The choice of recipient does not have a bearing on early outcome in liver transplant patients receiving grafts from non-heart-beating donors: a reappraisal?

INTRODUCTION: Donation after cardiac death has reemerged as a potential way of increasing the supply of organs for transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) liver transplantation (OLT) experience and compared with standard heart-beating donation (HBD) at a single center. METHODS: From October 2003 to November 2006, 13/111 liver transplantations were performed in our institution with NHBD. Living donor liver transplantation, splitting procedures, combined, and pediatric liver transplantations were excluded from this analysis. RESULTS: Donor population was similar in both groups. The median warm ischemia time was 10 minutes (range 6 to 38). The median cold ischemia times 6 hours and 16 minutes (2.4 to 6.30 hours and 9 hours and 14 minutes (2.15 to 15.35 hours) for NHBD and HBD groups, respectively (P = .0002). In the NHBD groups, 4/13 (31%) grafts were retransplanted within 3 months, due to ischemic biliary lesions with severe cholestasis (n = 3) or due to the occurrence of primary nonfunction (n = 1). The retransplantation rate was significantly lower in the HBD group (11/98, 11%; P = .03). One-year patient and graft survivals were 62% and 54% versus 86% and 79%, respectively, for the NHBD and HBD groups (P = .107 and P = .003). CONCLUSION: Liver grafts procured from donors after cardiac death accounted for a significantly greater retransplantation rates, mainly due to nonanastomotic biliary strictures. This risk must be taken into account when transplanting such grafts. Based upon this experience, NHBD cannot rival HBD to be a comparable source of quality organs for liver transplantation.

Improved results for adult split liver transplantation with extended right lobe grafts: could we enhance its application?

OBJECTIVE: Split liver transplantation (SLT) allows grafting of 2 recipients with 1 allograft. Results of adult SLT have improved since its first introduction. Children benefit most from SLT, while among some adult liver transplanters there are concerns about splitting a liver, turning a good quality graft into a marginal one. We performed a single center retrospective review to address this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and August 2008, we performed 22 extended right liver graft (eRLG) transplantations in 21 adult patients. RESULTS: Eleven donors (50%) did not meet the Eurotransplant criteria for optimal donors. Forty-one percent of eRLG donors showed hemodynamic instability at the time of harvest. Eighteen (82%) splitting procedures were performed ex situ. The main indications for transplantation were alcoholic liver cirrhosis (32%), hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (18%), and acute liver failure (18%). Mean recipient age was 54 years (range, 17-69 years); median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-40). Patients were followed for a median of 16 months (range, 4-92 months) following transplantation. We observed 5 (23%) vascular and 3 (14%) biliary complications. Overall patient survival was 84% at 3 years; overall graft survival was 79%. For the 11 patients who had undergone transplantation after 2007, we observed a 100% patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: After an initial learning curve and provided careful selection, exceptions to classical donor criteria for splitting can be accepted with successful outcomes comparable to those after whole liver transplantation.

Improved results for adult split liver transplantation with extended right lobe grafts: could we enhance its application?

OBJECTIVE: Split liver transplantation (SLT) allows grafting of 2 recipients with 1 allograft. Results of adult SLT have improved since its first introduction. Children benefit most from SLT, while among some adult liver transplanters there are concerns about splitting a liver, turning a good quality graft into a marginal one. We performed a single center retrospective review to address this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and August 2008, we performed 22 extended right liver graft (eRLG) transplantations in 21 adult patients. RESULTS: Eleven donors (50%) did not meet the Eurotransplant criteria for optimal donors. Forty-one percent of eRLG donors showed hemodynamic instability at the time of harvest. Eighteen (82%) splitting procedures were performed ex situ. The main indications for transplantation were alcoholic liver cirrhosis (32%), hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (18%), and acute liver failure (18%). Mean recipient age was 54 years (range, 17-69 years); median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-40). Patients were followed for a median of 16 months (range, 4-92 months) following transplantation. We observed 5 (23%) vascular and 3 (14%) biliary complications. Overall patient survival was 84% at 3 years; overall graft survival was 79%. For the 11 patients who had undergone transplantation after 2007, we observed a 100% patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: After an initial learning curve and provided careful selection, exceptions to classical donor criteria for splitting can be accepted with successful outcomes comparable to those after whole liver transplantation.