Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Safety Res ; 77: 324-327, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34092324

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: As part of scaling up the response to the opioid overdose epidemic, there is an opportunity to examine how state public health departments addressed workforce and other infrastructure needs to implement a large-scale opioid overdose prevention program. Understanding how this was done-and any lessons learned from the process-can inform future workforce development and capital improvement efforts. METHODS: Administrative data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prescription Drug Overdose Prevention for States (PfS) program were analyzed to understand how states adapted to this emerging public health priority. RESULTS: Six months into the first year of funding, 6 of the 16 state health departments had filled all anticipated staffing positions. States faced challenges obtaining timely expenditure authority and hiring staff. However, states were able to overcome these challenges by strategically reassigning staff, hiring from within, and utilizing existing contract mechanisms. CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed how planning, using existing infrastructure, and maintaining a prepared workforce are critical to ensure that public health agencies have the ability to surge to meet emerging challenges and effectively utilize resources to achieve program goals. practical applications: Greater attention should be directed toward strategically addressing known barriers and timelines in work plans and budgets during the application and selection process to ensure implementation readiness.


Asunto(s)
Epidemia de Opioides , Administración en Salud Pública , Gobierno Estatal , Recursos Humanos/organización & administración , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & control , Humanos , Selección de Personal , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Salud Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Food Nutr Bull ; 31(2 Suppl): S179-85, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20715602

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of peer-reviewed literature describing in detail the formative research to develop Sprinkles interventions. OBJECTIVE: To describe community members' reactions to and experiences using Sprinkles, with an emphasis on acceptability, utilization, and promotion. METHODS: Fourteen initial focus group discussions on Sprinkles and a 25-family home study were conducted. For the home study, each child 6 to 59 months of age in the household received 30 sachets (1 per day). The initial 14 focus group discussions included mothers, grandmothers, vendors, women who purchased from vendors, and adults in the general population. Home study families were recruited from participants in the initial 14 focus group discussions who had at least one child 6 to 59 months of age. RESULTS: Sprinkles were highly acceptable to adults and most children; some children thought Sprinkles were sugar. Most home study families prepared and used Sprinkles correctly. All families reported positive effects, particularly increased appetite, and recommended Sprinkles; none experienced major problems. Potential barriers identified were lack of knowledge of and experience with Sprinkles, availability of Sprinkles, and cost. Promotional messages targeted to mothers, fathers, all child-care providers, and doctors focused on the positive health effects of Sprinkles. CONCLUSIONS: Issues related to Sprinkles preparation, use, and barriers required attention before implementation. Locally appropriate visual and written instructions were developed for dissemination. Intervention training sessions and promotions were tailored to answer frequently asked questions, increase knowledge of Sprinkles, and provide tangible evidence of health benefits. Information needs and perceptions changed quickly after use of Sprinkles. Existing levels of Sprinkles awareness and knowledge should be considered when designing interventions.


Asunto(s)
Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Suplementos Dietéticos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Familia , Promoción de la Salud , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/prevención & control , Preescolar , Comercio/educación , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Familia/psicología , Padre/educación , Padre/psicología , Padre/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Lactante/prevención & control , Kenia , Masculino , Micronutrientes/efectos adversos , Micronutrientes/economía , Madres/educación , Madres/psicología , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Food Nutr Bull ; 31(2 Suppl): S168-78, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20715601

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partnered with local Kenyan institutions to implement the Nyando Integrated Child Health and Education Project, an effectiveness study that used social marketing and a community-based distribution program to promote the sale of Sprinkles and other health products. OBJECTIVE: To describe monitoring of wholesale sales, household demand, promotional strategies, and perceived factors influencing Sprinkles sales among vendors. METHODS: Ongoing quantitative and qualitative monitoring of Sprinkles sales began in May 2007 in 30 intervention villages. Data sources included baseline and follow-up cross-sectional surveys; office records of Sprinkles sales to vendors; biweekly household monitoring of Sprinkles use; and qualitative data collection, including vendor focus groups and key informant interviews. RESULTS: A total of 550 children aged 6 to 35 months were enrolled at baseline, and 451 were available at 12-month follow-up. During this period, nearly 160,000 sachets were sold wholesale to vendors, with variability in sales influenced by the social, political, and economic context. Vendors living closer to the wholesale office purchased more Sprinkles, so a second office was opened closer to remote vendors. On average, 33% of households purchased Sprinkles during household monitoring visits. Training sessions and community launches were important for community support and raising awareness about Sprinkles. Vendor incentives motivated vendors to sell Sprinkles, and consumer incentives promoted purchases. CONCLUSIONS: Sprinkles program monitoring in Kenya was critically important for understanding sales and distribution trends and vendor perceptions. Understanding these trends led to strategic changes to the intervention over time.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Mercadotecnía/métodos , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/prevención & control , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Comercio/educación , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Testimonio de Experto , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Lactante/prevención & control , Kenia , Masculino , Micronutrientes/economía , Madres/educación , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA