Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Fam Pract ; 36(5): 607-613, 2019 10 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30576438

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The evidence that large pay-for-performance schemes improve the health of populations is mixed-evidence regarding locally implemented schemes is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effects in Stoke-on-Trent of a local, multifaceted Quality Improvement Framework including pay for performance in general practice introduced in 2009 in the context of the national Quality and Outcomes Framework that operated from 2004. METHODS: We compared age-standardized mortality data from all 326 local authorities in England with the rates in Stoke-on-Trent using Difference-in-Differences, estimating a fixed-effects linear regression model with an interaction effect. RESULTS: In addition to the existing downward trend in cardiovascular deaths, we find an additional annual reduction of 36 deaths compared with the national mean for coronary heart disease and 13 deaths per 100000 from stroke in Stoke-on-Trent. Compared with the national mean, there was an additional reduction of 9 deaths per 100000 people per annum for coronary heart disease and 14 deaths per 100000 people per annum for stroke following the introduction of the 2009 Stoke-on-Trent Quality Improvement Framework. CONCLUSION: There are concerns about the unintended consequences of large pay-for-performance schemes in health care, but in a population with a high prevalence of disease, they may at least initially be beneficial. This study also provides evidence that a local, additional scheme may further improve the health of populations. Such schemes, whether national or local, require periodic review to evaluate the balance of their benefits and risks.


Asunto(s)
Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Medicina Estatal/economía , Medicina Estatal/tendencias , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Medicina General/organización & administración , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Mortalidad/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 16: 83, 2015 Jul 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26183439

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is common and conveys significant risk of morbidity and mortality. However, inadequate control of hypertension is common. Following a successful local use of a simple telehealth intervention ('Florence') for the diagnosis and management of hypertension, the Advice & Interactive Messaging (AIM) for Health simple telehealth programme was launched across England in March 2013. Four protocols were developed to diagnose and monitor blood pressure (BP). The aim of this service evaluation was to identify the extent to which predefined service outcomes, regarding ascertainment of a diagnosis of hypertension, and achievement of hypertension control, were met for the hypertension protocols. METHODS: Patients with opportunistic raised BP in general practice or diagnosed hypertension were selected by their usual primary care providers to register onto diagnostic or monitoring hypertension protocols, respectively. Florence sent patients prompts via text messaging to submit readings, educational messages and user satisfaction questions. Patient responses were stored on Florence for review by their primary care health providers. This service evaluation used data from 2963 patients from general practices across England registered onto one of four AIM hypertension protocols from inception to January 2014. Data were extracted from Florence and underwent descriptive analysis. RESULTS: 1166/1468 (79 %) patients were eligible to have a diagnosis of hypertension confirmed/refuted, of which 740 (63 %) had a mean BP in the hypertensive range from one week's readings. BP control was achieved by only 5-22 % of 1495 patients signed up to one of the three monitoring protocols. Patient engagement with the monitoring protocols was initially good but reduced over time. CONCLUSIONS: Although simple telehealth may be an acceptable tool for diagnosing and monitoring hypertension among responding patient users, and can have a useful role in diagnosis of hypertension (particularly if ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is not possible or is declined), problems were identified. Reduced patient engagement over longer periods and acceptance of suboptimal BP control among patients on monitoring protocols need to be urgently addressed. Empirical work is required to identify barriers to achieving BP control among hypertensive patients using simple telehealth and, consequently, services be developed to address these issues.


Asunto(s)
Medicina General/métodos , Hipertensión , Telemedicina/métodos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Inglaterra , Medicina General/organización & administración , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Telemedicina/organización & administración
3.
BMJ Open ; 5(3): e007270, 2015 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25795698

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To establish patient and professional user satisfaction with the Advice & Interactive Messaging (AIM) for Health programme delivered using a mobile phone-based, simple telehealth intervention, 'Florence'. DESIGN: A service evaluation using data extracted from Florence and from a professional user electronic survey. SETTING: 425 primary care practices across 31 Clinical Commissioning Groups in England. PARTICIPANTS: 3381 patients registered on 1 of 10 AIM protocols between March 2013 and January 2014 and 77 professional users. INTERVENTION: The AIM programme offered 10 clinical protocols, in three broad groups: (1) hypertension diagnosis/monitoring, (2) medication reminders and (3) smoking cessation. Florence sent patients prompts to submit clinical information, educational messages and user satisfaction questions. Patient responses were reviewed by their primary healthcare providers. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients and professional user experiences of using AIM, and within this, Florence. RESULTS: Patient activity using Florence was generally good at month 1 for the hypertension protocols (71-80%), but reduced over 2-3 months (31-60%). For the other protocols, patient activity was 0-39% at 3 months. Minimum target days of texting were met for half the hypertension protocols. 1707/2304 (74%) patients sent evaluative texts responded at least once. Among responders, agreement with the adapted friends and family statement generally exceeded preproject aspirations. Professional responders were generally positive or equivocal about the programme. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with AIM appeared optimal when patients were carefully selected for the protocol; professional users were familiar with the system, the programme addressed a problem with the previous service delivery that was identified by users and users took an active approach to achieve clinical goals. However, there was a significant decrease in patients' use of Florence over time. Future applications may be optimised by identifying and addressing reasons for the waning use of the service and enhancing support during implementation of the service.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Sistemas Recordatorios , Telemedicina , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inglaterra , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Autocuidado , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA