Comparison of outcomes for MR-guided versus CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in women with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to compare local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and dose to the organs at risk (OAR) in women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with MR-guided versus CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy (BT). METHODS: 56 patients (29 MR, 27 CT) were treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial BT between 2005-2015. The MR patients had been prospectively enrolled on a Phase II clinical trial. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) and Cox proportional hazards statistical modeling in JMP® & R®. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 19.7months (MR group) and 18.4months (CT group). There were no statistically significant differences in patient age at diagnosis, histology, percent with tumor size >4cm, grade, FIGO stage or lymph node involvement between the groups. Patients in the MR group had more lymphovascular involvement compared to patients in the CT group (p<0.01). When evaluating plans generated, there were no statistically significant differences in median cumulative dose to the high-risk clinical target volume or the OAR. 2-year K-M LC rates for MR-based and CT-based treatments were 96% and 87%, respectively (log-rank p=0.65). At 2years, OS was significantly better in the MR-guided cohort (84% vs. 56%, p=0.036). On multivariate analysis, squamous histology was associated with longer OS (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.72) in a model with MR BT (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08-1.18). There was no difference in toxicities between CT and MR BT. CONCLUSION: In this population of locally advanced cervical-cancer patients, MR-guided HDR BT resulted in estimated 96% 2-year local control and excellent survival and toxicity rates.

Outcomes with volume-based dose specification in CT-planned high-dose-rate brachytherapy for stage I-II cervical carcinoma: A 10-year institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for stage I-II cervical-cancer patients treated using computed-tomography (CT)-planned high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (BT). METHODS: A total of 150 patients were treated for Stage I-II cervical cancer using CT-planned BT between 4/2004 and 10/2014. Of these, 128 were eligible for inclusion. Kaplan-Meier local control (LC), pelvic control (PC), overall survival (OS), and PFS estimates were calculated. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 30months, the 2-year LC rate was 96%, PFS was 88%, and OS was 88%. Overall, 18 patients (14%) experienced any recurrence (AR), 8 had distant recurrence only and 10 had a combination of local, pelvic, regional, and distant recurrence. No patients had LR only. A prognostic factor for AR was tumor size >4cm (p=0.01). Patients with tumors >4cm were 3.3 times more likely to have AR than those with tumors ≤4cm (hazard ratio [HR]=3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-9.47). Point A was 85% of prescription for tumors < 4 cm and decreased approximately 3% over 5 fractions compared to 90% of prescription for tumors > 4 cm that decreased approximately 4% over 5 fractions. Two patients (2%) experienced grade≥2 late toxicity. There were no acute or late grade≥3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: CT-planned BT resulted in excellent local control and survival. Large tumor size was associated with an increased risk of recurrence outside the radiation field and worse PFS and OS. A volume-optimized plan treated a smaller area than a point A standard plan for patients with Stage I-II cervical cancer that have received chemoradiation. Given the outstanding LC achieved with modern therapy including chemoradiation, HDR, and image-based BT, further efforts to combat spread outside the radiation field with novel therapies are warranted.

The value of systematic contouring of the bowel for treatment plan optimization in image-guided cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dose-volume histogram metrics and optimization results of the contoured bowel in cervical cancer brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans of cervical cancer patients treated with image-guided high dose rate were retrospectively analyzed with institutional review board approval. In addition to the clinical target volume, rectum, bladder, and sigmoid, the bowel was contoured at the time of planning (Group 1) or at the time of this analysis (Group 2). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients treated with 145 insertions were included. Before optimization, mean ± 1 standard deviation overall bowel minimum dose to the most irradiated 2 cm3 volume of an organ (D2cc) was 67.8 Gyα/ß3 ± 13.7 Gyα/ß3 (Group 1: 72.6 ± 13.2 Gyα/ß3; Group 2: 57.3 ± 8.0 Gyα/ß3). Before optimization, one patient in Group 1 presented a bowel D2cc metric exceeding 100 Gyα/ß3. After optimization, bowel D2cc mean ± 1 standard deviation was 59.4 ± 6.7 Gyα/ß3 (Group 1: 61.4 ± 6.0 Gyα/ß3, p < 0.001; Group 2: 55.2 ± 6.5 Gyα/ß3, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Given the potentially high doses and the benefit of optimization in reducing dose to the organs at risk, we recommend consideration of systematic contouring of the bowel when bowel is present in the pelvis.

Image Guided Cervical Brachytherapy: 2014 Survey of the American Brachytherapy Society.

PURPOSE: To provide an update of the 2007 American brachytherapy survey on image-based brachytherapy, which showed that in the setting of treatment planning for gynecologic brachytherapy, although computed tomography (CT) was often used for treatment planning, most brachytherapists used point A for dose specification. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 45-question electronic survey on cervical cancer brachytherapy practice patterns was sent to all American Brachytherapy Society members and additional radiation oncologists and physicists based in the United States between January and September 2014. Responses from the 2007 survey and the present survey were compared using the χ(2) test. RESULTS: There were 370 respondents. Of those, only respondents, not in training, who treat more than 1 cervical cancer patient per year and practice in the United States, were included in the analysis (219). For dose specification to the target (cervix and tumor), 95% always use CT, and 34% always use MRI. However, 46% use point A only for dose specification to the target. There was a lot of variation in parameters used for dose evaluation of target volume and normal tissues. Compared with the 2007 survey, use of MRI has increased from 2% to 34% (P<.0001) for dose specification to the target. Use of volume-based dose delineation to the target has increased from 14% to 52% (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Although use of image-based brachytherapy has increased in the United States since the 2007 survey, there is room for further growth, particularly with the use of MRI. This increase may be in part due to educational initiatives. However, there is still significant heterogeneity in brachytherapy practice in the United States, and future efforts should be geared toward standardizing treatment.

Outcomes with image-based interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes of image-based versus non-image-based interstitial brachytherapy (IBBT) for vaginal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 72 patients with vaginal cancer treated with brachytherapy (BT), 47 had image guidance (CT=31, MRI=16) and 25 did not. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were generated for any recurrence, local control (LC), disease-free interval (DFI), and overall survival (OS) and Cox models were used to assess prognostic factors. RESULTS: Median age was 66 and median follow-up time was 24months. Median cumulative EQD2 dose was 80.8Gy in the non-IBBT group and 77Gy in the IBBT group. For non-IBBT versus IBBT, the 2-year KM LC was 71% vs. 93% (p=0.03); DFI was 54% vs. 86% (p=0.04); and OS 52% vs. 82% (p=0.35). On multivariate analysis, IBBT was associated with better DFI (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.73). Having any 2 or more of chemotherapy, high-dose-rate (HDR) BT or IBBT (temporally correlated variables) significantly reduced risk of relapse (HR=0.33, 95% CI=0.13-0.83), compared to having none of these factors. CONCLUSION: Over time, the use of chemotherapy, HDR, and IBBT has increased in vaginal cancer. The combination of these factors resulted in the highest rates of disease control. Image-guided brachytherapy for vaginal cancer patients maximizes disease control.

Pilot study assessing (18)F-fluorothymidine PET/CT in cervical and vaginal cancers before and after external beam radiation.

OBJECTIVE: The role of F-18-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET-CT imaging in the evaluation of gynecologic cancers has not been established. We sought to evaluate (FLT) PET-CT imaging in gynecologic cancers by comparing standard uptake values (SUVs) of FLT with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in the primary tumor at diagnosis, and assess FLT uptake immediately following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT). METHODS: In this pilot study, patients treated for cervical (5) or vaginal (1) cancer underwent FLT-PET and FDG-PET scanning at diagnosis (FLT1 and FDG1). Five patients (4 cervical and 1 vaginal) also underwent FLT-PET within 1-3 weeks after chemoRT before brachytherapy (FLT2). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the FLT1 and FDG1 parameters. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 61-years (range, 33-72). Cervical cancers were staged as IB2 (n = 1, 20%), IIB (n = 1, 20%), IIIB (n = 1, 20%) and IVA (n = 2, 40%) and the single vaginal cancer was staged IIIB. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3, 50%) followed by adenocarcinoma (n = 2, 33%) and clear-cell adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 1, 17%). Median tumor SUVmax at diagnosis was 7.8 on FLT1-PET (3.9-14.2) versus 11.6 (5.9-23.2) on FDG1-PET (p = 0.15). Tumor SUVmax of FLT declined 54%-100% after chemoRT. CONCLUSION: The tumor SUV of FLT at diagnosis was lower than that of FDG-PET. FLT uptake was markedly decreased after chemoRT. Results indicate that there may not be a significant effect of inflammation on FLT uptake in gynecologic cancers. FLT may be a useful tool when assessing the effects of chemoRT on gynecologic malignancies and planning for postchemoRT brachytherapy treatments.