IDEAL study: magnetic resonance imaging for suspected deep endometriosis assessment prior to laparoscopy is as reliable as radiological imaging as a complement to transvaginal ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the value of using one-stop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs standard radiological imaging as a supplement to transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) for the preoperative assessment of patients with endometriosis referred for surgery in a tertiary care academic center. METHODS: This prospective observational study compared the diagnostic value of the standard preoperative imaging practice of our center, which involves expert TVS complemented by intravenous urography (IVU) for the evaluation of the ureters and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) for the evaluation of the rectum, sigmoid and cecum, with that of expert TVS complemented by a 'one-stop' MRI examination evaluating the upper abdomen, pelvis, kidneys and ureters as well as rectum and sigmoid on the same day, for the preoperative triaging of 74 women with clinically suspected deep endometriosis. The findings at laparoscopy were considered the reference standard. Patients were stratified according to their need for monodisciplinary surgical approach, carried out by gynecologists only, or multidisciplinary surgical approach, involving abdominal surgeons and/or urologists, based on the extent to which endometriosis affected the reproductive organs, bowel, ureters, bladder or other abdominal organs. RESULTS: Our standard preoperative imaging approach and the combined findings of TVS and MRI had similar diagnostic performance, resulting in correct stratification for a monodisciplinary or a multidisciplinary surgical approach of 67/74 (90.5%) patients. However, there were differences between the estimation of the severity of disease by DCBE and MRI. The severity of rectal involvement was underestimated in 2.7% of the patients by both TVS and DCBE, whereas it was overestimated in 6.8% of the patients by TVS and/or DCBE. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary to expert TVS, 'one-stop' MRI can predict intraoperative findings equally well as standard radiological imaging (IVU and DCBE) in patients referred for endometriosis surgery in a tertiary care academic center. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Sperm motility after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with lightweight meshes: 3-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To analyse the effects of lightweight meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair on male fertility aspects, chronic pain development and recurrence at 3-year follow-up. METHODS: Fifty-nine male patients with a primary, unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia were randomised to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a standard polypropylene (Marlex(®)) or lightweight mesh (VyproII(®), TiMesh(®)). Patients attended clinical follow-up 3 years postoperatively, at which male fertility aspects, by semen analysis and scrotal ultrasound, chronic pain status (McGill Pain Questionnaire), quality of life (SF-36) and recurrence were assessed, or completed quality of life, pain and hernia-specific questionnaires at home. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients (83.1 %) completed follow-up (median follow-up = 39.1 months), by questionnaire and/or clinical follow-up. As other semen parameters and scrotal ultrasound results, sperm motility was unchanged compared to 1 year postoperatively, but not significantly different between VyproII(®) and TiMesh(®) versus Marlex(®) patients (-8.5 % and -8 % vs. -2.8 %; P = 0.23). Pain perception and quality of life were comparable between the heavyweight and lightweight groups, and no change was noted in comparison with 1 year postoperatively. Chronic pain incidence was 6.1 % (3 patients), without occurrence of disabling pain. Three patients were clinically diagnosed with a recurrent hernia (5.9 %). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in sperm motility in patients operated on with a lightweight mesh compared to patients operated on with a heavyweight mesh 1 year after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair could not be confirmed at 3 years follow-up. Furthermore, heavyweight and lightweight groups were comparable regarding quality of life, chronic pain and recurrence rate.

Fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in intestinal flora of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy--should we reassess our practices for antibiotic prophylaxis?

Although the estimate of the incidence of sepsis following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) is low, fluoroquinolone-resistant infections after prostate biopsy are being increasingly noted. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence of faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli strains before TRUSPB and at evaluating potential predisposing risk factors. The incidence of sepsis after prostate biopsy was determined, and our routine practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUSPB was evaluated. A prospective study was conducted in 342 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy between December 2009 and July 2010. Before TRUSPB, a rectal swab was cultured. The correlation between the presence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains and plausible risk factors was investigated by the use of a questionnaire. Of the 236 patients included, 22.0% (52/236) harboured ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli strains. The use of fluoroquinolones in the 6 months before biopsy was associated with an increased risk of faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains (p <0.01). Faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains was an important risk factor for infectious complications after TRUSPB (p <0.01). In conclusion, a significant number of patients have faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains (22.0%) before TRUSPB. The use of fluoroquinolones in the previous 6 months before biopsy is a risk factor for faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains and for infectious complications after TRUSPB. Hence, the universal administration of fluoroquinolones should be reconsidered.