RESUMEN
Recent changes in the classification of cervical adenocarcinomas have re-categorized serous carcinoma as potentially nonexistent. However, clinical and pathological profiles of cervical adenocarcinomas with serous-like morphological features have not been systematically evaluated using the latest taxonomy and biomarkers. We studied 14 cases of primary cervical carcinomas with serous-like morphologies (papillary and micropapillary patterns). None of these cases exhibited evidence of serous carcinoma involving the upper tracts. Patient ages ranged between 34 and 86 years, most presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Histologically, ten cases were classified as human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated carcinomas (eight usual-type endocervical adenocarcinomas and two adenosquamous carcinomas), of which six exhibited a papillary pattern and four had a micropapillary pattern. The four remaining cases were HPV-independent gastric-type adenocarcinomas, which displayed a papillary pattern in one case and a micropapillary pattern in three others. All ten HPV-associated carcinomas displayed block positive p16 and wild-type p53 by immunohistochemistry, with nine of them confirmed by HPV testing. Two of the four gastric-type adenocarcinomas had mutation-type p53, one of which also being p16 block positive. HER2 overexpression was demonstrated in 3/14 (21.4%) cases (2 HPV-associated and 1 HPV-independent). PD-L1 expression was identified in 4/10 (40%) cases, all HPV-associated. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed in two cases with a micropapillary pattern, revealing a missense variant in ATM in an HPV-associated tumor and missense variants in TP53 and SMARCB1 in an HPV-independent tumor. The results demonstrated that primary endocervical adenocarcinomas can mimic the appearance of serous carcinoma, while not representing serous carcinoma. Serous-like papillary and micropapillary patterns may be present in both HPV-associated and HPV-independent cervical carcinomas, but none of the cases studied were unequivocally serous upon detailed analysis. Our findings support the exclusion of "cervical serous carcinoma" from existing classifications of cervical adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Papilar/patología , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patología , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Adenocarcinoma Papilar/química , Adenocarcinoma Papilar/genética , Adenocarcinoma Papilar/virología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alphapapillomavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biopsia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/química , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/genética , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/virología , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación Missense , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/química , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/genética , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/virología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terminología como Asunto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/química , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/genética , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze the expression of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein in predicting the clinical outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The histologic specimens of 258 patients with Stage III to IVB nonkeratinizing NPC who were treated with radiotherapy alone (Group I) or concurrent-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Group II) were retrieved. Immunostaining on ERCC1 protein was performed. The relationship of ERCC1 expression and clinical outcomes was analyzed. RESULTS: The median ERCC1 score (proportion score of positively stained cells times intensity) was 200 (range, 0-300), and ERCC1 expression was defined as high if the score was above the median. In Group I high-score tumor had a statistically lower locoregional failure-free rate (LRFFR) compared with low-score tumor (p < 0.05) but not distant failure-free rate (DFFR) and overall survival (OS). In Group II no statistically differences were noted in LRFFR, DFFR and OS with regard to the ERCC1 expression. Resistance to cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in high-ERCC1 score tumor was not observed in Group II. Interestingly, low-score tumor in Group I achieved similar local and distant control compared with Group II. Multivariate analysis showed that ERCC1 score was an independent prognostic factor in LRFFR (p < 0.05) and approached statistical significance in failure-free survival (p = 0.08) and OS (p = 0.07). Tumor with high ERCC1 score had a 2-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.85) increased risk of locoregional failure. This may imply an association of ERCC1 expression with the repair of radiation damage. CONCLUSIONS: High ERCC1 expression predicts poor locoregional control in NPC. Chemotherapy response is not affected by ERCC1 expression. Further validation is required.