Human immunodeficiency virus and liver transplantation: our point of view.

INTRODUCTION: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been able to improve the immune system function and survival of HIV patients with a consequent increase in the number of HIV patients affected by end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Between June 2003 and October 2006, 10 HIV-positive patients underwent liver transplantations in our center. METHODS: All patients were treated with HAART before transplantation; treatment was interrupted on transplantation day and was restarted once the patients' conditions stabilized. Five patients were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive, 3 were hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive, and 2 were HBV-HCV coinfected. HIV viral load before transplantation was <50 copies/mL in all cases. CD4+ cell count before transplantation ranged between 144 and 530 c/microL. Immunosuppression was based on Cyclosporine (CyA) and steroid weaning for 8 patients, and on Tacrolimus and steroid weaning for 2 patients. RESULTS: Five patients were cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive pp65 antigenemia posttransplantation, and 1 patient was EBV-positive; 2 patients had a coinfection with HHV6. Four patients suffered from a cholestatic HCV recurrent hepatitis treated with antiviral therapy (peginterferon and Ribavirin). Three patients died after transplantation. DISCUSSION: The outcome of liver transplantation in HIV patients was influenced by infections (HCV, CMV, and EBV) and Kaposi's Sarcoma. HCV recurrence was more aggressive, showing a faster progression in this patient population. Drug interaction between HAART and immunosuppressants occurs; longer follow-up and better experience may improve the management of these drug interactions.

Temporary porto-caval shunt utility during orthotopic liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: In liver transplantation (OLT) a porto-caval shunt is a well-defined technique practiced by many surgeons in several centers. METHODS: We considered 186 cadaveric OLT patients who underwent a cavo-cavostomy-type reconstruction; they were divided into two groups: those in whom we performed a porto-caval shunt (group A) and those in whose we did not (group B). We evaluated several variables: warm and total ischemia time, intraoperative blood and fresh frozen plasma transfusions, crystalloid and colloid requirements, blood loss, operative duration, hemodynamic intraoperative changes and diuresis, length of hospital stay, and creatinine values at days 1 and 2, and at discharge day. RESULTS: Total and warm ischemic time differed significantly between the two groups. Infusion of blood, fresh frozen plasma, colloid, and crystalloid did not significantly differ. Blood loss was lower, and intraoperative diuresis was not significantly increased in group A subjects. Postoperative hospitalizations were 16.5 and 17.8 days and operative times, 504 and 611 minutes in the two groups. Both cardiac index and ejection fraction values during the anhepatic phase were significantly greater among group A than group B patients. PAD at the two phases was greater in group B. The PAS was significantly different only at reperfusion time. Creatinine values were significantly different at discharge. Better survival was shown for group A patients over group B subjects. CONCLUSION: The results presented herein confirmed that a porto-caval shunt during OLT was a safe, useful expedient contributing to an improved hemodynamic status and a better time distribution in the various phases of liver transplantation.

Sirolimus monotherapy in liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Since 1999, a new immunosuppressive drug was administered to renal transplant patients. The SRL molecule acts by blocking post-receptor signal transduction of interleukin-2 (IL-2) interacting with a family of intracellular binding proteins termed immunophilins FKBPs. Among these FKBPs, FK506 12-kd binding protein is the most relevant. SRL is an immunosuppressive drug. Therefore it can inhibit the immune system; at the same time the drug is not nephrotoxic, neurotoxic, and without diabetogenic effects. METHODS: Among 285 patients who underwent liver transplantation, 27 took Sirolimus as monotherapy. Immunosuppressive treatment upto cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK) associated with steroids (methylprednisolone) and mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) was initiated among subjects with pre-transplant renal failure. SRL was administered as monotherapy for patients who developed nephrotoxicity, or neurotoxicity, or diabetes. Moreover, patients affected by multifocal HCC who did not meet the Milan criteria or patients who developed Kaposi's Sarcoma were prescribed SRL monotherapy. RESULTS: Nephrotoxicity occurred in 14 patients with mean serum creatinine level 2.2 mg/dl. Eleven patients with real failure showed significant improvements after a mean period of 28 days of SRL monotherapy (range: 6-45 days). The mean creatinine serum level after treatment with SRL monotherapy was 1.0 mg/dl (range: 0.7-1.2 mg/dl). Neurotoxicity occurred in 4 patients with tremor, confusion, and agitation. Each patient had complete improvement of symptoms after a few days of Sirolimus monotherapy. Among Three patients who developed Kaposi's Sarcoma, two underwent remission. One patient had diabetes due to calcineurin inhibitors, and one showed arterial hypertension not treatable with drugs. After the switch, we treated these patients with medications. Another important indication was HCC not meeting the Milan criteria. CONCLUSION: SRL monotherapy may be used to manage complication of calcineurin inhibitors or Kaposi's Sarcoma.

Predictive factors of lack of response to antiviral therapy among in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.

The current therapy for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation OLT is based on interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) in monotherapy or combination. The rate of sustained virological response (SVR) varies between 10% and 45%. We have retrospectively analyzed factors that could predict SVR after antiviral therapy. We analyzed 42 patients who completed a cycle of therapy with natural or pegylated IFN plus RBV. There were 15 (35.7%) patients who obtained an SVR. The following factors were significantly associated with a lack of SVR: donor age >or=50 years (P = .046); donor body mass index (BMI) > 27 (P = .016); genotype 1 versus 2 to 3 (P = 0.010), aspartate transferase (AST) before therapy >or= 140 U/L (P = .046), alanine transferase before therapy >or= 280 U/L (P = .055), use of natural IFN versus pegylated IFN (P = .016). The only factors remaining after multivariate analysis were: donor BMI, AST before therapy and genotype. Our data confirmed that genotype 1 was associated with poorer outcomes; other additional parameters can influence the response to antiviral therapy.

Novel genetic mutation in apolipoprotein E2 homozygosis and its implication in organ donation: a case report.

Disorders in lipoprotein metabolism do not contraindicate liver procurement and transplantation (LT). In this circumstance, LT provides an intriguing opportunity to assess the in vivo contribution of the liver to the synthesis and degradation of genetically polymorphic plasma proteins. Apolipoprotein (APO) E exists with several common phenotypic differences due to gene polymorphism. Some authors have shown that the APOE phenotype of the recipient was virtually completely converted to that of the donor, providing evidence that >90% of plasma APOE arises from the liver. Homozygosis for APOE2 (E2-E2) is related to an increased incidence of type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP). Recently, some authors have identified 4 new APOE mutations that are strongly linked to a unique entity of renal lipidosis called lipoprotein glomerulopathy (LPG). At present, 65 cases of LPG have been reported worldwide, although most patients have been discovered in Japan and other East Asian countries. We have herein reported a case of LT in a patient with advanced hepatocarcinoma who received a liver from a caucasian donor affected by type III HLP due to homozygous E2-E2. The LPG was due to a novel genetic mutation in APOE. After the LT, the recipient, developed de novo severe lipid abnormalities despite good graft function. To our knowledge this is the first report of an LT using a graft from a non Asian donor with homozygous E2-E2 with the presence of a novel APOE mutation.