. In non-ischaemic scans the LVEF was greater (61 +/- 8 v. 51 +/- 14, p < 0.01) and EDV and ESV smaller after both stress and rest. CONCLUSIONS: The adenosine test may have an opposite influence on the EDV and ESV in comparison to the submaximal treadmill test and therefore the left ventricular function measurements after adenosine infusion should be interpreted carefully and may not represent those acquired after physical exercise. In the gated SPET scans showing ischaemia the post-stress EDV and ESV may be greater and the LVEF lower than at rest.