Natriuretic Equation to Predict Loop Diuretic Response in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Most acute decompensated heart failure admissions are driven by congestion. However, residual congestion is common and often driven by the lack of reliable tools to titrate diuretic therapy. The authors previously developed a natriuretic response prediction equation (NRPE), which predicts sodium output using a spot urine sample collected 2 h after loop diuretic administration. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to validate the NRPE and describe proof-of-concept that the NRPE can be used to guide diuretic therapy. METHODS: Two cohorts were assembled: 1) the Diagnosing and Targeting Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance (MDR) cohort was used to validate the NRPE to predict 6-h sodium output after a loop diuretic, which was defined as poor (<50 mmol), suboptimal (<100 mmol), or excellent (>150 mmol); and 2) the Yale Diuretic Pathway (YDP) cohort, which used the NRPE to guide loop diuretic titration via a nurse-driven automated protocol. RESULTS: Evaluating 638 loop diuretic administrations, the NRPE showed excellent discrimination with areas under the curve ≥0.90 to predict poor, suboptimal, and excellent natriuretic response, and outperformed clinically obtained net fluid loss (p < 0.05 for all cutpoints). In the YDP cohort (n = 161) using the NRPE to direct therapy mean daily urine output (1.8 ± 0.9 l vs. 3.0 ± 0.8 l), net fluid output (-1.1 ± 0.9 l vs. -2.1 ± 0.9 l), and weight loss (-0.3 ± 0.3 kg vs. -2.5 ± 0.3 kg) improved substantially following initiation of the YDP (p < 0.001 for all pre-post comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Natriuretic response can be rapidly and accurately predicted by the NRPE, and this information can be used to guide diuretic therapy during acute decompensated heart failure. Additional study of diuresis guided by the NRPE is warranted.

Real World Use of Hypertonic Saline in Refractory Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A U.S. Center's Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate real world safety and efficacy of hypertonic saline therapy in cases of refractory acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) at a large U.S. academic medical center. BACKGROUND: Hypertonic saline therapy has been described as a potential management strategy for refractory ADHF, but experience in the United States is limited. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in all patients receiving hypertonic saline for diuretic therapy-resistant ADHF at the authors' institution since March 2013. The primary analytic approach was a comparison of the trajectory of clinical variables prior to and after administration of hypertonic saline, with secondary focus on predictors of treatment response. RESULTS: A total of 58 hypertonic saline administration episodes were identified across 40 patients with diuretic-therapy refractory ADHF. Prior to hypertonic saline administration, serum sodium, chloride, and creatinine concentrations were worsening but improved after hypertonic saline administration (p < 0.001, all). Both total urine output and weight loss significantly improved with hypertonic saline (p = 0.01 and <0.001, respectively). Diuretic efficiency, defined as change in urine output per doubling of diuretic dose, also improved over this period (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in respiratory status or overcorrection of serum sodium with the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients who were refractory to ADHF, hypertonic saline administration was associated with increased diuretic efficiency, fluid and weight loss, and improvement of metabolic derangements, and no adverse respiratory or neurological signals were identified. Additional study of hypertonic saline as a diuretic adjuvant is warranted.

Hyperinflation of Isoproterenol.

The hyperinflation of isoproterenol, a 75-year-old drug, in early 2015 was unbelievable. The attention of health-care professionals, health system administrators, legislators, and the general public was quickly focused on Valeant Pharmaceuticals, purchaser of several generics solely to raise their price. With isoproterenol easily launched toward the top of drug expenditures, pharmacists in many hospitals were forced to engage stakeholders in the investigation and implementation of alternatives, explore utilization and optimize inventory, reduce cost through sterile product preparation, where possible, restrict use to settings that were beneficial to their budget, and become legislative advocates. The alternatives drugs and strategies will be reviewed.

Renal tubular resistance is the primary driver for loop diuretic resistance in acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Loop diuretic resistance is a common barrier to effective decongestion in acute heart failure (AHF), and is associated with poor outcome. Specific mechanisms underlying diuretic resistance are currently unknown in contemporary AHF patients. We therefore aimed to determine the relative importance of defects in diuretic delivery vs. renal tubular response in determining diuretic response (DR) in AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty AHF patients treated with intravenous bumetanide underwent a 6-h timed urine collection for sodium and bumetanide clearance. Whole-kidney DR was defined as sodium excreted per doubling of administered loop diuretic and represents the sum of defects in drug delivery and renal tubular response. Tubular DR, defined as sodium excreted per doubling of renally cleared (urinary) loop diuretic, captures resistance specifically in the renal tubule. Median administered bumetanide dose was 3.0 (2.0-4.0) mg with 52 (33-77)% of the drug excreted into the urine. Significant between-patient variability was present as the administered dose only explained 39% of variability in the quantity of bumetanide in urine. Cumulatively, factors related to drug delivery such as renal bumetanide clearance, administered dose, and urea clearance explained 28% of the variance in whole-kidney DR. However, resistance at the level of the renal tubule (tubular DR) explained 71% of the variability in whole-kidney DR. CONCLUSION: Defects at the level of the renal tubule are substantially more important than reduced diuretic delivery in determining diuretic resistance in patients with AHF.