Costs differences among monoclonal antibodies-based first-line oncology cancer protocols for breast cancer, colorectal carcinoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the costs of first-line monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) treatment protocols in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and colorectal carcinoma in South-Eastern Europe. METHODS: A retrospective, bottom-up case series study design was implemented with one-year time horizon and payer's perspective. The study sample size was 265 patients (breast cancer, N=137; colorectal cancer, N=44; and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, N=84), while treatment protocols included adjuvant mAbs: trastuzumab (N=137), bevacizumab (N=28), rituximab (N=16) and cetuximab (N=84). ICD-10 related resources use included history of medical services utilization, chronology (time out of service provision) and unit consumption of examinations, drugs prescribed, imaging, radiotherapy and surgical procedures provided etc., direct medical and lost productivity costs (€) across treatment groups during 2010-2013. RESULTS: The average length of observation was 125+97 days per patient. Total mean direct and indirect costs of care were: trastuzumab for breast cancer group € 17,740 per patient; bevacizumab for colorectal carcinoma group €8,775 per patient; cetuximab for colorectal carcinoma group € 27,181 per patient; and rituximab for non-Hodgkin lymphoma group €19,431 per patient. An average mAbs-treated patient incurred €17,897 costs of medical care. The total combined budget of these 330 patients was €4,742,775. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mAbs strongly correlated with high costs in first-line cancer medical care and dominated other cost domains. Cetuximab-based treatment protocols in colorectal carcinoma patients was substantially more expensive compared to trastuzumab (C50), bevacizumab (C20), and rituximab (C80) alternatives. Extremely high costs of mAbs are the key-issue for Eastern European policy makers by crossing the upper limits of affordability in middle-income economies.

Does the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Bcl-2 Have a Prognostic Significance in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Lung cancer is the most common cause of mortality from malignant tumors worldwide. The five-year survival rate for people with advanced stages varies considerably, from 35.4% to 6.9%. The angiogenic potential of bcl2 is not well known, nor is the way in which tumor cells with excessive bcl2 expression affect VEGF production. Hypothetically, given that tumor growth, progression and metastasis are dependent on angiogenesis, the antiapoptotic effect is expected to form a link between these two molecules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between bcl-2 and VEGF expression, clinicopathological features and survival in 216 patients with advanced NSCLC. Archival tumor tissues were examined by immunohistochemistry for the expression of bcl-2 and VEGF. Immunoreactivity for bcl-2 was observed in 41.4% of NSCLCs, 51% of squamous and 34.8% of adenocarcinomas-expressed Bcl-2. There was an inverse correlation of mononuclear stromal reaction and bcl-2 expression in adenocarcinoma (p < 0.0005). A total of 71.8% NSCLCs were VEGF positive, 56% of squamous and 82.2% of adenocarcinomas. High level of VEGF expression was significantly associated with histology type (p = 0.043), low histology grade (p = 0.014), clinical stage IV (p = 0.018), smoking history (p = 0.008) and EGFR mutations (p = 0.026). There was an inverse correlation in the expression of Bcl-2 and VEGF in NSCLC patients (p = 0.039, r = -0.163). Two-year survival of patients with unresectable NSCLC was 39.3%, and 50% of patients were alive at 17 months. Our results demonstrated no difference in survival for patients in advanced NSCLC grouped by bcl-2 and VEGF status. Additionally, we observed an inverse correlation in the expression of Bcl-2 and VEGF in NSCLC and mononuclear reaction and bcl-2 expression in adenocarcinomas.

Predicting the survival probability of functional neuroendocrine tumors treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: Serbian experience.

Introduction: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment option for well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor positive, unresectable or/and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although high disease control rates seen with PRRT a significant number NET patients have a short progression-free interval, and currently, there is a deficiency of effective biomarkers to pre-identify these patients. This study is aimed at determining the prognostic significance of biomarkers on survival of patients with NETs in initial PRRT treatment. Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with NETs treated with PRRT at the Department for nuclear medicine, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Serbia, with a five-year follow-up. Eligible patients with confirmed inoperable NETs, were retrospectively evaluated hematological, blood-based inflammatory markers, biochemical markers and clinical characteristics on disease progression. In accordance with the progression og the disease, the patients were divided into two groups: progression group (n=18) and a non-progression group (n=33). Clinical data were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 51 patients (Md=60, age 25-75 years) were treated with PRRT, of whom 29 (56.86%) demonstrated stable disease, 4 (7.84%) demonstrated a partial response, and 14 (27.46%) demonstrated progressive disease and death was recorded in 4 (7.84%) patients. The mean PFS was a 36.22 months (95% CI 30.14-42.29) and the mean OS was 44.68 months (95% CI 37.40-51.97). Univariate logistic regression analysis displayed that age (p<0.05), functional tumors (p<0.05), absolute neutrophil count (p<0.05), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio-NLR (p<0.05), C-reactive protein-CRP (p<0.05), CRP/Albumin (p<0.05), alanine aminotransferase-ALT (p<0.05), were risk factors for disease progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis exhibited that functional tumors (p<0.001), age (p<0.05), CRP (p<0.05), and ALT (p<0.05), were independent risk factors for the disease progression in patients with NETs. Tumor functionality was the most powerful prognostic factor. The median PFS (11.86 ± 1.41 vs. 43.38 ± 3.16 months; p=0.001) and OS (21.81 ± 2.70 vs 53.86 ± 3.70, p=0.001) were significantly shorter in patients with functional than non-functional NETs respectively. Conclusion: The study's results suggest that tumor functionality, and certain biomarkers may serve as prognostic survival indicators for patients with NETs undergoing PRRT. The findings can potentially help to identify patients who are at higher risk of disease progression and tailor treatment strategies accordingly.

Interrogating and Quantifying In Vitro Cancer Drug Pharmacodynamics via Agent-Based and Bayesian Monte Carlo Modelling.

The effectiveness of chemotherapy in cancer cell regression is often limited by drug resistance, toxicity, and neoplasia heterogeneity. However, due to the significant complexities entailed by the many cancer growth processes, predicting the impact of interference and symmetry-breaking mechanisms is a difficult problem. To quantify and understand more about cancer drug pharmacodynamics, we combine in vitro with in silico cancer models. The anti-proliferative action of selected cytostatics is interrogated on human colorectal and breast adenocarcinoma cells, while an agent-based computational model is employed to reproduce experiments and shed light on the main therapeutic mechanisms of each chemotherapeutic agent. Multiple drug administration scenarios on each cancer cell line are simulated by varying the drug concentration, while a Bayesian-based method for model parameter optimisation is employed. Our proposed procedure of combining in vitro cancer drug screening with an in silico agent-based model successfully reproduces the impact of chemotherapeutic drugs in cancer growth behaviour, while the mechanisms of action of each drug are characterised through model-derived probabilities of cell apoptosis and division. We suggest that our approach could form the basis for the prospective generation of experimentally-derived and model-optimised pharmacological variables towards personalised cancer therapy.

Appearance of ductal breast and colon carcinoma with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in a female patient: an extremely rare case.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Very few cases of coexistence of GIST and adenocarcinoma in other organs have been described. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 63-year-old female patient diagnosed with breast cancer. After five years of the diagnosis, the findings of colon adenocarcinoma and GIST in stage IA were discovered incidentally during surgical treatment of the colon carcinoma. This tumor display: mixed spindle-epithelioid cell cytological type, of moderate cellularity, mitotic index (1∕10) with low anaplasia, low proliferative status (Ki-67 index 12%), without necrosis and immunophenotype profile: antiendomysial antibody (EMA)-, vimentin+++, CD117++, CD34+++, alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)+, desmin+∕-, S-100-, CD68-. CONCLUSIONS: The present case is extremely rare since the patient has adenocarcinoma with GIST in a previously diagnosed breast carcinoma. Based on this, in clinical practice should always think about possibility occurrence of synchronous and metachronous tumors.

Pretreatment prognostic factors in patients with early-stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy alone.

PURPOSE: To investigate influence of various pretreatment prognostic factors in patients with early stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients were treated with tumor doses of 69.6 Gy, 1.2-Gy, twice-daily fractionation. There were 49 patients with Stage I and 67 patients with Stage II. Eighty patients had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 90-100 and 95 patients had <5% weight loss. Peripheral tumors were observed in 57 patients. Squamous histology was observed in 70 patients and the majority of patients had concomitant disease (n=72). RESULTS: The median survival time for all patients was 29 months; 5-year survival was 29%. The median time to local progression and the distant metastasis were not achieved, whereas 5-year local progression-free and distant metastasis-free survivals were 50% and 72%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified KPS, weight loss, location, histology, and the reason for not undergoing surgery as prognostic factors for survival. KPS, location, and histology influenced local progression-free survival, whereas only KPS and weight loss influenced distant metastasis-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis identified KPS and weight loss as the most important prognostic factors of outcome in patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with hyperfractionation radiation therapy.

Radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily chemotherapy in locally advanced, nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate the difference between conventionally fractionated (CF) and hyperfractionated (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT), with and without either daily cisplatin (CDDP) or carboplatin (CBDCA), in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) enrolled onto two consecutive prospective randomized studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of CF RT (70 Gy, group 1), CF RT and either daily CDDP (6 mg/m2) or daily CBDCA (25 mg/m2; group 2), Hfx RT (77 Gy, 1.1 Gy bid; group 3), or Hfx RT and daily CDDP (group 4). RESULTS: Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) than any other group. There was an insignificant difference favoring Hfx RT over CF RT, either alone or in combination with CDDP or CBDCA, regarding both OS (P =.058 and P =.051, respectively) and LRFS (P =.088 and P =.091, respectively). No difference was seen between CF RT plus chemotherapy (CHT) and Hfx RT alone regarding either OS (P =.32) or LRFS (P =.48). Regional recurrence-free survival was similar in the four treatment groups. CF RT plus CHT and Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better distant metastasis-free survival than CF RT and Hfx RT. High-grade toxicity was significantly more frequent in Hfx RT plus CDDP than in any other group, except in the Hfx RT group. Hfx RT led to significantly more acute toxicity and xerostomia than CF RT plus CHT. Hfx RT was more toxic than CF RT, either alone or with concurrent CHT. CONCLUSION: Results of this study show that there may be a therapeutic benefit for CF RT plus CHT over Hfx RT plus CDDP in patients with SCCHN, but this cannot be firmly established without a larger and well-planned controlled trial.

Radiation therapy remains the key cost driver of oncology inpatient treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Current radiation therapy capacities in Serbia and most of Eastern Europe are heavily lagging behind population needs. The primary study aim was assessment of direct costs of cancer medical care for patients suffering from cancer with assigned radiotherapy-based treatment protocols. Identification of key cost drivers and trends during 2010-2013 comparing brachytherapy and teleradiotherapy was a secondary objective of the study. METHODS: Retrospective, bottom-up database analysis was conducted on electronic discharge invoices. Payer's perspective has been adopted with a 1-year long time horizon. Total sample size was 2544 patients during a 4-years long observation period (2010-2013). The sample consisted of all patients with confirmed malignancy disorder receiving inpatient radiation therapy in a large university hospital. RESULTS: Diagnostics and treatment cost of cancer in the largest Western Balkans market of Serbia were heavily dominated by radiation therapy related direct medical costs. Total costs of care as well as mean cost per patient were steadily decreasing due to budget cuts caused by global recession. The paradox is that at the same time the budget share of radiotherapy increased for almost 15% and in value-based terms for €109 per patient (in total €109,330). Second ranked cost drivers were nursing care and imaging diagnostics. Costs of high-tech visualizing examinations were heavily dominated by nuclear medicine tests. CONCLUSION: The budget impact of radiation oncology to the large tertiary care university clinics of the Balkans is likely to remain significant in the future. Brachytherapy exhibited a slow growth pattern, while teleradiotherapy remained stable in terms of value-based turnover of medical services. Upcoming heavy investment into the national network of radiotherapy facilities will emphasize the unsatisfied needs. Huge contemporary budget share of radiotherapy coupled with rising cancer prevalence brings this issue into the hot spot of the ongoing cost containment efforts by local governments.

Five-year survival and costs of care in metastatic colorectal cancer: conventional versus monoclonal antibody-based treatment protocols.

AIM: To evaluate the costs and survival estimates of metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients treated with conventional cytostatic protocols and adjuvant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). METHODS: Retrospective randomized case series and cost-of-illness analysis was used. Metastatic colorectal carcinoma cases (62) were randomly selected from the archive of the largest university military hospital in Southeastern Europe. RESULTS: A 6-month longer survival was attributed to mAbs (p = 0.581). Conventional protocols incurred € 5137 (95% CI: € 3758-€ 6517) versus € 22,113 (95% CI: € 16,201-€ 28,025) total direct medical costs in mAb-based group. ICER of € 32,108 per life year gained attributable to mAbs three-fold exceeded informal willingness to pay threshold of Serbia. CONCLUSION: mAbs adjuvant protocols had modest positive impact on 5-year survival rates. Costs were driven by targeted biologicals, but significantly higher costs of care were recorded in mAb-treated group in other domains, as well. More selective prescription and reimbursement criteria should be applied to increase cost-effectiveness of targeted oncology agents.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy for incompletely resected supratentorial low-grade glioma: a 10-year update of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To provide a 10-year update of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) in adults with incompletely resected supratentorial low-grade glioma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 37 patients were treated with 55 Gy in 50 fractions in 25 treatment days in 5 weeks to tumor plus 2 cm, and additional 17.6 Gy given in 16 fractions in 8 treatment days in 1.5 weeks to tumor plus 1 cm, (1.1 Gy twice daily). Total dose was 72.6 Gy in 66 fractions in 33 treatment days in 6.5 weeks. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 121 months for all patients, the median survival time (MST) for all 37 patients was 145 months, whereas 10-year survival rate was 67%. Median time to tumor progression (MTP) has not yet been attained, but 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 62%. There was no difference in survival or PFS regarding gender, age, location, site, size, CT enhancement, and histology; whereas lower KPS, higher neurologic status, and lesser extent of surgery had an adverse influence. Infield progression occurred in 15 (88%), whereas in only 2 (12%) patients, tumor progression was described as marginal. Brain necrosis has not been observed so far. Autopsy findings confirmed recurrent glioma and excluded post-RT necrosis in 14 (38%) patients. Of those, 7 (50%) patients had either Grade 3 (n = 4) or Grade 4 (n = 3) glioma. CONCLUSION: High-dose HFX RT is effective with mild to moderate toxicity. Further studies are warranted with more patients before testing it against standard fractionation RT in this patient population.

Combined treatment modality for anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma: a 10-year update of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To provide updated outcome data (10 years) of a Phase II study of combined surgery, postoperative radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 23 adult patients, surgery, postoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 daily fractions within 6 weeks), and adjuvant modified chemotherapy (procarbazine 60 mg/m(2) on Days 1-14, lomustine 100 mg/m(2) on Day 1, and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) [maximum 2 mg] on Days 1 and 8) were administered every 6 weeks for up to six cycles or until progression occurred. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 116 months for all patients. The median survival time was 118 months, and the 5-year and 10-year survival rate was 57% and 47%, respectively. The median time to tumor progression was 78 months, with a 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival rate of 52% and 39%, respectively. Gender, age, Karnofsky performance status, location, and histologic type did not influence survival. Patients with tumors 4 cm (p = 0.0470), as did those with total tumor resection compared with those with subtotal tumor resection or biopsy only (p = 0.0024). Gender, Karnofsky performance status, location, and histologic type did not influence progression-free survival, but younger age (p = 0.0389), smaller tumor size (p = 0.0357), and more radical surgery (p = 0.0033) correlated positively with it. Acute high-grade (Grade 3 or worse) chemotherapy-related toxicity was mainly hematologic, with 3 patients (13%) experiencing acute Grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: The results of this 10-year update confirmed that the trimodality approach is effective in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma.

Impact of treatment interruptions due to toxicity on outcome of patients with early stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy alone.

We investigated the effect of treatment interruptions due to high-grade (> or =3) toxicity on outcome of patients with early stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT). Of 116 patients treated with total tumour doses of 69.6 Gy, 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation, 44 patients refused surgery while 72 patients were medically inoperable due to existing co-morbid states. Patients who were medically inoperable had worse KPS (P=0.0059) and more pronounced weight loss (P=0.0005). Among them, 12 patients experienced high-grade toxicity and 11 of them with either acute (n=6) or "consequential" late (n=5) high-grade toxicity requested interruption in the Hfx RT course (range, 12-25 days; median, 17 days). Superior survival (OS) was observed in patients who refused surgery when compared to those who were medically inoperable (P=0.0041), as well as superior local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (P=0.011), but not different distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.14). Cause-specific survival (CSS) also favoured patients who refused surgery (P=0.004). Multivariate analysis showed independent influence of the reason for not undergoing surgery on OS (P=0.035), but not on LRFS (P=0.084) or CSS (P=0.068). Patients who refused surgery did not experience high-grade toxicity (0/44), whereas 11 of 72 patients with medical inoperability and co-morbid states experienced high-grade toxicity and had treatment interruptions to manage toxicity (P=0.0064). Patients without treatment interruptions had significantly better OS (P=0.00000), LRFS (P=0.00000) and CSS (P=0.00000) than those with treatment interruptions. When corrected for treatment interruptions, the reason for not undergoing surgery independently influenced OS (P=0.040), but not LRFS (P=0.092) or CSS (P=0.068). In contrast to this, treatment interruption was independent prognosticator of all three endpoints used (P=0.00031, P=0.0075 and P=0.00033, respectively). When 11 patients with treatment interruptions were excluded, the reason for not undergoing surgery still affected OS (P=0.037) and CSS (P=0.039) but not LRFS (P=0.11). Multivariate analyses using OS, CSS and LRFS showed that the reason for not undergoing surgery affected OS (P=0.0436), but neither CSS (P=0.083) nor LRFS (P=0.080).

No thoracic radiation myelitis after spinal cord dose > or = 50.4 Gy using 1.2. Gy b.i.d. fractionation in patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy with and without concurrent chemotherapy.

We investigated a risk of developing radiation myelitis during four prospective studies using hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX RT) with and without concurrent chemotherapy (CHT) during which a portion of thoracic spinal cord received a dose > or = 50.4 Gy given via 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation. Of 536 patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which were treated on three prospective randomised Phase III studies and one Phase II study, 336 patients received irradiation dose > or = 50.4 Gy to a portion of their spinal cord and survived >1 year after the beginning of therapy. None of these 336 patients developed thoracic radiation myelitis. Therefore, the influence of potentially contributing factors on the occurrence of radiation myelitis, such as cord length, interfraction interval, or administration of concurrent CHT was not possible to investigate. These results give new insight about the influence of total dose/dose per fraction/interfraction interval with or without concurrent CHT on the thoracic spinal cord toxicity.

Pretreatment clinical prognostic factors in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: We investigated the influence of potential pre-treatment clinical prognostic factors in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND PATIENTS: A total of 285 patients were enrolled in two consecutive prospective randomised studies which compared (study 1) carboplatin and prolonged oral etoposide (group 1; n=58) with the same etoposide alone (group 2; n=59), and (study 2) carboplatin and prolonged oral etoposide (group 1; n=84) with the same carboplatin and high-dose intravenous etoposide (group 2; n=84). RESULTS: The median survival time for all 285 patients was 7 months, while 1- and 2-year survival rates were 29% and 8%, respectively. Age did not impact on outcome ( P=0.21), while female patients did significantly better than male patients ( P<0.0001). Patients with KPS 80-100 did significantly better than those with KPS 50-70 ( P<0.0001), as did patients with less pronounced weight loss ( P<0.0001) and those with only one metastatic site when compared to those having at least two metastatic sites ( P<0.0001). When evaluated regarding the metastatic site, only subcutaneous metastatic site did not influence survival. This was confirmed within univariate analyses, but when multivariate analyses were done gender, KPS, weight loss, number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases and presence of brain metastases independently influenced survival, while age and other metastatic locations did not. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, gender, KPS, weight loss, number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases and presence of brain metastases independently influenced survival in patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with CHT.

Multivariate analysis of clinical prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with a combined modality approach.

We investigated the influence of various clinical prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treated with a combined modality approach. A total of 175 patients with GBM was treated in four consecutive prospective phase II studies using surgery, hyperfractionated or accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and either adjuvant or concurrent or pre-irradiation chemotherapy (CHT) between January 1988 and December 1993. The median survival time for all 175 patients was 14 months and 1-3-year survival (OS) rates were 57%, 34% and 24%, respectively. The median time to tumour progression was 12 months, and 1-3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 43%, 11% and 7%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that of all investigated prognostic factors, only gender did not influence survival. Patients 55 years; patients with KPS 80-100 did better than those with KPS 50-70; patients with frontal tumours did better than those with tumours in other locations; patients with tumours up to 4 cm did better than those with larger tumours, as did patients with either subtotal or gross total tumour resection when compared to those undergoing biopsy only. Multivariate analysis showed that gender and tumour location did not independently influence survival. When PFS was used as the endpoint, only gender did not influence PFS, as confirmed by multivariate analysis.

Interfraction interval in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy: final results in 536 patients.

We investigated the influence of interfraction interval (IFI) on treatment outcome in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy (CHT). During 3 randomized phase III and 1 phase II study, a total of 536 patients were treated with Hfx RT alone or with concurrent carboplatin/etoposide. Two hundred eighty-five patients were treated with IFI of 4.5-5.0 hours, while 251 patients were treated with IFI of 5.5-6.0 hours. "Shorter" (4.5-5.0 hours) IFI led to better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0000) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (P = 0.0000). Multivariate analyses showed IFI to be an independent prognosticator of both OS and LRFS. These results were confirmed when we separated all patients (n = 536) into those treated with Hfx RT only (n = 127) and those treated with concurrent RT/CHT (n = 409). Various RT-related high-grade acute toxicity was not different between the 2 IFI, but patients treated with shorter IFI had a significantly higher incidence of hematological toxicity (P = 0.002). None of the late high-grade toxicities were different between the 2 interfraction intervals. Using regression analysis, it was shown that IFI was not a significant predictor of any of acute or late high-grade (> or =3) toxicity. IFI is an important prognosticator of OS and LRFS in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with Hfx RT with or without concurrent carboplatin/etoposide. IFI led to higher incidence only of hematological toxicity, but was not predictive of any acute or late high-grade (> or =3) toxicity. A carefully designed randomized trial seems necessary to give better insight into the issue of optimal IFI in this disease.

Clinical prognostic factors in patients with malignant glioma treated with combined modality approach.

The impact of various clinical pretreatment prognostic factors in patients with malignant glioma treated with a combined modality approach was investigated in 229 patients treated on four consecutive prospective phase II studies. The median survival time for all 229 patients is 14 months, and 2- and 5-year survival rates are 34%, and 9%, respectively. The median time to tumor progression is 14 months, and 2- and 5-year progression-free survival rates are 32%, and 9%, respectively. Females did better than males, while patients 55 years or less did better than those more than 55 years. Patients with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 80 to 100 did better than those with KPS 50 to 70 as well as did patients having preoperative tumor sizes 4 cm or less when compared to those with larger tumors. Frontal tumor location as well as more extensive surgery favorably influenced survival. Patients harboring anaplastic astrocytoma fared significantly better than those with glioblastoma multiforme. Both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses confirmed independent influence of these prognosticators. When progression-free survival was used as an endpoint, all seven variables remained independent prognosticators. This study showed that sex, age, KPS, tumor size, tumor location, histology, and extent of surgery are independent prognosticators in patients with malignant glioma treated with combined modality approach.

Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with high-dose hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent low-dose daily chemotherapy with or without weekend chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 301 patients.

We investigated the outcome in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with high-dose hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CHT) consisting of carboplatin (C) and etoposide (E). During three prospective randomized phase III and one prospective phase II study enrolling a total of 536 patients, 301 patients were treated with high-dose Hfx RT (69.6 Gy) and either low-dose daily CE (50 mg each) (n = 163) or daily CE (30 mg each) accompanied by "weekend" CE (100 mg of each on Saturdays and Sundays) (n = 138). The median survival time for all 301 patients is 22 months and 5-year survival is 24%. Median local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) time is 21 months and 5-year local recurrence-free survival is 32%. The median time to distant metastasis is 25 months, and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) is 35%. Only the type/schedule of CHT administration did not influence overall survival, LRFS, and DMFS. On multivariate analyses using these three endpoints, age stage, interfraction interval, and type/schedule of CHT administration did not predict survival, LRFS, and DMFS, while gender, KPS, and weight loss did. Only high grade hematologic toxicity was more frequent in weekend CHT group. High dose Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CE with or without weekend CE is an active treatment approach in stage III NSCLC that led to high overall survival, LRFS, and DMFS rates.