Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Burns ; 32(8): 992-9, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16901651

RESUMEN

The relationship between burn depth, healing time and the development of hypertrophic scarring (HTS) is well recognised by burn surgeons but is seldom mentioned in the published literature. We studied 337 children with scalds whose scars were monitored for up to 5 years. Overall HTS rates were found to be: under 10 days to healing=0%, 10-14 days=8%, 15-21 days=20%, 22-25 days=40%, 26-30 days=68% and over 30 days=92%. In the conservatively treated group the HTS rates are: under 10 days=0%, 10-14 days=2%, 15-21 days=20%, 22-25 days=28%, 26-30 days=75% and over 30 days=94%. If skin grafting is undertaken there is a much higher incidence of HTS in the 10-14 days group: 10-14 days=33%, 15-21 days=19%, 22-25 days=54%, 26-30 days=64% and over 30 days=88%. We conclude that there is a low risk of HTS formation in scalds healed before 21 days, and that surgery should be reserved for scalds likely to take more than 21 days to heal.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/patología , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/patología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Quemaduras/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Burns ; 32(6): 714-20, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16849034

RESUMEN

Loss of dermis is one of the principal factors that contributes to poor scar outcome after severe burn. Dermal loss may be due to the primary injury, surgical management or as a result of infection. Strategies for dermal preservation are therefore important to improve scar quality. We report our early experience using the Versajet hydrosurgery system, to preserve dermal tissues, both directly during surgical debridement and indirectly by reducing infection and optimising the use of biological dressings. In deep partial thickness burns softer necrotic dermis can be removed with the Versajet sparing the underlying tougher viable dermis. In superficial burns the Versajet cleans and removes loose epidermal elements providing an optimal wound surface for the application of biological dressings, even a number of days after injury. Versajet is most useful when the tissue to be removed is softer than that to be left behind.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/cirugía , Desbridamiento/métodos , Hidroterapia/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Trasplante de Piel , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Cicatrización de Heridas
3.
Burns ; 40(8): 1530-7, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24630818

RESUMEN

Little evidence has been produced on the best practice for managing paediatric burns. We set out to develop a formal approach based on the finding that hypertrophic scarring is related to healing-time, with durations under 21 days associated with improved scar outcome. Incorporating new advances in burn care, we compared outcomes under the new approach to a cohort treated previously. Our study was a retrospective cross-sectional case note study, with demographic, treatment and outcome information collected. The management and outcome of each case was assessed and compared against another paediatric burns cohort from 2006. 181 burns presenting across a six month period were analysed (2010 cohort) and compared to 337 children from a previous cohort from 2006. Comparison of patients between cohorts showed an overall shift towards shorter healing-times in the 2010 cohort. A lower overall rate of hypertrophic scarring was seen in the 2010 cohort, and for corresponding healing-times after injury, hypertrophic scarring rates were halved in comparison to the 2006 cohort. We demonstrate that the use of a structured approach for paediatric burns has improved outcomes with regards to healing-time and hypertrophic scarring rate. This approach allows maximisation of healing potential and implements aggressive prophylactic measures.


Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Quemaduras/terapia , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/prevención & control , Desbridamiento , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Masaje , Trasplante de Piel , Cicatrización de Heridas , Adolescente , Superficie Corporal , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/etiología , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 127(2): 716-722, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21285776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over the past few years, the use of propeller flaps, which base their blood supply on subcutaneous tissue or isolated perforators, has become increasingly popular. Because no consensus has yet been reached on terminology and nomenclature of the propeller flap, different and confusing uses of the term can be found in the literature. METHODS: In this article, the authors report the consensus on the definition and classification of propeller flaps reached by the authors that gathered at the First Tokyo Meeting on Perforator and Propeller Flaps in June of 2009. Some peculiar aspects of the surgical technique are discussed. RESULTS: A propeller flap can be defined as an "island flap that reaches the recipient site through an axial rotation." The classification is based on the nourishing pedicle (subcutaneous pedicled propeller flap, perforator pedicled propeller flap, supercharged propeller flap), the degrees of skin island rotation (90 to 180 degrees) and, when possible, the artery of origin of the perforator. CONCLUSIONS: The propeller flap is a useful reconstructive tool that can achieve good cosmetic and functional results. A flap should be called a propeller flap only if it fulfils the definition above. The type of nourishing pedicle, the source vessel (when known), and the degree of skin island rotation should be specified for each flap.


Asunto(s)
Colgajos Quirúrgicos/irrigación sanguínea , Humanos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/clasificación , Terminología como Asunto
5.
J Burn Care Res ; 31(1): 196-9, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20061856

RESUMEN

The most common pediatric burn injury is a superficial scald. The current follow-up protocol for such burns includes review of the patient at 2 weeks postinjury and then 2 months later. The authors decided to review the protocol to assess the need for this second follow-up. A retrospective study reviewed the case notes of patients younger than 16 years at the time of their injury presenting with a scald over 5% TBSA. The progress of healing and scar development up to 5 years follow-up was assessed. This study showed that scalds healing within 2 weeks following injury rarely became hypertrophic. A prospective study was performed over a 10-month period. All children who suffered a superficial partial-thickness scald injury were included. At the 2-week appointment, the need for further follow-up was predicted. The accuracy of this prediction was assessed 2 months later. This study showed that an experienced member of the burns team could reliably predict at 2-week appointment those children who could be safely discharged with no subsequent need for scar management. This study suggests that it will be safe to modify the follow-up protocol, reducing the number of clinic attendances.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/terapia , Cicatrización de Heridas , Adolescente , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Quemaduras/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/epidemiología , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/patología , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/prevención & control , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Burns ; 34(7): 953-64, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18508200

RESUMEN

Despite the changes to the UK fireworks laws and considerable efforts in prevention, children are still being injured by fireworks. The UK is one of many countries that have altered their firework laws in recent years. We reviewed 54 firework-injured children over the last 10 years and assessed the impact of the two recent UK law changes. Our study outlines past British firework legislation and reviews the literature. In November 1996, there were three deaths in England, Wales and Scotland due to fireworks. The British Government introduced the Fireworks (Safety) Regulations of 1996/1997, primarily banning banger fireworks (known as bangers). We have not seen banger injuries in Newcastle since then. The Fireworks Act 2003 and the Fireworks Regulations 2004 limited the sale of fireworks to the 3 weeks surrounding bonfire night, and banned under 18s from purchasing or possessing fireworks. In our series, we noticed that, in 2004, 83% of children's firework injuries happened in the 3 weeks surrounding Bonfire Night. We conclude that legislation has had an impact, but stricter enforcement of the existing laws and further education of children and the general public into the dangers of fireworks is needed, as children are still being injured.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Sustancias Explosivas , Seguridad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accidentes , Niño , Conducta Peligrosa , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Sustancias Explosivas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Legislación como Asunto , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA