Mortality after emergency Hartmann's procedure in octogenarians: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complicated diverticulitis is associated with a postoperative mortality rate of 20%. We hypothesized that age ≥80 was an independent risk factor for mortality after Hartmann's procedure for diverticular disease when controlling for baseline comorbidities. METHODS: Patients who underwent an urgent or emergent Hartmann's procedure (Current Procedural Terminology codes 44143 and 44206) for diverticular disease (International Classification of Diseases-9:562.xx) were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project 2005-2013 user file. Using propensity score matching to control for baseline comorbidities, a group of patients ≥80 years old was matched to a group of those <80 years old. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. RESULTS: From a total of 2986 patients, 464 patients (15.5%) were ≥80 years old. Two groups of 284 patients in each study arm were matched using propensity-matching. The mean age of the ≥80 group and <80 group was 84.4 ± 3.3 versus 63.77 ± 911.8; P < 0.0001, respectively. There was no statistical difference in baseline comorbidities or operative time between the groups. There was a significant difference in mortality with 19% and 9.2% in the >80 group versus <80 groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Factors associated with mortality included ascites (odds ratio [OR] 4.95, confidence interval [CI] 1.64-14.93, P = 0.005), previous cardiac surgery (OR 3.68, CI 1.46-9.26, P = 0.006), partially dependent or fully dependent functional status (OR 2.51, CI 1.12-5.56, P = 0.02), albumin <3 (OR 2.49, CI 1.18-5.29, P = 0.01), and American Society of Anesthesiologist class >3 (OR 2.10, CI 1.10-4.46, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians presenting with complicated diverticulitis requiring an emergent Hartmann's procedure have a higher mortality rate compared to those <80, even after controlling for baseline comorbidities. STUDY TYPE: This is a retrospective, descriptive study.

The 912th forward surgical team in Operation New Dawn: employment of the forward surgical team during troop withdrawal under combat conditions.

The Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq witnessed the first widespread use of U.S. Army Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs). Although doctrinally designed to support maneuver brigades in a linear front conflict, FSTs were quickly adapted to fulfill area support and special operation support missions as part of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. FST's were also split to cover a greater area in both theaters. We now report further adaptation of the split FST role to meet the unique requirements encountered during the final phase of Operation New Dawn. Maintaining resuscitative surgical capabilities for U.S. Forces withdrawing under combat conditions required changes in techniques, tactics, and procedures. We describe our experience within three different scenarios in which elements of an FST were successfully employed and discuss operational planning considerations.

Is spine consultation needed for all thoracolumbar fractures? Evaluation of a subspecialist-sparing protocol for screening and management of stable fractures.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of neurosurgeons is a problem in many US trauma centers. Most thoracolumbar spine fractures are treated conservatively, and at our institution, we found that most patients did not require surgery. We hypothesize that most spine fractures can be treated safely and effectively by the trauma team, without neurosurgical consultation, using a protocol to guide diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: A treatment protocol was designed, which used radiologic criteria to screen for potentially stable fractures and guide their treatment by the trauma service without obtaining a spine consult. All patients meeting criteria were ambulated 1 day to 2 days after admission, either with or without a thoracolumbar support orthotic, depending on their level of spinal injury. All received a repeat spine computed tomographic (CT) scan after ambulation. Any change in the fractures on CT findings triggered neurosurgical consultation. Patients with no change in their fractures were discharged with outpatient neurosurgery follow-up and imaging. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were evaluated prospectively and 45 met inclusion criteria. Of the 45 patients, 39 were managed without the need for neurosurgical consult. Six patients had mild postambulation CT changes, triggering spine consultation, and all six were managed nonoperatively. All unstable fractures, cord injuries, or cases requiring surgery were identified during the initial trauma survey. One hundred fifty-two retrospective cases were then reviewed. Of these 152 patients, 85 met inclusion criteria. Overall, patients with postambulation CT changes were older (median age, 72 vs. 46 years). Of the 85 patients, none of the 9 patients who had postambulation CT changes required surgery. Hundred percent were managed with repeat CT scan and continued bracing. All operative or unstable fractures during the study period would have been effectively screened out by the protocol's radiologic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a treatment protocol for stable thoracolumbar fractures seems to be safe and is currently in clinical practice at our institution. Its use could conserve neurosurgical resources without sacrificing patient safety outcomes.

Benefits of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: The traditional therapy for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis with peritonitis is emergency colectomy usually with colostomy. We report laparoscopic exploration with peritoneal lavage as an alternative in seven patients who required emergency surgery for diverticulitis. METHODS: Six patients presented with diffuse peritonitis and one with a failure of percutaneous therapy. All patients were explored laparoscopically and the peritoneal cavity was lavaged with saline in addition to receiving intravenous antibiotics. Patient demographics, clinical response, length of stay, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Six patients had resolution of peritonitis resolved and patients were discharged from the hospital. One of these patients who developed a pelvic abscess required a percutaneous drainage postoperatively. This patient ultimately returned 3 months later with recurrent symptoms and underwent colectomy with primary anastomosis. One patient failed to improve initially and underwent colectomy with primary anastomosis on the same admission. Five patients subsequently had elective sigmoid resections, four laparoscopic and one open. Mean length of stay was 7.7 days. There was no mortality. CONCLUSION: We conclude that laparoscopic exploration and peritoneal lavage can be performed safely in patients with diffuse, purulent peritonitis. Using this approach, most patients with purulent peritonitis can avoid emergent laparotomy with the risk of colostomy, and the need for a second surgery.

Surgeons' Experiences With Patients' Concerns Regarding Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about surgeons' attitudes toward patients' concerns about the role of trainees in their care. The nature of the discussion between surgeons and their patients about trainees and the effect on how patients are cared for is an important part of patient-centered care. We aim to elucidate surgeons' attitude toward patients' concerns regarding trainee involvement in their care. DESIGN: An electronic, web-based 15-question survey (SurveyMonkey) was used. SETTING: Surveys were sent to 528 e-mail accounts of the members of the Massachusetts Chapter of the American College of Surgeons. Surgeon demographics, the frequency and nature of patients' concerns about trainees, and the reactions to these concerns by surgeons were explored. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 528 surgeons surveyed, 109 completed the online survey. Most specialties of surgery were represented. RESULTS: We analyzed 109 responses (21% response rate). Most surgeons from a variety of specialties were involved with teaching medical students and residents. Half the respondents trained fellows as well. Patients' concerns are raised more often in the community setting where surgeons are more likely to alter their practice. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients' concerns about trainee involvement are infrequent, they arise enough to deserve specific attention in the current patient-centric environment. Surgeons successfully negotiate to have trainee involvement in the vast majority of cases. Specific guidelines should be developed and adopted to ensure that patients consent to trainee involvement and understand the role of trainees and their supervision.

Ideal timing of surgery for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Early surgery for appendicitis is thought to avoid complications associated with appendiceal rupture. AIMS: This study was to evaluate the effect of timing of surgery on complications, length of stay (LOS) and cost in patients undergoing appendectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 396 patients with appendectomies from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007 was performed. Demographic data, time of presentation, physical findings, diagnostic data, operating room times, LOS, cost and complications were collected. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on time from presentation to appendectomy. RESULTS: Pathology confirmed appendicitis in 354 (89%) patients. Most patients (90%) had surgery within 18 h of presentation. Timing of surgery did not affect the incidence of purulent peritonitis (P = 0.883), abscess (P = 0.841) or perforation (P = 0.464). LOS was significantly shorter for patients with emergency department registration to operating room times less than 18 h (P < 0.0001). Costs were significantly higher for patients with times to operating room greater than 18 h (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Timing of surgery did not affect the incidence of complications or perforated appendicitis. However, delay in surgical consultation and surgery are associated with increased LOS and increased hospital costs. The optimal timing of appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis appears to be within 18 h of emergency department presentation.

Fast track colorectal surgery.

A "fast track" colon surgery program is the global package of perioperative care encompassing preoperative, operative, and postoperative techniques, which in aggregate result in fewer complications, a reduction in cost, less postoperative pain, a reduction in the hospital length of stay, and quicker return to work and normal activities. Results of fast track programs have shown significant advantages; however, strong evidence is forthcoming. Implementation of a fast track program requires a significant commitment and a multidisciplinary approach. Fast track principles may also be applied to anorectal surgery with good results.

Tuberculous fistulae in ano: a case report and literature review.

Tuberculosis can present anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract; however, anorectal tuberculosis has been reported rarely. We present a case report of tuberculous fistulae in ano and review the extrapulmonary manifestations of tuberculosis.

Simple harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy utilizing local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation: a safe and rapid alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Harmonic Scalpel(R) hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) is an established surgical therapy for the treatment of symptomatic grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoid surgery is still being performed as an inpatient procedure with general or regional anesthesia in many centers today. There was a trend toward performing hemorrhoid surgery as an ambulatory procedure using local anesthesia supplemented with intravenous sedation. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HSH performed with combination local anesthesia and intravenous sedation in an ambulatory surgical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on the clinical charts of all patients undergoing HSH in an ambulatory surgical center from 2001 to 2005. All hemorrhoidectomies were attempted under propofol/ketamine intravenous sedation and local anesthesia in the prone position. A simple, open technique without routine suture was used. RESULTS: During the study period, 180 patients (70 females) underwent HSM. Mean procedure and total operating room time were 12 and 28 min, respectively. One patient (0.6%) was converted to general endotracheal anesthesia. Ten patients (5.6%) required post anesthesia care unit (PACU) observation. All patients were discharged home after the procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 19 patients (10.6%). There were no reoperations and the total readmission rate was 3.7%. CONCLUSION: HSH performed with a combination of intravenous sedation and local anesthesia is safe and effective in the ambulatory surgery setting. The combined technique was associated with a rate of complications comparable to published series utilizing conventional hemorrhoidectomy techniques. Added benefits include shorter hospital stay and a potential for cost savings.

Combination propofol/ketamine is a safe and efficient anesthetic approach to anorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Concerns persist regarding respiratory complications from combination deep intravenous sedation and local anesthesia for prone position anorectal surgery. We examined the safety and efficacy of this approach by using a propofol-based and ketamine-based technique. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients undergoing anorectal surgery. Outcomes (perioperative times, specific complications) were compared with respect to operative position and anesthetic approach. Significance was determined using Student's t-test and chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Surgery was performed on 448 patients during a three-year period. There was no significant difference in the two anesthetic groups with regard to age and gender. There were 19 anesthesia-related adverse events occurring in the study group (Monitored Anesthesia Care Group): nausea and vomiting (n = 8), airway obstruction necessitating conversion to general anesthesia (n = 2), excessive pain (n = 2), urinary retention (n = 5), and hospital readmission (n = 2). These occurred in <5 percent of those receiving the combination technique (19/407). Although there was no difference in total procedural time, there was a significant difference in total time spent in the operating room (P = 0.001) and in the hospital overall (P = 0.002). Of the patients receiving combination technique anesthesia, only 31 (7 percent) required the use of the postanesthesia care unit. All patients receiving general anesthesia (n = 23) required the postanesthesia care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Combination deep intravenous sedation with local anesthesia based on propofol and ketamine is a safe and effective technique for prone-position anorectal surgery. It results in decreased use of the postanesthesia care unit and earlier hospital discharge, reflecting a more efficient use of hospital resources.