Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 42(1): 201-217, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34823748

RESUMEN

Delayed administration of epinephrine (adrenaline), the first-line and only effective treatment of a systemic allergic reaction (SAR) and anaphylaxis, is associated with increased mortality. However, epinephrine is underused because of a lack of consensus as to when it should be administered and an inappropriate fear of using epinephrine and potential adverse effects from the medication. The authors emphasize that SARs and anaphylaxis should be considered as a spectrum, and that affected individuals be educated on its safety and repeatedly given instructions as to when and how epinephrine should be used at the first symptoms or signs of SAR and anaphylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Epinefrina , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 215: 108234, 2020 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few individuals hospitalized with Substance Use Disorder (SUD) complications participate in recovery support services after discharge. Peer recovery coaching represents one potential new method for promoting recovery. METHODS: A six-month prospective randomized controlled trial compared outcomes between the standard of care and a physician-initiated recovery coaching intervention. The primary outcome measure was engagement in recovery support services, and the secondary outcome measures were substance use frequency and self-reported physical and mental health using the SF-12 survey. Participants (N = 98) were eligible if they were identified by a healthcare provider as having a SUD and were hospitalized due to SUD complications. RESULTS: Engagement rate over the six-month post-discharge time period was higher for participants in the recovery coaching intervention (84 %, 95 % CI: 78%-91%) compared to the standard of care control condition (34 %, 95 % CI: 25 %-44 %), log OR = 28.59, p < .001. No overall group differences in substance use frequency (p = .80), self-reported physical (p = .69) or mental (p = .89) health were observed. CONCLUSION: An inpatient linkage to recovery coaching services improves engagement rates and can feasibly be implemented in a single-center inpatient service. This intervention is promising for promoting both short-term and long-term engagement in recovery support services.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Tutoría , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA