Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 110
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Emerg Med ; 64(2): 129-135, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36806434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorders. A previous randomized trial comparing emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine to standard care showed dramatic improvement in follow-up. This is encouraging, but must be replicated to understand the generalizability of buprenorphine treatment. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of an ED-initiated buprenorphine protocol similar to a previous randomized trial in a different population. METHODS: This ED-based descriptive study described the results of a project implementing an opioid use disorder treatment protocol that included buprenorphine. Patients with opioid use disorder were offered treatment with buprenorphine, a buprenorphine prescription whenever possible, and a follow-up visit to a clinic providing addiction treatment. The primary outcome was engagement in formal addiction treatment 30 days after the index visit. RESULTS: Of the 210 patients who accepted referral for outpatient medication-assisted treatment, 95 (45.2%) achieved the primary outcome. Two-thirds of these patients received a buprenorphine prescription at discharge; 40% were homeless. A regression analysis revealed one statistically significant predictor of the primary outcome: patients who were housed were 2.49 times more likely to engage in opioid use disorder treatment than patients who were homeless (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this descriptive study of an ED-initiated buprenorphine protocol, follow-up was less than that reported in a previous randomized controlled trial. Two important differences between our study and the randomized trial are the high rate of homelessness and the fact that not every patient received a prescription for buprenorphine. The efficacy of ED-initiated treatment may depend on certain population characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
2.
J Emerg Med ; 65(6): e594-e599, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37891065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Violence in the emergency department (ED) setting is well documented in medical literature. Weapons can be used to cause significant injury or mortality, although there is a paucity of literature on weapons and weapons screening in the ED. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of initiating a weapons screening process on the identification and removal of weapons. METHODS: Multiple aspects of a weapons screening program were evaluated at 2 and 6 months prior to and after a weapons screening protocol was initiated at an urban ED. In the Pre-Screen periods, only patients primarily seeking care for mental health were screened prior to entry. In the Post-Screen periods, all patients and visitors were screened with walk-through magnetometers or wand metal detectors, and additional screening checks were initiated. The number of individuals screened and numbers of weapons found were measured. Descriptive statistics comparing Pre- and Post-Screen periods were performed. RESULTS: Prior to the new screening process, 511 and 1701 patients primarily seeking care for mental health were screened, with 15 and 103 weapons confiscated at 2 and 6 months, respectively. After the screening process was initiated, 13,149 and 43,321 ED patients and visitors were screened, with 194 and 567 weapons confiscated at 2 and 6 months, respectively. Persons screened increased by 25-fold at both 2 and 6 months after implementing the screening process. Weapons confiscated increased approximately 13-fold and sixfold at the respective 2- and 6-month Pre- and Post-Screen periods, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implementation of weapons screening significantly increased the number of weapons identified and confiscated prior to entry in the ED by patients and visitors.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Armas , Humanos , Violencia , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
3.
J Emerg Med ; 64(4): 464-470, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990853

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spit restraint devices, also referred to as spit hoods, spit masks, or spit socks, are used by law enforcement and medical personnel to minimize transmission of communicable disease from bodily fluids from agitated individuals. Several lawsuits have implicated spit restraint devices as contributing to the death of individuals who are physically restrained by means of asphyxiation due to saturation of the mesh restraint device with saliva. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate whether a saturated spit restraint device has any clinically significant effects on the ventilatory or circulatory parameters of healthy adult subjects. METHODS: Subjects wore a spit restraint device dampened with 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose, an artificial saliva. Baseline vitals were taken, and a wet spit restraint device was then placed over the subject's head, and repeat measurements were taken at 10, 20, 30, and 45 min. A second spit restraint device was placed 15 min after the first. Measurements at 10, 20, 30, and 45 min were compared with baseline using paired t-tests. RESULTS: The mean age of 10 subjects was 33.8 years, and 50% were female. There was no significant difference between baseline and while wearing the spit sock for 10, 20, 30, and 45 min for the measured parameters including heart rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2, respiratory rate, or blood pressure. No subject indicated respiratory distress or had to terminate the study. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy adult subjects, there were no statistically or clinically significant differences in ventilatory or circulatory parameters while wearing the saturated spit restraint.


Asunto(s)
Máscaras , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Masculino , Saliva Artificial , Presión Sanguínea , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología
4.
Am J Public Health ; 112(1): 98-106, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34936416

RESUMEN

Objectives. To determine the effect of heat waves on emergency department (ED) visits for individuals experiencing homelessness and explore vulnerability factors. Methods. We used a unique highly detailed data set on sociodemographics of ED visits in San Diego, California, 2012 to 2019. We applied a time-stratified case-crossover design to study the association between various heat wave definitions and ED visits. We compared associations with a similar population not experiencing homelessness using coarsened exact matching. Results. Of the 24 688 individuals identified as experiencing homelessness who visited an ED, most were younger than 65 years (94%) and of non-Hispanic ethnicity (84%), and 14% indicated the need for a psychiatric consultation. Results indicated a positive association, with the strongest risk of ED visits during daytime (e.g., 99th percentile, 2 days) heat waves (odds ratio = 1.29; 95% confidence interval = 1.02, 1.64). Patients experiencing homelessness who were younger or elderly and who required a psychiatric consultation were particularly vulnerable to heat waves. Odds of ED visits were higher for individuals experiencing homelessness after matching to nonhomeless individuals based on age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Conclusions. It is important to prioritize individuals experiencing homelessness in heat action plans and consider vulnerability factors to reduce their burden. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):98-106. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306557).


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Calor Extremo , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , California/epidemiología , Estudios Cruzados , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Vulnerabilidad Social , Factores Sociodemográficos
5.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(8)2022 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35893100

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Risk stratification tools for febrile neutropenia exist but are infrequently utilized by emergency physicians. Procalcitonin may provide emergency physicians with a more objective tool to identify patients at risk of decompensation. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating the use of procalcitonin in cases of febrile neutropenia among adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department compared to a non-neutropenic, febrile control group. Our primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality with a secondary outcome of ICU admission. Results: Among febrile neutropenic patients, a positive initial procalcitonin value was associated with significantly increased odds of inpatient mortality after adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity (AOR 9.912, p < 0.001), which was similar, though greater than, our non-neutropenic cohort (AOR 2.18, p < 0.001). All febrile neutropenic patients with a positive procalcitonin were admitted to the ICU. Procalcitonin had a higher sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) in regard to mortality and ICU admission for our neutropenic group versus our non-neutropenic control. Conclusions: Procalcitonin appears to be a valuable tool when attempting to risk stratify patients with febrile neutropenia presenting to the emergency department. Procalcitonin performed better in the prediction of death and ICU admission among patients with febrile neutropenia than a similar febrile, non-neutropenic control group.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 1-4, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The restraint chair is a tool used by law enforcement and correction personnel to control aggressive, agitated individuals. When initiating its use, subjects are often placed in a hip-flexed/head-down (HFHD) position to remove handcuffs. Usually, this period of time is less than two minutes but can become more prolonged in particularly agitated patients. Some have proposed this positioning limits ventilation and can result in asphyxia. The aim of this study is to evaluate if a prolonged HFHD restraint position causes significant ventilatory compromise. METHODS: Subjects exercised on a stationary bicycle until they reached 85% of their predicted maximal heart rate. They were then handcuffed with their hands behind their back and placed into a HFHD seated position for five minutes. The primary outcome measurement was maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV). This was measured at baseline, after initial placement into the HFHD position, and after five minutes of being in the position while still maintaining the HFHD position. Baseline measurements were compared with final measurements for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 15 subjects. Subjects had a mean MVV of 165.3 L/min at baseline, 157.8 L/min after initially being placed into the HFHD position, and a mean of 138.7 L/min after 5 min in the position. The mean baseline % predicted MVV was 115%; after 5 min in the HFHD position the mean was 96%. This 19% absolute difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy seated male subjects with recent exertion, up to five minutes in a HFHD position results in a small decrease in MVV compared with baseline MVV levels. Even with this decrease, mean MVV levels were still 96% of predicted after five minutes. Though a measurable decrease was found, there was no clinically significant change that would support that this positioning would lead to asphyxia over a five-minute time period.


Asunto(s)
Asfixia/etiología , Ventilación Voluntaria Máxima , Postura , Restricción Física/efectos adversos , Adulto , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Aplicación de la Ley , Masculino , Esfuerzo Físico , Factores de Tiempo
7.
J Emerg Med ; 61(2): 131-139, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34006420

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The traditional model of emergency care may not be sufficient to address the complex care needs of older adults, who present to the emergency department with multiple comorbidities, geriatric syndromes, and social determinants of health, complicating diagnosis and management. Geriatric emergency departments (GEDs) have emerged throughout the last decade to address these concerns and improve the emergency care of older adults. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the policies, procedures, and workflow of our GEDs, and to provide data on patient outcomes and discuss challenges and recommendations in the development and implementation of a GED. DISCUSSION: Our GED includes interdisciplinary staff trained in geriatric emergency medicine, evidence-based protocols for geriatric care, physical modifications to accommodate older adults' functional limitations, administration of geriatric assessments, care coordination with case managers and social workers, and referrals to care. Assessments screen for geriatric syndromes and social determinants of health. Quality improvement is a critical component and includes a robust medication safety plan to reduce use of potentially inappropriate medications. Hospital administrators considering developing a GED should create a care planning team, conduct an institutional needs assessment, and identify the GED model that will most efficiently help them achieve an age-friendly health system. CONCLUSIONS: The GED will play an important role in addressing the diverse health care needs of older adults in the coming decades. Future research studies of health outcomes among older adults receiving care at GEDs compared with traditional EDs will be critical in informing future improvements and innovations in geriatric emergency care.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Geriatría , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
8.
J Emerg Med ; 61(4): 437-444, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of epidemiological data on ethnic disparities among older patients with COVID-19. The objective of this study was to characterize ethnic differences in clinical presentation and outcomes from COVID-19 among older U.S. adults. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study within two geriatric emergency departments (GEDs) at a large academic health system. One hundred patients 65 years or older who visited a GED between March 10, 2020 and August 9, 2020 and tested positive for COVID-19 were examined. Electronic medical records were used to determine presenting COVID-19-related symptoms, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics are reported with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In the overall sample, mean age was 75.9 years; 18% were 85 years or older; 50% were male; and 46.0% were Hispanic. Relative to non-Hispanic patients with COVID-19, Hispanic patients with COVID-19 had a higher percentage of shortness of breath (78.3% vs. 51.9%; difference: 26.4%; 95% CI 7.6-42.5%), pneumonia (82.6% vs. 50.0%; difference: 32.6%; 95% CI 14.1-47.9%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (13.0% vs. 1.9%; difference: 11.1%; 95% CI 0.7-23.9%), and acute kidney failure (41.3% vs. 22.2%; difference: 19.1%; 95% CI 0.9-36.0%). Rates of other poor outcomes, including hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, return visits to the GED within 30 days of discharge, or death, did not significantly differ between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data show that older Hispanic patients relative to non-Hispanic patients with COVID-19 presenting to a GED did not experience worse outcomes, including hospitalization, ICU admission, 30-day return visits to the GED, or death.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Etnicidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Emerg Med ; 61(3): 241-251, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34215470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no prior study that has documented emergency department (ED) outcomes or stratified mortality risks of cancer patients presenting with an acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ED treatment of these patients, to document their outcomes, and to identify risk factors associated with death. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on active cancer patients presenting with deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism to two academic EDs between July 2012 and June 2016. Key outcomes included mortality, ED revisit, and admission within 30 days. The patient cohort was characterized; crosstabs and regression analysis were performed to assess relative risks (RRs) and mitigating factors associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 355 patients, 9% died and 38% had one or more ED revisits or admissions. Recent immobility (RR 2.341, 95% CI 1.227-4.465), poor functional status (RR 2.090, 95% CI 1.028-4.248), recent admission (RR 2.441, 95% CI 1.276-4.669), and metastatic cancer (RR 4.669, 95% CI 1.456-14.979) were major risk factors for mortality. ED-provided anticoagulation reduced the overall mortality risk (RR 0.274, 95% CI 0.146-0.515) and mitigated the risk from recent immobility (RR 1.250, 95% CI 0.462-3.381), especially among patients with good or fair functional status. CONCLUSION: Immobility and cancer morbidity are key risk factors for mortality after an acute VTE, but ED-provided anticoagulation mitigates the risk of immobility among healthier patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status can help clinicians risk stratify these patients at presentation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(4): 735-740, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31227419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid related deaths have increased dramatically over the past 17 years. Although emergency physicians (EPs) have not been the primary force behind this rise, previous literature have suggested that EPs could improve their opioid prescribing practices. We designed this study to evaluate the trend in emergency department (ED) opioid prescriptions over time during the US opioid epidemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2018, evaluating all adult patients who presented to two study EDs for a pain-related complaint and received an analgesic prescription upon ED discharge. We compared these data to trends in lay media and medical literature regarding the opioid epidemic. We also evaluated the incidence of repeat ED visits based on the type of analgesic prescriptions provided. RESULTS: Opioid prescriptions decreased from 37.76% to 13.29% over the six year study period. This coupled with an increase in non-opioid medications from 6.12% to 11.33% and an increase in "no prescription" from 56.12% to 75.37%. This corresponded with an increase in the number of publications on the opioid epidemic within the lay-public and medical literature. Additionally, those patients that received no opiates were less likely to require a repeat ED visit. CONCLUSIONS: ED physicians are prescribing less opiates, while increasing the amount of non-narcotic analgesic prescriptions. This may be in response to the literature suggesting that prescription opioids play a large role in the opioids crisis. This decrease in opioid prescriptions did not increase the need for repeat ED visits.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Medicina de Emergencia/tendencias , Epidemia de Opioides/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Epidemia de Opioides/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
11.
J Emerg Med ; 59(3): 357-363, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32741575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) have experienced an increase in annual patient visits and length of stay over the past decade. Management of frequent-user patients with pain-related diagnoses are challenging in a time-limited setting. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe characteristics of frequent ED users with pain-related diagnoses. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of hospital ED visits from two EDs in using encounters from September 2016 to August 2018. Frequent users were characterized as having four or more visits in a 1-year period and were further classified into three categories based on the number of pain-related visits in the study period. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis results are reported for all demographic and clinical characteristics for index encounters, patient level data, and pain subgroups. RESULTS: Of all patients, 11.3% (n = 5174) were identified as frequent users, accounting for 38.9% (n = 91,114) of all ED visits. Overall, frequent pain users were more likely to be of middle age (odds ratio [OR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.72), female (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.79-3.29), have commercial insurance (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.37-2.66), and have 10 or more ED encounters (super user status) in a 12-month period (OR 23.66, 95% CI 17.12-32.71). CONCLUSION: Understanding characteristics of ED frequent users with pain-related diagnoses may inform community-based interventions designed to reduce episodic care and thereby improve care coordination and management.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Alta del Paciente , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
J Emerg Med ; 59(6): 952-956, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33139117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As many businesses reopen after government-induced restrictions, many public agencies and private companies, such as banks, golf courses, and stores, are using temperature screening to assess for possible coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection both for patrons and for employees. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the frequency of a fever ≥100.4°F and other symptoms associated with COVID-19 among patients in the emergency department (ED) who were tested in the ED for the illness. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of data from patients who were tested for acute COVID-19 infection from March 10, 2020 through June 30, 2020 at two EDs within the same health care system. Data collected included temperature, the presence or recent history of COVID-19-related symptoms, and COVID-19 test results. Descriptive statistics are reported for presenting fever and other COVID-19-related symptoms alone and in combination with presenting fever. RESULTS: A total of 6894 patients were tested for COVID-19. Among these, 330 (4.8%) tested positive for active infection. Of these patients, 64 (19.4%) presented with a fever ≥100.4°F (≥38.0°C). Increasing the number of COVID-19-related symptoms in combination with a presenting fever ≥100.4°F increased the number of people who could be identified as having a COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: About a quarter of patients who were tested positive for COVID-19 in our ED did not have a fever at presentation ≥100.4°F. Using only temperature to screen for COVID-19 in the community setting will likely miss the majority of patients with active disease.


Asunto(s)
Temperatura Corporal/fisiología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Termómetros/tendencias , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Fiebre/fisiopatología , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
J Emerg Med ; 58(3): 391-397, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When patients present to emergency departments (EDs) with symptoms suspicious for ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction, evaluation often includes imaging of the shunt with both computed tomography (CT) of the head without contrast and a plain radiograph "shunt series" (SS). Recent literature has called into question the diagnostic value of the SS for the detection of ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications, suggesting that the plain radiographs provide redundant information and unnecessary exposure to radiation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of abnormal SS plain radiography and head CT in the evaluation of shunt malfunction in all adult ED patients and to measure the association of abnormalities on CT and SS with surgical intervention. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all emergency department encounters at an urban level I trauma center between August 1, 2013 and October 3, 2018 in which an SS and head CT examination were performed within 24 h of each other. We described the results of imaging studies qualitatively and descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Positive findings on CT were significantly associated with the decision to proceed to surgery. Positive findings on SS, however, were not significantly associated with the decision to proceed to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The potential information gained from SS and convenience of ordering simultaneously with head CT does not appear to outweigh the risk of increased radiation exposure to the patient, the additional costs of the study, and the potential delay in time to head CT. These findings support the initial use of head CT in evaluation of shunt malfunction.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Derivación Ventriculoperitoneal , Adulto , Encefalopatías/etiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Derivación Ventriculoperitoneal/efectos adversos
14.
J Emerg Med ; 58(3): 457-463, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843323

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is commonly used to facilitate care in the emergency department. Acquired images are often reviewed by local experts for educational and quality assurance purposes. However, no published study has examined the accuracy and reliability of POCUS image interpretation by multiple reviewers. OBJECTIVES: We studied the accuracy and interrater agreement among expert and trainee reviewers of prerecorded pediatric skin and soft tissue (SST) POCUS images. METHODS: POCUS faculty and emergency medicine (EM) residents blindly reviewed deidentified pediatric SST POCUS images and indicated whether a drainable fluid collection was present, absent, or indeterminate. This was then compared with the gold standard based on discharge diagnoses and telephone follow-up. Images rated as indeterminate were excluded from the initial analysis. Sensitivity analysis assuming indeterminate answers were inaccurate was subsequently conducted. RESULTS: In phase 1, 6 pediatric EM POCUS directors reviewed 168 images. The overall accuracy was 79.7% (range 66.1-86.0%). The mean Cohen's kappa was 0.58 (range 0.24-0.84). Sensitivity analysis yielded an overall accuracy of 71.3% (range 56.5-76.9%) and a Cohen's kappa of 0.43 (range 0.20-0.59). In phase 2, 6 general EM POCUS faculty and 20 EM residents reviewed 120 images. The overall accuracy among residents was 72.2% (range 51.4-84.7%) and among faculty was 83.6% (range 77.9-88.8%). Sensitivity analysis yielded an overall resident accuracy of 63.0% (range 49.5-80.7) and an overall faculty accuracy of 73.9% (range 67.0-79.8%). Fleiss' kappa was 0.322 for residents and 0.461 for faculty. CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate accuracy and fair to good interrater agreement among POCUS faculty and EM residents reviewing pediatric SST POCUS images.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Docentes , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
15.
Ann Emerg Med ; 74(2): 270-275, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30704786

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Frequent users of the emergency department (ED) are often associated with increased health care costs. Limited research is devoted to frequent ED use within the increasing senior population, which accounts for the highest use of health care resources. We evaluate patient characteristics and patterns of ED use among geriatric patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study of ED visits among geriatric patients older than 65 years in 2013 and 2014. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent associations with frequent users. The setting was a nonpublic statewide database in California, which includes 326 licensed nonfederal hospitals. We included all geriatric patients within the database who were older than 65 years and had an ED visit in 2014, for a total of 1,259,809 patients with 2,792,219 total ED visits. The main outcome was frequent users, defined as having greater than or equal to 6 ED visits in a 1-year period, starting from their last visit in 2014. RESULTS: Overall, 5.7% of geriatric patients (n=71,449) were identified as frequent users of the ED. They accounted for 21.2% (n=592,407) of all ED visits. The associations of frequent ED use with the largest magnitude were patients with an injury-related visit (odds ratio 3.8; 95% confidence interval 3.8 to 3.9), primary diagnosis of pain (odds ratio 5.5; 95% confidence interval 5.4 to 5.6), and comorbidity index score greater than or equal to 3 (odds ratio 7.2; 95% confidence interval 7.0 to 7.5). CONCLUSION: Geriatric frequent users are likely to have comorbid conditions and be treated for conditions related to pain and injuries. These findings provide evidence to guide future interventions to address these needs that could potentially decrease frequent ED use among geriatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad/tendencias , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Dolor/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico
16.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(2): 291-293, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30415982

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare providers and law enforcement utilize spit socks to prevent exposure to communicable diseases transmitted by bodily fluid projection from agitated individuals. There are cases in which death is reported due to breathing being limited by a spit sock. There are no formally published studies on their use and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether wearing a spit sock causes a clinically significant impact on breathing. METHODS: Subjects sat with the spit mask over their heads for 15 min and their vital signs and ventilatory parameters were recorded after 5 min, 10 min and 15 min. Data were compared to baseline using Student's t-test with 95% confidence intervals using SPSS. RESULTS: The median age of the 15 subjects was 28 years and 53% were male. There was no significant difference between baseline and wearing the spit sock for 5, 10 or 15 min for heart rate (p = 0.250, p = 0.181, p = 0.546), oxygen saturation (p = 0.334, p = 1.00, p = 0.173), end-tidal pCO2 (p = 0.135, p = 0.384, p = 0.187), and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.485, p = 0.508, p = 0.915). The respiratory rate was not significantly different after 5 and 10 min (p = 0.898, p = 0.583), but decreased at 15 min (p = 0.048). The systolic blood pressure was lower after 5 and 10 min (p = 0.028, p = 0.045), but not significantly different at 15 min (p = 0.146). No subject indicated distress nor did the study need to be terminated due to pre-determined concerning vital signs or ventilatory parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy subjects there were no clinically significant changes in the physiologic parameters of breathing while wearing a spit sock.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Oxígeno/análisis , Equipo de Protección Personal , Adulto , Mordeduras Humanas/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Equipo de Protección Personal/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
17.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(9): 1699-1704, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30651182

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department (ED) utilization has increased for the last several decades. Despite a focus on adult frequent ED users, little research has examined pediatric frequent ED users. The purpose of this study was to assess pediatric ED utilization in California and to describe those identified as frequent ED users. METHODS: This was a retrospective multi-facility study of ED visits by children 1-17 years of age using statewide data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. Patients were classified into utilization groups by the number of ED visits in a one-year period prior to their last visit in 2016: occasional (1-5 visits) vs. frequent (>5 visits). Differences in patient characteristics were compared between occasional and frequent users. RESULTS: There were 690,130 patients between 1 and 17 years of age with 1,238,262 visits during the study period. Children with ≥6 visits (2.3%) accounted for 9.3% of all visits. 67% of frequent users had no visits to a pediatric ED. Over 40% (41.4%) of frequent users visited 2 or more hospitals, compared to 7.7% of occasional users. In multivariate analysis, the characteristics with the largest associations with frequent ED use were age, payer, and being admitted/transferred. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatric frequent users do not seek care in pediatric EDs. Age, prior admission, and Medicare/Medicaid appear to have the largest associations with pediatric patient frequent ED utilization.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , California , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
18.
J Emerg Med ; 57(1): 106-113, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31078346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Past studies suggest that patients who leave without being seen (LWBS) by a physician from a hospital's emergency department (ED) represent a quality and safety concern, and thus LWBS rates have often been used as an ED performance metric. There are few recent studies, however, that have examined the characteristics of the LWBS population at hospitals in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the LWBS population at a multi-hospital academic health system. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of electronic medical record data from EDs at two academic hospitals with a shared patient population that analyzed all LWBS visits during the 45-month period between July 2012 and March 2016. Demographic and clinical variables, including patient characteristics, chief complaint, acuity, and evidence of ongoing medical care, were assessed. RESULTS: During the study period, 2.4% of patients presenting to the study EDs left without being seen. This population tended to have lower-acuity chief complaints and nearly triple the number of ED visits as the general ED patient; 7.8% sought follow-up care from outpatient clinics and 24.8% returned to the ED within 7 days. Of this latter group, 11.5% were subsequently admitted for inpatient care, representing 0.068% of the total ED census during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: LWBS patients are high ED utilizers who may be effectively targeted by "hotspotting." Our 11.5% admission rate at return after LWBS compares favorably with the overall 20.9% admission rate at the study EDs and represents a small minority of all LWBS visits. Given the paucity of return ED visits after interval clinic encounters, our data suggest that patients who were seen in clinic had their medical complaint adequately resolved on a non-emergent outpatient basis, and that increased LWBS rates may reflect poor access to timely clinic-based care rather than intrinsic systemic issues within the ED.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/psicología , Conducta de Elección , Pacientes Internos/psicología , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/clasificación , Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , California , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Emerg Med ; 55(4): 573-581, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30181075

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel means of emergency department (ED) post-discharge communication-telephone callbacks and text messages-are increasingly being utilized to facilitate patient-oriented outcomes, such as ED revisits, patient adherence, and satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: The primary measure of interest is the rate of ED revisits in the week after discharge. The secondary measures of interests are rate of primary medical doctor (PMD) or specialist physician contact in the week after discharge and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Pilot randomized controlled trial with three groups: usual discharge; usual care + phone call 48 h after discharge asking if patients wanted to speak with a physician; or usual care + text message 48 h after discharge asking if patients wanted to speak with a physician. All participants received a 1-week assessment of patient satisfaction. ED revisit and contact with PMD or specialist physician within 7 days of discharge were obtained from electronic medical record and analyzed using χ2 test. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-one patients were enrolled and randomized (66 control, 103 phone, 82 text). Although the three groups did not show a statistically significant difference, the phone and text groups had similar and lower proportions of patients revisiting the ED (>50% reduction) and calling or visiting their PMD or specialist physician (approximately 30% reduction) than the control group (χ2 = 4.57, degrees of freedom [df] = 2, p = 0.10; χ2 = 1.36, df = 2, p = 0.51). There was no difference in patient satisfaction (χ2 = 2.88, df = 2, p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are contacted for ED follow-up by phone and text, though perhaps not more satisfied, may tend to revisit the ED and contact their PMD or specialty physician less often than patients receiving standard written discharge instructions. However, this pilot study is underpowered, so larger randomized studies are needed to confirm.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/normas , Comunicación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/normas , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Teléfono , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/psicología , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
J Emerg Med ; 55(5): 620-626, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30253951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A recent hepatitis A virus (HAV) outbreak in San Diego, California represents one of the largest HAV outbreaks in the United States. The County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency identified homelessness and illicit or injection drug use as risk factors for contracting HAV during this outbreak. OBJECTIVE: We describe those patients who presented to our Emergency Department (ED) and were identified as HAV positive. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study conducted at a tertiary care university health system's EDs from November 2016 to February 2018. Included were those of all ages who tested positive for HAV immunoglobulin M antibody. Outcome measures included: 1) demographic data; 2) number of patients testing positive for HAV by week and month of the outbreak; 3) homeless status, illicit and injection drug use, and alcohol use; 4) ED chief complaint; 5) initial liver function and coagulopathy test results, hepatitis B and C test results, and initial vital signs; 6) admission status; 7) death; and 8) the 7-day ED revisit rate for nonadmitted patients and the 30-day all-cause readmission rate for admitted patients. RESULTS: We identified 57,721 patients with at least one ED visit, and 1,453 of these were tested for HAV; 133 patients (9.2%) tested positive. Average age was 45.1 years, and 91 (68.4%) were male. Eighty-six patients (64.7%) were homeless and 53 patients (39.8%) reported illicit or injection drug use; 64 patients (48.1%) had chief complaints consistent with typical HAV symptoms. Most patients (112 or 84.2%) were admitted. Nine patients (6.8%) were admitted to a critical care setting; 8 patients (6%) died. CONCLUSIONS: During this large HAV outbreak, 9% of those screened for HAV tested positive. The majority were homeless, and 40% reported illicit or injection drug use. Most required hospitalization, and 6% of patients died.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , California/epidemiología , Femenino , Hepatitis A/mortalidad , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/mortalidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA