Premorbid angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of the premorbid use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) on short-term mortality in patients with sepsis. DATA SOURCES: Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE were searched for studies based on the below eligibility criteria. The protocol was registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42022309129). STUDY SELECTION: Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, (2) patients with sepsis aged ≥16 years, and (3) received premorbid ACEI/ARB, or not. DATA EXTRACTION: The patient and study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. All analyses were presented with the use of random-effects models. The primary outcome was short-term mortality defined as ≤30-day, in-hospital, or intensive care unit (ICU)- mortality. The secondary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI). DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifteen studies (N = 96,159) met the eligibility criteria. Of these, eleven studies (N = 40,360) reported unadjusted short-term mortalities. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of short-term mortality with the premorbid use of ACEI/ARB was as follows: OR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67 to 1.11; P = 0.24, I2 = 88%. Five studies reported an adjusted OR of short-term mortality with the premorbid use of ACEI/ARB as follows: OR, 0.74; 95%CI, 0.59 to 0.93; P < 0.01, I2 = 93%. Seven studies reported the pooled adjusted OR of AKI with the premorbid use of ACEI/ARB as follows: OR: 1.57, 95%CI: 1.26-1.96, p < 0.01, I2 = 69%. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, the premorbid ACEI/ARB was associated with significantly lower short-term mortality in patients with sepsis despite the significantly higher risk of AKI.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in patients with low-flow very low-gradient aortic stenosis.

AIMS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), low-flow low-gradient (LG) is a known predictor of worse outcomes. However, very LG may represent a distinct population with further cardiac dysfunction. It is unknown whether this population benefits from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to describe the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of low-flow very LG severe AS. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre study included all patients with low-flow severe AS between 2019 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups with very LG [mean pressure gradient (MPG) ≤ 20 mmHg], LG (20 < MPG < 40 mmHg), and high-gradient (HG) (MPG ≥ 40 mmHg). Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization was compared. A total of 662 patients [very LG 130 (20%); LG 339 (51%); HG 193 (29%)] were included. Median follow-up was 12 months. Very LG cohort had a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45% vs. 57% vs. 60%; P < 0.001). There was a graded increase in the risk of composite endpoint in the lower MPG strata (P < 0.001). Among those who underwent TAVR, very LG was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (adjusted HR 2.42 [1.29-4.55]). While LG and HG cohorts had decreased risk of composite endpoint after TAVR compared with conservative management, very LG was not associated with risk reduction (adjusted HR 0.69 [0.35-1.34]). CONCLUSION: Low-flow very LG severe AS represents a distinct population with significant comorbidities and worse outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the short- and long-term benefits of TAVR in this population.

Spontaneous Left Main Coronary Artery Dissection in a Male.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is one of the causes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that is increasingly recognized in young to middle-aged women without typical coronary risk factors. This case report describes a 46-year-old male with a rare presentation of SCAD involving the left main (LM) coronary artery. The patient underwent an emergency coronary angiogram for high-risk ACS and had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of LM due to active ischemia and hemodynamic instability. The extension of intramural hematoma after the LM coronary artery stent confirmed the initial suspicion of SCAD. The diagnosis of SCAD is crucial, as its management differs from other causes of ACS. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing SCAD, with adjunctive imaging using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In this patient, his physical examination findings and further imaging raised a suspicion for systemic connective tissue disease. Genetic analysis was executed, but no reportable variants in any of the 29 genes studied were identified. This case highlights the importance of recognizing SCAD as a potential cause of ACS even in men and emphasizes the findings during coronary angiography that can aid in an accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Low Flow Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Low-flow (LF) aortic stenosis (AS) is common among older adults and associated with worse outcomes than AS with normal stroke volume. It is unknown whether left ventricular (LV) remodeling identifies patients with LF AS at higher risk of complications. LV remodeling was evaluated in 463 patients with severe LF AS referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and classified as adaptive (normal geometry and concentric remodeling) or maladaptive (concentric and eccentric hypertrophy) using the American Society of Echocardiography gender-specific criteria. Of these, the 390 patients who underwent TAVR were followed for the end points of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The mean patient age was 79 (74.5 to 84) years. LV remodeling was adaptive in 57.4% (62 normal geometry, 162 concentric remodeling) and maladaptive in 42.6% (127 concentric hypertrophy, 39 eccentric hypertrophy). During a median follow-up of 3 years, 45 patients (11.5%) were hospitalized for HF and 73 (18.7%) died. After adjustment for widely used echocardiographic parameters, maladaptive remodeling was independently associated with HF hospitalization and death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.75, confidence interval 1.03 to 3.00). There was no significant difference between men and women in the association of maladaptive LV remodeling with the composite outcome (p = 0.40 for men and p = 0.06 for women). In conclusion, in patients with LF AS, maladaptive LV remodeling before TAVR is independently associated with higher incidences of postprocedural HF rehospitalization and death in both men and women. Assessment of LV remodeling has prognostic value over and above LV ejection fraction and may improve risk stratification for patients with LF AS.

Prognostic Implication of Pulmonary Hypertension in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Prognostic implications of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in low-flow low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unexplored. We aimed to investigate the impact of baseline and changes in PH after TAVR. In this single-center retrospective study, we included patients who underwent TAVR for low-flow LG AS. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: baseline pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) <46 mm Hg (no-to-mild PH) and PASP ≥46 mm Hg (moderate-to-severe PH). On the basis of changes in PASP after TAVR, patients were stratified into increased (ΔPASP ≥ + 5 mm Hg), no change (-4 to +4 mm Hg), and decreased (≤ -5 mm Hg) groups. Primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. In total, 210 patients were included, 148 in the no-to-mild PH group and 62 in the moderate-to-severe PH group. Median follow-up was 13.2 months. The moderate-to-severe PH group was at an increased risk of composite end point (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8 to 6.9), all-cause mortality (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.6), and heart failure rehospitalization (HR 8.3, 95% CI 2.9 to 23.7). There were no differences in clinical outcomes among those with increased (32%), no change (28%), and decreased (39%) PASP after TAVR. In conclusion, moderate-to-severe PH at baseline is an independent predictor of worse clinical outcomes in patients with low-flow LG AS who undergo TAVR, and this cohort of patients do not seem to derive the benefits of postoperative reduction of PASP.

Effect of immunomodulation on cardiac remodelling and outcomes in heart failure: a quantitative synthesis of the literature.

AIMS: Immunomodulation in heart failure (HF) has been studied in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with variable effects on cardiac structure, function, and outcomes. We sought to determine the effect of immunomodulation on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), and all-cause mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) through meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (TSAs) of RCTs. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, Embase®, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically reviewed to identify RCTs that studied the effects of immunomodulation in patients with HFrEF. The primary endpoint in this analysis was change in LVEF. Secondary outcomes were changes in LVEDD and all-cause mortality. TSA was used to quantify the statistical reliability of data in the cumulative meta-analyses. Nineteen RCTs with 1341 HFrEF subjects were eligible for analyses. The aetiology of HF, specific immunomodulation strategy, and treatment duration were variable across trials. Immunomodulation led to a greater improvement in LVEF [mean difference: +5.7% 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.0-8.5%, P < 0.001] and reduction in LVEDD (mean difference: -3.7 mm, 95% CI: -7.0 to -0.4 mm, P = 0.028) than no immunomodulation in meta-analyses and TSAs. We observed a non-significant decrease in all-cause mortality among those on immumomodulation (risk ratio: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4-1.3, P = 0.234), but the Z-curve for cumulative treatment effect of immunomodulation in the TSA did not cross the boundary of futility. CONCLUSIONS: Immunomodulation led to improved cardiac structure and function in patients with HFrEF. While these benefits did not translate into a significant improvement in mortality, our analysis suggests that larger studies of targeted immunomodulation are needed to understand the true benefits.