Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Healthc Manage Forum ; 25(3): 151-4, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252331

RESUMEN

Efforts are underway at the international, national, provincial/territorial, and local levels to address factors like income, education, and environment that influence the health of Canadians. Also known as the social determinants of health, these factors are closely linked to health equity. There are important Canadian innovations in research, practice, and policy that reflect our growing understanding of social determinants. However, concerted efforts are still required by health professionals to address social determinants of health through their work settings.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Salud Pública , Canadá , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Organización Mundial de la Salud
3.
Dev World Bioeth ; 9(2): 74-80, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18445072

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Ethical guidelines are designed to ensure benefits, protection and respect of participants in clinical research. Clinical trials must now be registered on open-access databases and provide details on ethical considerations. This systematic survey aimed to determine the extent to which recently registered clinical trials report the use of standard of care and post-trial obligations in trial registries, and whether trial characteristics vary according to setting. METHODS: We selected global randomized trials registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and http://www.controlled-trials.com. We searched for intervention trials of HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis from 9 October 2004, the date of the most recent version of the Helsinki Declaration, to 10 April 2007. RESULTS: We collected data from 312 trials. Fifty-eight percent (58%, 95% CI = 53 to 64) of trial protocols report informed consent. Fifty-eight percent (58%, 95% CI = 53 to 64) of trials report active controls. Almost no trials (1%, 95% CI = 0.5 to 3) mention post-trial provisions. Most trials measure surrogate outcomes. Twenty percent (20%, 95% CI = 16 to 25) of trials measure patient-important outcomes, such as death; and the odds that these outcomes are in a low income country are five times greater than for a developed country (odds ratio (OR) 5.03, 95% CI = 2.70 to 9.35, p = < 0.001). Pharmaceutical companies are involved in 28% (CI = 23 to 33) of trials and measure surrogate outcomes more often than nonpharmaceutical companies (OR 2.45, 95% CI = 1.18 to 5.09, p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: We found a large discrepancy in the quality of reporting and approaches used in trials in developing settings compared to wealthier settings.


Asunto(s)
Ética en Investigación , Consentimiento Informado/normas , Obligaciones Morales , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Países Desarrollados , Países en Desarrollo , Declaración de Helsinki , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/métodos , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Justicia Social
5.
BMC Public Health ; 8: 168, 2008 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18492256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Experience with public engagement activities regarding the risks and benefits of science and technology (S&T) is growing, especially in the industrialized world. However, public engagement in the developing world regarding S&T risks and benefits to explore health issues has not been widely explored. METHODS: This paper gives an overview about public engagement and related concepts, with a particular focus on challenges and benefits in the developing world. We then describe an Internet-based platform, which seeks to both inform and engage youth and the broader public on global water issues and their health impacts. Finally, we outline a possible course for future action to scale up this and similar online public engagement platforms. RESULTS: The benefits of public engagement include creating an informed citizenry, generating new ideas from the public, increasing the chances of research being adopted, increasing public trust, and answering ethical research questions. Public engagement also fosters global communication, enables shared experiences and methodology, standardizes strategy, and generates global viewpoints. This is especially pertinent to the developing world, as it encourages previously marginalized populations to participate on a global stage. One of the core issues at stake in public engagement is global governance of science and technology. Also, beyond benefiting society at large, public engagement in science offers benefits to the scientific enterprise itself. CONCLUSION: Successful public engagement with developing world stakeholders will be a critical part of implementing new services and technologies. Interactive engagement platforms, such as the Internet, have the potential to unite people globally around relevant health issues.


Asunto(s)
Participación de la Comunidad , Salud Global , Difusión de la Información , Opinión Pública , Abastecimiento de Agua , Países en Desarrollo , Salud , Política de Salud , Internet , América Latina , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA