Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with chronic urticaria during pregnancy: Results of PREG-CU, a UCARE study.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic urticaria (CU) is a common and primarily affects females, there is little data on how pregnancy interacts with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the treatment use by CU patients before, during and after pregnancy as well as outcomes of pregnancy. METHODS: PREG-CU is an international, multicentre study of the Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence network. Data were collected via a 47-item-questionnaire completed by CU patients who became pregnant during their disease course. RESULTS: Questionnaires from 288 CU patients from 13 countries were analysed. During pregnancy, most patients (60%) used urticaria medication including standard-dose second generation H1-antihistamines (35.1%), first generation H1-antihistamines (7.6%), high-dose second-generation H1-antihistamines (5.6%) and omalizumab (5.6%). The preterm birth rate was 10.2%; rates were similar between patients who did and did not receive treatment during pregnancy (11.6% vs. 8.7%, respectively). Emergency referrals for CU and twin birth were risk factors for preterm birth. The caesarean delivery rate was 51.3%. More than 90% of new-borns were healthy at birth. There was no link between any patient or disease characteristics or treatments and medical problems at birth. CONCLUSION: Most CU patients used treatment during pregnancy especially second-generation antihistamines which seem to be safe during pregnancy regardless of the trimester. The rates of preterm births and medical problems of new-borns in CU patients were similar to population norms and not linked to treatment used during pregnancy. Emergency referrals for CU increased the risk of preterm birth and emphasize the importance of sufficient treatment to keep urticaria under control during pregnancy.

Effects of pregnancy on chronic urticaria: Results of the PREG-CU UCARE study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU) predominantly affects women, and sex hormones can modulate disease activity in female CU patients. As of now, the impact of pregnancy on CU is largely unknown. AIM: To analyze the course and features of CU during and after pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PREG-CU is an international, multicenter study of the Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCARE) network. Data were collected via a 47-item questionnaire completed by CU patients, who became pregnant within the last 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 288 pregnancies of 288 CU patients from 13 countries were analyzed (mean age at pregnancy: 32.1 ± 6.1 years, duration of CU: 84.9 ± 74.5 months; CSU 66.9%, CSU + CIndU 20.3%, CIndU 12.8%).During pregnancy, 51.1% of patients rated their CU as improved, 28.9% as worse, and 20.0% as unchanged.CU exacerbations most commonly occurred exclusively during the third trimester (in 34 of 124 patients; 27.6%) or the first (28 of 124; 22.8%). The risk factors for worsening of CU during pregnancy were having mild disease and no angioedema before pregnancy, not taking treatment before pregnancy, CIndU, CU worsening during a previous pregnancy, treatment during pregnancy, and stress as a driver of exacerbations. After giving birth, urticaria disease activity remained unchanged in 43.8% of CU patients, whereas 37.4% and 18.1% experienced worsening and improvement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the complex impact of pregnancy on the course of CU and help to better counsel patients who want to become pregnant and to manage CU during pregnancy.

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and course of chronic urticaria.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically disrupts health care around the globe. The impact of the pandemic on chronic urticaria (CU) and its management are largely unknown. AIM: To understand how CU patients are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; how specialists alter CU patient management; and the course of CU in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cross-sectional, international, questionnaire-based, multicenter UCARE COVID-CU study assessed the impact of the pandemic on patient consultations, remote treatment, changes in medications, and clinical consequences. RESULTS: The COVID-19 pandemic severely impairs CU patient care, with less than 50% of the weekly numbers of patients treated as compared to before the pandemic. Reduced patient referrals and clinic hours were the major reasons. Almost half of responding UCARE physicians were involved in COVID-19 patient care, which negatively impacted on the care of urticaria patients. The rate of face-to-face consultations decreased by 62%, from 90% to less than half, whereas the rate of remote consultations increased by more than 600%, from one in 10 to more than two thirds. Cyclosporine and systemic corticosteroids, but not antihistamines or omalizumab, are used less during the pandemic. CU does not affect the course of COVID-19, but COVID-19 results in CU exacerbation in one of three patients, with higher rates in patients with severe COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic brings major changes and challenges for CU patients and their physicians. The long-term consequences of these changes, especially the increased use of remote consultations, require careful evaluation.

Multinational Drug Survival Study of Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Urticaria and Potential Predictors for Discontinuation.

Importance: Treating patients with chronic urticaria using omalizumab has been shown to be safe and effective in randomized clinical trials. Multinational studies on long-term omalizumab performance in chronic urticaria in clinical practice settings are lacking, especially on drug survival. Drug survival, which refers to the length of time that patients are treated with a specific drug, is a comprehensive outcome covering effectiveness, safety, and patient and physician preferences. Furthermore, little is known about the reasons and potential predictors for omalizumab discontinuation. Objective: To investigate omalizumab drug survival as well as reasons and potential predictors for discontinuation in a large, diverse population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international multicenter cohort study was conducted at 14 Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence in 10 countries, including all patients with chronic urticaria from these centers who were ever treated with omalizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: Drug survival analysis was performed to assess time to discontinuation. Patient characteristics and treatment protocols were investigated by Cox regression analysis to identify potential predictors for omalizumab discontinuation. Results: In 2325 patients with chronic urticaria who started omalizumab between June 2009 and July 2022, the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 42 (6) years, and 1650 participants (71%) were female. Overall omalizumab survival rates decreased from 76% to 39% after 1 to 7 years, respectively (median survival time, 3.3 [95 % CI, 2.9-4.0] years), primarily due to discontinuation from well-controlled disease in 576 patients (65%). Ineffectiveness and adverse effects were reasons for discontinuation in a far smaller proportion of patients, totaling 164 patients (18%) and 31 patients (4%), respectively. Fast treatment response was associated with higher rates of omalizumab discontinuation due to well-controlled disease (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.20-1.75]), and disease duration of more than 2 years was associated with lower rates of discontinuation due to well-controlled disease (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.98]). Immunosuppressive cotreatment at the start of omalizumab and autoimmune disease was associated with a higher risk for discontinuation due to ineffectiveness (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.12-2.42]). The presence of spontaneous wheals (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.93]) and access to higher dosages (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.27-0.58) were both associated with a lower risk for discontinuation of omalizumab due to ineffectiveness. Conclusion and Relevance: This multinational omalizumab drug survival cohort study demonstrated that treatment of chronic urticaria with omalizumab in a clinical setting is effective and safe, and well-controlled disease is the main reason for treatment discontinuation. These findings on omalizumab drug survival rates and reasons and potential predictors for discontinuation may guide patients and physicians in clinical decision-making and expectation management. These results may call for the identification of biomarkers for chronic urticaria remission in complete responders to omalizumab treatment.

Ultrastructure of vascular permeability in urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have addressed the ultrastructure of vascular permeability in urticaria. OBJECTIVES: To describe the types of endothelial cell organelles involved in vascular permeability in drug-induced acute urticaria (DIAU). METHODS: Seven patients with DIAU were enrolled in the study. Biopsies of urticarial lesions and apparently normal skin were performed. The 14 collected fragmentswere processed with immunogold electron microscopy using single stains for tryptase and factor XIIIa (FXIIIa) and double immunogold labeling for both tryptase and FXIIIa. RESULTS: Some sections demonstrated mast cells in the degranulation process, in both anaphylactic and piecemeal degranulation. After double immunogold staining, 10 nm (FXIIIa) and 15 nm (tryptase) gold particles wereboth present, covering the granules in the mast cells, indicating that both tryptase and FXIIIa were localized within the granules of these cells. Interestingly, we found strong evidence of the presence of caveolae and vesico-vacuolar organelles (VVOs) in the endothelial cells of the biopsies. In addition to these findings, we were able to demonstrate the presence of tryptase and FXIIIa in the endothelial celIs, in urticarial lesions and in apparently normal skin. CONCLUSIONS: VVOs are present in the endothelial cells of post-capillary venules in DIAU. This is the first report on the expression of FXIIIa and tryptase in the cytoplasm of endothelial cells in urticaria.

A concept for integrated care pathways for atopic dermatitis-A GA2 LEN ADCARE initiative.

INTRODUCTION: The integrated care pathways for atopic dermatitis (AD-ICPs) aim to bridge the gap between existing AD treatment evidence-based guidelines and expert opinion based on daily practice by offering a structured multidisciplinary plan for patient management of AD. ICPs have the potential to enhance guideline recommendations by combining interventions and aspects from different guidelines, integrating quality assurance, and describing co-ordination of care. Most importantly, patients can enter the ICPs at any level depending on AD severity, resources available in their country, and economic factors such as differences in insurance reimbursement systems. METHODS: The GA2 LEN ADCARE network and partners as well as all stakeholders, abbreviated as the AD-ICPs working group, were involved in the discussion and preparation of the AD ICPs during a series of subgroup workshops and meetings in years 2020 and 2021, after which the document was circulated within all GAL2 EN ADCARE centres. RESULTS: The AD-ICPs outline the diagnostic procedures, possible co-morbidities, different available treatment options including differential approaches for the pediatric population, and the role of the pharmacists and other stakeholders, as well as remaining unmet needs in the management of AD. CONCLUSION: The AD-ICPs provide a multidisciplinary plan for improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient feedback in AD management, as well as addressing critical unmet needs, including improved access to care, training specialists, implementation of educational programs, assessment on the impact of climate change, and fostering a personalised treatment approach. By focusing on these key areas, the initiative aims to pave the way for a brighter future in the management of AD.

Chronic urticaria patients are interested in apps to monitor their disease activity and control: A UCARE CURICT analysis.

BACKGROUND: Information/communication technologies such as mobile phone applications (apps) would enable chronic urticaria (CU) patients to self-evaluate their disease activity and control. Yet, recently Antó et al (2021) reported a global paucity of such apps for patients with CU. In this analysis, we assessed patient interest in using apps to monitor CU disease activity and control using questions from the chronic urticaria information and communication technologies (CURICT) study. METHODS: The methodology for CURICT has been reported. Briefly, a 23-item questionnaire was completed by 1841 CU patients from 17 UCAREs across 17 countries. Here, we analyzed patient responses to the CURICT questions on the use of apps for urticaria-related purposes. RESULTS: As previously published, the majority of respondents had chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU; 63%; 18% chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) [CIndu]; 19% with both), were female (70%) and in urban areas (75%). Over half of patients were very/extremely interested in an app to monitor disease activity (51%) and control (53%), while only ∼1/10 were not. Patients with both urticaria types versus those with CSU only (odds ratio [OR], 1.36 [1.03-1.79]) and females versus males (OR [95% CI], 1.47 [1.17-1.85]) were more likely to be very to extremely interested in an app to assess disease control. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, half of the patients with CU were very to extremely interested in using an app to assess their disease activity and control. Development of well-designed apps, specific to disease types (CSU, CIndU, CSU + CIndU, etc), validated by experts across platforms would help improve the management and possibly outcomes of CU treatment while providing important patient information to be used in future research.

Urticaria unresponsive to antihistaminic treatment: an open study of therapeutic options based on histopathologic features.

BACKGROUND: The non- or low-sedating H1 receptor antagonists represent the basic therapy for urticaria. OBJECTIVE: To test an alternative approach to patients unresponsive to conventional treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 patients with chronic urticaria unresponsive to conventional antihistamine treatment were enrolled for this study. They had uncontrolled urticaria even using multiple combinations of antihistamines on maximum doses and corticosteroids in short cycles (prednisone 20-40 mg, per os once a day, 3-7 days per month). Cutaneous biopsies of the urticaria lesions were taken. These findings were classified as: (I) a mixture of perivascular dermal inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils and/or eosinophils; (II) inflammatory infiltrate composed chiefly of neutrophils; and (III) inflammatory infiltrate composed mainly of eosinophils. According to histology, the patients were submitted to one of the following therapeutic schemes: class A - antihistamine treatment plus dapsone; class B - colchicine or dapsone; class C - montelukast. RESULTS: Four patients in class A, 08 in class B and seven in class C displayed complete control of urticaria after 12 weeks of treatment; one patient in class B and two in class C did not respond to treatment. Two years after discontinuation, 16 patients are still free of urticaria. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an alternative approach for treating unresponsive chronic urticaria.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome due to anticonvulsants in a two-year-old boy.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) usually refers to severe cutaneous drug eruption associated with systemic involvement and potentially fatal outcome. We report a 2-year-old Caucasian boy who developed DIHS due to phenytoin and phenobarbital and who showed extensive internal organ involvement. We are alerting that failure to recognize this drug eruption and discontinue the culprit drug may result in increased severity, greater extent of internal organ involvement, and fatal outcome. The recent research about the influence of human herpesvirus 6 co-infection on the pathogenesis of DIHS is also discussed by the authors in this paper.

Urticaria as a cutaneous sign of adult-onset Still's disease.

BACKGROUND: The cardinal signs and symptoms of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) include periodic fever, arthralgia and arthritis, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, an evanescent rash accompanied by neutrophilic granulocytosis, and a negative rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody test. OBJECTIVE: To alert clinicians and dermatologists to internal diseases such as AOSD when assisting patients with urticarial eruptions and systemic symptoms. METHODS: A case report of a 52-year-old white woman who received conventional therapy for urticaria for 3 years, with no improvement. Following this period, a diagnosis of AOSD was performed based on the presence of systemic symptoms. RESULTS: The inflammatory activity markers decreased by the second month of methotrexate therapy; however, the cutaneous lesions failed to disappear. Thalidomide was initiated, and total improvement of the cutaneous lesions was observed after 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Urticarial rash is an uncommon presentation of AOSD, and clinicians must be alert to the possibility of a misdiagnosis in these cases.

Urticárias / Urticaria

A urticária constitui uma das dermatoses mais freqüentes: 15 por cento a 20 por cento da população têm pelo menos um episódio agudo da doença em sua vida. Hoje a tendência é defini-la como síndrome que tem em comum o aparecimento da lesão elementar Urtica. É classificada segundo a evolução em aguda (duração menor que seis semanas) ou crônica (além de seis semanas). O tratamento da urticária pode compreender medidas não farmacológicas e intervenções medicamentosas, as quais são agrupadas em tratamentos de primeira (anti-histamínicos), segunda (corticosteróides e anti-leucotrienos) e terceira linha (medicamentos imunomoduladores).

Antileucotrienos em asmáticos corticodependentes – relato de seis casos / Antileukotriene in steroid dependent asthma – report of six cases

Objetivo: Descrever a experiência com o uso de antileucotrienos em seis pacientes com asma grave corticodependente, acompanhados no Serviço de Alergia e Imunopatologia do Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. Pacientes e métodos: Por um período de três meses os pacientes maiores de doze anos receberam aleatoriamente zafirlucaste 20mg de 12/12h ou montelucaste 10mg/dia e os menores de 12 anos montelucaste 5mg/dia. Os parâmetros avaliados foram: necessidade do uso diário de corticosteróides sistêmicos (oral), escore clínico de sintomas, prova de função pulmonar realizada antes da introdução da medicação e após três meses de acompanhamento. Resultados: Houve melhora do escore clínico em todos os pacientes (exceto um), melhora da prova de função pulmonar em apenas três dos pacientes, porém todos reduziram de forma significativa o uso diário de corticosteróides sistêmicos. Conclusão: Concluímos que na população avaliada, os pacientes em muito se beneficiaram com o uso de antileucotrienos, sugerindo que esta medicação tenha um papel no tratamento da asma grave corticodependente, para tanto, novos estudos serão necessários.