Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Food Prot ; 73(7): 1278-87, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20615340

RESUMEN

Provincial broiler-chicken marketing boards in Canada have recently implemented an on-farm food safety program called Safe, Safer, Safest. The purpose of this study was to measure broiler chicken producers' attitudes toward the program and food safety topics and use of highly recommended good production practices (GPP). Mailed and Web-based questionnaires were administered to all producers registered in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec in 2008. The response percentage was 33.2% (642 of 1,932). Nearly 70% of respondents rated the program as effective in producing safe chicken, and 49.1% rated the program requirements as easy to implement. Most respondents (92.9%) reported that they do not raise other poultry or keep birds as pets, and 79.8% reported that they clean and disinfect their barns between each flock cycle. Less than 50% of respondents reported that visitors wash their hands or change their clothes before entering barns, 38.4% reported that catching crews wear clean clothes and boots, and 35.8% reported that a crew other than from the hatchery places chicks. Respondents who rated the program requirements as effective or easy to implement were more likely to report the use of five of six highly recommended GPP. Only 21.1% of respondents indicated that Campylobacter can be transmitted from contaminated chicken meat to humans, and 26.6% believed that antimicrobial use in their industry is linked to antimicrobial resistance in humans. Continuing education of producers should focus on improving their awareness of these issues, while mandatory GPP should include those that are known to be effective in controlling Campylobacter and Salmonella in broiler chicken flocks.


Asunto(s)
Pollos/microbiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/normas , Contaminación de Alimentos/prevención & control , Manipulación de Alimentos/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/normas , Animales , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Campylobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Campylobacter/microbiología , Infecciones por Campylobacter/prevención & control , Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Canadá , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Humanos , Higiene , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Avian Dis ; 54(1 Suppl): 194-200, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20521632

RESUMEN

Since 2005 there have been five incursions into Great Britain of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of subtype H5N1 related to the ongoing global epizootic. The first incursion occurred in October 2005 in birds held in quarantine after importation from Taiwan. Two incursions related to wild birds: one involved a single dead whooper swan found in March 2006 in the sea off the east coast of Scotland, and the other involved 10 mute swans and a Canada goose found dead over the period extending from late December 2007 to late February 2008 on or close to a swannery on the south coast of England. The other two outbreaks occurred in commercial poultry in January 2007 and November 2007, both in the county of Suffolk. The first of these poultry outbreaks occurred on a large turkey farm, and there was no further spread. The second outbreak occurred on a free-range farm rearing turkeys, ducks, and geese and spread to birds on a second turkey farm that was culled as a dangerous contact. Viruses isolated from these five outbreaks were confirmed to be Asian H5N1 HPAI viruses; the quarantine outbreak was attributed to a clade 2.3 virus and the other four to clade 2.2 viruses. This article describes the outbreaks, their control, and the possible origins of the responsible viruses.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Subtipo H5N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Aviar/epidemiología , Animales , Aves , Subtipo H5N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Gripe Aviar/virología , Filogenia , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA