Comprehensive Review of the Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Thyroid Carcinoma.

Thyroid cancer is the most common head and neck cancer (HNC) in the world. In this article, we comprehensively cover baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up imaging recommendations for thyroid carcinomas along with the eighth edition of the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). We include characterization and risk stratification of thyroid nodules on ultrasound (US) proposed by various international bodies. Management guidelines (depending upon the type of thyroid carcinoma) based on the international consensus recommendations (mainly by the American Thyroid Association) are also extensively covered in this article, including the role of a radioiodine scan. The management of recurrent disease is also briefly elucidated in this article. In addition, we cover the risk factors and etiopathogenesis of thyroid carcinoma along with the non-imaging diagnostic workup essential for thyroid carcinoma management, including the significance of genetic mutations. US is the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, with US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) being the procedure of choice for tissue diagnosis. The roles of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) in thyroid carcinoma staging are also specified. Through this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive reference guide for the radiologists and the clinicians in the pursuit of optimal care for patients with thyroid carcinoma.

Adjuvant therapy for intermediate risk factors in oral cancer: Can we reach a consensus?

Oral carcinoma is a common disease that poses challenges in treatment management, especially for advanced cases. Adjuvant therapies, such as radiation and chemoradiation therapy, are typically used for advanced oral cancer patients. However, there is uncertainty regarding the use of adjuvant therapy for early-stage patients with certain soft histological parameters. The UICC manual of clinical oncology suggests that adjuvant therapy for such parameters is desirable but not essential. These parameters include perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, single nodal positivity, and patterns of invasion, which complicate the decision-making process for including adjuvant therapy. This review aims to provide evidence-based literature for effectively managing this patient group and developing treatment protocols based on current evidence.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis and Management of Primary Parathyroid Pathologies: A Comprehensive Review.

Parathyroid pathologies are suspected based on the biochemical alterations and clinical manifestations, and the predominant roles of imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism are localisation of tumour within parathyroid glands, surgical planning, and to look for any ectopic parathyroid tissue in the setting of recurrent disease. This article provides a comprehensive review of embryology and anatomical variations of parathyroid glands and their clinical relevance, surgical anatomy of parathyroid glands, differentiation between multiglandular parathyroid disease, solitary adenoma, atypical parathyroid tumour, and parathyroid carcinoma. The roles, advantages and limitations of ultrasound, four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), radiolabelled technetium-99 (99mTc) sestamibi or dual tracer 99mTc pertechnetate and 99mTc-sestamibi with or without single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or SPECT/CT, dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI), and fluoro-choline positron emission tomography (18F-FCH PET) or [11C] Methionine (11C -MET) PET in the management of parathyroid lesions have been extensively discussed in this article. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) has also been elucidated in this article. Management guidelines for parathyroid carcinoma proposed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) have also been described. An algorithm for management of parathyroid lesions has been provided at the end to serve as a quick reference guide for radiologists, clinicians and surgeons.

Current evidences in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and subsection meta-analysis for clinical decision making.

BACKGROUND: Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC) is a distinct entity with intermediate prognosis between indolent follicular thyroid cancers and anaplastic carcinoma. The management guidelines are not standardized for these cancers due its low prevalence and limited available literature. Therefore, we did this systematic review with emphasis on current evidence on diagnosis, imaging, molecular markers, and management of these carcinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched four databases, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Emcare to identify studies published till October 2023. All studies reporting diagnostic tests, imaging, molecular marker expression and management of PDTC were included in the review. The meta-analysis was conducted on expression of molecular markers in these cancers following recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled estimated prevalence with 95% confidence intervals. Based on the inclusion criteria, 62 articles were selected to be incorporated for the review. Differences in pathological diagnostic criteria of PDTC was noted in literature which was addressed in WHO 2022 diagnostic terminologies with expansion of the definition. Surgical management is uniformly recommended for early stage PDTC. However, literature is divided and anecdotal for recommendations on radioactive iodine (RAI), extent of neck dissection and adjuvant treatment in PDTC. Evidence for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), novel theragnostic approaches, immunotherapy targets are evolving. Based on the subset analysis for expression of molecular markers, we found the most common markers expressed were TERT (41%), BRAF (28%) and P 53 (25%). CONCLUSION: Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas have a high case fatality rate (up to 31%). Eighty-five % of the patients who succumb to the disease have distant metastasis. Even though under-represented in literature, evidence-based management of these aggressive tumors can help personalize the treatment for optimal outcomes.

N0 neck trial: Does intensification of follow-up (Ultrasound + Physical Examination) influence outcomes in early-stage oral cancer?

AIM OF THE STUDY: We previously reported a survival benefit of elective neck dissection (END) over therapeutic neck dissection (TND) in patients with clinically node-negative early-stage oral cancer. We now report the results of the second question in the same study addressing the impact of adding neck ultrasound to physical examination during follow-up on outcomes. METHODS: Patients with lateralized T1/T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were randomized to END or TND and to follow-up with physical-examination plus neck ultrasound (PE+US) versus physical-examination (PE). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between January 2004 and June 2014, 596 patients were enrolled. This is an intention to treat analysis of 592 analysable patients, of whom 295 were allocated to PE+US and 297 to PE with a median follow-up of 77.47 months (interquartile range (IQR) 54.51-126.48). There was no significant difference (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.92, 95% CI, 0.71-1.20, p = 0.54) in 5-year OS between PE+US (70.8%, 95% CI, 65.51-76.09) and PE (67.3%, 95% CI, 61.81-72.79). Among 131 patients with neck node relapse as the first event, the median time to relapse detection was 4.85 (IQR 2.33-9.60) and 7.62 (IQR 3.22-9.86) months in PE+US and PE arms, respectively. The N stage in the PE+US arm was N1 33.8%, N2a 7.4%, N2b/c 44.1% and N3 14.7% while in PE was N1 28.6%, N2a 9.5%, N2b/c 39.7%, N3 20.6% and unknown 1.6%. CONCLUSION: Adding neck ultrasound to physical examination during follow-up detects nodal relapses earlier but does not improve overall survival.