Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 35(4): 311-315, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37387696

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic pelvic main is a complex process that includes many causes. In gynecology, the treatment of myofascial pelvic pain and high tone pelvic floor disorders can be managed with skeletal muscle relaxants for select clinical indications. A review of skeletal muscle relaxants will be included for gynecologic indications. RECENT FINDINGS: There are limited studies on vaginal skeletal muscle relaxants, but there can be oral forms used for chronic myofascial pelvic pain. They function as antispastic, antispasmodic, and combination of the two modes of action. Diazepam is the most studied for myofascial pelvic pain in both oral and vaginal formulations. Its use can be combined with multimodal management to optimize outcomes. Other medications have limitations due to dependency and limited studies that demonstrate improvement in pain scales. SUMMARY: Skeletal muscle relaxants have limited high quality studies for chronic myofascial pelvic pain. Their use can be combined with multimodal options to improve clinical outcomes. Additional studies are needed for vaginal preparations and evaluation of safety and clinical efficacy for patient reported outcomes measures in patients living with chronic myofascial pelvic pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/complicaciones , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pelvis , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 30(8): 627-634, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37037283

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine national trends among race and ethnicity and route of benign hysterectomy from 2007 to 2018. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cohort program. SETTING: This study included data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database including data from the 2014 to 2018 targeted hysterectomy files. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing hysterectomy. INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Current Procedural Terminology codes identified women undergoing benign hysterectomy and perioperative data including race and ethnicity were obtained. To determine relative trends in hysterectomy among race and ethnicity cohorts (White, Black, Hispanic), we calculated the proportion of each procedure performed annually within each race and ethnicity group and compared it across groups. From 2007 to 2018, 269 794 hysterectomies were collected (190 154 White, 45 756 Black, and 33 884 Hispanic). From 2007 to 2018, rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy increased in all cohorts (30.2%-71.6% for White, 23.9%-58.5% for Black, 19.9%-64.0% for Hispanic; ptrend <0.01 for all). For each year from 2007 to 2018, the proportion of women undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy remained twice as high in Black Women compared with White women (33.1%-14.4%, p <.01). Data from the 2014 to 2018 targeted files showed Black and Hispanic women undergoing benign hysterectomy were generally younger, had larger uteri, were more likely to be current smokers, have diabetes and/or hypertension, have higher body mass index, and have undergone previous pelvic surgery (p ≤.01 for all). CONCLUSION: Compared with White women, Black and Hispanic women are less likely to undergo benign hysterectomy via a minimally invasive approach. Although larger uteri and comorbid conditions may attribute to higher rates of open abdominal hysterectomy, the higher prevalence of abdominal hysterectomy among younger Black and Hispanic women highlights potential racial disparities in women's health and access to care.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Histerectomía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud
3.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(8): 984-991, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35513300

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether female compared with male sex is associated with greater ergonomic strain with the use of 4 advanced energy laparoscopic devices (LigaSure, HALO PKS, ENSEAL, and Harmonic scalpel). DESIGN: Online survey distributed by e-mail using the REDCap platform (Vanderbilt University). All responses were anonymous. SETTING: Nationwide survey in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Gynecologic surgeons were surveyed through the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons listserv and 4 obstetrics and gynecology departmental listservs. INTERVENTIONS: The survey was distributed between May 1, 2020, and November 1, 2020. The primary outcome was the presence of physical complaints owing to laparoscopic devices. Descriptive statistics compared surgeon characteristics and ergonomic symptoms. Logistic regression was performed, adjusted for surgeon characteristics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 39%, comprising 149 women (78%) and 41 men (22%). Women compared with men had a significantly younger age (mean, 34 vs 44 years; p <.01), had smaller glove size (mean, 6.5 vs 7.5; p <.01), had shorter height (median, 66 vs 71 inches; p <.01), and were less frequently in practice for >10 years (19% vs 49%; p <.01). Women significantly more often reported physical complaints related to the use of laparoscopic devices (79% vs 41%; p <.01). Women reported that all devices had too large a fit for appropriate use (p <.01). Women were found to have 5.37 times the odds of physical complaints attributed to the use of laparoscopic instruments (crude oods ratio, 5.37; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-11.25); with adjustment for glove size, age, and laparoscopic case volume and duration, this was no longer significant (adjusted odds ratio, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-6.93). CONCLUSION: Women significantly more often report physical complaints and inappropriate fit of the LigaSure, HALO PKS, ENSEAL, and Harmonic scalpel. Female sex is associated with 5-fold greater odds of physical complaints with laparoscopic device use. Further investigation of the surgeon factors underlying device-related strain is a critical next step to understanding and reducing surgeon ergonomic injury.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Cirujanos , Adulto , Ergonomía , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Estados Unidos
4.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(12): 1357-1363, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191883

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether surgeon characteristics, including sex and hand size, were associated with grip strength decline with laparoscopic advanced energy devices. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Ergonomic simulation at an academic tertiary care site and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons 47th Annual Meeting. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight participants (19 women and 19 men) were recruited. INTERVENTIONS: Surgeon anthropometric measurements were collected. Each participant completed a 120-second trial of maximum voluntary effort with 3 laparoscopic advanced energy devices (LigaSure, HALO PKS, and ENSEAL). Grip strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer. Subjects completed the NASA Raw Task Load Index scale after each device trial. Grip strengths and ergonomic workload scores were compared using Student t tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests where appropriate. Univariate and multivariate models analyzed hand size and ergonomic workload. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Women had lower baseline grip strength (288 vs 451 N) than men, as did participants with glove size <7 compared with ≥7 (231 vs 397 N). Normalized grip strength was not associated with surgeon sex (p = .08), whereas it was significantly associated with surgeon glove size (p <.01). Grip strength decline was significantly greater for smaller compared to larger handed surgeons for LigaSure (p = .02) and HALO PKS devices (p <.01). The ergonomic workload of device use was significantly greater for smaller compared to larger handed surgeons (p <.01). Surgeon handspan significantly predicted grip strength decline with device use, even after accounting for potential confounders (R2 = .23, ß = .8, p <.01). CONCLUSION: Surgeons with smaller hand size experienced a greater grip strength decline and greater ergonomic workload during repetitive laparoscopic device use. No relationship was found between surgeon sex and grip strength decline or ergonomic workload. Laparoscopic device type was also identified as a significant main effect contributing to grip strength decline. These findings point toward ergonomic strain stemming from an improper fit between the laparoscopic device and the surgeon's hand during device use.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Cirujanos , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Ergonomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos
5.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(12): 2067-2072, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147694

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of myofascial pain in women undergoing uncomplicated, minimally invasive hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain, to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with preoperative myofascial pain, and examine the association between myofascial pain and postoperative pain in hysterectomy patients. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 353 adult women who underwent uncomplicated, minimally invasive hysterectomy between January 2014 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: All women underwent a preoperative pelvic floor examination. Myofascial pain was diagnosed as tenderness and reproduction of pain symptoms in at least 2 of 6 pelvic floor muscles. Demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative characteristics were compared between women with and without preoperative myofascial pain. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 353 women who underwent hysterectomy, the prevalence of myofascial pain was 42.7% (86.0% in patients with chronic pelvic pain [CPP] compared with 13.7% without CPP). Women with myofascial pain were more likely younger, Caucasian, sexually active, and with comorbid pain conditions. Patients with myofascial pain used a greater number of adjuvant pain medications before surgery including opiates (29.5%) but were only half as likely to use muscle relaxants (12.1%) for preoperative pain control. Contrastingly, in women without myofascial pain before surgery, controlled substances such as opiates (8%, p <.01) and benzodiazepines (3%, p <.01) were used at a three- fold lower frequency. Postoperative pain score was higher in patients with myofascial pain, with 37% reporting a visual analog scale score greater than 5 at the routine postoperative visit compared with only 1% of patients without myofascial pain. CONCLUSION: Myofascial pelvic pain must be considered in the evaluation of CPP, especially in surgical candidates. Women with myofascial pelvic use a greater amount of pain medication preoperatively and have higher pain scores postoperatively. Identification of these high-risk patients before surgery may improve pre and postoperative pain management with a multimodal therapy approach.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Diafragma Pélvico , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Dolor Pélvico/epidemiología , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(11): 1903-1911, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33962024

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Learning to evaluate and treat chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is an established curriculum objective within the Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (FMIGS). Our aim was to investigate current educational experiences related to the evaluation and management of CPP and the impacts of those experiences on FMIGS fellows and recent fellowship graduates, including satisfaction, confidence in management, and clinical interest in CPP. DESIGN: The AAGL-Elevating Gynecologic Surgery Special Interest Group for pelvic pain developed a 33-item survey tool to investigate the following topics: (1) current educational experiences with the assessment and management of patients with CPP, (2) satisfaction with fellowship training in CPP, (3) perceived preparedness to treat patients with CPP, (4) plans to incorporate management of CPP into clinical practice, and (5) perceived desires to expand CPP exposure. Composite scores were created to examine experiences related to diseases associated with CPP and pharmaceutical and procedural treatment options. SETTING: Electronic survey. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: The survey was distributed via AAGL email lists and offered on FMIGS social media sites from August 2017 to November 2017 to all active FMIGS fellows and individuals who graduated the fellowship during the preceding 5 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-three of 82 (65%) current FMIGS fellows and 104 of 169 (62%) recent fellowship graduates completed the survey. Only 66% of current fellows endorsed working with a fellowship faculty member whose clinical work focused on CPP. Most current fellows reported having a "good amount" of experience or "extensive" experience with superficial endometriosis (39/53, 74%) and deeply infiltrative endometriosis (34/53, 64%), whereas the majority reported having "no" or "little" experience with frequently comorbid conditions like irritable bowel syndrome (68%), pelvic floor tension myalgia (55%), and interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (51%). For both current fellows and recent graduates, increased CPP Disease Experience composite scores were associated with satisfaction with CPP training (current fellows odds ratio [OR] 1.9, p =.002; recent graduates OR 1.5, p < .001), perceived preparedness to treat patients with CPP (current fellows OR 2.0, p = .0021; recent graduates OR 1.5, p <.001), and the desire to incorporate the treatment of CPP into future clinical practice (current fellows OR 1.8, p = .0099; recent graduates OR 1.3, p = .0178). More than 80% (43/53) of current fellows indicated that they believed an expanded pelvic pain curriculum should be part of the FMIGS fellowship. CONCLUSION: This needs assessment of FMIGS fellows and recent graduates suggests that there are gaps between FMIGS curriculum objectives and current educational experiences, and that fellows desire increased CPP exposure. Expansion and standardization of the CPP educational experience is needed and could lead to increased focus on this disease process among subspecialty benign gynecologic surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Becas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Dolor Pélvico/cirugía
7.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(2): 282-287, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474174

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Compare odds of postoperative urinary symptoms in women who had cystoscopy after benign laparoscopic hysterectomy with 50% dextrose and with normal saline solution with intravenous indigo carmine. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: All women who underwent benign laparoscopic hysterectomy and intraoperative cystoscopy carried out by a single surgeon. INTERVENTIONS: We compared postoperative urinary symptoms in patients who received 50% dextrose cystoscopy fluid (January 2016-June 2017) with those who received saline cystoscopy with intravenous indigo carmine (November 2013-April 2014). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 96 patients had cystoscopy with 50% dextrose and 104 with normal saline with intravenous indigo carmine. Differences in baseline characteristics of the two groups of participants mainly reflected institutional population diversity: age (45.2 vs 41.9, p = .01), body mass index (26.9 vs 33.4, p <.01), race, current smoking status (1% vs 7.8%, p = .04), diabetes (2.1% vs 11.5%, p = .01), history of abdominal surgery (53.1% vs 74%, p <.01), hysterectomy type, receipt of intraoperative antibiotics (92.7% vs 100%, p <.01), recatheterization (10.4% vs 0%, p <.01), and removal of catheter on postoperative day 0 (66.7% vs 12.5%, p <.01). Urinary symptoms were similar for 50% dextrose and saline (12.5% vs 7.7%, p = .19). After adjusting for age, body mass index, race, diabetes, and day of catheter removal, there remained no significant differences in urinary symptoms between the groups (odds ratio 3.19 [95% confidence interval, 0.82-12.35], p = .09). One immediate bladder injury was detected in the saline group and 1 delayed lower urinary tract injury in the 50% dextrose group. CONCLUSION: Overall, most women experienced no urinary symptoms after benign laparoscopic hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in postoperative urinary symptoms or empiric treatment of urinary tract infection after the use of 50% dextrose cystoscopy fluid as compared with normal saline. The previous finding of increased odds of urinary tract infection after dextrose cystoscopy may be due to use in a high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Cistoscopía/efectos adversos , Cistoscopía/métodos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Cistoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Glucosa/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Carmin de Índigo/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Solución Salina/uso terapéutico , Uréter/lesiones , Uréter/microbiología , Vejiga Urinaria/lesiones , Vejiga Urinaria/microbiología , Adulto Joven
8.
South Med J ; 114(1): 4-7, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33398352

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to assess the current state of pain and opioid education in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) by performing a detailed review of the national educational curricula guiding OBGYN residency and fellowship training programs in the United States. METHODS: From 2019 to 2020 we reviewed seven documents created to guide learning and structure educational training for OBGYN residency and fellowship programs in the United States: the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) Educational Objectives Core Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology, the 2016 Educational Objectives-Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, and the 2018 Guides to Learning in Complex Family Planning, Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology, Maternal Fetal Medicine, and Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Each document was reviewed by two authors to assess for items referring to pain or opioids. RESULTS: The CREOG educational objectives, used to inform educational curricula for residency programs, were the most comprehensive, mentioning pain and/or opioid educational objectives the highest number of times and including the most categories. The CREOG document was followed by the Guides to Learning for Gynecologic Oncology and for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery. The Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Guide to Learning did not mention pain and/or opioids in the educational objectives. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies an opportunity for consistent and appropriate opioid and pain management education in OBGYN training.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Curriculum/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Obstetricia/educación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Competencia Clínica/normas , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Curriculum/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Obstetricia/métodos , Enseñanza/normas , Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
9.
J Adv Nurs ; 77(2): 1017-1026, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107642

RESUMEN

AIMS: This protocol describes a study aiming to: (1) describe pathways and experiences of women's symptom recognition, appraisal and management of endometriosis; and (2) identify differences in pathways and experiences among a socioeconomically and racially diverse group of women. DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative study with stratified purposeful sampling. METHODS: Data will be collected from a minimum of 24 women with provider-presumed or surgically confirmed diagnoses across two time points. The study will recruit across socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic/Latina) to ensure diversity of the sample. Recruitment will occur at a large public hospital in the southeastern United States (US). Participants will be interviewed using semi-structured interview guides informed by Elder and Giele's Life Course perspective approaching women as active beings in dynamic systems shaped by: 1) their location in time and space; 2) linked lives; and 3) human agency, and 4) the time of their lives. Each woman's experiences, symptoms, and contacts with health-care systems will be mapped to trace their diagnostic pathways. Coded interviews and data will undergo within- and across-case analysis to identify similarities and differences in their experiences. Institutional review board approval was obtained June 2019. DISCUSSION: The participants' diagnostic maps will enable us to distinguish the differences in pathways and experiences between and across groups. Findings will inform the development of interventions aimed at shortening the time to diagnosis. IMPACT: This will be the first study to compare pathways to diagnosis of endometriosis in a socioeconomically and racially diverse sample of US women using the life course perspective. The results from this research stand to inform future interventions aimed at helping women achieve more timely diagnoses.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Estados Unidos
10.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1363-1369, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843695

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative and 30-day posthysterectomy outcomes between patients who had bariatric surgery before hysterectomy and patients with a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 without a history of bariatric surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary-care, academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients with a history of bariatric surgery and patients with BMI >40 kg/m2 and no previous bariatric surgery who underwent any route of hysterectomy between January 1, 2000, and March 1, 2018. INTERVENTIONS: After exclusion of patients with gynecologic malignancy and bariatric surgery reversal, 223 patients with a history of bariatric surgery were matched at a 1:2 ratio by year of hysterectomy to 446 randomly selected patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2 and no bariatric surgery before hysterectomy. Demographics, medical comorbidities, and surgical characteristics were collected by a manual chart review. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the incidence of intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of major and minor postoperative complications. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of any intra- or postoperative complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean BMI in the bariatric surgery group was 35.2 ± 7.9 kg/m2, compared with 46.3 ± 5.6 kg/m2 in the control group (p <.01). Fewer patients in the bariatric surgery group had obesity-related comorbidities than the group with no previous bariatric surgery (p <.01). There were lower odds of any intraoperative complication in the bariatric surgery group than in the group with no bariatric surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.77), after adjusting for relevant confounding factors between groups. However, there was no difference in overall postoperative complications between women who had bariatric surgery and those who did not (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.82-1.91). When analyzed individually, a higher proportion of patients in the bariatric surgery group had postoperative cuff separation or dehiscence (1.4% [3/223], p = .04) and urinary retention (5.8% [13/223], p <.01). Combining all perioperative complications, we found no significant difference in minor complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo Grade 1 or 2 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.68-1.60), major complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or higher (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.61-2.54), or combined major and minor perioperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63-1.44) between patients with a history of bariatric surgery and morbidly obese patients with no bariatric surgery before hysterectomy, after adjusting for relevant confounding factors between groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with women who had a BMI >40 kg/m2, patients with a history of bariatric surgery before hysterectomy had a lower odds of complications during hysterectomy. However, despite lower BMI and fewer obesity-related medical comorbidities, there was no significant difference in posthysterectomy complications and no significant differences in overall major and minor complications.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/complicaciones , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/epidemiología , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Anesth Analg ; 129(3): 776-783, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31425219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in gynecologic surgery have been shown to decrease length of stay with no impact on readmission, but no study has assessed predictors of admission in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of admission after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) performed under an ERAS pathway. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of women undergoing LH/RAH for benign indications within an ERAS pathway. Data collected included same-day discharge, reason for admission, incidences of urgent clinic and emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, reoperations, and 9 postulated predictors of admission listed below. Patient demographics, markers of baseline health, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups (ERAS patients discharged on the day of surgery versus admitted) using Fisher exact and Student t tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the potential risk factors for being admitted, adjusting for age, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, preoperative diagnosis indicative of hysterectomy, preoperative chronic pain, completion of a preprocedure pain-coping skills counseling session, procedure time, and compliance to the ERAS pathway. RESULTS: There were 165 patients undergoing LH/RAH within an ERAS pathway; 93 (56%) were discharged on the day of surgery and 72 were admitted. There were no significant differences in ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations between groups (ER visits: discharged 13% versus admitted 13%, P = .99; 90-day readmission: discharged 4% versus admitted 7%, P = .51; and 90-day reoperation: discharged 4% versus admitted 3%, P = .70). The most common reasons for admission were postoperative urinary retention (n = 21, 30%), inadequate pain control (n = 21, 30%), postoperative nausea and vomiting (n = 7, 10%), and planned admissions (n = 7, 10%). Increased ASA physical status, being African American, and increased length of procedure were significantly associated with an increased risk of admission (ASA physical status III versus ASA physical status I or II: odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-7.16; P = .007; African American: OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.02-5.96; P = .04; and length of procedure, assessed in 30-minute increments: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: We were able to define predictors of admission for patients having LH/RAH managed with an ERAS pathway. Increased ASA physical status, being African American, and increased length of procedure were significantly associated with admission after LH/RAH performed under an ERAS pathway. In addition, the incidences of urgent clinic and ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations within 90 days of surgery were similar for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery compared to those admitted.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/tendencias , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Adulto , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 62(4): 666-676, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31524660

RESUMEN

Chronic pelvic is a multifaceted condition that often has both peripheral and central generators of pain. Despite its high prevalence, the evaluation and management of a pelvic pain patient often present many challenges to the practicing gynecologist. As with many other chronic pain conditions, pain severity does not always correlate with pelvic pathology and standard medical and surgical therapies are not always effective. An understanding of neurobiology and neuropsychology of chronic pelvic pain along with clinical pearls in the history and physical examination should guide management. Successful treatment of pelvic pain is typically multimodal, a combination of pharmacologic treatment strategies directed at the affected pathology and surrounding structures along with behavioral therapy. Evidence for these and other emerging therapies are presented in this article.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Ginecología/métodos , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Dolor Pélvico/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos
13.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 62(1): 11-21, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30668556

RESUMEN

The clinical setting in which women's health physicians practice, whether as generalist, obstetricians and gynecologists, or subspecialists, dictates our frequent clinical interaction with "pain." Opioid-containing medications are frequently prescribed within our specialty as a means of immediate pain relief. Opioid-containing medication causes a deep physiological alteration of several systems resulting in potential harm to acute and chronic opioid users. This article includes a thorough system-based review of opioid-containing medications on physiological systems. Women's health providers should have an in-depth understanding of such reverberations on patients' wellbeing to maintain the safest level of care. A solid grasp of physiological repercussions of opioid use would encourage physicians to seek alternative treatment options. Such practice is essential in curbing the opioid epidemic our patients are facing.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Péptidos Opioides/fisiología , Dolor/clasificación , Receptores Opioides/agonistas , Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Sistema Cardiovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Endocrino/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/fisiopatología , Dolor/fisiopatología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Sistema Respiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Salud de la Mujer
14.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 219(5): 480.e1-480.e8, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29959931

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although uterine size has been a previously cited barrier to minimally invasive hysterectomy, experienced gynecologic surgeons have been able to demonstrate that laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy is feasible with increasingly large uteri. By demonstrating that minimally invasive hysterectomy continues to have superior outcomes even with increased uterine weights, opportunity exists to meaningfully decrease morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with abdominal hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if there is an association between uterine weight and posthysterectomy complications and if differences in that association exist across vaginal, laparoscopic, and abdominal approaches. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study of prospectively collected quality improvement data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, composed of patient information and 30-day postoperative outcomes from >500 hospitals across the United States and targeted data files, which includes additional data on procedure-specific risk factors and outcomes in >100 of those participating hospitals. We analyzed patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions from 2014 through 2015, identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. We excluded patients who had cancer, surgery by a nongynecology specialty, or missing uterine weight. Patients were compared with respect to 30-day postoperative complications and uterine weight, stratified by surgical approach. Bivariable tests and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: In all, 27,167 patients were analyzed. After adjusting for potential confounders, including medical and surgical variables, women with 500-g uteri were >30% more likely to have complications compared to women with uteri ≤100 g (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.54; P < .0001), women with 750-g uteri were nearly 60% as likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.82; P < .0001), and women with uteri ≥1000 g were >80% more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.21; P < .0001). The incidence of 30-day postsurgical complications was nearly double in the abdominal hysterectomy group (15%) compared to the laparoscopic group (8%). Additionally, for each stratum of uterine weight, abdominal hysterectomy had significantly higher odds of any complication compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy, even after adjusting for potential demographic, medical, and surgical confounders. For uteri <250 g, abdominal hysterectomy had twice the odds of any complication, compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.33), and among women with uteri between 250-500 g, abdominal hysterectomy was associated with an almost 80% increase in odds of any complication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.19). Even among women with uteri >500 g, abdominal hysterectomy was still associated with a >30% increased odds of any complication, compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.71). CONCLUSION: We found that while uterine weight was an independent risk factor for posthysterectomy complications, abdominal hysterectomy had higher odds of any complication, compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy, even for markedly enlarged uteri. Our study suggests that uterine weight alone is not an appropriate indication for abdominal hysterectomy. We also identified that it is safe to perform larger hysterectomies laparoscopically. Patients may benefit from referral to experienced surgeons who are able to offer laparoscopic hysterectomy even for markedly enlarged uteri.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía Vaginal/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Útero/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Tamaño de los Órganos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 30(4): 267-271, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29889668

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nonobstetric surgery is performed in 1 : 200 to 1 : 500 of pregnant women in the United States annually. Previously, many argued that laparoscopy was contraindicated during pregnancy because of concerns for uterine injury and fetal malperfusion. Because surgeons have gained more experience with laparoscopy, it has become the preferred treatment modality for many surgical diseases in the gravid patient. RECENT FINDINGS: Specific preoperative considerations, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management per trimester will be reviewed to optimize patient and surgical outcomes. SUMMARY: The advantages of laparoscopic surgery are similar for pregnant and nonpregnant women. Surgery during pregnancy should minimize risks to both the fetus and the mother. Whenever a pregnant woman undergoes nonobstetric surgery, consultations among her surgical team are important to coordinate management. Both anatomic and physiologic changes related to pregnancy may require modifications in management. Surgeons must be aware of considerations, techniques, and postoperative management used for pregnant patients to optimize outcomes for both the fetus and mother.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Laparoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Embarazo , Trimestres del Embarazo , Cuidados Preoperatorios
16.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 21(4): 567-75, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24576505

RESUMEN

When appropriately performed, hysterectomy most often contributes substantially to quality of life. Postoperative morbidity is minimal, in particular after minimally invasive surgery. In a minority of women, pain during intercourse is one of the more long-lasting sequelae of the procedure. Complete evaluation and treatment of this complication requires a thorough understanding of the status and function of neighboring organ systems and structures (urinary system, gastrointestinal tract, and pelvic and hip muscle groups). Successful resolution of dyspareunia often may be facilitated with review of the patient's previous degree of comfort during sex and the nature of her relationship with her partner. Repeat surgery is needed in a small minority of patients.


Asunto(s)
Dispareunia/etiología , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Dispareunia/diagnóstico , Dispareunia/terapia , Femenino , Humanos
18.
F S Rep ; 5(1): 87-94, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38524213

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices after gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: University-based pratice. Patients: A total of 57 survey respondents identifying as transgender men or gender nonbinary with a history of gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs between 2014 and 2023 with the University of North Carolina Minimally Invasive Gynecology division. Intervention: Survey or questionnaire. Main Outcome Measures: The prevalence and severity of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices were measured with the use of the validated decisional regret scale (DRS) (scored 0-100). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported barriers to pursuing reproductive endocrinology and infertility consultation and fertility preservation treatment. Results: The survey response rate was 50.9% (57/112). "Mild" to "severe" decisional regret was reported by 38.6% (n = 22) of survey respondents, with DRS scores among all respondents ranging from 0-85. Higher median DRS scores were associated with patient-reported inadequacy of preoperative fertility counseling regarding implications of surgery on future fertility or family-building (0 vs. 50) and fertility preservation options (0 vs. 12.5). No desire for future fertility at the time of fertility counseling was the most frequent reason (68.4%) for declining a referral to reproductive endocrinology and infertility for additional fertility preservation discussion. Conclusions: Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret.

19.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 33(6): 798-804, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572932

RESUMEN

Introduction: Leiomyomas are associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), but more specific characterization of their impact on LUTS is needed. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 202 participants (101 per group) who underwent hysterectomy for leiomyomas versus abnormal uterine bleeding nonclassified (AUB-N) from July 2015 to May 2019. Baseline demographics, leiomyoma characteristics, and presence of baseline LUTS were collected. The main objective was to compare the prevalence of LUTS between these two groups. Secondary objectives were to analyze the association between leiomyoma characteristics and the prevalence of LUTS. Results: There was no difference in baseline prevalence of LUTS between the hysterectomy for leiomyoma versus AUB-N groups (42.6% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.67). When examining the entire study cohort of participants, irrespective of hysterectomy indication, leiomyoma size >6 cm was associated with an increased prevalence of LUTS when compared with leiomyoma <6 cm (64.9% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.02), and specifically difficulty passing urine (p = 0.02), nocturia (p = 0.04), and urinary frequency (p = 0.04). When controlling for age, body mass index, parity, chronic pelvic pain, and diabetes, leiomyomas >6 cm remained significantly associated with the presence of LUTS (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-8.3) when compared with leiomyoma <6 cm. Presence of >1 leiomyoma was associated with urinary frequency (67.9% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.02) when compared with ≤1 leiomyoma. Anterior location and uterine volume were not associated with a difference in LUTS. Conclusion: LUTS are prevalent in those planning hysterectomy for leiomyoma and AUB-N. Leiomyomas >6 cm are associated with the presence of LUTS. Future studies should evaluate change in LUTS following hysterectomy for leiomyomas.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía , Leiomioma , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior , Hemorragia Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas , Humanos , Femenino , Leiomioma/cirugía , Leiomioma/epidemiología , Leiomioma/complicaciones , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/epidemiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/complicaciones , Hemorragia Uterina/epidemiología , Hemorragia Uterina/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes
20.
Womens Health Issues ; 34(3): 221-231, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418360

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis, a chronic noncancerous gynecologic condition commonly characterized by disruptive physical and psychosocial symptoms, can be disabling. Individuals in the United States with endometriosis who are unable to work before retirement age can apply for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Given the multi-step process of disability review, it is important to better understand how disability decisions are made. This study aimed to examine approaches and rationales of U.S. federal appeals courts reviewing SSDI and/or SSI claims involving endometriosis-related issues of appeal. METHODS: We searched Westlaw and Nexis Uni records, available as of January 2021, for federal appeals of SSDI and SSI claims including endometriosis as an impairment. Two independent reviewers screened full-text cases and extracted data. Framework Analysis was applied to courts' rationales regarding endometriosis-related issues of appeal. RESULTS: Eighty-seven appeals addressed an endometriosis-related issue. Three themes-evidence, treatment, and time-were identified across the decisions. The courts' discussions across themes exposed rationales and evidentiary requirements that posed challenges for claimants with endometriosis. The courts found subjective reports of symptoms insufficient evidence of impairment and positive responses to treatments to indicate cures or prevent claimants from demonstrating the necessary continuous 12 months of impairment. Some courts expected claimants to use treatments such as contraception or hysterectomy without addressing the risks of such treatments or the fact that they might have been counter to claimants' needs and preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with endometriosis face evidentiary obstacles and common misconceptions about disease, diagnosis, and treatment in disability claims. SSDI and SSI endometriosis claims are systematically disadvantaged, particularly among those without access to care. The health care, policy, and legal systems can leverage the findings in this study to create a more equitable disability application and review system for those with chronic pain conditions such as endometriosis.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Endometriosis , Seguro por Discapacidad , Seguridad Social , Humanos , Femenino , Seguridad Social/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro por Discapacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , Personas con Discapacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Renta , Persona de Mediana Edad , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA