Screening for dilated cardiomyopathy in immediate family members: to whom, how, when (and where).

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of coronary artery disease, valvular disease, congenital heart disease, or altered haemodynamic conditions. Dilated cardiomyopathy can recognize multiple aetiologies, including infectious processes, effect of toxic substances, immunological mechanisms, and genetic causes. In recent years, many genes coding for proteins involved in the structure and function of the cardiomyocytes have been associated with the development of DCM, making the identification of familial forms increasingly frequent. At the same time, an ever-increasing use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has made it possible to identify early morpho-functional alterations in subjects with initial forms of the disease, or carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The increasingly in-depth understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms operating in DCM has also favoured the development of new therapeutic strategies including drugs with molecular targets and gene therapies. In this panorama, screening of family members of patients affected by DCM represents an important tool for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic stratification. In relation to its clinical relevance and its complexity, it is important that family screening and follow-up of identified patients are carried out in units dedicated to the treatment and study of cardiomyopathies.

State-of-the-Art of Endomyocardial Biopsy on Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Histologic evidence of myocardial inflammatory infiltrate not secondary to an ischemic injury is required by current diagnostic criteria to reach a definite diagnosis of myocarditis. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is therefore often indicated for the diagnosis of myocarditis, although it may lack sufficient sensitivity considering the limited possibility of myocardial sampling. Improving the diagnostic yield and utility of EMB is of high priority in the fields of heart failure cardiology and myocarditis in particular. The aim of the present review is to highlight indications, strengths, and shortcomings of current EMB techniques, and discuss innovations currently being tested in ongoing clinical studies, especially in the setting of acute myocarditis and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy. RECENT FINDINGS: EMB provides unique diagnostic elements and prognostic information which can effectively guide the treatment of myocarditis. Issues affecting the diagnostic performance in the setting of acute myocarditis and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathies will be discussed in this review in the light of recent expert consensus documents on the management of these conditions and on indication to EMB. Recent innovations using electroanatomic mapping (EAM)-guided EMB and fluoroscopic-guided EMB during temporary mechanical circulatory support have improved the utility of the procedure. EMB remains an important diagnostic test whose results need to be interpreted in the context of (1) clinical pre-test probability, (2) timing of sampling, (3) quality of sampling (4) site of sampling, (5) histologic type of myocarditis, and (6) analytic methods that are applied. Herein we will review these caveats as well as perspectives and innovations related to the use of this diagnostic tool.

Beyond Sarcomeric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: How to Diagnose and Manage Phenocopies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the most common phenocopies of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, their pathogenesis, and clinical presentation highlighting similarities and differences. We also suggest a step-by-step diagnostic work-up that can guide in differential diagnosis and management. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last years, a wider application of genetic testing and the advances in cardiac imaging have significantly changed the diagnostic approach to HCM phenocopies. Different prognosis and management, with an increasing availability of disease-specific therapies, make differential diagnosis mandatory. The HCM phenotype can be the cardiac manifestation of different inherited and acquired disorders presenting different etiology, prognosis, and treatment. Differential diagnosis requires a cardiomyopathic mindset allowing to recognize red flags throughout the diagnostic work-up starting from clinical and family history and ending with advanced imaging and genetic testing. Different prognosis and management, with an increasing availability of disease-specific therapies make differential diagnosis mandatory.

Electroanatomic mapping-guided endomyocardial biopsy in patients with apparently idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias.

The management of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in the presence of an apparently normal heart represents a major clinical challenge and a main field of clinical research. In the past years, new imaging techniques and the spreading of new generation genetic testing have improved our knowledge of the pathogenesis of apparently idiopathic VA. However, in the absence of specific recommendations, the type and the number of noninvasive and invasive studies necessary to rule out a possible underlying cause of VA or sudden cardiac death remain extremely variable. Therefore, in many patients the underlying cardiac disease is not recognized, and a possible specific therapeutic approach cannot be initiated. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) can provide a significant contribution to the identification of myocardial disorders causing VA but has never been definitively included in the routine diagnostic work-up of these patients due to the possible sampling error particularly in disorders with a focal or patchy distribution. Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) may guide EMB allowing to draw myocardial samples from abnormal voltage, areas of the ventricular wall, thus reducing sampling error and increasing the sensitivity of EMB. The systematic association of EAM with EMB represents a crucial approach to characterize the pathological substrate of electroanatomic abnormalities and VA and to further clarify the arrhythmogenic mechanisms of acquired and also inherited arrhythmic disorders.

From Atrial Fibrillation Management to Atrial Myopathy Assessment: The Evolving Concept of Left Atrium Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent genetically inherited cardiovascular disorder in adults and a significant cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Historically, atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considered as a critical aspect in HCM patients as it is considered to be a marker of disease progression, escalates the frequency of heart failure hospitalisations, increases the risk of thromboembolic events, and worsens quality of life and outcome. Increasing evidence suggests that AF is the result of a subtle long-standing process that starts early in the history of HCM. The process of left atrial dilation accompanied by morphologic and functional remodelling is the quintessential prerequisite for the onset of AF. This review aims to describe the current understanding of AF pathophysiology in HCM, emphasising the role of left atrial myopathy in its development. In addition, we discuss risk factors and management strategies specific to AF in the context of HCM, providing insights into the complexities and challenges of treating this specific patient population.

Optimal timing of follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with uncomplicated acute myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is central in the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of acute myocarditis (AM) but the timing of repeated CMR scans to assess edema resolution and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) stabilization remain unclear. We assessed edema and LGE evolution over 12 months to identify the optimal timing of repeat CMR evaluation in AM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with AM underwent CMR at clinical presentation (CMR-1), after 3 months (CMR-2) and after 12-months (CMR-3). CMR included assessment of edema and LGE, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular mass index (LVMi). After CMR-3 patients were followed-up every three-months by clinical evaluation, Holter-monitoring, and echocardiography. All patients had edema and LGE at CMR-1. At CMR-2 edema-positive segments (0.42 ± 0.34 vs. 3.18 ± 2.33, p < 0.005), LGE (4.98 ± 4.56 vs. 9.60 ± 8.58 g, and 4.22 ± 3.97% vs 7.50 ± 5.61%) and LVMi (69.82 ± 11.83 vs 76.06 ± 13.13 g/m2) (all p < 0.0001) significantly reduced, while LVEF (63.12 ± 5.47% vs.61.15 ± 6.87% p < 0.05) significantly improved, compared to CMR-1. At CMR-2 edema persisted in 7 patients (21%) but resolved at CMR-3 with no further changes of LVMi, LVEF and LGE. During follow-up (85 ± 15 months), 5 (15%) patients showed persistent ventricular arrhythmias. Univariate predictors of arrhythmic persistence were LGE extension at CMR-2 and CMR-3 (both p < 0.05), but not at CMR-1 (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with uncomplicated AM show edema resolution with LGE stabilization after 3 months. Further CMR evaluations should be limited to patients with persisting edema at this time. LGE extent measured after edema resolution is associated with persistent ventricular arrhythmias.

Real-world candidacy to mavacamten in a contemporary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy population.

AIMS: In the EXPLORER-HCM trial, mavacamten reduced left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and improved functional capacity of symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients. We sought to define the potential use of mavacamten by comparing real-world HOCM patients with those enrolled in EXPLORER-HCM and assessing their eligibility to treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected information on HOCM patients followed up at 25 Italian HCM outpatient clinics and with significant LVOTO (i.e. gradient ≥30 mmHg at rest or ≥50 mmHg after Valsalva manoeuvre or exercise) despite pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapy. Pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapy resolved LVOTO in 1044 (61.2%) of the 1706 HOCM patients under active follow-up, whereas 662 patients (38.8%) had persistent LVOTO. Compared to the EXPLORER-HCM trial population, these real-world HOCM patients were older (62.1 ± 14.3 vs. 58.5 ± 12.2 years, p = 0.02), had a lower body mass index (26.8 ± 5.3 vs. 29.7 ± 4.9 kg/m2 , p < 0.0001) and a more frequent history of atrial fibrillation (21.5% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.027). At echocardiography, they had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 66 ± 7% vs. 74 ± 6%, p < 0.0001), higher left ventricular outflow tract gradients at rest (60 ± 27 vs. 52 ± 29 mmHg, p = 0.003), and larger left atrial volume index (49 ± 16 vs. 40 ± 12 ml/m2 , p < 0.0001). Overall, 324 (48.9%) would have been eligible for enrolment in the EXPLORER-HCM trial and 339 (51.2%) for treatment with mavacamten according to European guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world HOCM patients differ from the EXPLORER-HCM population for their older age, lower LVEF and larger atrial volume, potentially reflecting a more advanced stage of the disease. About half of real-world HOCM patients were found eligible to mavacamten.

Myocarditis and COVID-19 related issues.

The recent COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic by SARS-CoV2 infection has caused millions of deaths and hospitalizations across the globe. In the early pandemic phases, the infection had been initially considered a primary pulmonary disease. However, increasing evidence has demonstrated a wide range of possible cardiac involvement. Most of systemic and cardiac damage is likely sustained by a complex interplay between inflammatory, immune-related and thrombotic mechanisms. Biventricular failure and myocardial damage with elevation of cardiac biomarkers have been reported in COVID-19 patients, although histological demonstration of acute myocarditis has been rarely documented. Indeed while cardiac magnetic resonance findings include different patterns of myocardial involvement in terms of late gadolinium enhancement, histological data from necropsy and endomyocardial biopsy showed peculiar inflammatory patterns, mostly composed by macrophages. On the other hand COVID-19 vaccines based on mRN technology have been also associated with increased risk of myocarditis. COVID-19 and mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis present different clinical and imaging presentations and recent data suggest the presence of distinctive immunological mechanisms involved.

Opportunities and drawbacks of the subcutaneous defibrillator across different clinical settings.

INTRODUCTION: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an established therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and an alternative to a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system in selected patients. Beyond randomized clinical trials, many observational studies have described the clinical performance of S-ICD across different subgroups of patients. AREAS COVERED: Our review aimed to describe the opportunities and drawbacks of the S-ICD, focusing on their use in special populations and across different clinical settings. EXPERT OPINION: The choice to implant S-ICD should be based on the patient's tailored approach, which takes into account the adequate S-ICD screening at rest or during stress, the infective risk, the ventricular arrhythmia susceptibility, the progressive nature of the underlying disease, the work or sports activity, and the risk of lead-related complications.

The Diagnostic Value of the 12-Lead ECG in Arrhythmogenic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Novel ECG Signs.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic (ECG) findings in arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (ALVC) are limited to small case series. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the ECG characteristics of ALVC patients and to correlate ECG with cardiac magnetic resonance and genotype data. METHODS: We reviewed data of 54 consecutive ALVC patients (32 men, age 39 ± 15 years) and compared them with 84 healthy controls with normal cardiac magnetic resonance. RESULTS: T-wave inversion was often noted (57.4%), particularly in the inferior and lateral leads. Low QRS voltages in limb leads were observed in 22.2% of patients. The following novel ECG findings were identified: left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) (20.4%), pathological Q waves (33.3%), and a prominent R-wave in V1 with a R/S ratio ≥0.5 (24.1%). The QRS voltages were lower in ALVC compared with controls, particularly in lead I and II. At receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the sum of the R-wave in I to II ≤8 mm (AUC: 0.909; P < 0.0001) and S-wave in V1 plus R-wave in V6 ≤12 mm (AUC: 0.784; P < 0.0001) effectively discriminated ALVC patients from controls. It is noteworthy that 4 of the 8 patients with an apparently normal ECG were recognized by these new signs. Transmural late gadolinium enhancement was associated to LPFB, a R/S ratio ≥0.5 in V1, and inferolateral T-wave inversion, and a ringlike pattern correlated to fragmented QRS, SV1+RV6 ≤12 mm, low QRS voltage, and desmoplakin alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological Q waves, LPFB, and a prominent R-wave in V1 were common ECG signs in ALVC. An R-wave sum in I to II ≤8 mm and SV1+RV6 ≤12 mm were specific findings for ALVC phenotypes compared with controls.

Prediction of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: role of vasodilator challenge.

AIMS: Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is an indicator of right ventricular (RV) function and an independent predictor of right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Administration of vasodilator challenge during right heart catheterization (RHC) could reduce RV workload allowing a better assessment of its functional reserve. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing LVAD implantation at our Institution between May 2013 and August 2021 were enrolled. Only patients who had undergone RHC and vasodilator challenge with sodium nitroprusside were analyzed. We collected all available clinical, instrumental, and haemodynamic parameters, at baseline and after nitroprusside infusion and evaluated potential associations with post-LVAD RVF. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 19 (35%) developed RVF after LVAD implantation. Fractional area change (FAC) (OR: 0.647, CI: 0.481-0.871; P = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR: 0.856, CI: 0.761-0.964; P = 0.010), and post-sodium nitroprusside (NTP) PAPi (OR: 0.218, CI: 0.073-0.653; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of post-LVAD RVF. The model combining FAC, PASP, and post-NTP PAPi demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 90.7%. Addition of post-NTP PAPi significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support right-sided heart failure risk score [79.4 vs. 70.4%; area under the curve (AUC): 0.841 vs. 0.724, P = 0.022] and the CRITT score (79.6% vs. 74%; AUC: 0.861 vs. 0.767 P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Post-NTP PAPi has observed to be an independent predictor of RVF following LVAD implantation. Dynamic assessment of PAPi using a vasodilator challenge may represent a method of testing RV functional reserve in candidates for LVAD implantation. Larger and prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Long-Term Mortality Comparison of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Treated With Culprit-Only or Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether, in a real word context of patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), multivessel disease (MVD) and cardiogenic shock (CS), the successful treatment with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) of only culprit lesions (OC-PCI) is associated with better long-term mortality rates than multivessel PCI (MV-PCI) of all significant lesions. METHODS: From our registry of all consecutive patients admitted for AMI between January 1995 and December 2016 we selected those presenting with CS and MVD successfully treated with p-PCI, and compared those who underwent OC-PCI against MV-PCI, either during the p-PCI (MV-pPCI) or by staged revascularization (Staged-PCI) during hospitalization. The primary endpoint was 2-year all-cause death. RESULTS: Among 4210 patients with AMI, 406 (9.6%) presented CS (Killip class IV). A total of 292 patients had MVD. Of them, 252 (86.3%) were successfully treated with p-PCI, 159 patients with OC-PCI and 93 with MV-PCI, either in the same (n = 29) or staged procedure (n = 64). At 2-year follow-up the overall mortality was 47.6%, lower in MV-PCI group (37.6% vs 53.5% in OC-PCI, p = 0.019). Diabetes (HR = 1.50, 1.01-2.22), three vessel disease (HR = 1.49, 1.02-2.17) and basal left ventricular ejection fraction <15% (HR = 3.39, 2.41-6.27) were independent predictors of mortality, while MV-PCI was the only variable associated with improved survival (HR = 0.54, 0.36-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: In this real world registry of AMI patients with MVD presenting CS, MV-PCI was associated with better long-term survival.

Prevalence, causes and predictors of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous studies assessing the natural history of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), there is lack of data regarding the burden of hospitalization. Aim of this study was to describe prevalence, causes and predictors of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with HCM. METHODS: We retrospectively included 253 patients with HCM undergoing first evaluation at our center. Enrolment criteria included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) at baseline and > 1-year follow-up. All hospital admissions were recorded during follow-up and adjudicated as acute vs elective and cardiovascular (CV) vs non-cardiovascular (non-CV). RESULTS: During 6.4 ± 4.0 years there were 187 hospitalizations in 92 patients (36%, at a rate of 5.7%/year). Most were CV-related (158/187,84.5%; 4.8%/year) while non-CV admissions were 29/187 (15.5%, 0.88%/year). There was a slight predominance of elective (n = 96, 58%, 2.8%/year) vs acute (n = 62, 41.8%, 2.0%/year) CV hospitalizations. Independent predictors of CV hospitalization were baseline symptoms (NYHA class II vs I: HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.24-3.43, NYHA III-IV vs I: HR 3.05; 95% CI 1.40-6.65, p = .004), indexed left atrial (LA) volume (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p < .001), and lower indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume iRVEDV) at cardiac magnetic resonance (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In little over 6 years, CV hospitalization was required in over one-in-three of our HCM patients, often unplanned and due to acute disease-related complications. Symptomatic status, larger LA volume and reduced iRVEDV at baseline were independently associated with CV admissions. Strategies aimed at preventing hospitalizations are an important target to reduce the burden of disease in HCM patients.

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Comparison of Patients With Left Main Vs Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

INTRODUCTION: It is not clear if differences exist about treating left main bifurcation (LMB) and non-left main bifurcation (non-LMB) lesions by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We prospectively analyzed all consecutive patients treated at our center for bifurcation lesions from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015, including acute myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiogenic shock, and compared the angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with LMB and non-LMB lesions treated with PCI and second-generation drug-eluting stent (2G-DES) implantation. The primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) composite, including MI, clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization (TVR), and cardiac death (CD) at 2-year follow-up. We also compared the angiographic patency of the vessel, which was a composite of the restenosis-reocclusion (RR) rate. RESULTS: Out of 1081 patients (1368 bifurcations), a total of 320 patients had LMB (29%). Overall, procedural success was 98.4%. Clinical follow-up rate was 100%. Angiographic follow-up rate was 83.7%. No differences were seen regarding the primary endpoint of all MACE (17.8% in LMB vs 18.0% in non-LMB; P>.99), MI rate (4.3% in LMB vs 2.9% in non-LMB; P=.20), and CD (8.7% in LMB vs 5.8% in non-LMB; P=.08). The overall RR rate was 11.8%, with 5% RR rate in the LMB group (16/320 lesions) and 9.7% RR rate in the non-LMB group (102/1048 lesions); P<.01. The LMB group had a better TVR rate (5.0% vs 9.4% in the non-LMB group; P=.01). CONCLUSION: PCI with 2G-DES for LMB has better target-vessel patency and TVR rates when compared with non-LMB lesions, without clinical differences in terms of 2-year clinical outcomes.