When to lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible joint effusion in painful total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if knee arthroplasty without sonographically visible effusion needs to undergo lavage to rule out infection. METHODS: Patients were accrued by a retrospective search of a longitudinally maintained radiology database looking for patients referred for ultrasound guided aspiration of suspected TKA infection. Clinical presentations, laboratory tests, intraoperative findings, and follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-nine patients were included (mean age of 67 years (range, 36-91)) including 251 females. Four hundred three patients had effusions, of which 57 were infected based on ultrasound-guided and surgical aspirates. Sixty-four patients lacked effusions, of which 47 underwent lavage at the clinicians' request, with 6/47 infected. Nineteen patients without effusion were not lavaged at the clinicians' request due to low suspicion, and none were infected. Patients with positive lavage cultures all had clinical risk factors. Infection rates were significantly higher in patients with joint effusion and clinical suspicion for infection compared to absent joint effusion and absent clinical suspicion. A significantly higher proportion of patients with hyperemia or moderate-severe synovial thickening on ultrasound were symptomatic and had joint effusion and positive joint cultures. Aspiration of native fluid had 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity while lavage had a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 100%. Negative predictive value for native aspirates was 94% compared to 86% for lavage. CONCLUSION: A TKA with low clinical suspicion of infection does not need to undergo lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible effusion.

Outcomes after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for prosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty usually have excellent long-term outcomes. However, a subset of patients is diagnosed with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring revision procedures and prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder PJI in patients undergoing débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, and 2-stage revision. We also sought to compare outcomes and complications across procedures. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with PJI after primary shoulder arthroplasty between January 2010 and August 2021. Patients were included if they underwent treatment with DAIR, single-stage revision, or 2-stage revision. Demographic information, surgical details, complications, laboratory data, postoperative antibiotic regimen, and infectious pathogen were collected. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes were collected: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Shoulder Activity Scale, and PROMIS Upper Extremity. Chi-square, t test, and 1-way analysis of variance were used as appropriate to evaluate each factor. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the study, 26% treated with DAIR, 9% treated with single-stage revision, and 65% treated with 2-stage revision. There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities. Patients undergoing DAIR were diagnosed significantly earlier than those undergoing single- and 2-stage revision procedures (12.6 ± 22.9 months vs. 49.6 ± 48.4 vs. 25.0 ± 26.6, P = .010). Recurrent PJI was noted in 23.1% of patients: 29.4% of DAIR patients, no single-stage patients, and 23.8% of 2-stage patients (P = .330). Patients undergoing 2-stage revision with treatment failure had a significantly higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.2 ± 3.7 vs. 3.7 ± 3.9, P = .027). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes across groups. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing treatment of shoulder PJI with DAIR did not have an increased rate of reinfection compared with single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. Patients treated with DAIR were diagnosed with PJI significantly earlier than those undergoing single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between groups. This information adds to the body of work detailing outcomes after DAIR for shoulder PJI and provides encouraging data for use in this patient population. Future studies with a larger sample size may be conducted to further investigate specific pathogens, infection timelines, and antibiotic regimens that reduce the risk of treatment failure.

Does Computer Navigation or Robotic Assistance Affect the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of technology during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with more accurate component position and less blood loss. Yet to date, the risk of developing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) associated with computer navigation (CN) or robotic assistance (RA) has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study used propensity score-matching (PSM) in a large cohort of primary TKA patients to compare the rate of PJI following conventional TKA (TKA) versus CN-TKA and RA-TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 13,015 knees in 11,727 patients who underwent primary TKA at a single institution from 2018 to 2021. The cohort was stratified into TKA, CN-TKA, and RA-TKA groups. 1:1 PSM was applied to 11,834 patients. Propensity score-matching was performed using logistic regression accounting for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, CCI components, and smoking status. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate differences in surgical time and PJI rate. RESULTS: Significantly longer median operating times were noted in the RA-TKA group (14 minutes) compared to TKA (P < .001). The PJI rates among matched cohorts were similar among RA-TKA (0.3%), CN-TKA (0.3%), and conventional TKA (0.5%). Multivariable logistic regressions demonstrated that the use of robotic assistance (odds ratio (OR) = 0.5, P = .423) or computer navigation (OR = 0.61, P = .128) was not associated with increased risk of PJI when compared to conventional TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Use of computer navigation and robotic assistance during primary TKA are associated with longer surgical times, but no difference in PJI frequency within 90 days of surgery.

Perioperative Glycemic Variability Influences Infection Rates Differently Following Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Recent investigations have determined that abnormal postoperative glycemia following primary total joint arthroplasty is associated with adverse events. Our study aimed to determine if hyperglycemia and glycemic variability following aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) were associated with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within two years postoperatively. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 2,208 patients within a single institution undergoing aseptic rTJA from 2012 to 2019. Postoperative glucose values were recorded. Glycemic variability was measured via three parameters: coefficient of variation (%CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and J-index. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations with PJI at 90-day, 1-, and 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: In revision hips, all glycemic measures were not associated with PJI at any timepoint in logistic regression analyses, except for MAGE, which predicted PJI at one year (P = 0.045); body mass index (BMI) was the only factor associated with PJI at all timepoints in all models. In revision knees, all glycemic measures were not associated with PJI at any timepoint in logistic regression analyses; however, PJI rates differed between diabetics and non-diabetics at all time-points (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate that decreasing preoperative BMI and postoperative glycemic variability may be critical in reducing PJI rates in revision hips. Furthermore, patients who have diabetes should be counseled that they remain at higher risk of PJI regardless of perioperative glucose control after revision knee surgery.

The Infected Polypropylene Mesh: When Does Biofilm Form and Which Antiseptic Solution Most Effectively Removes It?

BACKGROUND: Polypropylene (PPE) mesh is commonly utilized to reconstruct catastrophic extensor mechanism disruptions in revision total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, these procedures are associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection. The purpose of the current study was to: 1) visualize and quantify the progression of bacterial biofilm growth on PPE-mesh; and 2) determine which antiseptic solutions effectively remove viable bacteria. METHODS: Knitted PPE mesh samples were cultured with either methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or Escherichia coli (E. coli) for 7 days, with regular quantification of colony forming units (CFUs) and visualization using scanning electron microscopy to identify maturity. Immature (24 hour) and mature (72 hour) biofilm was treated with one of 5 commercial antiseptics for 3 minutes. A 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, a surfactant-based formulation of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), undiluted (10%) povidone-iodine, and 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine and 3% hydrogen peroxide. A 3-log reduction in CFUs compared to saline was considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: The CFU counts plateaued, indicating maturity, at 72 hours for both MSSA and E. coli. The scanning electron microscopy confirmed confluent biofilm formation after 72 hours. The 10% povidone-iodine was clinically effective against all MSSA biofilms and immature E. coli biofilms. The 10% povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide was effective in all conditions. Only 10% povidone iodine formulations produced significantly (P < .0083) reduced CFU counts against mature biofilms. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteria rapidly form biofilm on PPE mesh. Mesh contamination can be catastrophic, and clinicians should consider utilizing an antiseptic solution at the conclusion of mesh implantation. Undiluted povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide should be considered when attempting to salvage infected PPE mesh.

Perioperative Cefazolin for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Who Have a Penicillin Allergy: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND: Cefazolin is the standard of care for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States. The potential allergic cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin causes uncertainty regarding optimal antibiotic choice in patients who have a reported penicillin allergy (rPCNA). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of perioperative cefazolin in PCNA patients undergoing primary TJA. METHODS: We identified all patients (n = 49,842) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (n = 25,659) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 24,183) from 2016 to 2022 who received perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients who had an rPCNA (n = 5,508) who received cefazolin (n = 4,938, 89.7%) were compared to rPCNA patients who did not (n = 570, 10.3%), and to patients who did not have an rPCNA (n = 43,359). The primary outcome was the rate of allergic reactions within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the rates of superficial infections, deep infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections within 90 days. RESULTS: The rate of allergic reactions was 0.1% (n = 5) in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin, compared to 0.2% (n = 1) in rPCNA patients who did not (P = .48) and 0.02% (n = 11) in patients who have no rPCNA (P = .02). Allergic reactions were mild in all 5 rPCNA patients who received cefazolin and were characterized by cutaneous symptoms (n = 4) or dyspnea in the absence of respiratory distress (n = 1) that resolved promptly with antibiotic discontinuation and administration of antihistamines and/or corticosteroids. We observed no differences in the rates of superficial infections (0.1 versus 0.2%, P = .58), deep infections (0.3 versus 0.4%, P = .68), or C difficile infections (0.04% versus 0%, P = .99) within 90 days in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin versus alternative perioperative antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of more than 5,500 patients who had an rPCNA undergoing primary TJA, perioperative prophylaxis with cefazolin resulted in a 0.1% incidence of allergic reactions that were clinically indolent. Cefazolin can be safely administered to most patients, independent of rPCNA severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

How accurate are positive preoperative aspiration culture results in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection? A concordance study.

BACKGROUND: The concordance between preoperative synovial fluid cultures and intraoperative tissue cultures for identifying pathogenic microorganisms in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains poorly understood. The purpose of our study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of positive synovial fluid culture results in early pathogen identification for shoulder PJI. METHODS: A total of 35 patients who met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI following primary anatomic or reverse arthroplasty and the study inclusion criteria were identified retrospectively from a single institution (multiple surgeons) from January 2011 to June 2021. The inclusion criteria required a positive preoperative intra-articular synovial fluid sample within 90 days analyzed within the same institution and intraoperative tissue cultures at the time of arthrotomy. Concordance was determined when the organism(s) identified from the aspirate correlated with the intraoperative specimens. RESULTS: Overall concordance was identified in 28 of 35 patients (80%), with similar concordance for anatomic (21 of 24, 88%) and reverse (7 of 11, 64%) shoulder arthroplasties (P = .171). Culture discordance occurred in 7 of 35 patients (20%): of these, 5 (14%) had no corresponding intraoperative culture growth whereas 2 (6%) had polymicrobial intraoperative cultures. Monomicrobial Cutibacterium acnes PJI cases were the most common (24 of 35, 69%) and had an overall concordance rate of 79%. Of 5 discordant C acnes patients, 2 had polymicrobial intraoperative cultures and 3 had negative intraoperative culture results; all the patients with negative intraoperative culture results had received antibiotics between the time of aspiration and surgery. Considered separately, concordance in patients who had a positive aspirate finding for C acnes and did not receive antibiotics prior to surgery was 19 of 21 (90%), with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 82%-100%) and a corresponding positive predictive value of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 58%-93%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative positive aspiration culture results demonstrated favorable sensitivity and specificity when compared with intraoperative tissue cultures in identifying pathogenic microorganisms in shoulder PJI patients. These findings are congruent with literature from hip and knee arthroplasty. Ultimately, confidence in the accuracy of positive preoperative aspiration culture results in shoulder PJI may facilitate the development of early, targeted treatment strategies while directing patient expectations and risk.

No Difference in the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing the Posterolateral Compared to the Direct Anterior Approach.

BACKGROUND: There remains inconsistent data about the association of surgical approach and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to evaluate the risk of reoperation for superficial infection and PJI after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a multivariate model. METHODS: We reviewed 16,500 primary THAs, collecting data on surgical approach and all reoperations within 1 year for superficial infection (n = 36) or PJI (n = 70). Considering superficial infection and PJI separately, we used Kaplan-Meier survivorship to assess survival free from reoperation and a Cox Proportional Hazards multivariate models to assess risk factors for reoperation. RESULTS: Between direct anterior approach (DAA) (N = 3,351) and PLA (N = 13,149) cohorts, rates of superficial infection (0.4 versus 0.2%) and PJI (0.3 versus 0.5%) were low and survivorship free from reoperation for superficial infection (99.6 versus 99.8%) and PJI (99.4 versus 99.7%) were excellent at both 1 and 2 years. The risk of developing superficial infection increased with high body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1 per unit increase, P = .003), DAA (HR = 2.7, P = .01), and smoking status (HR = 2.9, P = .03). The risk of developing PJI increased with the high BMI (HR = 1.04, P = .03), but not surgical approach (HR = 0.68, P = .3). CONCLUSION: In this study of 16,500 primary THAs, DAA was independently associated with an elevated risk of superficial infection reoperation compared to the PLA, but there was no association between surgical approach and PJI. An elevated patient BMI was the strongest risk factor for superficial infection and PJI in our cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Taking a Deeper Dive Into Malnutrition and Revision Arthroplasty: When Do Nutritionists Get Involved?

BACKGROUND: Perioperative malnutrition is associated with increased complications and mortality following revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA). Nutritional consultations are useful in characterizing patient nutritional status but are inconsistently utilized post rTJA. We sought: 1) to describe the prevalence of nutritional consultations post rTJA, 2) to determine if septic rTJA patients needed consultations more often, and 3) if a diagnosis of 'malnutrition' from the nutritionist conferred increased readmission rates. METHODS: A retrospective study of 2,697 rTJAs performed in a single institution over a 4-year period was performed. Patient demographics, reasons for rTJA, occurrences of nutritional consultation (indicated if body mass index < 20, malnutrition screening tool score ≥ 2, or poor oral intake postoperatively), specific nutritional diagnosis (according to 2020 Electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology and 90-day readmission rates were recorded and analyzed). Rates of consultations and adjusted logistic regressions were calculated. RESULTS: There were 501 patients (18.6%) who required nutritional consultations, with 55 (11.0%) of these patients receiving a 'malnutrition' diagnosis. Septic rTJA patients required significantly more nutritional consultations (P < .01) and were significantly more likely to have 'malnutrition' (P = .49). A diagnosis of malnutrition was associated with the highest odds of all-cause readmission (odds ratio (OR) = 3.89, P = .01), which was even higher than undergoing a septic rTJA. CONCLUSION: Nutritional consultations occur frequently following rTJA. Patients who receive a diagnosis of 'malnutrition' through consultation are at significantly higher risk for readmission and require close follow-up. Future efforts are needed to further characterize these patients in order to identify as well as optimize them preoperatively.

Clinical and Biomechanical Characteristics of Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Post Fractures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the polyethylene post are a rare but known complication after posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated the polyethylene and patient characteristics for 33 primary PS polyethylene components that were revised with fractured posts. METHODS: We identified 33 PS inserts revised between 2015 and 2022. Patient characteristics collected included age at index TKA, sex, body mass index, length of implantation (LOI), and patient-reported details on events surrounding the post fracture. Implant characteristics recorded were manufacturer, cross-linking properties (highly cross-linked polyethylene [XLPE] versus ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene [UHMWPE]), wear characteristics based on subjective scoring of the articular surfaces and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of fracture surfaces. Mean age at index surgery was 55 years (range, 35 to 69), mean body mass index was 29.5 (range, 18.5 to 37.2), and mean LOI was 10.0 (range, 4 to 26). RESULTS: Total surface damage scores were significantly higher in the UHMWPE group versus the XLPE group (57.3 versus 44.2, P = .003). SEM demonstrated fracture initiation at the posterior edge of the post in 10 of 13 cases. UHMWPE fracture surfaces posts had more tufted, irregularly clamshell features, while XLPE posts had more precise clamshell marking and a diamond pattern in the region of acute, final fracture. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of PS post fracture differed between XLPE and UHMWPE implants, with fractures occurring in the XLPE with less generalized surface damage, after a shorter LOI, and with SEM evaluation indicative of a more brittle fracture pattern.

Which Combination is the Best? A Comparison of the Predictive Potential of Serum Biomarker Combinations to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Without a gold-standard test, recent periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) literature has explored the utility of combining serological results, with promising findings. However, previous studies evaluated fewer than 200 patients and often studied only 1 to 2 test combinations. The purpose of this study was to accumulate a large single-institution cohort of revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) patients to determine the diagnostic utility of combination serum biomarkers to identify PJI. METHODS: A single institution longitudinal database was assessed to identify all patients who underwent rTJA from 2017 to 2020. There were 1,363 rTJA patients (715 rTKA patients and 648 rTHA patients) including 273 PJI cases (20%) analyzed. The PJI was diagnosed post-rTJA utilizing 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were systematically collected for all patients. RESULTS: The rTKA combination markers of CRP + ESR (sensitivity: 78.3%, specificity: 88.8%, positive predictive value (PPV): 70.0%, negative predictive value (NPV): 92.5%), CRP + D-dimer (sensitivity: 60.5%, specificity: 92.6%, PPV: 63.4%, NPV: 91.7%), and CRP + IL-6 (sensitivity: 38.5%, specificity: 100.0%, PPV: 100.0%, NPV: 92.9%) all yielded higher specificity than CRP alone (sensitivity: 94.4%, specificity: 75.0%, PPV: 55.5%, NPV: 97.6%). Similarly, the rTHA combination markers of CRP + ESR (sensitivity: 70.1%, specificity: 88.8%, PPV: 58.1%, NPV: 93.1%), CRP + D-dimer (sensitivity: 57.1%, specificity: 90.1%, PPV: 43.2%, NPV: 94.1%), and CRP + IL-6 (sensitivity: 21.4%, specificity: 98.4%, PPV: 60.0%, NPV: 91.7%) all yielded higher specificity than CRP alone (sensitivity: 84.7%, specificity: 77.5%, PPV: 45.4%, NPV: 95.8%). CONCLUSION: Overall, in diagnosing PJI for both rTKA and rTHA, 2-marker combinations yielded higher specificity, while 3-marker combinations yielded higher sensitivity compared to CRP alone. However, compared to all 2-marker and 3-marker combinations, CRP demonstrated superior overall diagnostic utility. These findings suggest that routine combination testing of markers for PJI diagnosis may be excessive and an unnecessary use of resources, especially in resource-limited situations.

The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) Score Predicts Discharge Destination, Length of Stay, and Postoperative Mobility After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Predicting an arthroplasty patient's discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and physical function is helpful because it allows for preoperative patient optimization, expectation management, and discharge planning. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score to predict discharge destination, LOS, and postoperative mobility in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Primary unilateral TKAs (n = 9,064) and THAs (n = 8,649) performed for primary osteoarthritis at our institution from 2018 to 2021 (excluding March to June 2020) were identified using a prospectively maintained institutional registry. We evaluated the associations between preoperative RAPT score and (1) discharge destination, (2) LOS, and postoperative mobility as measured by (3) successful ambulation on the day of surgery and (4) Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" score. RESULTS: On multivariable analyses adjusting for multiple covariates, every one-point increase in RAPT score among TKA patients was associated with a 1.82-fold increased odds of home discharge (P < .001), 0.22 days shorter LOS (P < .001), 1.13-fold increased odds of ambulating on postoperative day 0 (P < .001), and 0.25-point higher Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care score (P < .001). Similar findings were seen among THAs. A RAPT score of 8 or higher was the most sensitive and specific cutoff to predict home discharge. CONCLUSION: Among nearly 18,000 TKA and THA patients, RAPT score was predictive of discharge disposition, LOS, and postoperative mobility. A RAPT score of 8 or higher was the most sensitive and specific cutoff to predict discharge to home. In contrast to prior studies of the RAPT score which have grouped TKAs and THAs together, this study ran separate analyses for TKAs and THAs and found that THA patients seemed to perform better than TKA patients with equal RAPT scores, suggesting that RAPT may behave differently between TKAs and THAs, particularly in the intermediate risk RAPT range.

The AAHKS Best Podium Presentation Research Award: Comparing the Efficacy of Irrigation Solutions on Staphylococcal Biofilm Formed on Arthroplasty Surfaces.

BACKGROUND: A diverse array of antibacterial solutions is utilized by orthopedic surgeons in an attempt to disperse bacterial biofilm. Few studies compare these agents against biofilm grown on clinically relevant orthopedic biomaterials, such as plastic, acrylic cement, and porous titanium. METHODS: MSSA biofilm was grown on plastic 48-well plates, polymethylmethacrylate cement beads and porous Ti-6Al-4V acetabular screw caps. Antibacterial solutions were tested according to manufacturer guidance and included: isotonic saline, vancomycin (1 mg/mL), polymyxin-bacitracin (500,000 U/L-50,000 U/L), povidone-iodine 0.3%, povidone-iodine 10%, a 1:1 combination of povidone-iodine 10% & 4% hydrogen peroxide, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and betaine 0.04%, a commercial solution containing chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) 0.05%, and a commercial solution containing benzalkonium chloride and ethanol. Twenty four and 72-hour biofilms were exposed to solutions for 3 minutes to reproduce intraoperative conditions. Solution efficacy was measured through sonication of treated surfaces followed by counting colony forming units and validated with a resazurin assay to assess cell viability. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated at least once. A three-fold log reduction in CFU counts versus controls was considered as a measure of solution efficacy. RESULTS: Saline, vancomycin and polymyxin-bacitracin were ineffective compared to other solutions against planktonic MSSA. Povidone-iodine 10% and a 1:1 solution of povidone-iodine 10% and 4% hydrogen peroxide were the only effective solutions against biofilm across all three surfaces and time points. CONCLUSION: Commercial antibacterial solutions vary significantly in their efficacy against MSSA biofilm. Efficacy globally decreased as biofilm maturity increased. Increased solution cost did not confer increased efficacy.

The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Are Intraoperative Cultures Necessary If the Aspiration Culture Is Positive? A Concordance Study in Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: The concordance between preoperative synovial fluid culture and multiple intraoperative tissue cultures for identifying pathogenic microorganisms in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains unknown. Our aim is to determine the diagnostic performance of synovial fluid culture for early organism identification. METHODS: A total of 363 patients who met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI following primary total joint arthroplasty were identified from a retrospective joint infection database. Inclusion criteria required a positive preoperative intra-articular synovial fluid sample within 90 days of intraoperative tissue culture(s) at revision surgery. Concordance was defined as matching organism(s) in aspirate and intraoperative specimens. RESULTS: Concordance was identified in 279 (76.8%) patients with similar rates among total hip arthroplasties (77.2%) and total knee arthroplasties (76.4%, P = .86). Culture discordance occurred in 84 (23.1%) patients; 37 (10.2%) had no intraoperative culture growth and 33 (90.1%) were polymicrobial. Monomicrobial Staphylococcal PJI cases had high sensitivity (0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.98) and specificity (0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.90). Polymicrobial infections had the lowest sensitivity (0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.19). CONCLUSION: Aspiration culture has favorable sensitivity and specificity when compared to tissue culture for identifying the majority of PJI organisms. Clinicians can guide surgical treatment and postoperative antibiotics based on monomicrobial aspiration results, but they should strongly consider collecting multiple tissue cultures to maximize the chance of identifying an underlying polymicrobial PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Accuracy of Predictive Algorithms in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR).

BACKGROUND: Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) failure remains high for total hip and knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to determine the predictive value of the CRIME80 and KLIC for failure of DAIR in acute hematogenous (AH) and acute postoperative (AP) PJIs, respectively. METHODS: We identified 134 patients who underwent DAIR for AH PJI with <4 weeks of symptoms after index arthroplasty and 122 patients who underwent DAIR for AP PJI <90 days from index. In the AH group, 15 patients (11%) failed at 90 days and overall, 33 (25%) had failed by 2 years. In the AP group, 39 (32%) failed at 90 days and overall, 52 (43%) failed by 2 years. Logistic regression models were used to determine the area under the curve (AUC) to establish thresholds using the Youden index. RESULTS: For the AP cohort, AUCs were below 0.66 for KLIC, Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and McPherson host grade. For the AH cohort, 90-day AUCs were 0.70 for CRIME80 and below 0.66 for Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and McPherson host grade. In multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, the CRIME80 AUC improved to 0.77 at 90 days. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the first external validation of the KLIC and CRIME80 for predicting DAIR failure in a North American population. The results indicate that alternative methods for predicting DAIR failure at 90 days and 2 years for acute PJI are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic III.

Irrigation and Debridement With Implant Retention: Does Chronicity of Symptoms Matter?

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a rare, yet devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Chronic infection is generally considered a contraindication to debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR); however, outcomes stratified by chronicity have not been well documented. METHODS: A retrospective review of all DAIR cases performed at a single institution from 2008 to 2015 was performed. Chronicity of PJI was categorized as acute postoperative, chronic, or acute hematogenous. Failure after DAIR, defined as re-revision for infection recurrence with the same organism, was evaluated between the 3 chronicity groups at 90 days as well as at a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 248 patients undergoing DAIR for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty PJI were included. Categorization of PJI was acute (acute postoperative) in 59 cases (24%), chronic in 54 (22%), and acute hematogenous in 135 (54%). DAIR survivorship was 47% (range 0.3-10 years). Overall, there were 118 (47.6%) treatment failures after DAIR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. There was no difference in failure rate between total hip or total knee arthroplasty patients (P = .07). Patients infected with Staphylococcus conferred a higher risk of failure for all DAIR procedures regardless of chronicity category. CONCLUSION: Identification of microbial species prior to undertaking DAIR may be more clinically relevant than stratification according to chronicity category when considering treatment options.

Treatment and Outcome of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a devastating but poorly understood complication, with a paucity of published data regarding treatment and outcomes. This study analyzes the largest cohort of UKA PJIs to date comparing treatment outcome, septic and aseptic reoperation rates, and risk factors for treatment failure. METHODS: Twenty-one UKAs in 21 patients treated for PJI, as defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. Minimum and mean follow-up was 1 and 3.5 years, respectively. Fourteen (67%) patients had acute postoperative PJIs. Surgical treatment included 16 debridement, antibiotics, and implant retentions (DAIRs) (76%), 4 two-stage revisions (19%), and 1 one-stage revision (5%). Twenty (95%) PJIs were culture positive with Staphylococcus species identified in 15 cases (71%). RESULTS: Survivorship free from reoperation for infection at 1 year was 76% (95% confidence interval, 58%-93%). Overall survival from all-cause reoperation was 57% (95% confidence interval, 27%-87%) at 5 years. Two additional patients (10%) underwent aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty for lateral compartment degeneration 1 year after DAIR and tibial aseptic loosening 2.5 years after 2-stage revision. All patients who initially failed PJI UKA treatment presented with acute postoperative PJIs (5 of 14; 36%). CONCLUSION: Survivorship free from persistent PJI at 1 year is low at 76% but is consistent with similar reports of DAIRs for total knee arthroplasties. Furthermore, there is low survivorship free from all-cause reoperation of 71% and 57% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of these poorer outcomes and consider treating UKA PJI early and aggressively.

Disruption of the Gut Microbiome Increases the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Mice.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications of total joint arthroplasty. Given the mortality and morbidity associated with PJI and the challenges in treating it, there has been increased interest in risk factors that can be modified before surgery. In this study, we used a novel mouse model to consider the role of the gut microbiome as a risk factor for PJI. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the state of the gut microbiota before surgery influence the likelihood of developing an established infection in a mouse model of PJI? (2) How does the state of the gut microbiota before surgery influence the local and systemic response to the presence of an established infection in a mouse model of PJI? METHODS: Male C57Bl/6 mice were divided into two groups: those with modified microbiome [INCREMENT]microbiome (n = 40) and untreated mice (n = 42). In [INCREMENT]microbiome mice, the gut flora were modified using oral neomycin and ampicillin from 4 weeks to 16 weeks of age. Mice received a titanium tibial implant to mimic a joint implant and a local inoculation of Staphylococcus aureus in the synovial space (10 colony forming units [CFUs]). The proportion of animals developing an established infection in each group was determined by CFU count. The local and systemic response to established infection was determined using CFU counts in surrounding joint tissues, analysis of gait, radiographs, body weight, serum markers of inflammation, and immune cell profiles and was compared with animals that received the inoculation but resisted infection. RESULTS: A greater proportion of animals with disrupted gut microbiota had infection (29 of 40 [73%]) than did untreated animals (21 of 42 [50%]; odds ratio, 2.63, 95% CI, 1.04-6.61; p = 0.035). The immune response to established infection in mice with altered microbiota was muted; serum amyloid A, a marker of systemic infection in mice, was greater than in mice with disrupted gut microbiota with infection (689 µg/dL; range, 68-2437 µg/dL, p < 0.05); infection associated increases in monocytes and neutrophils in the spleen and local lymph node in untreated mice but not were not observed in mice with disrupted gut microbiota. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this in vivo mouse model suggest that the gut microbiota may influence susceptibility to PJI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These preclinical findings support the idea that the state of the gut microbiome before surgery may influence the development of PJI and justify further preclinical and clinical studies to develop appropriate microbiome-based interventions.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Joint Disease: Prevention and Diagnosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur following total joint arthroplasty (TJA), causing significant morbidity and often requiring revision surgery. This goal of this manuscript is to review the current evidence for the prevention and diagnosis of PJI in patients with inflammatory arthritis. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with inflammatory arthritis have a higher risk of PJI after TJA; however, there are several preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic measures that can be optimized to lower the burden of PJI in this population. This manuscript will review the current evidence and clinical practice recommendations that support specific features of preoperative evaluation, perioperative medication management, and surgical planning in inflammatory arthritis patients undergoing TJA. Evidence and recommendations for the diagnosis of PJI in this patient population will also be reviewed. Despite increased research efforts directed towards PJI, specific approaches directed at the inflammatory arthritis patient population remain surprisingly limited. Optimization strategies such as adequately managing disease-modifying medications, treating preoperative anemia, encouraging smoking cessation, and improving weight management are strongly encouraged before entering the perioperative period. If PJI does occur in the inflammatory arthritis patient, establishing the diagnosis is challenging, since guidelines were created from investigations of PJI in primarily patients without inflammatory arthritis. Future prospective research is required to better guide clinicians in preventing and diagnosing PJI in inflammatory arthritis patients undergoing TJA.

Current Options and Emerging Biomaterials for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infection in the setting of total joint arthroplasty, referred to as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is a devastating complication requiring prolonged and costly treatment. The unique environment around an artificial joint and ability of surrounding tissues to sequester bacteria collectively make prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition challenging. In light of the unique pathogenesis of PJI, this review explores the limitations of contemporary treatments and discusses novel treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advancements in local antibiotic delivery platforms for preventing and treating PJI include titanium nanotube arrays, synthetic polymers, resorbable hydrogels, and cyclodextrin-based drug delivery options. In particular, cyclodextrins have facilitated great advancements in other clinical disorders and have demonstrated early promise as a future option in the arena of PJI. Novel treatment modalities for PJI optimize the implant surfaces to prevent bacterial biofilm formation or provide prolonged intra-articular antibiotic dosing to eradicate bacteria.