Protective effect of height on long-term survival of resectable lung cancer: a new feature of the lung cancer paradox.

INTRODUCTION: Unlike most malignancies, higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer and improved prognosis after surgery. However, it remains controversial whether height, one of determinants of BMI, is associated with survival independently of BMI and other confounders. METHODS: We extracted data on all consecutive patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer included in Epithor, the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery database, over a 16-year period. Height was analysed as a continuous variable, and then categorised into four or three categories, according to sex-specific quantiles. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association of height with survival, adjusted for age, tobacco consumption, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), WHO performance status (WHO PS), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, extent of resection, histological type, stage of disease and centre as a random effect, as well as BMI in a further analysis. RESULTS: The study included 61 379 patients. Higher height was significantly associated with better long-term survival after adjustment for other variables (adjusted HR 0.97 per 10 cm higher height, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.99); additional adjustment for BMI resulted in an identical HR. The prognostic impact of height was further confirmed by stratifying by age, ASA class, WHO PS and histological type. When stratifying by BMI class, there was no evidence of a differential association (p=0.93). When stratifying by stage of disease, the prognostic significance of height was maintained for all stages except IIIB-IV. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that height is an independent prognostic factor of resectable lung cancer.

A surgical series on endometriosis-related diaphragmatic hernia.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endometriosis syndrome gives rise to various clinical and radiological manifestations. We reviewed the records of patients operated for intrathoracic migration of abdominal viscera through a diaphragmatic hernia secondary to thoracic endometriosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the single-center prospective collected database of all patients operated for thoracic endometriosis during the twenty years. All cases in which an abdominal organ was found to be herniated into the thoracic cavity were retrieved. Clinical and pathological data are presented and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty women of median age 36 (range 25-58) years were operated for endometriosis-related diaphragmatic hernia. The hernia was diagnosed concomitantly with endometriosis-related pneumothorax in 13 cases and during the exploration of catamenial thoracic pain in seven cases. There were 18 cases on the right side and two cases on the left side. The median diameter of the hernia was 8 cm (2.5-20 cm). In seventeen cases, the hernia was repaired by direct suture, and in three cases a heterologous prosthesis was positioned. At follow-up, two patients had an episode of recurrent pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic hernia should be ruled out in the presence of endometriosis-related pneumothorax or catamenial thoracic pain. Surgery is indicated to make a pathological diagnosis, restore anatomy, and prevent recurrence in patients presenting with pneumothorax.

Prognostic score and sex-specific nomograms to predict survival in resectable lung cancer: A French nationwide study from the Epithor cohort database.

Background: Prognostic assessment in patients undergoing cancer treatments is of paramount importance to plan subsequent management. In resectable lung cancer availability of an easy-to use nomogram to predict long-term outcome would be extremely useful to identify high-risk patients in the era of perioperative targeted and immune therapies. Methods: We retrieved clinical, surgical and pathological data of all consecutive patients included in Epithor, the database of French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and operated on between 2003 and 2020 for non-small cell lung cancer in a curative intent. The primary endpoint was overall survival up to 5 years. We assessed prognostic significance of available variables using Cox modelling, in the whole dataset, and in men and in women separately, and performed temporal validation. Finally, we constructed two sex-specific nomograms. Survivals by fifths of score were assessed in the development and temporal validation sets. Findings: The study included 62,633 patients (43,551 men and 19,082 women). Median survival time was 9.2 years. Nine factors had strong prognostic impact and were used to construct nomograms. The optimism-corrected c statistic for the prognostic score was 0.689 in the development sample, and 0.726 (95% CI 0.718-0.735) in the temporal validation sample. All differences between adjacent fifths of score were significant (P < 0.0001). Figures of 3-year OS by fifths of score were 92.2%, 83.0%, 74.3%, 64.0%, and 43.4%, respectively, in the development set and 93.3%, 88.4%, 81.0%, 73.7%, 55.7% in the temporal validation set. Performance of score was maintained when stratifying by stage of diseases. Interpretation: In the present work, we report evidence that long-term overall survival after resection of NSCLC can be predicted by an easy to construct and use composite score taking into account both host and tumour related factors. Funding: Epithor is funded by FSTCVS.

Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Lung Resection Surgery: Program Establishment and Results of a Cohort Study Encompassing 1243 Consecutive Patients.

INTRODUCTION: In spite of increasing diffusion, Enhanced Recovery Pathways (ERP) have been scarcely assessed in large scale programs of lung cancer surgery. The aim of this study was auditing our practice. METHODS: A two-step audit program was established: the first dealing with our initial ERP experience in patients undergoing non-extended anatomical segmentectomies and lobectomies, the second including all consecutive patients undergoing all kind of lung resections for NSCLC. The first step aimed at auditing results of ERP on occurrence of postoperative complications and at assessing which ERP components are associated with improved short-term outcomes. We also audited late results by assessing long-term survival of patients in the first step of our study. The second step aimed at auditing on large-scale short-term results of the ERP in a real-life setting. RESULTS: Over a one-year period, 166 patients were included. The median number of ERP procedures per patient was three (IQR 3-4). No postoperative death occurred. The overall adverse events rate was 30%. In multivariate analyzes, the only element associated with reduced adverse postoperative events was chest tube withdrawal within POD2 (OR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.10-0.46)). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 97%, 86.1%, and 76.3%, respectively. In the second period, 1077 patients were included in our ERP; 11 patients died during the postoperative period or within 30 days of operation (1.02%). The overall postoperative adverse event rate was 30.3%, major complication occurring in 134 (12.4%), and minor ones in 192 (17.8%). Respiratory complications occurred in 64 (5.9%). Thoracoscore independently predicted postoperative death, the occurrence of complications (all-kind, minor, major, or respiratory ones). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance to ERP procedures and early chest tube removal are associated with reduced postoperative events in patients with lung resection surgery. In a large setting scale, ERP can be applied with satisfactory results in terms of mortality and morbidity. Thoracoscore is a useful tool in predicting mortality and postoperative adverse events.

The Reality of Lung Cancer Paradox: The Impact of Body Mass Index on Long-Term Survival of Resected Lung Cancer. A French Nationwide Analysis from the Epithor Database.

Obesity could have a protective effect in patients with lung cancer. We assessed the prognostic role of preoperative BMI on survival in patients who underwent lung resection for NSCLC. A total of 54,631 consecutive patients with resectable lung cancer within a 15-year period were extracted from Epithor (the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery database). Patient subgroups were defined according to body mass index (BMI): underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Underweight was associated with lower survival (unadjusted HRs 1.24 (1.16-1.33)) compared to normal weight, whereas overweight and obesity were associated with improved survival (0.95 (0.92-0.98) and 0.88 (0.84-0.92), respectively). The impact of BMI was confirmed when stratifying for sex or Charlson comorbidities index (CCI). Among patients with obesity, a higher BMI was associated with improved survival. After adjusting for period of study, age, sex, WHO performance status, CCI, side of tumor, extent of resection, histologic type, and stage of disease, the HRs for underweight, overweight, and obesity were 1.51 (1.41-1.63), 0.84 (0.81-0.87), and 0.80 (0.76-0.84), respectively. BMI is a strong and independent predictor of survival in patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC.

Total Psoas Area and Total Muscular Parietal Area Affect Long-Term Survival of Patients Undergoing Pneumonectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

There is no standardization in methods to assess sarcopenia; in particular the prognostic significance of muscular fatty infiltration in lung cancer patients undergoing surgery has not been evaluated so far. We thus performed several computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric measurements of sarcopenia in 238 consecutive non-small cell lung-cancer patients undergoing pneumonectomy from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2015. Sarcopenia was assessed by the following CT-based parameters: cross-sectional total psoas area (TPA), cross-sectional total muscle area (TMA), and total parietal muscle area (TPMA), defined as TMA without TPA. Measures were performed at the level of the third lumbar vertebra and were obtained for the entire muscle surface, as well as by excluding fatty infiltration based on CT attenuation. Findings were stratified for gender, and a threshold of the 33rd percentile was set to define sarcopenia. Furthermore, we assessed the possibility of being sarcopenic at both the TPA and TPMA level, or not, by taking into account of not fatty infiltration. Five-year survival was 39.1% for the whole population. Lower TPA, TMA, and TPA were associated with lower survival at univariate analysis; taking into account muscular fatty infiltration did not result in more powerful discrimination. Being sarcopenic at both psoas and parietal muscle level had the optimum discriminating power. At the multivariable analysis, being sarcopenic at both psoas and parietal muscles (considering the whole muscle areas, including muscular fat), male sex, increasing age, and tumor stage, as well as Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), were independently associated with worse long-term outcomes. We conclude that sarcopenia is a powerful negative prognostic factor in patients with lung cancer treated by pneumonectomy.

Normalized Pulmonary Artery Diameter Predicts Occurrence of Postpneumonectomy Respiratory Failure, ARDS, and Mortality.

Hypothesizing that pulmonary artery diameter is a marker of subclinical pulmonary hypertension, we assessed its impact on postoperative outcome in patients requiring pneumonectomy. Morphometric, clinical, and laboratory data were retrospectively retrieved from files of 294 consecutive patients treated by pneumonectomy for malignancy (289 NSCLC). Pulmonary artery was measured at bifurcation level on CT scan and normalized by body surface area. Median normalized pulmonary artery diameter (cut-off for analyses) was 14 mm/m2. Postoperatively, 46 patients required re-do intubation and 30 had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Multivariate analysis showed that Charlson Comorbidity Index >5 (p = 0.0009, OR 3.8 [1.76-8.22]), right side of pneumonectomy (p = 0.013, OR 2.37 [1.20-4.71]), and higher normalized pulmonary artery diameter (p = 0.029, OR 2.16 [1.08-4.33]) were independent predictors of re-do intubation, while Charlson Comorbidity Index >5 (p = 0.018, OR 2.55 [1.17-5.59]) and higher normalized pulmonary artery diameter (p = 0.028, OR = 2.52 [1.10-5.77]) were independently associated with occurrence of ARDS. Post-operative mortality was 8.5%. Higher normalized pulmonary artery diameter, (p = 0.026, OR 3.39[1.15-9.95]), right side of pneumonectomy (p = 0.0074, OR 4.11 [1.46-11.56]), and Charlson Comorbidity Index >5 (p = 0.0011, OR 5.56 [1.99-15.54]) were independent predictors of postoperative death. We conclude that pre-operative normalized pulmonary artery diameter predicts the risk of re-do intubation, ARDS and mortality in patients undergoing pneumonectomy for cancer.

Percutaneous lung microwave ablation versus lung resection in high-risk patients. A monocentric experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF WORK: Lung microwave ablation (MWA) is considered an alternative treatment in high-risk patients, not suitable for surgery. The aim of our study is to compare MWA and pulmonary lobectomy in high-risk, lung cancer patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, propensity score--weighted cohort study. All adult patients who underwent CT guided MWA for stage I NSCLC between June 2009-October 2014 were included in the study and were compared with a cohort of patients submitted to lung lobectomy in the same period of time. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: 32 patients underwent MWA, and 35 high-risk patients submitted to lung lobectomy in the same period were selected. Median follow-up time was 51.1 months (95% CI: 43.8-62.3). Overall survival was 43.8 (95% CI: 26.1-55) and 55.8 months (95% CI: 49.9-76.8) in the MWA group and Lobectomy group, respectively. Negative prognostic factors were MWA procedure (HR:2.25, 95% CI: 1.20-4.21, p= 0.0109) and nodule diameter (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07; p= 0.007) for OS, while MWA procedure (HR: 5.2; 95% CI: 2.1-12.8: p < 0.001), ECOG 3 (HR: 5.0; 95% CI: 1.6-15.6; p = 0.006) and nodule diameter (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.0-1.1; p = 0.003) for DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a high percentage of local relapse in the MWA group but a comparable overall survival. Although lung lobectomy remains the gold standard treatment for stage I NSCLC, we can consider the MWA procedure as valid alternative local treatment in high-risk patients for stage I NSCLC.

Transbronchial Cryobiopsies in Lung Allograft Recipients for Surveillance Purposes: Initial Results.

Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) using standard forceps is the main procedure to establish the presence of lung allograft rejection (AR) after lung transplantation. Few studies report the use of the transbronchial cryobiopsy (TCB) as a scheduled procedure for surveillance purposes in lung allograft, despite this the technique yields larger biopsies. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic yield and potential complications of TCB compared with conventional forceps biopsy for acute rejection surveillance in lung transplantation. In our center, TCBs are performed to monitor lung allografts at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. From March 2018 to September 2019 TCBs were performed in 54 lung transplanted patients for surveillance purposes. Clinical and functional data, complications, and histologic results were collected. We analyzed through a retrospective study our first 75 cases of cryobiopsies for surveillance purposes in lung allograft recipients. The diagnostic rate of AR using TCB was 100% compared with 83% using conventional TBB. Also, diagnostic rate of airway inflammation and chronic rejection was 17% and 21% higher, respectively, for TCB compared with TBB. The overall major complication rate was 9%: 1 pneumothorax case required chest tube drainage and 6 moderate bleedings. Bleeding rate in the scheduled TCB group (8%) seems to be higher if compared with scheduled TBB group (1%). TCB seems to be safe and effective for diagnosis of lung AR compared with transbronchial conventional forceps biopsy.

Serum miR-223: A Validated Biomarker for Detection of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The published circulating miRNA signatures proposed for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) detection are inconsistent and difficult to replicate. Reproducibility and validation of an miRNA simple signature of NSCLC are prerequisites for translation to clinical application. METHODS: The serum level of miR-223 and miR-29c, emerging from published studies, respectively, as a highly sensitive and a highly specific biomarker of early-stage NSCLC, was measured with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technique in an Italian cohort of 75 patients with stage I-II NSCLC and 111 tumor-free controls. By ROC curve analysis we evaluated the miR-223 and miR-29c performance in discerning NSCLC cases from healthy controls. RESULTS: Reproducibility and robust measurability of the two miRNAs using ddPCR were documented. In a training set (40 stage I-II NSCLCs and 56 controls), miR-223 and miR-29c, respectively, showed an AUC of 0.753 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.655-0.836] and 0.632 (95% CI, 0.527-0.729) in identifying NSCLC. Combination of miR-223 with miR-29c yielded an AUC of 0.750, not improved over that of miR-223 alone. Furthermore, in an independent blind set (35 stage I-II NSCLCs and 55 controls), we validated serum miR-223 as an effective biomarker of stage I-II NSCLC (AUC = 0.808; 95% CI, 0.712-0.884), confirming the miR-223 diagnostic performance reported by others in Chinese cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Using ddPCR technology, miR-223 was externally validated as a reproducible, effective serum biomarker of early-stage NSCLC in ethnically different subjects. Combination with miR-29c did not improve the miR-223 diagnostic performance. IMPACT: Serum miR-223 determination may be proposed as a tool for refining NSCLC risk stratification, independent of smoking habit and age.

Quantitative computed tomography detects interstitial lung diseases proven by biopsy.

Background: The Quantitative chest CT (QCT) is emerging as a promising tool in the assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, the precise relationship between QCT parameters and the fibrosis detectable in lung tissue, remains to be established. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare QCT and histopathological features in patients with ILD. Moreover we verified if the QCT assessment is similar in patients with or without a ILD diagnosis proven by a biopsy. Methods: Twenty patients affected by ILD who underwent a chest CT and, later, a lung biopsy, were enrolled. Patients were divided according to the histopathological findings (IPF vs sarcoidosis) in two groups (respectively bIPF and bSarc). Other 20 patients with a radiological diagnosis of IPF were included in a control group (rIPF). All CTs were post-processed with a free software (Horos) in order to obtain an ILD quantitative assessment. Results: There were no differences in terms of gender, smoking habit and spirometric values between patients' groups. rIPF subjects were older than the other: 70 vs 59 and 47 years (p<0.001). A different distribution of QCT parameters was observed between bIPF and bSarc (p<0.01) while it was comparable within bIPF and rIPF. Conclusions: QCT parameters were similar in subjects affected by the same type of ILD detected with biopsy and with CT alone. These findings make stronger the assumption that QCT can identify the presence of pulmonary fibrosis and, ultimately, that it can represent an useful and effective tool to assess ILD. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2018; 35: 16-20).

Multicentric study of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration for lung cancer staging in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Multi-institutional studies of endobronchial-ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal staging in lung cancer are scarce. It is unclear if the high diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNA reported by experts' guidelines can be generally achieved. METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed in five tertiary referral centers of thoracic surgery in Italy, to assess the EBUS-TBNA diagnostic performance in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient inclusion criteria were: both genders; >18 years old; with suspect/confirmed NSCLC; undergoing EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal node enlargement at computed tomography (size >1 cm, ≤3 cm) and/or pathological uptake at positron emission tomography. Altogether we included 485 patients [male, 366; female, 119; median age, 68 years (IQR, 61-74 years)] undergoing mediastinal staging between January 2011 and July 2016. All EBUS-TBNAs were performed by experienced bronchoscopists, without pre-defined quality standards. Depending on usual practice in each center, EBUS-TBNA was done under conscious sedation, with 21- or 22-Gauge (G) needle, and specimen preparation was cell-block, or cytology slides, or core-tissue. Sampling was classified inadequate in absence of lymphocytes, or when sample was insufficient. We analyzed the EBUS-TBNA procedural steps likely to influence the rate of adequate samplings (diagnostic yield). RESULTS: EBUS-TBNA sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy respectively were 90%, 78% and 93% in the whole cohort. At multivariate analysis, use of 21-G needle was associated with better diagnostic yield (P<0.001). Center and specimen processing technique were not independent factors affecting EBUS-TBNA diagnostic yield. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicentric study, EBUS-TBNA was a highly sensitive and accurate method for NSCLC mediastinal node staging. Results indicate better performance of EBUS-TBNA with 21-G needle, and suggest that specimen processing technique could be chosen according to the local practice preference.