Decrease in platelet count in patients with AKI and its association with major adverse kidney events.

INTRODUCTION: A reduction in platelet count in critically ill patients is a marker of severity of the clinical condition. However, whether this association holds true in acute kidney injury (AKI) is unknown. We analyzed the association between platelet reduction in patients with AKI and major adverse kidney events (MAKE). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, we included AKI patients at the Hospital Civil of Guadalajara, in Jalisco, Mexico. Patients were divided according to whether their platelet count fell >21% during the first 10 days. Our objectives were to analyze the associations between a platelet reduction >21% and MAKE at 10 days (MAKE10) or at 30-90 days (MAKE30-90) and death. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2023, 400 AKI patients were included, 134 of whom had a > 21% reduction in platelet count. The mean age was 54 years, 60% were male, and 44% had sepsis. The mean baseline platelet count was 194 x 103 cells/µL, and 65% of the KDIGO3 patients met these criteria. Those who underwent hemodialysis (HD) had lower platelet counts. After multiple adjustments, a platelet reduction >21% was associated with MAKE10 (OR 4.2, CI 2.1-8.5) but not with MAKE30-90. The mortality risk increased 3-fold (OR 2.9, CI 1.1-7.7, p = 0.02) with a greater decrease in the platelets (<90 x 103 cells/µL). As the platelets decreased, the incidence of MAKE was more likely to increase. These associations lost significance when accounting for starting HD. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective cohort of patients with AKI, a > 21% reduction in platelet count was associated with MAKE. Our results are useful for generating hypotheses and motivating us to continue studying this association with a more robust design.

A reduction in platelet count in critically ill patients has been associated with a worse prognosis, but it is not yet known whether this relationship also exists in patients with acute kidney injury, who are more susceptible to platelet decrease due to the syndrome or due to the onset of hemodialysis. In our study of acute kidney injury patients, we found that those whose platelet count decreased >21% during the first days were more likely to experience a major kidney event. In addition, the greater the decrease in platelet count was, the more likely these events were to occur. The significance of this association was lost in patients who start hemodialysis. Our conclusions could serve to generate hypotheses about this interesting relationship.

Biomarker-Concordant Steroid Administration in Severe Coronavirus Disease-2019.

BACKGROUND: Although corticosteroids have become the standard of care for patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) on supplemental oxygen, there is growing evidence of differential treatment response. This study aimed to evaluate if there was an association between biomarker-concordant corticosteroid treatment and COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS: This registry-based cohort study included adult COVID-19 hospitalized patients between January 2020 and December 2021 from 109 institutions. Patients with available C-reactive protein (CRP) levels within 48 h of admission were evaluated. Those on steroids before admission, stayed in the hospital for <48 h, or were not on oxygen support were excluded. Corticosteroid treatment was biomarker-concordant if given with high baseline CRP ≥150 mg/L or withheld with low CRP (<150 mg/L) and vice-versa was considered discordant (low CRP with steroids, high CRP without steroids). Hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using varying CRP level thresholds. The model interaction was tested to determine steroid effectiveness with increasing CRP levels. RESULTS: Corticosteroid treatment was biomarker-concordant in 1778 (49%) patients and discordant in 1835 (51%). The concordant group consisted of higher-risk patients than the discordant group. After adjusting for covariates, the odds of in-hospital mortality were significantly lower in the concordant group than the discordant (odds ratio [95% confidence interval (C.I.)] = 0.71 [0.51, 0.98]). Similarly, adjusted mortality difference was significant at the CRP thresholds of 100 and 200 mg/L (odds ratio [95% C.I.] = 0.70 [0.52, 0.95] and 0.57 [0.38, 0.85], respectively), and concordant steroid use was associated with lower need for invasive ventilation for 200 mg/L threshold (odds ratio [95% C.I.] = 0.52 [0.30, 0.91]). In contrast, no outcome benefit was observed at CRP threshold of 50. When the model interaction was tested, steroids were more effective at reducing mortality as CRP levels increased. CONCLUSION: Biomarker-concordant corticosteroid treatment was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality in severe COVID-19.

Probiotics in septic acute kidney injury, a double blind, randomized control trial.

INTRODUCTION: During acute kidney injury (AKI) due to sepsis, the intestinal microbiota changes to dysbiosis, which affects the kidney function recovery (KFR) and amplifies the injury. Therefore, the administration of probiotics could improve dysbiosis and thereby increase the probability of KFR. METHODS: In this double-blind clinical trial, patients with AKI associated with sepsis were randomized (1:1) to receive probiotics or placebo for 7 consecutive days, with the objectives of evaluate the effect on KFR, mortality, kidney replacement therapy (KRT), urea, urine volume, serum electrolytes and adverse events at day 7. RESULTS: From February 2019 to March 2022, a total of 92 patients were randomized, 48 to the Probiotic and 44 to Placebo group. When comparing with placebo, those in the Probiotics did not observe a higher KFR (HR 0.93, 0.52-1.68, p = 0.81), nor was there a benefit in mortality at 6 months (95% CI 0.32-1.04, p = 0.06). With probiotics, urea values decreased significantly, an event not observed with placebo (from 154 to 80 mg/dl, p = 0.04 and from 130 to 109 mg/dl, p = 0.09, respectively). Urinary volume, need for KRT, electrolyte abnormalities, and adverse events were similar between groups. (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03877081) (registered 03/15/2019). CONCLUSION: In AKI related to sepsis, probiotics for 7 consecutive days did not increase the probability of KFR, nor did other variables related to clinical improvement, although they were safe.

Use of an extended KDIGO definition to diagnose acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19: A multinational study using the ISARIC-WHO clinical characterisation protocol.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common and significant problems in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, little is known about the incidence and impact of AKI occurring in the community or early in the hospital admission. The traditional Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition can fail to identify patients for whom hospitalisation coincides with recovery of AKI as manifested by a decrease in serum creatinine (sCr). We hypothesised that an extended KDIGO (eKDIGO) definition, adapted from the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) 0by25 studies, would identify more cases of AKI in patients with COVID-19 and that these may correspond to community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI) with similarly poor outcomes as previously reported in this population. METHODS AND FINDINGS: All individuals recruited using the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC)-World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Characterisation Protocol (CCP) and admitted to 1,609 hospitals in 54 countries with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection from February 15, 2020 to February 1, 2021 were included in the study. Data were collected and analysed for the duration of a patient's admission. Incidence, staging, and timing of AKI were evaluated using a traditional and eKDIGO definition, which incorporated a commensurate decrease in sCr. Patients within eKDIGO diagnosed with AKI by a decrease in sCr were labelled as deKDIGO. Clinical characteristics and outcomes-intensive care unit (ICU) admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital death-were compared for all 3 groups of patients. The relationship between eKDIGO AKI and in-hospital death was assessed using survival curves and logistic regression, adjusting for disease severity and AKI susceptibility. A total of 75,670 patients were included in the final analysis cohort. Median length of admission was 12 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7, 20). There were twice as many patients with AKI identified by eKDIGO than KDIGO (31.7% versus 16.8%). Those in the eKDIGO group had a greater proportion of stage 1 AKI (58% versus 36% in KDIGO patients). Peak AKI occurred early in the admission more frequently among eKDIGO than KDIGO patients. Compared to those without AKI, patients in the eKDIGO group had worse renal function on admission, more in-hospital complications, higher rates of ICU admission (54% versus 23%) invasive ventilation (45% versus 15%), and increased mortality (38% versus 19%). Patients in the eKDIGO group had a higher risk of in-hospital death than those without AKI (adjusted odds ratio: 1.78, 95% confidence interval: 1.71 to 1.80, p-value < 0.001). Mortality and rate of ICU admission were lower among deKDIGO than KDIGO patients (25% versus 50% death and 35% versus 70% ICU admission) but significantly higher when compared to patients with no AKI (25% versus 19% death and 35% versus 23% ICU admission) (all p-values <5 × 10-5). Limitations include ad hoc sCr sampling, exclusion of patients with less than two sCr measurements, and limited availability of sCr measurements prior to initiation of acute dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: An extended KDIGO definition of AKI resulted in a significantly higher detection rate in this population. These additional cases of AKI occurred early in the hospital admission and were associated with worse outcomes compared to patients without AKI.

Assessment of a modified renal angina index for AKI prediction in critically ill adults.

BACKGROUND: The renal angina index (RAI) is a useful tool for risk stratification of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill children. We evaluated the performance of a modified adult RAI (mRAI) for the risk stratification of AKI in critically ill adults. METHODS: We used two independent intensive care unit (ICU) cohorts: 13 965 adult patients from the University of Kentucky (UKY) and 4789 from University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW). The mRAI included: diabetes, presence of sepsis, mechanical ventilation, pressor/inotrope use, percentage change in serum creatinine (SCr) in reference to admission SCr (ΔSCr) and fluid overload percentage within the first day of ICU admission. The primary outcome was AKI Stage ≥2 at Days 2-7. Performance and reclassification metrics were determined for the mRAI score compared with ΔSCr alone. RESULTS: The mRAI score outperformed ΔSCr and readjusted probabilities to predict AKI Stage ≥2 at Days 2-7: C-statistic: UKY 0.781 versus 0.708 [integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) 2.2%] and UTSW 0.766 versus 0.696 (IDI 1.8%) (P < 0.001 for both). In the UKY cohort, only 3.3% of patients with mRAI score <10 had the AKI event, while 16.4% of patients with mRAI score of ≥10 had the AKI event (negative predictive value 96.8%). Similar findings were observed in the UTSW cohort as part of external validation. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill adults, the adult mRAI score determined within the first day of ICU admission outperformed changes in SCr for the prediction of AKI Stage ≥2 at Days 2-7 of ICU stay. The mRAI is a feasible tool for AKI risk stratification in adult patients in the ICU.

Recognition and management of community-acquired acute kidney injury in low-resource settings in the ISN 0by25 trial: A multi-country feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is increasingly encountered in community settings and contributes to morbidity, mortality, and increased resource utilization worldwide. In low-resource settings, lack of awareness of and limited access to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions likely influence patient management. We evaluated the feasibility of the use of point-of-care (POC) serum creatinine and urine dipstick testing with an education and training program to optimize the identification and management of AKI in the community in 3 low-resource countries. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patients presenting to healthcare centers (HCCs) from 1 October 2016 to 29 September 2017 in the cities Cochabamba, Bolivia; Dharan, Nepal; and Blantyre, Malawi, were assessed utilizing a symptom-based risk score to identify patients at moderate to high AKI risk. POC testing for serum creatinine and urine dipstick at enrollment were utilized to classify these patients as having chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute kidney disease (AKD), or no kidney disease (NKD). Patients were followed for a maximum of 6 months with repeat POC testing. AKI development was assessed at 7 days, kidney recovery at 1 month, and progression to CKD and mortality at 3 and 6 months. Following an observation phase to establish baseline data, care providers and physicians in the HCCs were trained with a standardized protocol utilizing POC tests to evaluate and manage patients, guided by physicians in referral hospitals connected via mobile digital technology. We evaluated 3,577 patients, and 2,101 were enrolled: 978 in the observation phase and 1,123 in the intervention phase. Due to the high number of patients attending the centers daily, it was not feasible to screen all patients to assess the actual incidence of AKI. Of enrolled patients, 1,825/2,101 (87%) were adults, 1,117/2,101 (53%) were females, 399/2,101 (19%) were from Bolivia, 813/2,101 (39%) were from Malawi, and 889/2,101 (42%) were from Nepal. The age of enrolled patients ranged from 1 month to 96 years, with a mean of 43 years (SD 21) and a median of 43 years (IQR 27-62). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (418/2,101; 20%). At enrollment, 197/2,101 (9.4%) had CKD, and 1,199/2,101 (57%) had AKD. AKI developed in 30% within 7 days. By 1 month, 268/978 (27%) patients in the observation phase and 203/1,123 (18%) in the intervention phase were lost to follow-up. In the intervention phase, more patients received fluids (observation 714/978 [73%] versus intervention 874/1,123 [78%]; 95% CI 0.63, 0.94; p = 0.012), hospitalization was reduced (observation 578/978 [59%] versus intervention 548/1,123 [49%]; 95% CI 0.55, 0.79; p < 0.001), and admitted patients with severe AKI did not show a significantly lower mortality during follow-up (observation 27/135 [20%] versus intervention 21/178 [11.8%]; 95% CI 0.98, 3.52; p = 0.057). Of 504 patients with kidney function assessed during the 6-month follow-up, de novo CKD arose in 79/484 (16.3%), with no difference between the observation and intervention phase (95% CI 0.91, 2.47; p = 0.101). Overall mortality was 273/2,101 (13%) and was highest in those who had CKD (24/106; 23%), followed by those with AKD (128/760; 17%), AKI (85/628; 14%), and NKD (36/607; 6%). The main limitation of our study was the inability to determine the actual incidence of kidney dysfunction in the health centers as it was not feasible to screen all the patients due to the high numbers seen daily. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter, non-randomized feasibility study in low-resource settings demonstrates that it is feasible to implement a comprehensive program utilizing POC testing and protocol-based management to improve the recognition and management of AKI and AKD in high-risk patients in primary care.

Continuous renal replacement therapy principles.

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is an extracorporeal blood purification therapy that aims to support kidney function over an extended period of time. One of the main objectives of CRRT is the removal of excess fluid and solutes retained as a consequence of acute kidney injury. Because prescription of CRRT requires goals to be set with regard to the rate and extent of solute and fluid removal, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism by which solute and fluid removal occurs during CRRT is essential. Basic mechanisms of fluid transport and solute removal (ultrafiltration, diffusion, convection, and adsorption) and the factors influencing these processes in CRRT are described. From the combination of the different transport mechanisms, a number of CRRT modalities are identified and described. Finally, these principles are applied to provide a brief overview of the concept of effluent-based CRRT dose.

Nephrologist Interventions to Avoid Kidney Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Based on the pathophysiology of acute kidney injury (AKI), it is plausible that certain early interventions by the nephrologist could influence its trajectory. In this study, we investigated the impact of 5 early nephrology interventions on starting kidney replacement therapy (KRT), AKI progression, and death. METHODS: In a prospective cohort at the Hospital Civil of Guadalajara, we followed up for 10 days AKI patients in whom a nephrology consultation was requested. We analyzed 5 early interventions of the nephrology team (fluid adjustment, nephrotoxic withdrawal, antibiotic dose adjustment, nutritional adjustment, and removal of hyperchloremic solutions) after the propensity score and multivariate analysis for the risk of starting KRT (primary objective), AKI progression to stage 3, and death (secondary objectives). RESULTS: From 2017 to 2020, we analyzed 288 AKI patients. The mean age was 55.3 years, 60.7% were male, AKI KDIGO stage 3 was present in 50.5% of them, sepsis was the main etiology 50.3%, and 72 (25%) patients started KRT. The overall survival was 84.4%. Fluid adjustment was the only intervention associated with a decreased risk for starting KRT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.70, and p ≤ 0.001) and AKI progression to stage 3 (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.49-0.71, and p ≤ 0.001). Receiving vasopressors and KRT were associated with mortality. None of the interventions studied was associated with reducing the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort study of AKI patients, we found for the first time that early nephrologist intervention and fluid prescription adjustment were associated with lower risk of starting KRT and progression to AKI stage 3.

Acute kidney injury in renal trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: The kidney is the most commonly injured organ of the genitourinary system during trauma. We describe the associated risk factors for the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with renal trauma (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data from 65 patients who suffered RT from 2015 to 2019 at the Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and AKI risk factors were described. We assessed the risk factors related to AKI development. RESULTS: In our study cohort, 60 (92.3%) patients were men, mean age 25 (20 - 30) years; the most common cause of RT was firearm injury in 26 (40%) of patients and 46 (70%) required surgery. AKI associated with RT developed in 39 (60%) patients. There were no differences between patients with or without AKI requiring nephrectomy (35.9 vs. 19.2%, p = 0.15). RT was classified as high-grade in 37 (56.9%) cases; high-grade RT increased four-fold the probability of AKI (adjusted OR 3.95, p = 0.05). A model for AKI prediction during RT was built with the most relevant variables: firearm injury, shock, emergency surgery, high-grade RT, and liver injury, all predicting AKI (ROC-AUC of 0.74 p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: AKI occurred in 60% of cases with RT, and it was significantly associated with high-grade RT. Further studies will be required to confirm this association in other populations, which could lead to an earlier and proactive management of AKI in this setting.

Dose in continuous renal replacement therapy.

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is one of the most used types of renal replacement therapies for the treatment of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Recent practice clinical guidelines based on recent clinical trials recommend a prescribed dose of 20-25 mL/kg/h of effluent since these trials could not find differences between high-intensity versus low-intensity CRRT dose and different outcomes as mortality and recovery of renal function. Nevertheless, the results of these recent trials do not mean that CRRT dose is not important, and on the contrary, these trials inform us that dose needs to be continuously assessed and modified according to clinical, metabolic, and physiological needs of each patient. Dose prescription in CRRT needs to be a dynamic and precise process, in which evidence-based quality measures will be used to guide CRRT dose prescription that will match daily patients needs. Delivered dose should be routinely monitored to ensure that it will be achieved. Quality measures for monitoring delivered dose of CRRT have been proposed, but they still need validation, before be implemented into clinical practice.

Las terapias de reemplazo renal continuo (TRRC) son de los tipos mas empleados de terapias de reemplazo renal para el tratamiento de pacientes con lesión renal aguda (IRA) críticamente enfermos. Guías de practica clínica recientemente publicadas basadas en estudios clínicos recomiendas prescribir una dosis de efluente de 20-25 ml/kg/h, ya que estos ensayos clínicos no pudieron encontrar diferencias en desenlaces como mortalidad o recuperación de la función renal. Sin embargo, el resultado de estos ensayos clínicos recientes no significan que la dosis en TRRC no sea importante, por el contrario estos estudios nos muestran que la dosis tienen que ser continuamente evaluada y modificada de acuerdo a las necesidades clínicas, metabólicas, y fisiológicas de cada paciente. La prescripción de dosis en TRRC necesita ser un proceso dinámico y preciso, en el cual medidas de calidad basadas en evidencia serian empleadas para guiar la prescripción de dosis que cubra las necesidades diarias del paciente. La dosis proporcionada debe de ser constantemente monitorizada para asegurar de que esta sea lograda. Se han propuesto medidas de calidad para la monitorización de la dosis entregada de TRRC, pero aun necesitan ser validadas antes de ser implementadas en la practica clínica diaria.

Indications and timing of renal replacement therapy.

The management of patients with acute kidney injury is mainly supportive in nature, with no available proven therapeutic modalities to treat the condition. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is indicated in patients with severe kidney injury, or increased volume or metabolic demands. In the absence of clinically significant uremic symptoms or specific indications such as severe electrolyte abnormalities or volume overload, the optimal timing of RRT initiation is controversial. Randomized, controlled trials that have compared strategies of early versus delayed initiation of RRT in the absence of obvious indications have yielded conflicting results. The implementation of decision support systems is challenging but could provide clinicians a framework with specific recommendations for interventions. Recently, some algorithms have been proposed to guide physicians in the decision to initiate, and their application in clinical practice may reduce variations across physicians and centers. The decision on the appropriate time to start RRT is complex, integrating numerous variables, and should largely be individualized, however the lack of definitive parameters to define early or late initiation reveals a great need to continue research on this field. Such evidence is important for reducing variations in the clinical practice of RRT prescription and improving patient outcomes.

El tratamiento de la lesión renal aguda es principalmente de soporte, ya que no se disponen de terapias efectivas para tratar esta enfermedad. La terapia de reemplazo renal (TRR) esta indicada en pacientes con lesión renal aguda secundaria a sepsis grave, o cuando existen demandas metabólicas incrementadas o sobrecarga de volumen. El tiempo de inicio óptimo de TRR en ausencia de síndrome urémico clínicamente significativo, o cuando existen indicaciones especificas como alteraciones en los electrolitos o sobrecarga de volumen es controversial. Estudios clínicos aleatorizados y controlados que han comparado estrategias de inicio temprano versus inicio tardío de TRR han mostrado resultados contradictorios. La implementación de un sistema de soporte para la toma de decisiones constituye un reto, pero podría proveer a los clínicos una estructura con recomendaciones especificas para intervenciones terapéuticas. Recientemente, se han propuesto algunos algoritmos para guiar a los médicos en la toma de decisiones acerca de cuando iniciar la TRR, y la aplicación de estos algoritmos en la practica clínica podría reducir la variabilidad en relación a la toma de decisiones entre diferentes médicos y centros. La decisión en cuanto al tiempo ideal de inicio de TRR es complejo, integra varias variables, y debiera ser individualizado; sin embargo, la falta de parámetros categóricos para definir un inicio temprano versus un inicio tardío nos muestran la necesidad de seguir investigando en esta área. Tal evidencia es importante para reducir la variaciones en la práctica clínica de la prescripción de TRR y para mejorar los desenlaces en los pacientes.

Fluid overload in the ICU: evaluation and management.

BACKGROUND: Fluid overload is frequently found in acute kidney injury patients in critical care units. Recent studies have shown the relationship of fluid overload with adverse outcomes; hence, manage and optimization of fluid balance becomes a central component of the management of critically ill patients. DISCUSSION: In critically ill patients, in order to restore cardiac output, systemic blood pressure and renal perfusion an adequate fluid resuscitation is essential. Achieving an appropriate level of volume management requires knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology, evaluation of volume status, and selection of appropriate solution for volume repletion, and maintenance and modulation of the tissue perfusion. Numerous recent studies have established a correlation between fluid overload and mortality in critically ill patients. Fluid overload recognition and assessment requires an accurate documentation of intakes and outputs; yet, there is a wide difference in how it is evaluated, reviewed and utilized. Accurate volume status evaluation is essential for appropriate therapy since errors of volume evaluation can result in either in lack of essential treatment or unnecessary fluid administration, and both scenarios are associated with increased mortality. There are several methods to evaluate fluid status; however, most of the tests currently used are fairly inaccurate. Diuretics, especially loop diuretics, remain a valid therapeutic alternative. Fluid overload refractory to medical therapy requires the application of extracorporeal therapies. In critically ill patients, fluid overload is related to increased mortality and also lead to several complications like pulmonary edema, cardiac failure, delayed wound healing, tissue breakdown, and impaired bowel function. Therefore, the evaluation of volume status is crucial in the early management of critically ill patients. Diuretics are frequently used as an initial therapy; however, due to their limited effectiveness the use of continuous renal replacement techniques are often required for fluid overload treatment. Successful fluid overload treatment depends on precise assessment of individual volume status, understanding the principles of fluid management with ultrafiltration, and clear treatment goals.

Renal Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Biomarkers have become important tools in the diagnosis and management of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS), a complex condition characterized by dysfunction in both the cardiovascular and renal systems. Biomarkers can help identify the presence and severity of CRS, predict its progression and outcomes, and facilitate personalized treatment options. Several biomarkers, including natriuretic peptides, troponins, and inflammatory markers, have been extensively studied in CRS, and have shown promising results in improving diagnosis and prognosis. In addition, emerging biomarkers, such as kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, offer potential for early detection and intervention of CRS. However, the use of biomarkers in CRS is still in its infancy, and further research is needed to establish their utility in routine clinical practice. This review highlights the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of CRS, and discusses their potential as valuable clinical tools for personalized medicine in the future.

Acute Kidney Injury: Gaps and Opportunities for Knowledge and Growth.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs frequently in hospitalized patients, regardless of age or prior medical history. Increasing awareness of the epidemiologic problem of AKI has directly led to increased study of global recognition, diagnostic tools, both reactive and proactive management, and analysis of long-term sequelae. Many gaps remain, however, and in this article we highlight opportunities to add significantly to the increasing bodies of evidence surrounding AKI. Practical considerations related to initiation, prescription, anticoagulation, and monitoring are discussed. In addition, the importance of AKI follow-up evaluation, particularly for those surviving the receipt of renal replacement therapy, is highlighted as a push for global equity in the realm of critical care nephrology is broached. Addressing these gaps presents an opportunity to impact patient care directly and improve patient outcomes.

Bicarbonate-Based Solution for the Management of Established Acute Kidney Injury: A Pilot Open-Label Observation Study.

Background Administration of intravenous (IV) solutions constitutes a key component of acute kidney injury (AKI) management. However, the optimal IV fluid solution in the setting of AKI remains uncertain. In this study, we assessed whether the use of bicarbonate-containing solution in patients with established AKI is associated with early renal recovery as compared to bicarbonate-free solutions. Methods We performed an open-label observational pilot study in 59 patients with established AKI. IV fluid solutions that were used include bicarbonate-based solution with low chloride content (80 mEq/L of 8% sodium bicarbonate in a solution that contains 77 mEq/L of sodium, 77 mEq/L of chloride and 25 g/L of glucose) or solutions without bicarbonate with high chloride content (0.9% normal saline, 0.45% half-saline, normal ringer, or 4% succinylated gelatine). We evaluated the association of IV fluids type with renal recovery. Results The median age of study participants was 66 years (inter-quartile range (IQR) 37-85), and 59% (n=35) were men. The prevalence of diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-3 were 34% (n=20) and 39% (n=23), respectively. Patients who received bicarbonate-based IV solutions had a greater reduction of serum creatinine (sCr) per day (delta sCr) as compared with patients who received bicarbonate-free solutions (-0.29±0.47 vs. 0.07±0.42; p=0.007). The renal recovery was faster in patients who received bicarbonate-based solutions as compared to the bicarbonate-free group (days from peak sCr to baseline sCr: 5.6±2.1 vs. 7.6±2.8; p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions We observed faster renal recovery in patients with established AKI who received the bicarbonate-based solution with low chloride content. Our study findings require confirmation in larger cohorts.