Clinical outcome after radical excision of moderate-severe endometriosis with or without bowel resection and reanastomosis: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcome of women requiring laparoscopic excision of moderate-severe endometriosis in women with and without bowel resection and reanastomosis. METHODS: Two hundred three patients with laparoscopically excised moderate (n = 67) or severe (n = 136) endometriosis (rAFS: revised endometriosis classification of the American Fertility Society) were prospectively followed during a median of 20 months (1-45 months) using a CONSORT-inspired checklist. Patients completed the EHP30 Quality-of-Life Questionnaire and visual analogue scales (VAS) for dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and deep dyspareunia and answered questions about postoperative complications, reinterventions/recurrences, and fertility outcome 1 month before and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcome was compared between women with deeply infiltrative endometriosis undergoing CO2 laser ablative surgery with bowel resection (study group, 76/203; 37%) and without bowel resection (control group, 127/203; 63%). RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to population characteristics and clinical outcome, except for mean rAFS score [higher in study group (73 ± 31) than in control group (48 ± 26)] and minor complication rate [higher in study group (11%) than in control group (1%)]. In both groups, mean VAS and EHP30 scores improved significantly and remained stable for 24 months after surgery, with a pregnancy rate of 51%. Within 1, 2, and 3 years follow-up, the cumulative reintervention rate was 1%, 7%, and 10%, respectively, and the cumulative endometriosis recurrence rate was 1%, 6%, and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcome after CO2 laser laparoscopic excision of moderate-severe endometriosis was comparable in women with or without bowel resection and reanastomosis, except for a higher minor complication rate occurring in women with bowel resection and reanastomosis (NCT00463398).

Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a laparoscopic approach on female fecundity in ileoanal pouch surgery. BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is associated with tubal factor infertility in female patients. Different studies showed less adhesion formation after laparoscopic colectomy. The relation between laparoscopic pouch surgery and fertility, however, has not been studied so far. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out in 3 university hospitals in the Netherlands and in Belgium. Female patients older than 18 years that had IPAA under the age of 41 were eligible for inclusion (n = 179). We sent them a questionnaire addressing medical and fertility history. The primary endpoint was time to first spontaneous pregnancy after IPAA. This study has been registered with ISRCTN.org (ISRCTN85421386). RESULTS: Of 179 eligible patients, 160 (89%) returned the questionnaire. After IPAA, 50 (31%) patients attempted to conceive. Of these, 23 (46%) had undergone open and 27 (54%) had undergone laparoscopic IPAA. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Indications for surgery were ulcerative colitis (UC) in 37 patients, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in 12 patients, and colonic ischemia in 1 patient. A Kaplan-Meier survival function was plotted for time to first spontaneous pregnancy and showed a higher pregnancy rate after laparoscopic IPAA (log-rank, P = 0.023). Similarly, subsequent survival analysis for all patients with UC showed an increased pregnancy rate for the laparoscopic group (log-rank, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy rates are significantly higher after laparoscopic IPAA. This makes the laparoscopic approach the method of choice in young women.

Long-Term Assessment of a Prospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective descriptive cohort study on 331 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification [POP-Q] system stage 2 or greater) at one center, with minimum 1.5 years of follow-up by April 30, 2014. Primary outcome measures were Patient Global Impression of Change score and failure at the apex (C≥-1 cm; POP-Q stage 2 or greater). Secondary outcomes were anatomical failure in other compartments, duration of follow-up, occurrence and time point of complications, reinterventions, and functional outcomes by response to a standardized 24-question interview on prolapse and bladder, bowel, and sexual function. Assessment was by an experienced clinician not involved in patient management. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 84.6% (280/331); 185 of 331 (55.9%) patients were both physically examined and interviewed, and 95 of 331 (25.7%) were interviewed only. The median age at interview was 72 years (interquartile range 13 years), with a follow-up period of 85.5 months (interquartile range 46 months). Approximately 83% (231/280) reported improvement; 5.7% (16/280) were unchanged, 5.7% (16/280) felt slightly worse, and 6.8% (17/280) reported clear deterioration. Anatomical failure at point-C was 8.6% (16/185); anterior (22.2%, 41/185) and posterior (28.6%, 53/185) prolapse were more common than apical prolapse. Of those with level-I anatomical cure, 10.1% (17/185) felt worse; half of them (9/17) because of prolapse in another compartment. The others had urinary problems (41.2%, 7/17), obstructive defecation (11.8%, 2/17), or dyspareunia (11.8%, 2/17). Conversely, the majority of patients with recurrence at the vault (62.5%, 10/16) self-reported to be improved. The reoperation rate was 17.8% (48/270), including 19 (7.0%) for graft-related complications and nine (3.3%) for prolapse. CONCLUSION: More than four out of five patients (82.5%) felt improved 86 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Of those not improved, two thirds had recurrent prolapse; however, typically mid-vaginal. The other third reported urinary or bowel problems or dyspareunia. Reintervention for prolapse was 3.3%. The most common reasons for reoperation were graft-related complications (7.0%) and urinary incontinence (6.7%).

Augmented renal clearance in non-critically ill abdominal and trauma surgery patients is an underestimated phenomenon: A point prevalence study.

BACKGROUND: Augmented renal clearance refers to increased renal elimination of circulating solutes as compared with normal baseline and could lead to underexposure of frequently used renally eliminated antimicrobials. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of augmented renal clearance in an adult non-critically ill surgery population. Besides, predictors for augmented renal clearance were investigated. A prospective observational single-center point prevalence study was conducted. METHODS: The measured creatinine clearance based on an 8-hour urinary collection was used as primary method for determining kidney function. Augmented renal clearance was defined as measured creatinine clearance of 130 mL/min per 1.73m² or greater. A Poisson regression model was applied to identify predictors for augmented renal clearance. RESULTS: Augmented renal clearance prevalence was 30% and 35% in 103 abdominal and 129 trauma surgery patients, respectively. Younger age (abdominal cohort: relative risk, 0.963 (95% CI, 0.949-0.978); trauma cohort: relative risk, 0.971 [95% CI, 0.960-0.983]) and also for trauma surgery patients, male sex (relative risk, 1.808 [95% CI, 1.026-3.185]) were found to be independent predictors for augmented renal clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Augmented renal clearance is an underestimated phenomenon in adult non-critically ill surgery patients. Especially younger patients, and, in the subset of trauma surgery, males are prone to exhibit augmented renal clearance. Since augmented renal clearance is a risk factor for lower antimicrobial exposure, the impact of augmented renal clearance in relation to antimicrobial underexposure should be investigated in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiological study, level III.

Incidence and Severity of Prepouch Ileitis: A Distinct Disease Entity or a Manifestation of Refractory Pouchitis?

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the operation of choice for patients with treatment-refractory ulcerative colitis. However, after this intervention, up to 50% of patients develop pouchitis. Moreover, a subgroup will also develop inflammation in the afferent ileum proximal to the pouch, a condition named prepouch ileitis (PI). METHODS: Data on 546 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were retrospectively collected from 3 tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral centers in the Netherlands, Belgium, and England. PI was considered present if there was endoscopic and histological inflammation in the afferent limb proximal to the pouch. Crohn's disease was excluded by reviewing the histology of colectomy resection specimens. RESULTS: PI was present in 33/546 (6%) patients and all of these had concurrent pouchitis. One hundred forty-four (26%) patients had pouchitis without PI and 369 (68%) patients did not have inflammatory pouch disease. Of the 33 patients with PI, 6 (18%) received no specific treatment, 9 (27%) responded to antibiotics, and 18 (54%) required escalation in therapy to steroids/immunomodulators or anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. Potent immunosuppressive treatment was required more frequently in patients with PI than those with pouchitis alone. CONCLUSIONS: PI is less common and more treatment refractory than pouchitis alone. Once PI is diagnosed, clinicians should be aware that response to antibiotic therapy is less likely than in pouchitis alone. Immunomodulatory therapy and escalation to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents should be considered early in cases of nonresponse. The suggestion that PI represents misdiagnosed Crohn's disease could not be substantiated in our cohort.