Function and composition of pancreatic islet cell implants in omentum of type 1 diabetes patients.

Intraportal (IP) islet cell transplants can restore metabolic control in type 1 diabetes patients, but limitations raise the need for establishing a functional beta cell mass (FBM) in a confined extrahepatic site. This study reports on function and composition of omental (OM) implants after placement of islet cell grafts with similar beta cell mass as in our IP-protocol (2-5.106 beta cells/kg body weight) on a scaffold. Four of seven C-peptide-negative recipients achieved low beta cell function (hyperglycemic clamp [HGC] 2-8 percent of controls) until laparoscopy, 2-6 months later, for OM-biopsy and concomitant IP-transplant with similar beta cell dose. This IP-transplant increased HGC-values to 15-40 percent. OM-biopsies reflected the composition of initial grafts, exhibiting varying proportions of endocrine-cell-enriched clusters with more beta than alpha cells and leucocyte pole, non-endocrine cytokeratin-positive clusters surrounded by leucocytes, and scaffold remnants with foreign body reaction. OM-implants on a polyglactin-thrombin-fibrinogen-scaffold presented larger endocrine clusters with infiltrating endothelial cells and corresponded to the higher HGC-values. No activation of cellular immunity to GAD/IA2 was measured post-OM-transplant. Establishment of a metabolically adequate FBM in omentum may require a higher beta cell number in grafts but also elimination of their immunogenic non-endocrine components as well as local conditioning that favors endocrine cell engraftment and function.

Formation of amyloid in encapsulated human pancreatic and human stem cell-generated beta cell implants.

Detection of amyloid in intraportal islet implants of type 1 diabetes patients has been proposed as cause in their functional decline. The present study uses cultured adult human islets devoid of amyloid to examine conditions of its formation. After intraportal injection in patients, amyloid deposits <15 µm diameter were identified in 5%-12% of beta cell containing aggregates, 3-76 months posttransplant. Such deposits also formed in glucose-controlling islet implants in the kidney of diabetic mice but not in failing implants. Alginate-encapsulated islets formed amyloid during culture when functional, and in all intraperitoneal implants that corrected diabetes in mice, exhibiting larger sizes than in functioning nonencapsulated implants. After intraperitoneal injection in a patient, retrieved single capsules presented amyloid near living beta cells, whereas no amyloid occurred in clustered capsules with dead cells. Amyloid was also demonstrated in functional human stem cell-generated beta cell implants in subcutaneous devices of mice. Deposits up to 35 µm diameter were localized in beta cell-enriched regions and related to an elevated IAPP over insulin ratio in the newly generated beta cells. Amyloid in device-encapsulated human stem cell-generated beta cell implants marks the formation of a functional beta cell mass but also an imbalance between its activated state and its microenvironment.

Use of hyperglycemic clamp to assess pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplant in patient with heterotaxy syndrome and dorsal pancreas agenesis leading to chronic pancreatitis.

Patients with heterotaxy syndrome (HS) can present with an associated complete dorsal pancreas agenesis (DPA). They are considered to be at increased risk for developing diabetes due to a reduced functional beta cell mass (FBM) as well as for chronic pancreatitis leading to unmanageable pain. We report the case of a young woman with chronic pancreatitis due to HS and associated DPA. She presented with a severe persisting upper abdominal pain refractory to nonsurgical treatment. Unlike in previously reported cases, she had a high FBM (ie, 150% of normoglycemic controls) as determined by hyperglycemic clamp. She underwent a total pancreatectomy followed within 24 hours by an intraportal autologous islet cell transplant containing 4 × 106 beta cells (4700 islet equivalent)/kg body weight. After surgery, the pain resolved, eliminating the need for analgesics. The intraportal implant established an adequate FBM (72% of controls at posttransplant month 2), achieving glycemic control without need for insulin administration. A hyperglycemic clamp can assess the utility and efficacy of an intraportal islet cell autotransplant following total pancreatectomy in patients with HS and complete DPA.

Utility of Islet Cell Preparations From Donor Pancreases After Euthanasia.

Patients fulfilling criteria for euthanasia can choose to donate their organs after circulatory death [donors after euthanasia (DCD V)]. This study assesses the outcome of islet cell isolation from DCD V pancreases. A procedure for DCD V procurement provided 13 pancreases preserved in Institut Georges Lopez-1 preservation solution and following acirculatory warm ischemia time under 10 minutes. Islet cell isolation outcomes are compared with those from reference donors after brain death (DBD, n = 234) and a cohort of donors after controlled circulatory death (DCD III, n = 29) procured under the same conditions. Islet cell isolation from DCD V organs resulted in better in vitro outcome than for selected DCD III or reference DBD organs. A 50% higher average beta cell number before and after culture and a higher average beta cell purity (35% vs 24% and 25%) was observed, which led to more frequent selection for our clinical protocol (77% of isolates vs 50%). The functional capacity of a DCD V islet cell preparation was illustrated by its in vivo effect following intraportal transplantation in a type 1 diabetes patient: injection of 2 million beta cells/kg body weight (1,900 IEQ/kg body weight) at 39% insulin purity resulted in an implant with functional beta cell mass that represented 30% of that in non-diabetic controls. In conclusion, this study describes procurement and preservation conditions for donor organs after euthanasia, which allow preparation of cultured islet cells, that more frequently meet criteria for clinical use than those from DBD or DCD III organs.

Lower beta cell yield from donor pancreases after controlled circulatory death prevented by shortening acirculatory warm ischemia time and by using IGL-1 cold preservation solution.

Organs from donors after controlled circulatory death (DCD III) exhibit a higher risk for graft dysfunction due to an initial period of warm ischemia. This procurement condition can also affect the yield of beta cells in islet isolates from donor pancreases, and hence their use for transplantation. The present study uses data collected and generated by our Beta Cell Bank to compare the number of beta cells in isolates from DCD III (n = 141) with that from donors after brain death (DBD, n = 609), before and after culture, and examines the influence of donor and procurement variables. Beta cell number per DCD III-organ was significantly lower (58 x 106 versus 84 x 106 beta cells per DBD-organ; p < 0.001) but their purity (24% insulin positive cells) and insulin content (17 µg / 106 beta cells in DCD III-organs versus 19 µg / 106 beta cells in DBD-organs) were similar. Beta cell number correlated negatively with duration of acirculatory warm ischemia time above 10 min; for shorter acirculatory warm ischemia time, DCD III-organs did not exhibit a lower beta cell yield (74 x 106 beta cells). Use of Institut Georges Lopez-1 cold preservation solution instead of University of Wisconsin solution or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate also protected against the loss in beta cell yield from DCD III-organs (86 x 106 for IGL-1 versus 54 x 106 and 65 x 106 beta cells respectively, p = 0.042). Multivariate analysis indicates that both limitation of acirculatory warm ischemia time and use of IGL-1 prevent the reduced beta cell yield in islet cell isolates from DCD III-organs.

Heterogeneity of Human Pancreatic Islet Isolation Around Europe: Results of a Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Europe is currently the most active region in the field of pancreatic islet transplantation, and many of the leading groups are actually achieving similar good outcomes. Further collaborative advances in the field require the standardization of islet cell product isolation processes, and this work aimed to identify differences in the human pancreatic islet isolation processes within European countries. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire about critical steps, including donor selection, pancreas processing, pancreas perfusion and digestion, islet counting and culture, islet quality evaluation, microbiological evaluation, and release criteria of the product, was completed by isolation facilities participating at the Ninth International European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (EPITA) Workshop on Islet-Beta Cell Replacement in Milan. RESULTS: Eleven islet isolation facilities completed the questionnaire. The facilities reported 445 and 53 islet isolations per year over the last 3 years from deceased organ donors and pancreatectomized patients, respectively. This activity resulted in 120 and 40 infusions per year in allograft and autograft recipients, respectively. Differences among facilities emerged in donor selection (age, cold ischemia time, intensive care unit length, amylase concentration), pancreas procurement, isolation procedures (brand and concentration of collagenase, additive, maximum acceptable digestion time), quality evaluation, and release criteria for transplantation (glucose-stimulated insulin secretion tests, islet numbers, and purity). Moreover, even when a high concordance about the relevance of one parameter was evident, thresholds for the acceptance were different among facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The result highlighted the presence of a heterogeneity in the islet cell product process and product release criteria.