Bronchopulmonary penetration of isavuconazole in lung transplant recipients.

Isavuconazole's (ISA) pharmacokinetics was studied among lung transplant recipients to evaluate its bronchopulmonary penetration. This study included 13 patients and showed mean serum concentrations of 3.30 (standard deviation [SD] 0.45), 5.12 (SD 1.36), and 6.31 (SD 0.95) at 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h respectively. Mean concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid were 0.969 (SD 0.895), 2.141 (SD 1.265), and 2.812 (SD 0.693) at the same time points. ISA is a drug with a tolerable safety profile that achieves adequate concentrations in the lung.

Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services.

BACKGROUND: The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated. METHODS: To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis. RESULTS: The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 min. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores > 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score. CONCLUSIONS: The aScope4™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images.

Peripheral blood eosinophilia as a marker of acute cellular rejection in lung transplant recipients.

Previous studies in solid organ transplantation have shown a relationship between circulating eosinophil (EOS) counts and the presence of acute cellular rejection (ACR). However, the relationship between this potential biomarker and ACR in lung transplant (LTx) patients remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between EOS and the presence of acute cellular rejection in lung transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 583 transbronchial biopsies (TBB) performed in 256 lung transplant patients between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed age, sex, underlying pathology, date of transplant, indications for TBB, presence and degree of ACR, and the simultaneous absolute and relative EOS. RESULTS: ACR were observed in 170 of 583 TBB (29.2%). EOS in patients with ACR were higher than in patients without ACR (203.6 ± 248/mm3 vs 103.1 ± 153/mm3; p < 0.001). High levels of both absolute and relative EOS were associated with the presence of ACR regardless of the underlying disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.003; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002-1.004; OR 1.226; 95% CI, 1.120-1.342) and time after transplant (OR 1.003; 95% CI, 1.002-1.004 and OR 1.239; 95% CI, 1.132-1.356). Moreover, both absolute and relative EOS were strongly associated with moderate and severe grades of ACR (OR 3.55; 95% CI, 3.00-4.10 and OR 3.56; 95% CI, 3.00-4.12). CONCLUSIONS: EOS are elevated in ACR, especially in moderate or severe ACR. Increased vigilance for ACR is therefore advisable in lung transplant recipients with elevated EOS.

Interrupted versus continuous suture for bronchial anastomosis in lung transplantation: does it matter?

OBJECTIVES: Bronchial anastomotic complications remain a major concern in lung transplantation. We aim to compare 2 different techniques, continuous suture (CS) versus interrupted suture (IS) by analysing airway complications requiring intervention. METHODS: Lung transplantations between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. Airway complications requiring intervention were classified following the 2018 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus and analysed comparing 3 groups of patients according to surgical technique: group A, both anastomosis performed with CS; group B, both with interrupted; and group C, IS for 1 side and CS for the contralateral side. RESULTS: A total of 461 anastomoses were performed in 245 patients. The incidence of airway complications requiring intervention was 5.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8-8.6] per patient (14/245) and 3.7% (95% CI: 2.0-5.4) per anastomosis (17/461). Complications that required intervention were present in 5 out of 164 (3.1%) anastomosis with interrupted technique, and in 12/240 (5%) with CS. No significant differences were found between techniques (P = 0.184). No statistical differences were found among group A, B or C in terms of incidence of anastomotic complications, demographics, transplant outcomes or overall survival (log-rank P = 0.513). In a multivariable analysis, right laterality was significantly associated to complications requiring intervention (OR 3.7 [95% CI: 1.1-12.3], P = 0.030). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 12 patients (85.7%). Retransplantation was necessary in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, although it seems that anastomotic complications requiring intervention occur more frequently with CS, there are no statistical differences compared to IS. Endoscopic treatment offers good outcomes in most of the airway complications after lung transplantation.