Impact of Submucosal Saline Injection During Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Sized 3-9 mm: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The role of submucosal injection during cold snare polypectomy (CSP) remains uncertain. In this study, we investigated the impact of submucosal saline injection during CSP for colorectal polyps sized 3-9 mm. METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in 6 Chinese centers between July and September 2020 (ChiCTR2000034423). Patients with nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 3-9 mm were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either CSP with submucosal injection (SI-CSP) or conventional CSP (C-CSP). The primary outcome was the incomplete resection rate (IRR). Secondary outcomes included procedure time, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and perforation. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients with 234 polyps in the SI-CSP group and 150 patients with 216 polyps in the C-CSP group were included in the analysis. The IRR was not decreased in the SI-CSP group compared with that in the C-CSP group (1.7% vs 1.4%, P = 1.000). The median procedure time in the SI-CSP group was significantly longer than that in the C-CSP group (108 seconds vs 48 seconds, P < 0.001). The incidences of intraprocedural bleeding and delayed bleeding were not significantly different between the 2 groups ( P = 0.531 and P = 0.250, respectively). There was no perforation in either group. DISCUSSION: Submucosal saline injection during CSP for colorectal polyps sized 3-9 mm did not decrease the IRR or reduce adverse events but prolonged the procedure time.

3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to 2 L polyethylene glycol in colonoscopic bowel preparation in relatively high-BMI (≥ 24 kg/m2) individuals: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for poor bowel preparation is controversial, and the optimal bowel preparation regimen for people with a high BMI is unclear. METHODS: We prospectively included 710 individuals with high BMIs (≥ 24 kg/m2) who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy from January to November 2021 at 7 hospitals. Participants were randomly allocated into 3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) group (n=353) and 2 L PEG group (n=357). The primary outcome was the rate of adequate bowel preparation, and the secondary outcomes included Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and adverse reactions during bowel preparation. Furthermore, we did exploratory subgroup analyses for adequate bowel preparation. RESULTS: After enrollment, 15 individuals didn't undergo colonoscopy, finally 345 participants took 3 L split-dose PEG regimen, and 350 participants took 2 L PEG regimen for colonoscopic bowel preparation. 3 L split-dose PEG regimen was superior to 2 L PEG regimen in the rate of adequate bowel preparation (81.2% vs. 74.9%, P = 0.045), BBPS score (6.71±1.15 vs. 6.37±1.31, P < 0.001), and the rate of polyp detection (62.0% vs. 52.9%, P = 0.015). The cecal intubation rate was similar in both groups (99.7%). Regarding adverse reactions, individuals were more likely to feel nausea in the 3 L PEG group (30.9% vs. 19.3%; P = 0.001); however, the degree was mild. In the subgroup analysis for adequate bowel preparation, 3 L split-dose PEG regimen performed better than 2 L PEG regimen in the overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 ) (P = 0.006) and individuals with constipation (P = 0.044), while no significant differences were observed in relatively normal (BMI 24-24.9 kg/m2) (P = 0.593) and obese individuals (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) (P = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: 3 L split-dose PEG regimen is superior to 2 L PEG regimen for colonoscopic Bowel Preparation in relatively high-BMI individuals, especially overweight individuals (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 ). TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2000039068). The date of first registration, 15/10/2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn.

The prospective multiple-centre randomized controlled clinical study of high-dose amoxicillin-proton pump inhibitor dual therapy for H. pylori infection in Sichuan areas.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of high-dose amoxicillin-proton pump inhibitor dual therapy, and to provide a new eradication regimen as a first-line option for patients with H. pylori infection. METHODS: A total of 971 H. pylori positive patients who received initial treatment were recruited from March to August 2020, and randomly divided into treatment group and control group. The treatment group received of 20 mg esomeprazole four times daily and 750 mg amoxicillin four times daily for 14 days. Control group received of 220 mg bismuth potassium citrate twice daily, 20 mg esomeprazole twice daily, 1000 mg amoxicillin twice daily and 250 mg clarithromycin capsule twice daily for 14 days. Four weeks after the end of treatment, the urea breath test was reviewed to detect whether H. pylori was eradicated. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in age, gender, the total clinical symptom scores before and after initial treatment, the compliance, and the degree of remission of symptoms before and after initial treatment between the two groups. The eradication rates of H. pylori between dual therapy and quadruple therapy were 88.31% and 85.26% (p=.158) by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 88.66% and 85.44% (p=.186) by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis, and 91.63% and 90.60% (p=.116) by PP analysis, respectively. Adverse events in dual therapy group were significantly lower than quadruple therapy group (13.3% vs. 28.2% (p<.01)). CONCLUSIONS: For the initial treatment of H. pylori infection, the high-dose dual therapy regimen has the same efficacy as the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy regimen, good compliance, less adverse reactions and high safety, so it can be recommended as the empirical first-line treatment regimen for the eradication of H. pylori (KY2019173).

[Study on the mechanism of protective effect of oral L-arginine on intestine after scald injury in rats].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the mechanism of protective effect of oral L-arginine (L-Arg) on the intestine after scald injury in rats. METHODS: Sixty-six Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into three groups: i.e. normal control (N, n = 6, without treatment), oral L-arginine group (A, n = 30, with 1 ml 70 g/L of L-Arg per os 2 times a day from 2 post scald hour (PSH)) on with normal enteral feeding and group B (n = 30, with oral feeding of cold boiled water after scald). The changes in the content of superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), endothelin (ET), ET/NO ratio in the intestine and the level of plasma endotoxin (LPS) in portal vein were assessed at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 PSH. Ileum tissue samples were harvested for pathological examination. RESULTS: The ET content in the intestinal tissue in A group at 6, 12 and 24 PSH (0.80 +/- 0.26 ng/g, 0.75 +/- 0.30 ng/g, 0.63 +/- 0.22 ng/g) was obviously lower than that in B group (1.26 +/- 0.38 ng/g, 1.34 +/- 0.37 ng/g, 0.97 +/- 0.19 ng/g, P < 0.05), but the NO contents in the intestine in A group at the same time points were significantly higher than that in B group (P < 0.01). The ET/NO ratio and the level of plasma endotoxin in A group were significantly lower than those in B group at each time point (P < 0.05 or 0.01). Pathological examination showed that the intestinal mucosal injury in the A group was obviously milder than that in the B group. CONCLUSION: Oral L-arginine was shown to have the effects to ameliorate ischemia reperfusion injury of the intestine and to protect the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa. This might be related to an increase in the NO level in intestinal mucosa resulting in maintenance of a stable ET/NO ratio.