Early targeted heart rate exercise is safe and May hasten return-to-duty in service members with acute concussion, a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of an exercise tolerance assessment and intervention added to the Progressive Return to Activity Clinical Recommendations (PRA-CR) in acutely concussed service members (SMs). METHODS: This non-randomized, pilot trial was performed at one center. SMs in the experimental group (ERG) performed the Buffalo Concussion March-in-place Test (BCMT) at every clinic visit and were prescribed at least 20 minutes/day of targeted exercise in addition to PRA-CR. Data for the control group (SCG) were extracted from the same clinic immediately prior to ERG. SMs in both groups were assessed by the same clinician to determine return-to-duty. RESULTS: BCMT identified concussion-related exercise intolerance in 100% (n = 14) at screening visit (mean 3.4 days after injury) and in 0% (n = 7) who had recovered. No adverse effects were associated with BCMT. The estimated recovery time for ERG who performed the exercise intervention (n = 12) was 17.0 (12.8, 21.2) days and for SCG (n = 15) was 23.7 (19.9, 27.5) days (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Assessment of exercise tolerance was feasible and could be incorporated into the PRA-CR. Future definitive, randomized controlled trials should be performed to assess the effectiveness of exercise reset program for SMs after concussion.

RETRACTED - Intra-individual Cognitive Variability: An Examination of ANAM4 TBI-MIL Simple Reaction Time Data from Service Members with and without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Objectives: The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics 4 TBI-MIL (ANAM4) is a computerized cognitive test often used in post-concussion assessments with U.S. service members (SMs). Existing evidence, however, remains mixed regarding ANAM4's ability to identify cognitive issues following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Studies typically examine ANAM4 by comparing mean scores to baseline or normative scores. A more fine-grained approach involves examining inconsistency within an individual's performance. Methods: Data from a sample of 231 were healthy control SMs and 100 SMs within 7 days of mTBI who took the ANAM4 were included in analyses. We examine each individual's performance on a simple reaction time (SRT) subtest that is administered at the beginning (SRT1) and end (SRT2) of the ANAM4 battery, and calculate the standard deviation of difference scores by trial across administrations. Results: Multivariate analysis of variance and univariate analyses revealed group differences across all comparisons (p<.001) with pairwise comparisons revealing higher intra-individual variability and slower raw reaction time for the mTBI group compared with controls. Effect sizes were small though exceeded the recommended minimum practical effect size (ES>0.41). Conclusions: While inconsistencies in performance are often viewed as noise or test error, the results suggest intra-individual cognitive variability may be more sensitive than central tendency measures (i.e., comparison of means) in detecting changes in cognitive function in mTBI. Additionally, the findings highlight the utility of ANAM4's repeating a subtest at two points in a battery to explore within-subject differences in performance. (JINS, 2017, 23, 1-6).

Headache complexity (number of symptom features) differentiates post-traumatic from non-traumatic headaches.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic headaches are a common sequela of mild traumatic brain injury (concussion). It is unclear whether or how these headaches differ phenotypically from primary headaches. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether there is an overarching unobserved latent trait that drives the expression of observed features of post-traumatic headache and other headaches. METHODS: Data from this post-hoc analysis come from the Warrior Strong Cohort Study conducted from 2010 through 2015. Approximately 25,000 soldiers were screened for concussion history at routine post-deployment health assessments. A random sample was invited to participate, enrolling 1567. Twelve observed headache phenotypic features were used to measure "headache complexity", the latent trait of clinical interest, using single factor confirmatory factor analysis. We compared headache complexity between groups and determined whether headache complexity predicted accessing medical care for headache. RESULTS: Of 1094 soldiers with headaches, 198 were classified as having post-traumatic headache. These headaches were compared to those in the other soldiers (647 without concussion history and 249 with concussion history). Soldiers with post-traumatic headache had greater endorsement of all 12 headache features compared to the soldiers with non-concussive headaches. The confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit (χ2 (51) = 95.59, p = 0.0002, RMSEA = 0.03, comparative fit index = 0.99, and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.99), providing empirical support for the headache complexity construct. Soldier groups differed in their mean headache complexity level (p < 0.001) such that post-traumatic headache soldiers had greater headache complexity compared to non-concussed soldiers (standardized mean difference = 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.09, p < 0.001 and to concussed soldiers with coincidental headaches standardized mean difference = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.96, p < 0.001). Increasing headache complexity predicted medical encounters for headache (odds ratio = 1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.49-2.35, p < 0.001) and migraine (odds ratio = 3.74, 95% confidence interval: 2.33-5.98, p < 0.001) during the year following deployment.Conclusions and relevance: The current study provided support for a single latent trait, characterized by observed headache symptoms, that differentiates between concussive and non-concussive headaches and predicts use of medical care for headache. The single trait confirmatory factor analysis suggests that post-traumatic headaches differ from non-concussive headaches by severity more than kind, based on the symptoms assessed.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01847040.

Impact of Prior Brain Injury on Concussion Recovery in Military Personnel: Evaluation of Timing Between Concussions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of timing between the current and the most recent previous concussions on symptom severity among acutely concussed active duty military Service members (SMs). SETTING: Three military installations. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four SMs aged 18 to 44 years who sustained a concussion within 72 hours of enrollment. No previous concussion within 1 year preenrollment. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with enrollment within 72 hours of injury, and follow-up at 1 week and 1 month postinjury. MAIN MEASURES: Lifetime concussion history (yes/no) and recency of the latest concussion (no history, relatively more recent [1 to <6 years ago], and more remote [6+ years ago]) from the current concussion using the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method-Interview Form. Symptom severity (total and by categories: cognitive, affective, somatosensory, vestibular) at all time points using the Neurobehavioral Symptoms Inventory. RESULTS: Concussion history assessed as having any previous concussion was not found significantly related to symptom severity (total or by categories) following a current concussion. However, when timing between concussion was taken into account, time since previous concussion was significantly related to symptomatology, whereby those with relatively more recent previous concussion had greater total symptoms within 72 hours of injury and at 1 week postinjury (though not at 1 month) than those with more remote previous concussion (≤72 hours: difference = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.8 to 29.1; 1 week: difference = 15.2, 95% CI = 1.2 to 29.2) or no history (≤72 hours: difference = 11.6, 95% CI = 0.4 to 22.8; 1 week: difference = 13.9, 95% CI = 2.4 to 25.4). When evaluated by symptom category, this relationship was particularly important on affective and somatosensory symptoms. CONCLUSION: In recently concussed active duty SMs, the timing between the current and previous concussions may be an important factor in determining prognosis. Clinical assessment of concussion history that accounts for the timing of the most recent event may be necessary to identify patients who may require a more conservative plan of care and more gradual return to activity in the acute recovery stage.

Beliefs About the Influence of Rest During Concussion Recovery May Predict Activity and Symptom Progression Within an Active Duty Military Population.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate relationships between beliefs about the impact of rest and the level of activities and symptoms over time among active duty Service members sustaining concussion, and whether these relationships vary by provision of concussion education. DESIGN: Longitudinal study using multilevel modeling to assess the relationship between beliefs about rest within 72 hours of concussion and change in activity and symptom level over time, as well as interaction by concussion education at the initial clinic visit. SETTING: Three military treatment facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants included active duty Service members diagnosed with a concussion (N=111; median age, 24 y). Individuals with previous history of concussion within 12 months of study enrollment were excluded. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Activity questionnaire and the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory assessed within 72 hours of concussion; at 1 week; and at 1, 3, and 6 month(s) postinjury. RESULTS: Receipt of concussion education from providers was significantly associated with greater belief that rest influences concussion recovery. Greater belief that rest influences symptom recovery at the acute stage of concussion was associated with a greater increase in activities over time, but only among those who received education from their provider. Additionally, greater belief about the influence of rest was related to a more rapid decrease in symptoms over time. CONCLUSIONS: Concussed Service members who underestimate the influence of rest during acute recovery may be at risk for poorer recovery. Treatment of Service members with postconcussive symptoms should consider patient knowledge and/or beliefs about rest and recovery, which may influence prognosis. Our results support the provider's use of concussion education to correct potential misconceptions that may negatively impact symptom recovery.

Feasibility of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Assessment Based on Cardiovascular Response to Postural Change.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of short-term cardiovascular responses to postural change as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), using heart rate metrics that can be measured with a wearable electrocardiogram sensor. SETTING: Military TBI clinic. DESIGN: Data collected from active-duty service members who had sustained a medically diagnosed mTBI within the prior 72 hours and from age- and sex-matched controls. Cardiac data collected while participants performed a sequence of postural changes. MAIN MEASURES: Model classification compared with clinical mTBI diagnosis. RESULTS: Cardiac biomarkers of mTBI were identified and logistic regression classifiers for mTBI were developed from different subsets of biomarkers. The best model achieved 90% sensitivity and 69% specificity using data from 2 different postural changes. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive measurement of cardiovascular response to postural change is a promising approach for field-deployable post-mTBI screening.

Activity Level During Acute Concussion May Predict Symptom Recovery Within an Active Duty Military Population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on symptom resolution of activity acutely following a concussion and the role of acute-phase symptoms on this relationship among active duty service members (SMs). SETTING: Three military installations. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two SMs aged 18 to 44 years who sustained a concussion within 72 hours of enrollment. DESIGN: Longitudinal design with data collected within 72 hours of injury (baseline, n = 62) and at 1 week (n = 57), 1 month (n = 50), 3 months (n = 41), and 6 months (n = 40) postinjury. MAIN MEASURES: Baseline activity level using a 60-item Activity Questionnaire. Symptom level at baseline and during follow-up using Neurobehavioral Symptoms Inventory. RESULTS: Significant interaction (Pi < .05) was found, with significant main effects (P < .05) limited to SMs with elevated baseline symptomatology. Among these participants, greater baseline total activity was significantly related to greater vestibular symptoms at 1, 3, and 6 months (ß = .61, .63, and .59, respectively). Significant associations were also found for particular types of baseline activity (eg, physical; vestibular/balance; military-specific) and symptoms at 1, 3, and/or 6 months postinjury. CONCLUSION: These results provide support for clinical guidance that symptomatic SMs, particularly those with high levels of acute symptoms, may need to avoid excessive activity acutely following concussion.

Trajectory of Postconcussive Symptoms 12 Months After Deployment in Soldiers With and Without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Warrior Strong Study.

We analyzed data from a cohort of recently deployed soldiers from 2 US Army bases, Fort Carson and Fort Bragg (2009 to 2015). Soldiers with and without a recent history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) on deployment were evaluated within days of return and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Those with mTBI were more likely than those without to endorse ≥1 postconcussive symptom as "severe" and/or "very severe" (47% vs. 21%, baseline; adjusted relative risk (RR) = 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.51, 1.93, all time points), which remained significant after adjusting for posttraumatic stress disorder (adjusted RR = 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.20, 1.50). Prevalence and relative risks for 3 of the most common baseline symptoms remained constant over time: sleep problems (RR = 2.19), forgetfulness (RR = 2.56), and irritability (RR = 2.73). The pattern was slightly different for headache (baseline, RR = 3.44; 12 months, RR = 3.26), due to increased prevalence of headache in those without mTBI. The prevalence of clinically relevant postconcussive symptoms remained relatively constant over 1 year of follow-up, whether or not symptoms were associated with concussion. Service members with recent mTBI reported more symptoms than those without at all time points.

Intraindividual Cognitive Variability: An Examination of ANAM4 TBI-MIL Simple Reaction Time Data from Service Members with and without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics 4 TBI-MIL (ANAM4) is a computerized cognitive test often used in post-concussion assessments with U.S. service members (SMs). However, existing evidence remains mixed regarding ANAM4's ability to identify cognitive issues following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Studies typically examine ANAM4 using standardized scores and/ or comparisons to a baseline. A more fine-grained approach involves examining inconsistency within an individual's performance (i.e., intraindividual variability). METHODS: Data from 237 healthy control SMs and 105 SMs within seven days of mTBI who took the ANAM4 were included in analyses. Using each individual's raw scores on a simple reaction time (RT) subtest (SRT1) that is repeated at the end of the battery (SRT2), we calculated mean raw RT and the intraindividual standard deviation (ISD) of trial-by-trial RT. Analyses investigated differences between groups in mean RT, RT variability (i.e., ISD), and change in ISD from SRT1 and SRT2. RESULTS: Using regression residuals to control for demographic variables, analysis of variance, and pairwise comparisons revealed the control group had faster mean RT and smaller ISD compared to the mTBI group. Furthermore, the mTBI group had a significant increase in ISD from SRT1 to SRT2, with effect sizes exceeding the minimum practical effect for comparisons of ISD in SRT2 and change in ISD from SRT1 to SRT2. CONCLUSIONS: While inconsistencies in performance are often viewed as test error, the results suggest intraindividual cognitive variability may be more sensitive than traditional metrics in detecting changes in cognitive function after mTBI. Additionally, the findings highlight the utility of the ANAM4's repeating a RT subtest at two points in the same session for exploring within-subject differences in performance variability. (JINS, 2018, 24, 156-162).

The experience, expression, and control of anger following traumatic brain injury in a military sample.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the experience and expression of anger in a military sample. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 661 military personnel with a history of TBI and 1204 military personnel with no history of TBI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, between-group design, using multivariate analysis of variance. MAIN MEASURE: State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2). RESULTS: Participants with a history of TBI had higher scores on the STAXI-2 than controls and were 2 to 3 times more likely than the participants in the control group to have at least 1 clinically significant elevation on the STAXI-2. Results suggested that greater time since injury (ie, months between TBI and assessment) was associated with lower scores on the STAXI-2 State Anger scale. CONCLUSION: Although the results do not take into account confounding psychiatric conditions and cannot address causality, they suggest that a history of TBI increases the risk of problems with the experience, expression, and control of anger. This bolsters the need for proper assessment of anger when evaluating TBI in a military cohort.

Randomized, controlled clinical trial of acoustic stimulation to reduce postconcussive symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Effective interventions are needed to address postconcussive symptoms. We report the results of randomized, sham-controlled trial of Cereset Research™ Standard Operating Procedures (CR-SOP), a noninvasive, closed-loop, allostatic, acoustic stimulation neurotechnology previously shown to improve insomnia. METHODS: Military service members, veterans, or their spouses with persistent symptoms (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory [NSI] Score ≥23) after mTBI 3 months to 10 years ago, were randomized to receive 10 sessions of engineered tones linked to brainwaves (LB, intervention), or random engineered tones not linked to brainwaves (NL, sham control). The primary outcome was change in NSI, with secondary outcomes of heart rate variability and self-report measures of sleep, mood, and anxiety. RESULTS: Participants (n = 106, 22% female, mean age 37.1, 2.8 deployments, 3.8 TBIs) were randomized 1:1 to LB or NL, with no significant differences between groups at baseline. Among all study participants, the NSI declined from baseline 41.0 to 27.2 after (P < 0.0001), with gains largely sustained at 3 months (31.2) and 6 months (28.4). However, there were no significant differences between the LB (NSI declined from 39.9 at baseline to 28.2 post-intervention, 31.5 at 3 months, and 29.4 at 6 months) and NL (NSI declined from 41.5 at baseline to 26.2, 29.9, and 27.3, respectively. Similar patterns were observed for the PCL5 and PHQ-9 and there was no difference in HRV between groups. INTERPRETATION: Ten hours of acoustic stimulation while resting in a zero-gravity chair improves postconcussive symptoms. However, linking tones to brain electrical activity did not reduce symptoms more than random tones. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT03649958.

Subjective and Performance-Based Cognition and Their Associations with Head Injury History in Older Former National Football League Players.

PURPOSE: Investigate the association between self-reported subjective and performance-based cognition among older (50-70 years) former professional American football players, as well as the relationship of cognitive measures with concussion history and years of football participation, as a proxy for repetitive head impact exposure. METHODS: Among older former National Football League (NFL) players ( N = 172; mean age = 60.69 ± 5.64), associations of subjective (Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Cognitive Function-Short Form) and performance-based cognitive measures (Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone [BTACT] Executive Function and Episodic Memory indices) were assessed via univariable and multivariable regression models, with a priori covariates of depression and race. A similar univariate and multivariable regression approach assessed associations between concussion history and years of football participation with subjective and performance-based cognitive measures. In a sample subset ( n = 114), stability of subjective cognitive rating was assessed via partial correlation. RESULTS: Subjective ratings of cognition were significantly associated with performance-based assessment, with moderate effect sizes (episodic memory ηp2 = 0.12; executive function ηp2 = 0.178). These associations were weakened, but remained significant ( P s < 0.05), with the inclusion of covariates. Greater concussion history was associated with lower subjective cognitive function ( ηp2 = 0.114, P < 0.001), but not performance-based cognition. The strength of association between concussion history and subjective cognition was substantially weakened with inclusion of covariates ( ηp2 = 0.057). Years of participation were not associated with measures of subjective or objective cognition ( P s > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reinforce the importance of comprehensive evaluation reflecting both subjective and objective measures of cognition, as well as the consideration of patient-specific factors, as part of a comprehensive neurobehavioral and health assessment of older former contact sport athletes.

An Initial Psychometric Analysis of the Brain Gauge Tactile-Based Test Battery and Its Potential for Clinical Use Assessing Patients With Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: A new brief computerized test battery that uses tactile stimulation, Brain Gauge (BG), has been proposed as a cognitive assessment aid and its developers have reported an almost perfect ability to distinguish acute mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients from healthy controls. This investigation attempted to replicate those results and serve as an initial psychometrically and clinically focused analysis of BG. METHODS: BG scores from 73 military service members (SM) assessed within 7 days after having a clinically diagnosed mTBI were compared to 100 healthy SMs. Mean scores were compared, score distributions were examined, and univariate and multivariate base rate analyses of low scores were performed. RESULTS: SMs with mTBI had statistically significantly worse performance on both BG Reaction Time (RT) tests and the Sequential Amplitude Discrimination test as reflected by higher mean RT and RT variability and higher minimum detectable amplitude difference. SMs with mTBI also had a significantly lower whole-battery composite (i.e., Cortical Metric Symptom Score). Larger proportions of SMs with mTBI had lower overall performance than controls. However, at most only 26.9% of those with mTBI performed at potentially clinically meaningful cutoffs that were defined as various numbers of low scores that were prevalent in no more than 10% of the control group, which is equivalent to specificity ≥90% and sensitivity ≤26.9% for mTBI. CONCLUSION: Our analysis did not replicate the high level of classification accuracy reported by BG's developers. Pending further psychometric development, BG may have limited clinical utility for assessing mTBI patients.

Warfighter Resilience.

PURPOSE: Our aim in this study was to psychometrically test resilience assessments (Ego Resiliency Scale [ER89], Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale [CD-RISC 25], Responses to Stressful Experiences Scale [RSES short-form]) and describe resilience levels in a Special Operations Forces (SOF) combat sample. METHODS: Fifty-eight SOF combat Servicemembers either entering SOF (career start; n = 38) or having served multiple years with their SOF organization (mid-career; n = 20) self-reported resilience, mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) history, and total military service. RESULTS: All resilience metrics demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, but ceiling effects were found for CD-RISC and RSES scores. ER89 scores were moderate on average. ER89 scores were higher in SOF career start than mid-career Servicemembers (ηρ2 = 0.07) when accounting for the interaction between SOF career stage and total military service (ηρ2 = 0.07). DISCUSSION: SOF mid-career Servicemembers had similar ER89 resilience scores with more total military service. The SOF career start combat Servicemembers had higher ER89 measured resilience with less total military service only, potentially showing a protective effect of greater service before entering SOF. CONCLUSION: The ER89 may be a more optimal military resilience metric than the other metrics studied; longitudinal research on SOF combat Servicemember resilience is warranted.

Active Warfighter Mental Health Lower in Mid-Career.

PURPOSE: The present study investigated Special Operations Forces (SOF) combat Servicemember mental health at different SOF career stages in association with resilience. METHODS: Fifty-eight SOF combat Service Members either entering SOF (career start; n=38) or multiple years with their SOF organization (mid-career; n=20) self-reported mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) history, resilience, subjective well-being, depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. Poisson regression analyses were employed to test SOF career stage differences in each mental health symptom using resilience, while accounting for other pertinent military factors. RESULTS: There were significant interaction effects of SOF career stage and resilience on mental health symptoms. SOF career start combat Servicemembers endorsed lower depression and posttraumatic stress and higher subjective well-being with higher resilience, but these associations between resilience and mental health symptoms were not seen in SOF mid-career Servicemembers. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, the adaptive association between resilience and mental health seemed to be blunted in combat Servicemembers having served multiple years in SOF. This information informs research to provide evaluation tools to support prophylactic performance and long-term health preservation in military populations.

Targeted dietary interventions to reduce pain in persistent post-traumatic headache among service members: Protocol for a randomized, controlled parallel-group trial.

INTRODUCTION: Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is common after traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially among active-duty service members (SMs), affecting up to 35% of patients with chronic TBI. Persistent PTH is disabling and frequently unresponsive to treatment and is often migrainous. Here, we describe a trial assessing whether dietary modifications to increase n-3 eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and reduce n-6 linoleic acid (LA), will alter nociceptive lipid mediators and result in clinical improvements in persistent PTH. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial tests the efficacy, safety, and biochemical effects of targeted, controlled alterations in dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids in 122 adult SMs and military healthcare beneficiaries with diagnosed TBI associated with actively managed persistent frequent (>8 /month) PTH with migraine. Following a 4-week baseline, participants are randomized to one of two equally intensive dietary regimens for 12 additional weeks: 1) increased n-3 EPA + DHA with low n-6 LA (H3L6); 2) usual US dietary content of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids (Control). During the intervention, participants receive diet arm-specific study oils and foods sufficient for 75% of caloric needs and comprehensive dietary counseling. Participants complete daily headache diaries throughout the intervention. Clinical outcomes, including the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), headache hours per day, circulating blood fatty acid levels, and bioactive metabolites, are measured pre-randomization and at 6 and 12 weeks. Planned primary analyses include pre-post comparisons of treatment groups on clinical measures using ANCOVA and mixed-effects models. Similar approaches to explore biochemical and exploratory clinical outcomes are planned. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registration: NCT03272399.

An Investigation of the Accuracy of Reaction Time Measurements on ANAM4 TBI-MIL Across Three Computer Platforms.

STUDY DESIGN: Using two observational methods and a within-subjects, counterbalanced design, this study aimed to determine if a computer's hardware and software settings significantly affected reaction time (RT) on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (Version 4) Traumatic Brain Injury Military (ANAM4 TBI-MIL). METHODS: Three computer platforms were investigated: Platform 1-older computers recommended for ANAM4 TBI-MIL administration, Platform 2-newer computers with settings downgraded to run like the older computers, and Platform 3-newer computers with default settings. Two observational methods were used to compare measured RT to observed RT on all three platforms: 1, a high-speed video analysis to compare the timing of stimulus onset and response to the measured RT and 2, comparing a preset RT delivered by a robotic key actuator activated by optic detector to the measured RT. Additionally, healthy active duty service members (n = 169) were administered a brief version of the ANAM4 TBI-MIL battery on each of the three platforms. RESULTS: RT differences were observed with both the high-speed video and robotic arm analyses across all three computer platforms, with the smallest discrepancies between observed and measured RT on Platform 1, followed by Platform 2, then Platform 3. When simple reaction time (SRT) raw and standardized scores obtained from the participants were compared across platforms, statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences were seen, especially between Platforms 1 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: A computer's configurations have a meaningful impact on ANAM SRT scores. The difference in an individual's performance across platforms could be misinterpreted as clinically meaningful change.

Best Practices for Progressive Return to Activity after Concussion: Lessons Learned from a Prospective Study of U.S. Military Service Members.

Primary care providers can play a crucial role in the clinical management of concussion. However, many providers lack up-to-date information about best practices for rest and return to activity after these injuries. Most research on this topic has been conducted in athletes, and so less is known about how to assist patients with returning to activity in other settings and populations. This article provides a review of best practices for management of progressive return to activity after concussion, with an emphasis on "lessons learned" from the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) Progressive Return to Activity (PRA) study, a multi-site longitudinal research project conducted to evaluate concussion management practices and the effectiveness of provider training on DVBIC clinical recommendations (CRs). Provider clinical practices and patient outcomes were examined at three U.S. military treatment facilities before and after providers completed a standardized training on DVBIC PRA CRs. In summary, research findings provide additional support that concussion recovery can be influenced by patients' activity levels after injury. Patients with concussion may experience poorer outcomes if they return to pre-injury levels of activity too rapidly, but they may also be at risk for prolonged symptoms if they fail to increase activity levels over time after an initial period of rest. Additionally, training primary care providers in return to activity guidelines can result in more effective patient education and better clinical outcomes. This knowledge can be used to inform best practices for progressive return to activity in both civilian and military settings.

"Return to duty" as an outcome metric in military concussion research: Problems, pitfalls, and potential solutions.

OBJECTIVE: "Return to duty" (RTD) is often used as an outcome metric in military concussion research, but is inconsistently defined across studies and presents several key problems to researchers. Using results from the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center's (DVBIC) Progressive Return to Activity (PRA) study, we highlight problems with RTD, and suggest solutions to inform future efforts. METHOD: 116 service members (SMs) were enrolled in one of two groups (pre-implementation and post-implementation of the PRA Clinical Recommendation [CR]). Data, including the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI-22), was collected within 72-hours of injury (baseline), and at 1-week, 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months post-injury. Our analyses focused on three time points: baseline, approximate RTD date, and post-RTD follow-up, with RTD data captured via self-report and electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary analyses included comparisons across PRA-CR implementation groups. RESULTS: Of those SMs (<50% of the sample) with both self-reported and EMR RTD dates, dates largely did not match (range 1 to 36 days). RTD (either date) also did not indicate symptom recovery, with >50% of SMs reporting "abnormally high" symptom levels (i.e., NSI-22 total ≥75th percentile) at RTD, and over 50% of SMs reporting at least one significant symptom (i.e., any NSI-22 item ≥ 2) after RTD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate challenges encountered with a RTD outcome metric. Military concussion researchers should strive to use a well-defined RTD outcome metric. We propose defining RTD as a return to deployment readiness. Further, researchers should utilize Department of Defense definitions of Individual Medical Readiness and Deployment Limiting conditions to increase specificity of a RTD outcome metric. Improving the way RTD is captured will improve confidence that tools used after a SM sustains concussion are adequately informing RTD decisions.

Mental Health Symptoms Are Associated With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury History in Active Special Operations Forces (SOF) Combat and Combat Support Soldiers.

INTRODUCTION: Special Operations Forces (SOF) combat arms and combat support Soldiers are at risk for impaired mental health, such as mood- and stress-related disorders, due to operational and training demands. Additionally, these individuals experience high risk for sustaining mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). These mTBIs have also been linked to negative psychological outcomes, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms. Studying mental illnesses and their related symptoms alone does not fully address mental health, which may be better understood by 2 separate but overlapping continua measuring both mental illness and subjective well-being (ie, emotional, psychological, and social well-being). Due to the lack of research in this area, current mental health symptoms in active SOF combat Soldiers in relation to mTBI warrants investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 113 SOF combat and combat support Soldiers completed self-report psychological and mTBI history measures during an in-person laboratory setting. These psychometric measures included (1) psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory 18), (2) anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item), (3) posttraumatic stress (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5), (4) somatization (Patient Health Questionnaire-15), and (5) subjective well-being (Mental Health Continuum Short Form). RESULTS: On average, SOF combat Soldiers endorsed moderate well-being and low psychological distress, somatization, posttraumatic stress, and anxiety. Most SOF combat Soldiers had sustained 1 or more mTBI. We observed mTBI history had significant effects on each dependent variable in the expected directions. History of more mTBIs, controlling for age, was associated with lower subjective well-being as well as higher psychological distress, somatization, posttraumatic stress, and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSION: Although SOF combat Soldiers reported relatively adaptive mental health symptoms across participants, there was considerable variance in the measures reported. Some of the variance in mental health symptoms was accounted for by mTBI history while controlling for age, with reporting higher numbers of lifetime mTBIs and older age being associated with worse mental health symptoms. Longitudinal investigations into these associations and their impact on Soldier performance is warranted.