[Therapeutic management of bipolar disorder in France and Europe: a multinational longitudinal study (WAVE-bd)]. / Prise en charge thérapeutique des patients présentant un trouble bipolaire en France et en Europe : étude multinationale longitudinale WAVE-bd.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder is a complex disease which requires multiple healthcare resources and complex medical care programs including pharmacological and non pharmacological treatment. If mood stabilizers remain the corner stone for bipolar disorder treatment, the development of atypical antipsychotics and their use as mood stabilizers has significantly modified therapeutic care. At the present time, psychiatrists have a large variety of psychotropic drugs for bipolar disorder: mood stabilizers, atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics… However, despite the publication of guidelines on pharmacological treatment, with a high degree of consensus, everyday clinical practices remain heterogeneous. Moreover, there are few longitudinal studies to describe therapeutic management of bipolar disorder, whatever the phase of the disease is. Indeed, most of the studies are carried out on a specific phase of the disease or treatment. And there is no study comparing French and European practices. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we aim to present the comparison of the management of pharmacological treatments of bipolar disorder between France and Europe, using the data of the observational Wide AmbispectiVE study of the clinical management and burden of bipolar disorder (WAVE-bd study). METHODS: The WAVE-bd study is a multinational, multicentre and non-interventional cohort study of patients diagnosed with BD type I or type II, according to DSM IV-TR criteria, in any phase of the disorder, who have experienced at least one mood event during the 12 months before enrolment. In total, 2507 patients have been included across 8 countries of Europe (480 in France). Data collection was retrospective (from 3 to 12 months), but also prospective (from 9 to 15 months) for a total study length of 12 to 27 months. Main outcome measures were the healthcare resource use and pharmacological treatments. RESULTS: Our results show differences in the therapeutic management of bipolar disorder between France and other European countries. Regarding healthcare resource use, our results show that French patients consult more frequently a psychiatrist or a psychologist and less frequently a general practitioner or the emergency ward in comparison with patients from other European countries. In the whole European population, including France, atypical antipsychotics are widely used. Only 25% of the patients receive lithium and more than 50% of the patients receive antidepressants, while their use in bipolar disorder remains controversial. Most of the patients receive polymedication. Considering all phases of the disease pooled, less lithium and less atypical antipsychotics are prescribed to French patients, whereas they receive more antidepressants and more benzodiazepines than patients from other European countries. On the over hand, prescription of anticonvulsants and electroconvulsive therapy are equal. Moreover, data analyses by polarity of the episodes globally confirm these trends. There are a few exceptions: mixed states, in which lithium is twice more prescribed in France in comparison to other countries; depressive states, in which antidepressants are even more prescribed in other countries than in France; and less prescription of anticonvulsants in manic, mixed and euthymic phases in France. CONCLUSION: The WAVE-bd study is the first observational study conducted on a large sample of bipolar I and II patients that compares therapeutic management between France and other European countries. The differences observed in therapeutic care across the different phases of the disease show that treatments differ depending on the countries studied, but also according to the preventive or curative phases, polarity of the bipolar disorder, comorbidities, impact of guidelines, and care organization. Although French patients have been treated by less lithium and less atypical antipsychotics than other European patients, they receive more antidepressants and more benzodiazepines. Finally, patients generally receive polymedication and the diversity in prescriptions shows how bipolar disorder is a complex disorder.

[Current status and management of patients with bipolar disorder in France: the MONTRA survey]. / Caractéristiques et modalités de prise en charge des patients présentant un trouble bipolaire en France : enquête MONTRA.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to assess the characteristics of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and to evaluate the prescribing practices. METHODS: MONTRA is a quantitative survey conducted between December 2010 and February 2011. Data were extracted by the psychiatrists from the medical files of BD patients seen on four consecutive days of consulting. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-nine psychiatrists included 2529 patients (inpatients, n=319; outpatients from mental clinics, n=1090; outpatients consulting in private practice, n=1020). In the total patient population (mean age: 47 years; women, 58%), BD was distributed as follows: BD type I, 56%; BD type II, 40%; other types of BD, 4%; rapid cyclers, 10%. The prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities was high (anxiety disorders, 48%; abuse and dependence on toxic substances, 17 and 10% respectively), 36% of the patients had a history of suicide attempt and the risk of suicide, when assessed, was 6%. In about half the patients (48%), the polarity of the initial bipolar episode was of the depressive type (versus 39% for the manic/hypomanic type). Outpatients were globally independent and did not require assistance in the management of their disease or its treatment whereas the social and professional lives of inpatients were negatively affected by their condition. Based on the psychiatrist's declarations, 39 to 50% of the outpatients were symptom-free, 36 to 40% were in the intercurrent phase with residual symptoms, 11 to 17% presented either a manic or depressive acute BP episode, and 3 to 4% were in a mixed state; among inpatients, 52% presented an acute episode either manic or depressive, 38% were in the intercurrent phase and 9% were in a mixed state. In the symptomatic patients from the total population (61%), the most prevalent symptoms were depressive and corresponded to acute symptoms (patients with a depressive episode, 14%) or residual symptoms (patients in the intercurrent phase, 27%). The predominant depressive polarity was observed in both hospitalized and outpatients. The pharmacological treatment of BD included polytherapy in 73% of the patients. In the manic episodes (n=126), the patients were treated with a Mood Stabilizer (MS, 56%) or an atypical antipsychotic (AAP, 52%) in association. In the depressive episodes (n=342), the patients received an antidepressant drug associated with a MS or an AAP (70%). In symptom-free or symptomatic intercurrent periods (n=1943), the patients were treated with a MS (49-58%) or an AAP (37-49%), in association. CONCLUSION: BD patients evaluated in our survey were in majority diagnosed with BD type I, associated with considerable comorbidity. In the symptomatic patients, the most prevalent symptoms, either acute or residual, were of the depressive type. In the majority of the patients, whatever the clinical status, polytherapy was prescribed for the BD.

Hospital cost of Clostridium difficile infection including the contribution of recurrences in French acute-care hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The impact of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) on healthcare costs is significant due to the extra costs of associated inpatient care. However, the specific contribution of recurrences has rarely been studied. AIM: The aim of this study was to estimate the hospital costs of CDI and the fraction attributable to recurrences in French acute-care hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for 2011 on a sample of 12 large acute-care hospitals. CDI costs were estimated from both hospital and public insurance perspectives. For each stay, CDI additional costs were estimated by comparison to controls without CDI extracted from the national DRG (diagnosis-related group) database and matched on DRG, age and sex. When CDI was the primary diagnosis, the full cost of stay was used. FINDINGS: A total of 1067 bacteriological cases of CDI were identified corresponding to 979 stays involving 906 different patients. Recurrence(s) were identified in 118 (12%) of these stays with 51.7% of them having occurred within the same stay as the index episode. Their mean length of stay was 63.8 days compared to 25.1 days for stays with an index case only. The mean extra cost per stay with CDI was estimated at €9,575 (median: €7,514). The extra cost of CDI in public acute-care hospitals was extrapolated to €163.1 million at the national level, of which 12.5% was attributable to recurrences. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of CDI is substantial and directly impacts healthcare systems in France.

Phase transition with the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless singularity in the Ising model on a growing network.

We consider the ferromagnetic Ising model on a highly inhomogeneous network created by a growth process. We find that the phase transition in this system is characterized by the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless singularity, although critical fluctuations are absent and the mean-field description is exact. Below this infinite order transition, the magnetization behaves as exp((-const/square root of(Tc-T)). We show that the critical point separates the phase with the power-law distribution of the linear response to a local field and the phase where this distribution rapidly decreases. We suggest that this phase transition occurs in a wide range of cooperative models with a strong infinite-range inhomogeneity.