A study from The Mayo Clinic evaluated long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis.

Longer survival using modern therapies has increased the number of patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis receiving kidney transplantation. We evaluated 60 patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis who underwent kidney transplantation based on their hematologic response for outcomes of death, graft failure, and complications. Patient hematologic responses (light-chain in blood or urine) prior to kidney transplantation were three patients had no response, five had a partial response, six had a very good partial response, 37 had a complete response, and nine were treatment-naive patients (never treated for this disorder). After transplantation, seven of nine treatment-naive patients achieved a complete response. The median follow-up for the entire transplant cohort was 61 months. The estimated median overall survival from the time of kidney transplantation was 123 months for the entire group. Median overall survival was not reached for the very good partial response plus complete response groups, it was 47 months for no response plus partial response groups, and 117 months for the treatment-naive group (all significantly different). Median overall survival of very good partial response was 81 months, while the median was not reached in the complete response group (no significant difference). The time to amyloid recurrence was significantly longer in complete response compared to very good partial response (median 181 vs 81 months). Death-censored graft survival at one- and five-years was 98.3%, and 95.8%, respectively for all groups. Of the 60 patients, three had allograft failure, 19 died with a functioning graft, and 13 had an amyloid recurrence. Thus, outcomes after kidney transplant in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis seem acceptable if a very good partial response or complete response is achieved either before or after transplantation.

De novo pauci-immune glomerulonephritis in renal allografts.

Pauci-immune glomerulonephritis in the native kidney presents with renal insufficiency, proteinuria, and hematuria, and is usually due to anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Rarely, kidney transplants can show this pattern as de novo disease. We performed a retrospective analysis in 10 cases of de novo pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. The mean time from transplant to diagnostic biopsy was 32 months (range, 4-96). All biopsies showed focal necrotizing or crescentic glomerulonephritis (mean 16% glomeruli, range 2-36%). Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy showed a pauci-immune pattern. No patients had evidence of systemic vasculitis. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody results were available for 7 patients and were negative in all but one. Most patients had functioning grafts at one year after diagnosis. Two patients had repeat biopsies that showed continued active glomerulonephritis. We report the first clinicopathologic series of de novo pauci-immune glomerulonephritis which appears to be a unique pathologic entity that may occur early or late post-transplant and in our cohort is not associated with systemic vasculitis and usually not associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. The degree of crescent formation and renal impairment are milder than those of pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis in the native kidney.

Recurrence of DNAJB9-Positive Fibrillary Glomerulonephritis After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Series.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN) is a rare glomerular disease that often progresses to kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy. We have recently identified a novel biomarker of FGN, DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9 (DNAJB9). In this study, we used sequential protocol allograft biopsies and DNAJB9 staining to help characterize a series of patients with native kidney FGN who underwent kidney transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Between 1996 and 2016, kidney transplantation was performed on 19 patients with a reported diagnosis of FGN in their native/transplant kidneys. Using standard diagnostic criteria and DNAJB9 staining, we excluded 5 patients (4 atypical cases diagnosed as possible FGN and 1 donor-derived FGN). Protocol allograft biopsies had been performed at 4, 12, 24, 60, and 120 months posttransplantation. DNAJB9 immunohistochemistry was performed using an anti-DNAJB9 rabbit polyclonal antibody. Pre- and posttransplantation demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Summary statistical analysis was performed, including nonparametric statistical tests. OBSERVATIONS: The 14 patients with FGN had a median posttransplantation follow-up of 5.7 (IQR, 2.9-13.8) years. 3 (21%) patients had recurrence of FGN, detected on the 5- (n=1) and 10-year (n=2) allograft biopsies. Median time to recurrence was 10.2 (IQR, 5-10.5) years. Median levels of proteinuria and iothalamate clearance at the time of recurrence were 243mg/d and 56mL/min. The remaining 11 patients had no evidence of histologic recurrence on the last posttransplantation biopsy, although the median time of follow-up was significantly less at 4.4 (IQR, 2.9-14.4) years. 3 (21%) patients had a monoclonal protein detectable in serum obtained pretransplantation; none of these patients had recurrent FGN. LIMITATIONS: Small study sample and shorter follow-up time in the nonrecurrent versus recurrent group. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, FGN had an indolent course in the kidney allograft in that detectable histologic recurrence did not appear for at least 5 years posttransplantation.

Karyomegalic interstitial nephritis in a renal allograft.

Karyomegalic interstitial nephritis (KIN) is a rare renal interstitial disease entity characterized by large tubular nuclei, accompanied by interstitial inflammation, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis. Approximately 50 cases of KIN have been described in the native kidney. In this case study, we describe the first case of KIN in a kidney allograft. A 41-year-old man presented with declining kidney function and a serum creatinine of 2.7 mg/dL. The native kidney biopsy showed large pleomorphic nuclei in the proximal and distal tubular epithelial cells, which was associated with interstitial inflammation, and extensive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Immunohistochemistry for cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, and simian virus 40 were negative. A diagnosis of KIN was rendered. The patient received a living-related kidney transplant from his sister. At 4-, 12-, and 24-months posttransplant, protocol allograft biopsies showed KIN with large pleomorphic nuclei in the proximal and distal tubules with mild interstitial inflammation, minimal tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis. At 24.7 months of follow-up, the patient has stable renal function with a serum creatinine of 1.6 mg/dL. The KIN may represent recurrent KIN or donor-associated KIN. Recognition of this rare disease entity is important as it can be mistaken for a viral infection.

Using computer-assisted morphometrics of 5-year biopsies to identify biomarkers of late renal allograft loss.

The current Banff scoring system was not developed to predict graft loss and may not be ideal for use in clinical trials aimed at improving allograft survival. We hypothesized that scoring histologic features of digitized renal allograft biopsies using a continuous, more objective, computer-assisted morphometric (CAM) system might be more predictive of graft loss. We performed a nested case-control study in kidney transplant recipients with a surveillance biopsy obtained 5 years after transplantation. Patients that developed death-censored graft loss (n = 67) were 2:1 matched on age, gender, and follow-up time to controls with surviving grafts (n = 134). The risk of graft loss was compared between CAM-based models vs a model based on Banff scores. Both Banff and CAM identified chronic lesions associated with graft loss (chronic glomerulopathy, arteriolar hyalinosis, and mesangial expansion). However, the CAM-based models predicted graft loss better than the Banff-based model, both overall (c-statistic 0.754 vs 0.705, P < .001), and in biopsies without chronic glomerulopathy (c-statistic 0.738 vs 0.661, P < .001) where it identified more features predictive of graft loss (% luminal stenosis and % mesangial expansion). Using 5-year renal allograft surveillance biopsies, CAM-based models predict graft loss better than Banff models and might be developed into biomarkers for future clinical trials.

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin G deposits is associated with high rate of early recurrence in the allograft.

The characteristics of allograft proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin G deposits (PGNMID) are not well defined. To better characterize this disease we retrospectively identified 26 patients with allograft PGNMID, including 16 followed with early protocol biopsies. PGNMID was found to be a recurrent disease in most (89%) patients. A diagnostic biopsy was done for proteinuria and/or increased creatinine in most patients. Median time from transplant to diagnostic biopsy was 5.5 months, with detection within three to four months post-transplant in 86% of patients. Mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis was the most common pattern on the diagnostic biopsy with 89% of cases showing immunoglobulin G3 subtype restriction. A detectable serum paraprotein was present in 20% of patients. During a mean follow up of 87 months from implantation, 11 of 25 patients lost their allograft largely due to PGNMID within a mean of 36 months from diagnosis. Median graft survival was 92 months. Independent predictors of graft loss were a higher degree of peak proteinuria and longer time from implantation to diagnosis. Sixteen patients were treated with immunosuppressive therapy which resulted in over 50% reduction in proteinuria in 60%, and improvement of glomerular pathology in nine of 13 patients. However, 44% of responders subsequently relapsed. Thus, PGNMID has a high recurrence rate in renal allografts occurring early with detection enhanced by protocol biopsies. Graft outcome is guarded as nearly half of patients lose their graft within three years from diagnosis. Hence, there is a need for better treatment strategies for this disease.

Late graft failure after kidney transplantation as the consequence of late versus early events.

Beyond the first posttransplant year, 3% of kidney transplants fail annually. In a prospective, multicenter cohort study, we tested the relative impact of early versus late events on risk of long-term death-censored graft failure (DCGF). In grafts surviving at least 90 days, early events (acute rejection [AR] and delayed graft function [DGF] before day 90) were recorded; serum creatinine (Cr) at day 90 was defined as baseline. Thereafter, a 25% rise in serum Cr or new-onset proteinuria triggered graft biopsy (index biopsy, IBx), allowing comparison of risk of DCGF associated with early events (AR, DGF, baseline serum Cr >2.0 mg/dL) to that associated with later events (IBx). Among 3678 patients followed for 4.7 ± 1.9 years, 753 (20%) had IBx at a median of 15.3 months posttransplant. Early AR (HR = 1.77, P < .001) and elevated Cr at Day 90 (HR = 2.56, P < .0001) were associated with increased risk of DCGF; however, later-onset dysfunction requiring IBx had far greater impact (HR = 13.8, P < .0001). At 90 days, neither clinical characteristics nor early events distinguished those who subsequently did or did not undergo IBx or suffer DCGF. To improve long-term kidney allograft survival, management paradigms should promote prompt diagnosis and treatment of both early and later events.

De novo donor-specific antibody following BK nephropathy: The incidence and association with antibody-mediated rejection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The risk of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development following BK viremia (BKV) or nephropathy (BKN) after kidney transplant remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationships among dnDSA, BKV (BK blood PCR > 15 000 copies), BKN, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and allograft loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 904 solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 10/2007 and 5/2014. Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent covariates were used to assess the relationships among BKN, isolated BKV, dnDSA, and the subsequent risk of AMR and allograft loss. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, we observed that BKN, but not BKV was a risk factor for dnDSA (HR, 3.18, P = .008). Of the patients with BK nephropathy, 14.0% (6/43) developed dnDSA, which occurred within 14 months of BK diagnosis. DnDSA in this setting remains a risk factor for subsequent AMR (HR 4.75, P = .0001) and allograft loss (HR 2.63, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: BKN is an independent risk factor for development of dnDSA. Improved understanding of the characteristics of patients with BKN who are at highest risk for development of dnDSA would be valuable to customize immunosuppression reduction in this population.

Recent advances in our understanding of recurrent primary glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation.

Recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN) is an important cause of kidney allograft failure, particularly in younger recipients. Approximately 15% of death-censored graft failures are due to recurrent GN, but this incidence is likely an underestimation of the magnitude of the problem. Overall, 18% to 22% of kidney allografts are lost due to GN, either recurrent or presumed de novo. The impact of recurrent GN on allograft survival was recognized from the earliest times in kidney transplantation. However, progress in this area has been slow, and our understanding of GN recurrence remains limited, in large part due to incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases. This review focuses on recent advances in our general understanding of the pathophysiology of primary GN, the risk of recurrence in the allograft, and the consequences for kidney graft survival. We focus specifically on the most common forms of primary GN, including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and IgA nephropathy. New understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases has had direct clinical implications for transplantation, allowing better identification of candidates at high risk of recurrence and earlier diagnoses, and it is expected to lead to significance improvements in the therapy and perhaps even prevention of GN recurrence. More than ever, it is essential to fully characterize GN before transplantation as this information will direct our management posttransplantation. Further, the relative rarity of recurrent GN dictates the need for multicenter studies in order to evaluate, test, and validate recent advances and therapies.

Relationship between pre-transplant physical function and outcomes after kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: Performance-based measures of physical function predict morbidity following non-transplant surgery. Study objectives were to determine whether physical function predicts outcomes after kidney transplant and assess how physical function changes post-transplant. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study involving living donor kidney transplants recipients at our center from May 2012 to February 2014. Physical function was measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB [balance, chair stands, gait speed]) and grip strength testing. Initial length of stay (LOS), 30- day rehospitalizations, allograft function, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed. RESULTS: The majority of the 140 patients in our cohort had excellent pre-transplant physical function. In general, balance scores were more predictive of post-transplant outcomes than the SPPB. Decreased pre-transplant balance was independently associated with longer LOS and increased rehospitalizations but not with post-transplant QOL; 35% of patients experienced a clinically meaningful (≥ 1.0 m/s) improvement in gait speed 4 months post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased physical function may be associated with longer LOS and rehospitalizations following kidney transplant. Further studies are needed to confirm this association. The lack of relationship between pre-transplant gait speed and outcomes in our cohort may represent a ceiling effect. More comprehensive measures, including balance testing, may be required for risk stratification.

Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society Consensus Report on Pathologic Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting of GN.

Renal pathologists and nephrologists met on February 20, 2015 to establish an etiology/pathogenesis-based system for classification and diagnosis of GN, with a major aim of standardizing the kidney biopsy report of GN. On the basis of etiology/pathogenesis, GN is classified into the following five pathogenic types, each with specific disease entities: immune-complex GN, pauci-immune GN, antiglomerular basement membrane GN, monoclonal Ig GN, and C3 glomerulopathy. The pathogenesis-based classification forms the basis of the kidney biopsy report. To standardize the report, the diagnosis consists of a primary diagnosis and a secondary diagnosis. The primary diagnosis should include the disease entity/pathogenic type (if disease entity is not known) followed in order by pattern of injury (mixed patterns may be present); score/grade/class for disease entities, such as IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and ANCA GN; and additional features as detailed herein. A pattern diagnosis as the sole primary diagnosis is not recommended. Secondary diagnoses should be reported separately and include coexisting lesions that do not form the primary diagnosis. Guidelines for the report format, light microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy, and ancillary studies are also provided. In summary, this consensus report emphasizes a pathogenesis-based classification of GN and provides guidelines for the standardized reporting of GN.

Volume regression of native polycystic kidneys after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The natural course of native kidneys after renal transplantation (RT) or dialysis in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) remains poorly understood. METHODS: We measured the total volumes of native kidneys and liver in 78 and 68 ADPKD patients, respectively, who had pre-transplant (within 2 years) and at least one post-transplant computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); in 40 patients with at least two post-transplant but no pre-transplant CT/MRIs; in 9 patients on chronic hemodialysis with at least one CT/MRI before and after beginning dialysis; and in 5 patients who had no image before and more than one image after dialysis. The last imaging was used in patients with multiple studies. RESULTS: Mean total kidney volume (TKV) ( ± SD) prior to transplantation was 3187 ± 1779 mL in the 78 patients who had imaging before and after transplantation and decreased by 20.2, 28.6, 38.3 and 45.8% after 0.5-1 (mean 0.7), 1-3 (1.8), 3-10 (5.7) and >10 (12.6) years, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, time on dialysis prior to RT and time from baseline to transplantation were negatively associated with reduction in TKV, whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after transplantation and time from transplantation were positively associated with percent reduction in TKV. In the 40 patients with imaging only after transplantation, TKV decreased by 3.2 ± 16.3% between 7.2 ± 6.0 and 11.2 ± 6.8 years after transplantation (P < 0.001). TKV was 11.2 ± 35.6% higher (P = NS) after a follow-up of 3.4 ± 2.0 years in the 9 patients with imaging before and after initiation of hemodialysis and 3.4 ± 40.2% lower (P = NS) in the 5 patients with imaging between 2.0 ± 2.1 and 3.5 ± 3.6 years after initiation of hemodialysis. In the 68 patients with liver measurements, volume increased by 5.8 ± 17.9% between baseline and follow-up at 3.7 ± 3.8 years after transplantation (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: TKV of native polycystic kidneys decreases substantially after RT. The reduction occurs mainly during the early post-transplantation period and more slowly thereafter.

Outcomes of patients with renal monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease.

Recent reports suggest that deep hematologic responses to chemotherapy are associated with improved renal outcomes in monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD). Here we describe the long term outcomes and identify prognostic factors after first line treatment of the largest reported series of patients with MIDD. Between March 1992 and December 2014, 88 patients with MIDD were seen at Mayo Clinic, MN. Renal responses were defined using criteria used for light chain amyloidosis (AL) or those used by the IMWG. Sixty-one (69%) patients had a GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 16 (18%) were on renal replacement therapy at diagnosis. The interval between albuminuria or elevation in creatinine and MIDD diagnosis was 12 months suggesting a delay in diagnosis. Thirty-seven patients (42%) had at least a hematologic CR/VGPR. Fifty-three (60%) received an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based treatments. Patients receiving ASCT or PI-based therapies were more likely to achieve at least a hematologic CR/VGPR compared to those receiving other therapies: 66% vs 2%, p < 0.0001. Patients that achieved a hematologic CR were more likely to achieve a renal response (53% vs 24%, p = 0.001). Five year overall and renal survival for the entire cohort was 67% and 57%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, a baseline GFR < 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a renal response (using AL or IMWG criteria) were independently predictive of progression to dialysis. This study confirms that deep hematologic responses, best achieved with ASCT or PI-based therapies, are a prerequisite to achieving renal responses. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1123-1128, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Through a glass darkly: seeking clarity in preventing late kidney transplant failure.

A common lament is that long-term kidney transplant outcomes remain the same despite improvements in early graft survival. To be fair, progress has been made-in both our understanding of chronic injury and modestly, graft survival. However, we are still a long way from actually solving this important and difficult problem. In this review, we outline recent data supporting the existence of several causes of renal allograft loss, the incidences of which peak at different time points after transplantation. On the basis of this broadened concept of chronic renal allograft injury, we examine the challenges of clinical trial design in long-term studies, including the use of surrogate end points and biomarkers. Finally, we suggest a path forward that, ultimately, may improve long-term renal allograft survival.

Adherence to a pedometer-based physical activity intervention following kidney transplant and impact on metabolic parameters.

The majority of kidney transplant recipients die from cardiovascular events. Physical activity may be a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease following transplant. The goal of our study was to examine adherence to a physical activity intervention following kidney transplant and its impact on metabolic parameters. All patients who received a kidney transplant at our center between 12/2010 and 12/2011 received usual care (n = 162), while patients transplanted between 12/2011 and 1/2013 received a 90-day pedometer-based physical activity intervention (n = 145). Metabolic parameters were assessed at four and 12 months post-transplant. Baseline demographics and clinical management were similar between cohorts. Adherence to the prescription was 36.5%. Patients in the physical activity cohort had lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure four months post-transplant compared to the usual care cohort (122 ± 18 vs. 126 ± 16 mmHg, p = 0.049 and 73 ± 10 vs. 77 ± 9, p = 0.004) and less impaired fasting glucose (20.7% vs. 30.9%, p = 0.04). Twelve-month outcomes were not different between cohorts. Over one-third of our cohort adhered to a pedometer-based physical activity intervention following kidney transplant, and the intervention was associated with improved metabolic parameters. Further study of post-transplant exercise interventions and methods to optimize long-term adherence are needed.

Clinical findings, pathology, and outcomes of C3GN after kidney transplantation.

C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) results from abnormalities in the alternative pathway of complement, and it is characterized by deposition of C3 with absent or scant Ig deposition. In many patients, C3GN progresses to ESRD. The clinical features, pathology, and outcomes of patients with C3GN receiving kidney transplantation are unknown. Between 1996 and 2010, we identified 21 patients at our institution who received a kidney transplant because of ESRD from C3GN. The median age at the time of initial diagnosis of C3GN at kidney biopsy was 20.8 years. The median time from native kidney biopsy to dialysis or transplantation was 42.3 months. Of 21 patients, 14 (66.7%) patients developed recurrent C3GN in the allograft. The median time to recurrence of disease was 28 months. Graft failure occurred in 50% of patients with recurrent C3GN, with a median time of 77 months to graft failure post-transplantation. The remaining 50% of patients had functioning grafts, with a median follow-up of 73.9 months. The majority of patients had hematuria and proteinuria at time of recurrence. Three (21%) patients were positive for monoclonal gammopathy and had a faster rate of recurrence and graft loss. Kidney biopsy at the time of recurrence showed mesangial proliferative GN in eight patients and membranoproliferative GN in six patients. All allograft kidney biopsies showed bright C3 staining (2-3+), with six biopsies also showing trace/1+ staining for IgM and/or IgG. To summarize, C3GN recurs in 66.7% of patients, and one half of the patients experience graft failure caused by recurrence.

Enhanced posttransplant management of patients with diabetes improves patient outcomes.

The survival of patients with diabetes mellitus in the general population has improved in recent years. Here we assessed whether similar trends have occurred in 1688 kidney recipients, including 413 with diabetes prior to transplant between 1996 and 2007. Compared to patients without diabetes, the 5-year mortality was significantly increased (hazard ratio (HR) 2.68 (1.95-3.69)) due to higher cardiovascular-, infection-, and malignancy-related deaths in those with diabetes. However, 5-year mortality in patients with diabetes significantly declined over time (HR 0.883 (0.817-0.954)), narrowing the mortality difference between patients with and those without diabetes and in more recent years largely eliminating it. Post transplant, patients with diabetes experienced a significant decline in major fatal/nonfatal cardiac events (HR 0.853 (0.782-0.930)) and infectious deaths over time. In contrast, neither cardiac events nor overall mortality declined in recipients without diabetes. The decline in mortality due to diabetes did not relate to a reduced pretransplant risk profile and was independent of posttransplant variables. The use of cardioprotective medications and glycemic control improved over time post transplant. Furthermore, graft function and serum albumin significantly improved over time and these parameters related to better survival (albumin, HR 0.365 (0.223-0.599); eGFR, HR 0.803 (0.756-0.852)). Thus, survival of kidney recipients with diabetes mellitus has improved markedly since 1996 likely reflecting, at least in part, enhanced posttransplant management and outcomes.

Impact of urinary tract infection on allograft function after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication after kidney transplantation. We aim to determine its impact on allograft function as indicated by several measures such as iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and creatinine value. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study to determine the impact of UTI on kidney allograft outcome. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 301 kidney transplant recipients; 84% were living donor transplants. One hundred and one patients (34%) developed at least one episode of UTI and the incidence of UTI during the first year after transplantation was 25%. At the end of the follow-up, the iGFR was lower among patients who had developed at least one UTI (p = 0.044). However, eGFR and creatinine values were not significantly different between UTI and non-UTI groups. CONCLUSION: When kidney function was measured by eGFR and creatinine, there was no significant difference in allograft function between kidney recipients with or without UTI. However, when kidney function was measured by nuclear studies, there was a tendency toward impairment in allograft function among patients who developed atleast one UTI after transplantation.

A prospective controlled study of kidney donors: baseline and 6-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Most previous studies of living kidney donors have been retrospective and have lacked suitable healthy controls. Needed are prospective controlled studies to better understand the effects of a mild reduction in kidney function from kidney donation in otherwise healthy individuals. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients approved for donation at 8 transplant centers in the United States were asked to participate. For every donor enrolled, an equally healthy control with 2 kidneys who theoretically would have been suitable to donate a kidney also was enrolled. PREDICTOR: Kidney donation. MEASUREMENTS: At baseline predonation and at 6 months after donation, medical history, vital signs, measured (iohexol) glomerular filtration rate, and other measurements were collected. There were 201 donors and 198 controls who completed both baseline and 6-month visits and form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Compared with controls, donors had 28% lower glomerular filtration rates at 6 months (94.6 ± 15.1 [SD] vs 67.6 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P < 0.001), associated with 23% greater parathyroid hormone (42.8 ± 15.6 vs 52.7 ± 20.9 pg/mL; P < 0.001), 5.4% lower serum phosphate (3.5 ± 0.5 vs 3.3 ± 0.5 mg/dL; P < 0.001), 3.7% lower hemoglobin (13.6 ± 1.4 vs 13.1 ± 1.2 g/dL; P < 0.001), 8.2% greater uric acid (4.9 ± 1.2 vs 5.3 ± 1.1 mg/dL; P < 0.001), 24% greater homocysteine (1.2 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.4 mg/L; P < 0.001), and 1.5% lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (54.9 ± 16.4 vs 54.1 ± 13.9 mg/dL; P = 0.03) levels. There were no differences in albumin-creatinine ratios (5.0 [IQR, 4.0-6.6] vs 5.0 [IQR, 3.3-5.4] mg/g; P = 0.5), office blood pressures, or glucose homeostasis. LIMITATIONS: Short duration of follow-up and possible bias resulting from an inability to screen controls with kidney and vascular imaging performed in donors. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney donors have some, but not all, abnormalities typically associated with mild chronic kidney disease 6 months after donation. Additional follow-up is warranted.