RESUMEN
Parkinson's disease is clinically known for the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and accumulation of intraneuronal cytoplasmic inclusions rich in alpha-synuclein called 'Lewy bodies' and 'Lewy neurites'. Together with dementia with Lewy bodies and multiple system atrophy, Parkinson's disease is part of a group of disorders called synucleinopathies. Currently, diagnosis of synucleinopathies is based on the clinical assessment which often takes place in advanced disease stages. While the causal role of alpha-synuclein aggregates in these disorders is still debatable, measuring the levels, types or seeding properties of different alpha-synuclein species hold great promise as biomarkers. Recent studies indicate significant differences in peptide, protein and RNA levels in blood samples from patients with Parkinson's disease. Seed amplification assays using CSF, blood, skin biopsy, olfactory swab samples show great promise for detecting synucleinopathies and even for discriminating between different synucleinopathies. Interestingly, small extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes, display differences in their cargoes in Parkinson's disease patients versus controls. In this update, we focus on alpha-synuclein aggregation and possible sources of disease-related species released in extracellular vesicles, which promise to revolutionize the diagnosis and the monitoring of disease progression.
Asunto(s)
Exosomas , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Sinucleinopatías , Humanos , alfa-Sinucleína/metabolismo , Sinucleinopatías/patología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/metabolismo , Exosomas/metabolismo , BiomarcadoresRESUMEN
Parkinson's disease (PD) biomarkers are needed by both clinicians and researchers (for diagnosis, identifying study populations, and monitoring therapeutic response). Imaging, genetic, and biochemical biomarkers have been widely studied. In recent years, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have become a promising material for biomarker development. Proteins and molecular material from any organ, including the central nervous system, can be packed into EVs and transported to the periphery into easily obtainable biological specimens like blood, urine, and saliva. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles (published before November 15, 2022) reporting biomarker assessment in EVs in PD patients and healthy controls (HCs). Biomarkers were analyzed using random effects meta-analysis and the calculated standardized mean difference (Std.MD). Several proteins and ribonucleic acids have been identified in EVs in PD patients, but only α-synuclein (aSyn) and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) were reported in sufficient studies (n = 24 and 6, respectively) to perform a meta-analysis. EV aSyn was significantly increased in neuronal L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM)-positive blood EVs in PD patients compared to HCs (Std.MD = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 0.76-2.93, P = 0.0009). Further analysis of the biological sample and EV isolation method indicated that L1CAM-IP (immunoprecipitation) directly from plasma was the best isolation method for assessing aSyn in PD patients. Upcoming neuroprotective clinical trials immediately need peripheral biomarkers for identifying individuals at risk of developing PD. Overall, the improved sensitivity of assays means they can identify biomarkers in blood that reflect changes in the brain. CNS-derived EVs in blood will likely play a major role in biomarker development in the coming years. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Vesículas Extracelulares , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , alfa-Sinucleína/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Parkinson/metabolismoRESUMEN
Since the original description by James Parkinson, Parkinson's disease (PD) has intrigued us for over 200 years. PD is a progressive condition that is incurable so far, and affects millions of people worldwide. Over the years, our knowledge has expanded tremendously, and a range of criteria have been put forward and used to try to define PD. However, owing to the complexity of the problem, it is still not consensual how to diagnose and classify a disease that manifests with diverse features, and that responds differently to existing therapies and to those under development. We are now living a time when 'biological' information is becoming abundant, precise, and accessible enabling us to attempt to incorporate different sources of information to classify different forms of PD. These refinements are essential for basic science, as they will enable us to develop improved models for studying PD, and to implement new findings into clinical practice, as this will be the path towards effective personalized medicine.