Choice of approach, but not femoral head size, affects revision rate due to dislocations in THA after femoral neck fracture: results from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register.

PURPOSE: Hip dislocation after arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remains a serious complication. The aim of our study was to investigate FNF patients treated with THA, with a special focus of comparing the effect of surgical approach and femoral head size on the risk of revision for dislocation. METHODS: Data were derived from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register, and we calculated the cumulative revision rates after surgery. For survival analysis, we used revision due to dislocation as an end-point. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the influence of various covariates (age, gender, femoral head size, surgical approach). RESULTS: A total of 8,813 primary THAs were registered from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013, of which 1,412 were due to FNF: 899 involved 28-mm femoral heads and the remaining 513 received 32-mm heads. The posterior approach was used in 1,156 cases and the anterolateral approach in 256.. At the end of the follow-up period, 74 hips had been revised for recurrent dislocation. Cox regression adjusting for age, gender and head size showed that the posterior approach had 2.3-times [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-5.0, p = 0.04] greater risk of revision for dislocation CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in order to reduce the early dislocation rate in FNF patients treated with THA, it is more effective to use the anterolateral approach than it is to select a femoral head size of 32 mm instead of 28 mm.

First outcome results after total knee and hip replacement from the Lithuanian arthroplasty register.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 2010, the Lithuanian Association of Arhtroplasty was established and on January 1, 2011, initiated a national study of all reoperations after total knee (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) in Lithuania. The aim of the study was to investigate the revision rates after TKR and THR at two years follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lithuanian patients undergoing primary TKR and THR from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012, were included in the study. The patient, surgery and prosthetic implantation data were collected via internet database. For reoperations we recorded the reason and type of revision, primary implantation date. We analyzed implant survival rates using any revision as an endpoint on included primary procedures, performed until September 1, 2013. RESULTS: The completeness of the register verified with state patients fund data reached 85% of all replacements. Out of 3823 primary TKR during the study period 25 revisions were performed with overall implant survival rate 99%. The main reason for knee revision was infections. During the inclusion period we registered 6072 primary THR and 149 revisions with overall implant survival rate 97%. Recurrent dislocation of prosthetic component was the main reason for hip revision. Significantly inferior survival results for femoral neck fracture patients were observed as compared with patients operated for osteoarthritis. Posterior approach as compared to others significantly affected inferior implant survival rates for femoral neck fracture patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival after total knee and hip replacements revealed a high treatment quality of this surgery in Lithuania.

Conventional drainage versus four hour clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in severe osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomised trial.

Total knee replacement in severe osteoarthritis usually requires extensive soft tissue releases often associated with considerable bleeding. In a prospective, randomised trial we compared postoperative conventional suction drainage versus four hour clamping drainage in 60 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. We compared blood loss, number of transfusions, postoperative complications and knee function and found significantly less postoperative blood loss through the drains (p < 0.001), and fewer blood transfusions (p = 0.09) were needed in the clamped group. We conclude that clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in severe osteoarthritis reduces blood loss through the drains and the need for blood transfusions.