A survey of stereotactic radiation therapy in veterinary medicine.

Radiotherapy plays an important role in curative and palliative cancer treatment. As a novel radiation delivery technique, stereotactic radiotherapy utilizes three-dimensional-conformal treatment planning, high-precision beam delivery technology, and patient specific position verification to target tumors, often in one to five high-dose fractions. Currently, there is no consensus about best stereotactic radiotherapy practices in veterinary radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to document the breadth of perspectives, techniques, and applications of stereotactic radiotherapy in veterinary medicine. We conducted an online survey of American College of Veterinary Radiology members specializing in radiation oncology to assess how, when, and why stereotactic radiotherapy is being used. Both stereotactic radiotherapy users and nonusers completed the survey. The overall response and survey completion rates were 54% (67/123) and 87% (58/67), respectively. Overall, 55% of respondents reported providing stereotactic radiotherapy at their facility, with a median of 4.5 canine cases and one feline case per month. Delivery methods included C-arm linear accelerator with multi-leaf collimator, helical tomotherapy, and CyberKnife. Nonpituitary intracranial tumors, pituitary tumors, and sinonasal tumors were the most common cancers treated using stereotactic radiotherapy in both species. The most common fractionation scheme was three fractions of 10 Gy/fraction. The results of this survey suggest common availability of stereotactic radiotherapy in veterinary radiation facilities. These results provide valuable information regarding current stereotactic radiotherapy practices in veterinary medicine, and may provide an initial step toward standardizing methods and establishing consensus guidelines.

SINGLE INSTITUTION VARIABILITY IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION TARGET DELINEATION FOR CANINE NASAL NEOPLASIA.

Contouring variability is a significant barrier to the accurate delivery and reporting of radiation therapy. The aim of this descriptive study was to determine the variation in contouring radiation targets and organs at risk by participants within our institution. Further, we also aimed to determine if all individuals contoured the same normal tissues. Two canine nasal tumor datasets were selected and contoured by two ACVR-certified radiation oncologists and two radiation oncology residents from the same institution. Eight structures were consistently contoured including the right and left eye, the right and left lens, brain, the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and planning target volume (PTV). Spinal cord, hard and soft palate, and bulla were contoured on 50% of datasets. Variation in contouring occurred in both targets and normal tissues at risk and was particularly significant for the GTV, CTV, and PTV. The mean metric score and dice similarity coefficient were below the threshold criteria in 37.5-50% and 12.5-50% of structures, respectively, quantitatively indicating contouring variation. This study refutes our hypothesis that minimal variation in target and normal tissue delineation occurs. The variation in contouring may contribute to different tumor response and toxicity for any given patient. Our results also highlight the difficulty associated with replication of published radiation protocols or treatments, as even with replete contouring description the outcome of treatment is still fundamentally influenced by the individual contouring the patient.