The application of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in gastric cancerstaging and factors affecting its sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy offluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT), to correctly determine initial tumor stage in treatment-naive gastric cancer patients and to analyze the factors influencing the risk of false negative results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of 111 previously untreated gastric cancer patients were retrospectively assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative prediction value (NPV) were evaluated. An array of clinical, pathological and metabolic variables was analyzed to identify factors contributing to the risk of a false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) PET/CT result in detecting primary and metastatic tumor sites. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PET/CT to visualize distant metastases were 76.4%; 86.7%; 83% and 81.2%, respectively. In 13 (11.7%) patients the PET/CT exam was able to identify metastatic sites not recognized in radiographic staging, significantly altering the initially planned management. Of 64 PET/CT studies negative for distant metastases, 12 (18.75%) were clinically confirmed to be false negative. The risk of acquiring a FN result for primary tumor was 10.8% (12/111) and the overall risk of any FN readout for either primary and metastatic sites was 18.9% (21/111). The factors that contributed to increased probability of a FN result for primary tumor detection were early primary tumor stage T1-T2 (+16.2%; χ2=5.0, P=0.025), female sex (+10.1%; χ2=5.71, P=0.017) and neutrophil count below 4.2k/µL (9.7%; χ2=6.1, P=0.014). Patients with non-intestinal Lauren histologic type (+18.7%; χ2=8.9, P=0.003) or signet-ring/mucinous carcinoma (+9.6%; χ2=7.7, P=0.005) had increased probability of PET/CT being unable to identify their distant metastases. Women and patients with low neutrophil count featured borderline insignificantly increased percentage of non-intestinal tumor histology (P=0.07 and P=0.057, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fluorine-18-FDG PET/CT is a valuable diagnostic method in gastric cancer patients which significantly contributes to determining the TNM stage and thus helps choose correct patient management. Histology and primary tumor stage as well as patient cohorts in which these factors may vary should be considered when evaluating results to decrease a chance of a false negative readout.

Establishment and Characterization of the Novel High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cell Line OVPA8.

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most frequent histological type of ovarian cancer and the one with worst prognosis. Unfortunately, the majority of established ovarian cancer cell lines which are used in the research have unclear histological origin and probably do not represent HGSOC. Thus, new and reliable models of HGSOC are needed. Ascitic fluid from a patient with recurrent HGSOC was used to establish a stable cancer cell line. Cells were characterized by cytogenetic karyotyping and short tandem repeat (STR) profiling. New generation sequencing was applied to test for hot-spot mutations in 50 cancer-associated genes and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was used to check for TP53 status. Cells were analyzed for expression of several marker genes/proteins by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and immunocytochemistry (ICC). Functional tests were performed to compare OVPA8 cells with five commercially available and frequently used ovarian cancer cell lines: SKOV3, A2780, OVCAR3, ES2, and OAW42. Our newly-established OVPA8 cell line shows morphologic and genetic features consistent with HGSOC, such as epithelial morphology, multiple chromosomal aberrations, TP53 mutation, BRCA1 mutation, and loss of one copy of BRCA2. The OVPA8 line has a stable STR profile. Cells are positive for EpCAM, CK19, and CD44; they have relatively low plating efficiency/ability to form spheroids, a low migration rate, and intermediate invasiveness in matrigel, as compared to other ovarian cancer lines. OVPA8 is sensitive to paclitaxel and resistant to cisplatin. We also tested two FGFR inhibitors; OVPA8 cells were resistant to AZD4547 (AstraZeneca, London, UK), but sensitive to the new inhibitor CPL304-110-01 (Celon Pharma, Lomianki/Kielpin, Poland). We have established and characterized a novel cell line, OVPA8, which can be a valuable preclinical model for studies on high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Safety and feasibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment combined with radiotherapy in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, there are conflicting data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy, and no consensus guidelines exist to guide practice. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and feasibility of CDK4/6i treatment with radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, for studies in advanced/metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and radiotherapy with the provided safety data on the occurrence of toxicity. The main outcomes were safety (grade 3-5 adverse events), CDK 4/6i dose reduction, and the discontinuation rate due to toxicity. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 1133 patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients were included. Among them, 617 pts received CDK4/6i and radiotherapy; the median follow-up was 17.0 months (IQR 9.2 - 18.0), and the median age was 58.8 years (IQR 55.5---62.5). The pooled prevalence of severe hematologic toxicity was 29.4% (95% CI 14.0% - 47.4%; I2 = 93%; τ2 = 0.084; p < 0.01 and severe non-hematologic toxicity was 2.8% (95% CI 1.1% - 4.8%; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.0; p = 0.67). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i dose reduction was 24.0% (95% CI 11.1% - 39.4%; I2 = 90%; τ2 = 0.052; p < 0.01) with no difference between CDK4/6i plus RT vs. CDK4/6i (odds ratio of 0.934; 95% CI 0.66 - 1.33; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.0; p = 0.56). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i discontinuation due to toxicity was 2.3% (95% CI 0.4% - 5.2%; I2 = 23%; τ2 = 0.002; p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that radiotherapy in addition to CDK4/6i treatment in breast cancer patients is generally safe and well tolerated and remains a viable treatment option.

Safety and Feasibility of Radiation Therapy Combined with CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer.

The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy in advanced hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy (RT) are conflicting. A retrospective evaluation of 288 advanced breast cancer patients (pts) treated with CDK4/6i was performed, and 100 pts also received RT. Forty-six pts received 63 RT courses concurrently and fifty-four sequentially before CDK4/6i initiation (76 RT courses). Neutropenia was common (79%) and more frequent during and after concurrent RT than sequential RT (86% vs. 76%); however, CDK4/6i dose reduction rates were similar. In patients treated with CDK4/6i alone, the dose reduction rate was 42% (79 pts) versus 38% with combined therapy, and 5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity in the combined group. The risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction was correlated with neutropenia grade, RT performed within the first two CDK4/6i cycles, and more than one concurrent RT; a tendency was observed in concurrent bone irradiation. However, on multivariate regression analysis, only ECOG 1 performance status and severe neutropenia at the beginning of the second cycle were found to be associated with a higher risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction. This largest single-center experience published to date confirmed the acceptable safety profile of the CDK4/6i and RT combination without a significantly increased toxicity compared with CDK4/6i alone. However, one might delay RT for the first two CDK4/6i cycles, when myelotoxic AE are most common.

Determinants of the level of circulating-tumor HPV16 DNA in patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer at the time of diagnosis.

Circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPV16) assessed in liquid biopsy may be used as a marker of cancer in patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV + OPC). Factors influencing the initial ctHPV16 quantity are not well recognized. In this study we aimed to establish what factors are related to the level of ctHPV16 at the time of diagnosis. 51 patients (37 men and 14 women, median age of 57 years old) with HPV + OPC prior to definitive treatment were included. ctHPV16 was measured by qPCR. Tumor and nodal staging were assessed according to AJCC8. Blood derived factors included squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), serum soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21-1), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin level (Alb), neutrophils (Neut), thrombocytes (Plt) and lymphocyte (Lym) count, Neut/Lym ratio were assessed. The volumes of the primary tumor (TV) and involved lymph nodes (NV) were calculated using MRI, CT or PET-CT scans. Data were analysed using parametric and nonparametric methods. Variables for multivariable linear regression analysis were chosen based on the results from univariable analysis (correlation, univariable regression and difference). There were 9 (18%), 10 (19%) and 32 (63%) patients who had TV and NV assessed in MRI, CT or PET respectively. Primary tumor neither as T-stage nor TV was related to ctHPV16 level. Significant differences in the ctHPV16 between patients with high vs low pain (P = 0.038), NV (P = 0.023), TV + NV (P = 0.018), CYFRA 21-1 (P = 0.002), CRP (P = 0.019), and N1 vs N3 (P = 0.044) were observed. ctHPV16 was significantly associated with CYFRA 21-1 (P = 0.017), N stage (P = 0.005), NV (P = 0.009), TV + NV (P = 0.002), CRP (P = 0.019), and pain (P = 0.038). In univariable linear regression analysis the same variables predicted ctHPV16 level. In multivariable analyses, CYFRA 21-1 and CRP (both as categorical variables) were predictors of ctHPV16 level even above NV. ctHPV16 at presentation is driven by tumor volume measured mostly by N. CYFRA 21-1 and CRP are additional factors related to ctHPV16 prior to the treatment.

Changing patterns of urologic emergency visits and admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine the change in the number and severity of visits to the emergency departments (EDs) and subsequent admissions for urgent urologic conditions in the early stage of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated data from 13 urologic centers in Poland and compared the number of visits to the EDs and subsequent admissions before and after the advent of COVID-19 in 2020, and before and after the escalating national restrictions. Furthermore, data on types of urologic complaints, crucial laboratory parameters, and post-admission procedures were analyzed. RESULTS: In total 1,696 and 2,187 urologic visits (22.45% decrease) and 387 and 439 urologic urgent admissions (11.85% decrease) were reported in given periods in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The year-over-year difference in daily mean visits was clear (36.1 vs. 46.5; p < 0.001). Declines were seen in all complaints but device malfunction. In 2020 daily mean visits and admissions decreased from 40.9 and 9.6 before lockdowns to 30.9 (p < 0.001) and 6.9 (p = 0.001) after severe restrictions, respectively. There was a trend towards more negative laboratory parameter profiles in 2020, with patients who visited the EDs after severe restrictions having twice as high median levels of C-reactive protein (15.39 vs. 7.84, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The observed declines in ED visits and admissions were apparent with the significant effect of national lockdowns. Our results indicate that some of the patients requiring urgent medical help did not appear at the ED or came later than they would have done before the pandemic, presenting with more severe complaints.

Advances in ovarian cancer therapy.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. Current state-of-the-art surgery and chemotherapy result in the high incidence of complete remissions; however, the recurrence rate is also high. For most patients, the disease eventually becomes a continuum of symptom-free periods and recurrence episodes. Different targeted treatment approaches and biological drugs, currently under development, bring the promise of turning ovarian cancer into a manageable chronic disease. In this review, we discuss the current standard in the therapy for ovarian cancer, major recent studies on the new variants of conventional therapies, and new therapeutic approaches, recently approved and/or in clinical trials. The latter include anti-angiogenic therapies, polyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, inhibitors of growth factor signaling, or folate receptor inhibitors, as well as several immunotherapeutic approaches. We also discuss cost-effectiveness of some novel therapies and the issue of better selection of patients for personalized treatment.

Unsupervised analysis reveals two molecular subgroups of serous ovarian cancer with distinct gene expression profiles and survival.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed at late stages, and thus, patients' prognosis is poor. Improvement in treatment outcomes depends, at least partly, on better understanding of ovarian cancer biology and finding new molecular markers and therapeutic targets. METHODS: An unsupervised method of data analysis, singular value decomposition, was applied to analyze microarray data from 101 ovarian cancer samples; then, selected genes were validated by quantitative PCR. RESULTS: We found that the major factor influencing gene expression in ovarian cancer was tumor histological type. The next major source of variability was traced to a set of genes mainly associated with extracellular matrix, cell motility, adhesion, and immunological response. Hierarchical clustering based on the expression of these genes revealed two clusters of ovarian cancers with different molecular profiles and distinct overall survival (OS). Patients with higher expression of these genes had shorter OS than those with lower expression. The two clusters did not derive from high- versus low-grade serous carcinomas and were unrelated to histological (ovarian vs. fallopian) origin. Interestingly, there was considerable overlap between identified prognostic signature and a recently described invasion-associated signature related to stromal desmoplastic reaction. Several genes from this signature were validated by quantitative PCR; two of them-DSPG3 and LOX-were validated both in the initial and independent sets of samples and were significantly associated with OS and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We distinguished two molecular subgroups of serous ovarian cancers characterized by distinct OS. Among differentially expressed genes, some may potentially be used as prognostic markers. In our opinion, unsupervised methods of microarray data analysis are more effective than supervised methods in identifying intrinsic, biologically sound sources of variability. Moreover, as histological type of the tumor is the greatest source of variability in ovarian cancer and may interfere with analyses of other features, it seems reasonable to use histologically homogeneous groups of tumors in microarray experiments.