Obstetric violence is a misnomer.

The term "obstetric violence" has been used in the legislative language of several countries to protect mothers from abuse during pregnancy. Subsequently, it has been expanded to include a spectrum of obstetric procedures, such as induction of labor, episiotomy, and cesarean delivery, and has surfaced in the peer-reviewed literature. The term "obstetric violence" can be seen as quite strong and emotionally charged, which may lead to misunderstandings or misconceptions. It might be interpreted as implying a deliberate act of violence by healthcare providers when mistreatment can sometimes result from systemic issues, lack of training, or misunderstandings rather than intentional violence. "Obstetric mistreatment" is a more comprehensive term that can encompass a broader range of behaviors and actions. "Violence" generally refers to the intentional use of physical force to cause harm, injury, or damage to another person (eg, physical assault, domestic violence, street fights, or acts of terrorism), whereas "mistreatment" is a more general term and refers to the abuse, harm, or control exerted over another person (such as nonconsensual medical procedures, verbal abuse, disrespect, discrimination and stigmatization, or neglect, to name a few examples). There may be cases where unprofessional personnel may commit mistreatment and violence against pregnant patients, but as obstetrics is dedicated to the health and well-being of pregnant and fetal patients, mistreatment of obstetric patients should never be an intended component of professional obstetric care. It is necessary to move beyond the term "obstetric violence" in discourse and acknowledge and address the structural dimensions of abusive reproductive practices. Similarly, we do not use the term "psychiatric violence" for appropriately used professional procedures in psychiatry, such as electroshock therapy, or use the term "neurosurgical violence" when drilling a burr hole. There is an ongoing need to raise awareness about the potential mistreatment of obstetric patients within the context of abuse against women in general. Using the term "mistreatment in healthcare" instead of the more limited term "obstetric violence" is more appropriate and applies to all specialties when there is unprofessional abuse and mistreatment, such as biased care, neglect, emotional abuse (verbal), or physical abuse, including performing procedures that are unnecessary, unindicated, or without informed patient consent. Healthcare providers must promote unbiased, respectful, and patient-centered professional care; provide an ethical framework for all healthcare personnel; and work toward systemic change to prevent any mistreatment or abuse in our specialty.

Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated with Maternal Comorbidity Burden and Social Vulnerability.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the associations of the obstetric comorbidity index (OB-CMI) and social vulnerability index (SVI) with severe maternal morbidity (SMM). STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of all patients who delivered (gestational age > 20 weeks) within a university health system from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. OB-CMI scores were assigned to patients using clinical documentation and diagnosis codes. SVI scores, released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), were assigned to patients based on census tracts. The primary outcome was SMM, based on the 21 CDC indicators. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to model the odds of SMM as a function of OB-CMI and SVI while adjusting for maternal race and ethnicity, insurance type, preferred language, and parity. RESULTS: In total, 73,518 deliveries were analyzed. The prevalence of SMM was 4% (n = 2,923). An association between OB-CMI and SMM was observed (p < 0.001), where OB-CMI score categories of 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 were associated with higher odds of SMM compared with an OB-CMI score category of 0. In the adjusted model, there was evidence of an interaction between OB-CMI and maternal race and ethnicity (p = 0.01). After adjusting for potential confounders, including SVI, non-Hispanic Black patients had the highest odds of SMM among patients with an OB-CMI score category of 1 and ≥4 compared with non-Hispanic White patients with an OB-CMI score of 0 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-3.66 and aOR 10.07, 95% CI 8.42-12.03, respectively). The association between SVI and SMM was not significant on adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: OB-CMI was significantly associated with SMM, with higher score categories associated with higher odds of SMM. A significant interaction between OB-CMI and maternal race and ethnicity was identified, revealing racial disparities in the odds of SMM within each higher OB-CMI score category. SVI was not associated with SMM after adjusting for confounders. KEY POINTS: · OB-CMI was significantly associated with SMM.. · Racial disparities were seen within each OB-CMI score group.. · SVI was not associated with SMM on adjusted analysis..

The impact of birth settings on pregnancy outcomes in the United States.

In the United States, 98.3% of patients give birth in hospitals, 1.1% give birth at home, and 0.5% give birth in freestanding birth centers. This review investigated the impact of birth settings on birth outcomes in the United States. Presently, there are insufficient data to evaluate levels of maternal mortality and severe morbidity according to place of birth. Out-of-hospital births are associated with fewer interventions such as episiotomies, epidural anesthesia, operative deliveries, and cesarean deliveries. When compared with hospital births, there are increased rates of avoidable adverse perinatal outcomes in out-of-hospital births in the United States, both for those with and without risk factors. In one recent study, the neonatal mortality rates were significantly elevated for all planned home births: 13.66 per 10,000 live births (242/177,156; odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 3.62-4.84; P<.0001) vs 3.27 per 10,000 live births for in-hospital Certified Nurse-Midwife-attended births (745/2,280,044; odds ratio, 1). These differences increased further when patients were stratified by recognized risk factors such as breech presentation, multiple gestations, nulliparity, advanced maternal age, and postterm pregnancy. Causes of the increased perinatal morbidity and mortality include deliveries of patients with increased risks, absence of standardized criteria to exclude high-risk deliveries, and that most midwives attending out-of-hospital births in the United States do not meet the gold standard for midwifery regulation, the International Confederation of Midwives' Global Standards for Midwifery Education. As part of the informed consent process, pregnant patients interested in out-of-hospital births should be informed of its increased perinatal risks. Hospital births should be supported for all patients, especially those with increased risks.

Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe.

The landmark Roe vs Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973 established a constitutional right to abortion. In June 2022, the Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision brought an end to the established professional practice of abortion throughout the United States. Rights-based reductionism and zealotry threaten the professional practice of abortion. Rights-based reductionism is generally the view that moral or ethical issues can be reduced exclusively to matters of rights. In relation to abortion, there are 2 opposing forms of rights-based reductionism, namely fetal rights reductionism, which emphasizes the rights for the fetus while disregarding the rights and autonomy of the pregnant patient, and pregnant patient rights reductionism, which supports unlimited abortion without regards for the fetus. The 2 positions are irreconcilable. This article provides historical examples of the destructive nature of zealotry, which is characterized by extreme devotion to one's beliefs and an intolerant stance to opposing viewpoints, and of the importance of enlightenment to limit zealotry. This article then explores the professional responsibility model as a clinically ethically sound approach to overcome the clashing forms of rights-based reductionism and zealotry and to address the professional practice of abortion. The professional responsibility model refers to the ethical and professional obligations that obstetricians and other healthcare providers have toward pregnant patients, fetuses, and the society at large. It provides a more balanced and nuanced approach to the abortion debate, avoiding the pitfalls of reductionism and zealotry, and allows both the rights of the woman and the obligations to pregnant and fetal patients to be considered alongside broader ethical, medical, and societal implications. Constructive and respectful dialogue is crucial in addressing diverse perspectives and finding common ground. Embracing the professional responsibility model enables professionals to manage abortion responsibly, thereby prioritizing patients' interests and navigating between absolutist viewpoints to find balanced ethical solutions.

The care of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic - response of a large health system in metropolitan New York.

The rapid progression of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak presented extraordinary challenges to the US health care system, particularly straining resources in hard hit areas such as the New York metropolitan region. As a result, major changes in the delivery of obstetrical care were urgently needed, while maintaining patient safety on our maternity units. As the largest health system in the region, with 10 hospitals providing obstetrical services, and delivering over 30,000 babies annually, we needed to respond to this crisis in an organized, deliberate fashion. Our hospital footprint for Obstetrics was dramatically reduced to make room for the rapidly increasing numbers of COVID-19 patients, and established guidelines were quickly modified to reduce potential staff and patient exposures. New communication strategies were developed to facilitate maternity care across our hospitals, with significantly limited resources in personnel, equipment, and space. The lessons learned from these unexpected challenges offered an opportunity to reassess the delivery of obstetrical care without compromising quality and safety. These lessons may well prove valuable after the peak of the crisis has passed.

Statewide Initiative to Reduce Postnatal Growth Restriction among Infants <31 Weeks of Gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To decrease the incidence of postnatal growth restriction, defined as discharge weight <10th percentile for postmenstrual age, among preterm infants cared for in New York State Regional Perinatal Centers. STUDY DESIGN: The quality improvement cohort consisted of infants <31 weeks of gestation admitted to a New York State Regional Perinatal Center within 48 hours of birth who survived to hospital discharge. Using quality improvement principles from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and experience derived from successfully reducing central line-associated blood stream infections statewide, the New York State Perinatal Quality Collaborative sought to improve neonatal growth by adopting better nutritional practices identified through literature review and collaborative learning. New York State Regional Perinatal Center neonatologists were surveyed to characterize practice changes during the project. The primary outcome-the incidence of postnatal growth restriction-was compared across the study period from baseline (2010) to the final (2013) years of the project. Secondary outcomes included differences in z-score between birth and discharge weights and head circumferences. RESULTS: We achieved a 19% reduction, from 32.6% to 26.3%, in postnatal growth restriction before hospital discharge. Reductions in the difference in z-score between birth and discharge weights were significant, and differences in z-score between birth and discharge head circumference approached significance. In survey data, regional perinatal center neonatologists targeted change in initiation of feedings, earlier breast milk fortification, and evaluation of feeding tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide collaborative quality improvement can achieve significant improvement in neonatal growth outcomes that, in other studies, have been associated with improved neurodevelopment in later infancy.

Variation in Enteral Feeding Practices and Growth Outcomes among Very Premature Infants: A Report from the New York State Perinatal Quality Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is inversely related to neurodevelopmental outcome. We analyzed growth outcomes and enteral nutrition practices among preterm infants at New York State (NYS) regional perinatal centers (RPCs) to identify practices associated with risk of EUGR. METHODS: Surviving infants < 31 weeks' gestation admitted to a NYS RPC during 2010 were identified and data collected on their growth and enteral nutrition from a statewide database. Neonatologists at NYS RPCs were surveyed to identify center-specific nutritional practices. Survey responses, nutrition, and growth data were then analyzed to identify factors associated with risk of EUGR. RESULTS: Of the 1,387 infants, 32.6% were discharged with EUGR. Incidence of EUGR varied more than fivefold among RPCs. Nutritional practices directly related to EUGR included age at first enteral feeding and full enteral feedings. Among the surveyed nutrition practices, longer duration of trophic feeding before advancing was associated with an increased risk of EUGR while later discontinuation of total parenteral nutrition and larger trophic feeding volume were associated with lower risk. CONCLUSION: Our study found marked variation in nutrition practices and incidence of EUGR among preterm infants at NYS RPCs. A statewide quality improvement initiative to reduce practice variation and improve growth in preterm infants is underway.

A call for safety: Anticipating and mitigating risk across an obstetrics and gynecology service line.

Delivery of healthcare is a complex interaction of patients, healthcare providers, nurses, ambulatory practices, and hospitals. As the model of health care transitioned, free standing physician practices and hospitals have coalesced to form networks of ambulatory practices and hospitals. This change in the model of healthcare delivery presented challenges to provide safe, quality, cost-effective care for patients, with potentially increased risk to an organization. The development and imbedding of comprehensive safety strategies are imperative to the foundation of this model. Northwell Health, a large health system in the northeastern United States developed a strategy for their Obstetrics and Gynecology Service Line which includes weekly interaction by departmental leadership from each hospital to discuss operations, share concerns and identify potential opportunities to prevent recurrent suboptimal outcomes and improve patient safety. The weekly Safety Call, described in this article is a component of the safety and quality program that has contributed to a 19% decrease in the Weighted Adverse Outcomes Index for the 10 maternity hospitals delivering over 30,000 babies annually within the system since inception. There was also a significant reduction in insurance premiums based on actuarial projections of risk reduction because of the implementation of an Obstetrical Safety Program.

Association of Maternal Comorbidity Burden With Cesarean Birth Rate Among Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Pregnancies.

IMPORTANCE: Cesarean birth rate among nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) pregnancies is a standard quality measure in obstetrical care. There are limited data on how the number and type of preexisting conditions affect mode of delivery among primigravidae, and it is also uncertain how maternal comorbidity burden differs across racial and ethnic groups and whether this helps to explain disparities in the NTSV cesarean birth rate. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between obstetric comorbidity index (OB-CMI) score and cesarean delivery among NTSV pregnancies and to evaluate whether disparities in mode of delivery exist based on race and ethnicity group after adjusting for covariate factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of deliveries between January 2019 and December 2021 took place across 7 hospitals within a large academic health system in New York and included all NTSV pregnancies identified in the electronic medical record system. Exclusion criteria were fetal demise and contraindication to labor. EXPOSURE: The OB-CMI score. Covariate factors assessed included race and ethnicity group (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, other or multiracial, and declined or unknown), public health insurance, and preferred language. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Cesarean delivery. RESULTS: A total of 30 253 patients (mean [SD] age, 29.8 [5.4] years; 100% female) were included. Non-Hispanic White patients constituted the largest race and ethnicity group (43.7%), followed by Hispanic patients (16.2%), Asian or Pacific Islander patients (14.6%), and non-Hispanic Black patients (12.2%). The overall NTSV cesarean birth rate was 28.5% (n = 8632); the rate increased from 22.1% among patients with an OB-CMI score of 0 to greater than 55.0% when OB-CMI scores were 7 or higher. On multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression modeling, there was a statistically significant association between OB-CMI score group and cesarean delivery; each successive OB-CMI score group had an increased risk. Patients with an OB-CMI score of 4 or higher had more than 3 times greater odds of a cesarean birth (adjusted odds ratio, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.90-3.40) than those with an OB-CMI score of 0. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, nearly all other race and ethnicity groups were at increased risk for cesarean delivery, and non-Hispanic Black patients were at highest risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.31-1.55). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of patients with NTSV pregnancies, OB-CMI score was positively associated with cesarean birth. Racial and ethnic disparities in this metric were observed. Although differences in the prevalence of preexisting conditions were seen across groups, this did not fully explain variation in cesarean delivery rates, suggesting that unmeasured clinical or nonclinical factors may have influenced the outcome.

Elective delivery before 39 weeks' gestation: reconciling maternal, fetal, and family interests in challenging circumstances.

We present the case of a 36-year-old woman who has experienced three lost pregnancies; during the most recent loss, a full term pregnancy, she almost died from complications of placental abruption. She is now completing the 34th week of gestation and is experiencing symptoms similar to those under which she lost the previous pregnancy. Despite a lack of specific medical indications, the patient and her husband firmly but politely request that the attending obstetrician/perinatologist perform an immediate cesarean section in order to alleviate the couple's anxiety about possibly never having a family. Discussing the case are an experienced perinatologist, a neonatologist, a regional perinatal center coordinator, and a clinical ethicist.

Acceptance of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination among postpartum women during delivery hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: The immediate postpartum period, during delivery hospitalization, represents a unique opportunity to offer coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination to those who did not previously receive it. In this study, we evaluated patient characteristics associated with acceptance of vaccination in this group. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated all unvaccinated patients who were offered postpartum COVID-19 vaccination during delivery hospitalization between May 2021 and September 2021 at seven hospitals within a large integrated health system in New York. During the study period, each hospitalized, unvaccinated obstetrical patient was offered the vaccine prior to discharge. Patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during hospitalization were excluded. Medical records were reviewed to obtain sociodemographic characteristics and to confirm administration of COVID-19 vaccination. Multiple logistic regression was performed to model the probability of receiving postpartum vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 8,281 unvaccinated postpartum patients were included for analysis and 412 (5%) received a COVID-19 vaccine before hospital discharge. Patients who received the vaccine were more likely to be older, have private insurance, decline to answer questions about religious affiliation, and deliver in the final two months of the study period. Likelihood of receiving postpartum vaccination was not affected by race-ethnicity, preferred language, marital status, parity, body mass index, or neighborhood socioeconomic conditions. Patients who declined vaccination were more likely to have positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing at delivery compared to those who received vaccination (49 vs. 29%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Only 5% of unvaccinated postpartum patients received a COVID-19 vaccine before hospital discharge. It is concerning that patients with public health insurance were less likely to receive vaccination. This may be due to variation in vaccine counseling or other unmeasured factors. Despite the low acceptance rate in our study population, COVID-19 vaccination should be offered in a variety of clinical settings to maximize opportunities for administration.

Considerations for emergencies & disasters in the neonatal intensive care unit.

This article outlines outside principles of emergency and disaster planning for neonatal intensive care units and includes resources available to organizations to support planning and education, and considerations for nurses developing hospital-specific neonatal intensive care unit disaster plans. Hospital disaster preparedness programs and unit-specific policies and procedures are essential in facilitating an effective response to major incidents or disasters, whether they are man-made or natural. All disasters place extraordinary stress on existing resources, systems, and personnel. If nurses in neonatal intensive care units work collaboratively to identify essential services in disasters, the result could be safer care for vulnerable patients.