Comparative Safety Analysis of Nabilone Versus Opioids: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Some have advocated that nabilone be used rather than opioids to manage chronic, noncancer pain, since the former drug may have a better safety profile. OBJECTIVE: We compared the safety of incident nabilone use relative to incident opioid use with respect to multiple clinically important outcomes. DESIGN: A population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Province of Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Persons aged 12 years and older, diagnosed with a musculoskeletal condition within the past 3 years prior to the index date. EXPOSURES: Incident nabilone use, with incident opioid use serving as the reference group. MEASUREMENTS: Within 3 months following the index date, we separately evaluated for pneumonia, motor vehicle accidents, falls or fractures, mental and behavioral disorder due to psychoactive substance use, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 18,863 incident nabilone users were propensity score matched to an equal number of opioid users. In the overall matched analysis, incident nabilone users vs. incident opioid users had significantly lower rates of pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.96), falls or fractures (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50-0.64), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95), but significantly higher rate of mental or behavioral disorder (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.45-3.43). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to rate of motor vehicle accidents. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounding may have influenced results. CONCLUSIONS: While usage of nabilone relative to opioids was associated with reduced rates of pneumonia, falls or fractures, and all-cause mortality, it was simultaneously associated with an increased rate of adverse mental health outcomes. This picture of mixed safety results raises concerns with the policy approach of broadly substituting use of opioids with nabilone. FUNDING SOURCE: Ontario Ministry of Health.

Association of ever use of e-cigarettes with health and lifestyle variables among young adults: a Canadian health measure survey study.

Research suggests that vaping raises oxidative stress levels and has been implicated in poor mental health. The objective of this study is to assess cross-sectional associations between quality of life (QOL) indicators and e-cigarette (EC) use in young Canadian adults. We used data from the 2016-2017 Canadian Health Measures Survey. We compared physical activity (daily steps), physiological measurements (high-density lipoprotein for cholesterol level), self-perceived life stress, mental health, and QOL between ever-use EC users and non-users. Multivariable binary or ordinal logistic regressions were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analyses included 905 participants (15-30 years) with 115 (12.7%) reporting EC use and 790 non-users. After adjusting for confounders, compared to non-users, EC users had significantly higher odds of being physically active (OR = 2.19, 95%CI: 1.14-4.20) but also with self-reported extreme life stress (OR = 2.68, 95%CI: 1.45-4.92). Albeit statistically non-significant, EC users also had higher odds of poorer QOL (OR = 1.12, 95%CI: 0.64-1.95). No statistically significant interactions between EC use, cigarette smoking, cannabis consumption and health outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study found that EC use was independently and significantly associated with increased odds of life stress and an indication of poorer QOL. Ongoing surveillance on young EC users is important to measure the long-term impact of vaping on their physical, mental health and quality of life to target for interventions. WHAT IS KNOWN: • E-cigarette use has been associated with high-risk behaviours and adverse mental health outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. WHAT IS NEW: • E-cigarette users had significantly higher odds of being physically active and higher amounts of life stress.

Effects of donor smoking history on early post-transplant lung function measured by oscillometry.

Introduction: Prior studies assessing outcomes of lung transplants from cigarette-smoking donors found mixed results. Oscillometry, a non-invasive test of respiratory impedance, detects changes in lung function of smokers prior to diagnosis of COPD, and identifies spirometrically silent episodes of rejection post-transplant. We hypothesise that oscillometry could identify abnormalities in recipients of smoking donor lungs and discriminate from non-smoking donors. Methods: This prospective single-center cohort study analysed 233 double-lung recipients. Oscillometry was performed alongside routine conventional pulmonary function tests (PFT) post-transplant. Multivariable regression models were constructed to compare oscillometry and conventional PFT parameters between recipients of lungs from smoking vs non-smoking donors. Results: The analysis included 109 patients who received lungs from non-smokers and 124 from smokers. Multivariable analysis identified significant differences between recipients of smoking and non-smoking lungs in the oscillometric measurements R5-19, X5, AX, R5z and X5z, but no differences in %predicted FEV1, FEV1/FVC, %predicted TLC or %predicted DLCO. An analysis of the smoking group also demonstrated associations between increasing smoke exposure, quantified in pack years, and all the oscillometry parameters, but not the conventional PFT parameters. Conclusion: An interaction was identified between donor-recipient sex match and the effect of smoking. The association between donor smoking and oscillometry outcomes was significant predominantly in the female donor/female recipient group.

Respiratory oscillometry with CT image analysis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis following single lung transplant.

Oscillometry is an emerging pulmonary function testing tool that is conducted during tidal breaths with minimal patient effort. It is highly sensitive to changes in lung mechanics. Oscillometry was recently shown to be highly associated with disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The usefulness of oscillometry after single lung transplant in IPF patients is not well understood. Our study demonstrated that oscillometry can detect changes in the graft despite presence of a native fibrotic lung to provide useful information to complement spirometry.

Pollution exposure in the 1st 3 months post transplant is associated with lower baseline FEV1 and higher CLAD risk.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to air pollution post lung transplant has been shown to decrease graft and patient survival. This study examines the impact of air pollution exposure in the first 3 months post-transplant on baseline (i.e. highest) forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) achieved and development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). METHODS: Double-lung transplant recipients (n=82) were prospectively enrolled for comprehensive indoor and personal environmental monitoring at 6- and 12-weeks post-transplant and followed for >4 years. Associations between clinical and exposure variables were investigated using an exposomics approach followed by analysis with a Cox Proportional Hazards model. Multivariable analyses were used to examine the impact of air pollution on baseline % predicted FEV1 (defined as the average of the 2 highest values achieved post-transplant) and risk of CLAD. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed a significant inverse relationship between personal black carbon (BC) levels and baseline % FEV1. The multivariable model indicated that patients with higher-than-median exposure to BC (>350 ng/m3) attained a baseline % FEV1 that was 8.8% lower than those with lower-than-median BC exposure (p = 0.019). Cox proportional hazards model analysis revealed that patients with high personal BC exposure had a 2.4 times higher hazard risk for CLAD than patients with low BC exposure (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Higher personal BC levels during the first 3 months post-transplant decreases baseline FEV1 and doubles the risk of CLAD. Strategies to reduce BC exposure early following lung transplant may help improve lung function and long-term outcomes.