Procedure-specific Cardiac Surgeon Volume associated with Patient outcome following Valve Surgery, but not Isolated CABG Surgery.

PURPOSE: Trends towards surgical sub-specialisation to improve patient-outcomes are well-documented and largely supported by evidence. However few studies have examined whether this benefit exists within adult-cardiac surgery. To answer whether sub-specialisation within adult-cardiac surgery improves patient-outcomes, this study assessed the relationship between procedure-specific and total-cardiac surgeon-volume and mortality and morbidity in cardiac-valve and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. METHODS: Data came from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) registry from 2001 to 2010 and included 23 hospitals, 109 surgeons, 20,619 patients with isolated-CABG-surgery and 11,536 patients with a valve-procedure. Hierarchical logistic regression using generalised estimating equations was used to analyse outcomes. Measures included operative-mortality and occurrence of a complication (deep sternal wound infection, new stroke, acute kidney injury). RESULTS: Crude operative mortality (and complication rates) were 1.7% (4.9%) and 4% (11%) in the isolated-CABG and valve-surgical populations respectively. A greater procedure-specific surgeon volume was associated with reduced mortality and complication rates in valve-surgery but not isolated-CABG. There was a 33% decrease in odds of dying for every additional 50 valve procedures performed [OR 0.67, p=0.003]. Conversely, greater total-cardiac surgical volume for individual surgeons did not result in improved outcomes, for both isolated-CABG and valve populations. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of an association between increased valve-specific surgeon volumes with improved valve-surgery outcomes, and absence of an association between these outcomes and annual total-cardiac surgical experience supports the case for sub-specialisation specifically within the field of valve surgery.

Stanford type a aortic dissection in pregnancy: a diagnostic and management challenge.

BACKGROUND: In women under the age of 40, over 50% of type A aortic dissections occur in the obstetric population. This is a complex situation, with potential catastrophic outcomes for mother and child. Time to diagnosis is often delayed by a low degree of suspicion, atypical presentation and difficulties investigating pregnant women. Management requires early involvement of multiple teams and appreciation of potential complications. We report our experience (the largest series described) and describe our surgical strategy. METHODS: A retrospective search of the cardiothoracic surgical database at our centre from 2002 to 2010 identified five pregnant women with type A dissections. RESULTS: Median time to diagnosis was 18.5 h (range 5.5-150 h) and median time from diagnosis to arrival in the operating theatre was 1.5 h (range 0.5-54 h). Four patients underwent concomitant Caesarean section and dissection repair. There was one maternal death and one unrelated foetal death. CONCLUSION: Occurrence of type A aortic dissection in pregnant women is uncommon but potentially catastrophic. A high index of suspicion and timely investigations are necessary to expedite definitive management. Sound surgical strategies and collaboration with appropriate teams are necessary to optimise outcome.

Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm - The Branch First Technique.

Surgical management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is complex. In particular, maintaining adequate spinal cord and reno-visceral protection during the operation can be challenging. We describe here a branch-first technique developed at our institution, endeavoring to minimized renal and visceral organ ischemic time, decrease risk of spinal cord injury, and provide a controlled and uncluttered field in which the surgeon can operate.