Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(1): 32-37, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549756

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Access to high-quality care for revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) is poorly understood but may vary based on insurance type. This study investigated distance traveled for hip and knee rTJA based on insurance type. METHODS: A total of 317 revision hips and 431 revision knees performed between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cluster sampling was used to select primary hips and knees for comparison. Median driving distance was compared based upon procedure and insurance type. RESULTS: Revision hip and knee patients traveled 18.2 and 11.0 miles farther for surgery compared to primary hip and knee patients (P ≤ .001). For hip rTJA, Medicaid patients traveled farther than Medicare patients followed by commercially insured patients with median distances traveled of 98.4, 67.2, and 35.6 miles, respectively (P = .016). Primary hip patients traveled the same distance regardless of insurance type (P = .397). For knee rTJA, Medicaid patients traveled twice as far as Medicare and commercially insured patients (medians of 85.0, 43.5, and 42.2 miles respectively, P ≤ .046). Primary knee patients showed a similar pattern (P = .264). Age and ASA-PS classification did not indicate greater comorbidity in Medicaid patients. CONCLUSION: Insurance type may influence rTJA referrals, with disproportionate referral of Medicaid and Medicare patients to nonlocal care centers. In addition to patient burden, these patterns potentially present a financial burden to facilities accepting referrals. Strategies to improve equitable access to rTJA, while maintaining the highest and most economical standards of care for patients, providers, and hospitals, are encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicaid , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(5): 1131-1135, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278186

RESUMEN

This article discusses the implementation of a new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Value Pathway (MVPs) applicable to elective total hip and total knee arthroplasty as created by Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) - the Improving Care for Lower Extremity Joint Repair MVP (MVP ID: G0058). We describe specific quality measures, surgeon-hospital collaborations, future developments with Quality Payment Program, and how lessons from early implementation will empower clinicians to participate in the refining of this MVP. The CMS has designed MVPs as a subset of measures relevant to a specialty or medical condition, in an effort to reduce the burden of reporting and improve assessment of care quality. Physicians and payors must be mindful of detrimental effects these measures in their current form may have on surgeons, institutions, and patients, including disincentivizing care for sicker or more vulnerable populations, and increased administrative costs. Early voluntary participation is crucial to gain valuable experience for the orthopedic community and in an effort to work alongside CMS to maximize care while minimizing cost for patients and burden for providers.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Cirujanos , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Motivación , Notificación Obligatoria , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Extremidad Inferior , Reembolso de Incentivo
3.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(5): 1136-1139, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278185

RESUMEN

A new mandatory hospital-level, risk-standardized performance measure for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on patient-reported outcomes (THA/TKA PRO-PM) has been implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). All THA and TKA in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries at inpatient facilities are included. The THA/TKA PRO-PM is the proportion of risk-standardized THA or TKA patients meeting or exceeding the substantial clinical benefit threshold between preoperative and postoperative outcomes measures (Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement). This binary outcome (yes/no) is then divided by all eligible patients creating a percentage of patients reaching substantial clinical benefit. The percentile score among hospitals will be reported. Following 2 voluntary reporting periods, mandatory reporting will begin in 2025. The CMS requires 50% reporting rates; failure leads to annual payment reduction in fiscal year 2028. The CMS intends the THA/TKA PRO-PM to be a patient-centered, meaningful, and relatable measure of hospital performance reported to the public. For surgeons, this is an opportunity to collaborate with hospitals for developing and implementing a THA/TKA data collection system to avoid penalties for the hospital. Further implementation for outpatient surgery and in ambulatory surgery centers has been announced by CMS. Major resources will be needed to succeed in the expected capture rates.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Osteoartritis , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Hospitales , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente
4.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 55(2): 193-206, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403366

RESUMEN

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most common complications after total joint arthroplasty. It is challenging to manage, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and is a financial burden on the health care system. Failure of 2-stage management for chronic PJI is not uncommon. Repeat infections are oftentimes polymicrobial, multiple drug-resistant microorganisms, or new organisms. Optimizing the success of index 2-stage revision is the greatest prevention against failure of any subsequent management options and requires a robust team-based approach.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Reoperación , Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(3 Supple A): 38-43, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423114

RESUMEN

Aims: Oxidized zirconium (OxZi) and highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) were developed to minimize wear and risk of osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, retrieval studies have shown that scratched femoral heads may lead to runaway wear, and few reports of long-term results have been published. The purpose of this investigation is to report minimum ten-year wear rates and clinical outcomes of THA with OxZi femoral heads on HXLPE, and to compare them with a retrospective control group of cobalt chrome (CoCr) or ceramic heads on HXLPE. Methods: From 2003 to 2006, 108 THAs were performed on 96 patients using an OxZi head with a HXLPE liner with minimum ten-year follow-up. Harris Hip Scores (HHS) were collected preoperatively and at the most recent follow-up (mean 13.3 years). Linear and volumetric liner wear was measured on radiographs of 85 hips with a minimum ten-year follow-up (mean 14.5 years). This was compared to a retrospective control group of 45 THAs using ceramic or CoCr heads from October 1999 to February 2005, with a minimum of ten years' follow-up. Results: Average HHS improved from 50.8 to 91.9 and 51.0 to 89.8 in the OxZi group and control group, respectively (p = 0.644), with no osteolysis in either group. Linear and volumetric wear rates in the OxZi group averaged 0.03 mm/year and 3.46 mm3/year, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in HHS scores, nor in linear or volumetric wear rate between the groups, and no revision for any indication. Conclusion: The radiological and clinical outcomes, and survivorship of THA with OxZi femoral heads and HXLPE liners, were excellent, and comparable to CoCr or ceramic heads at minimum ten-year follow-up. Wear rates are below what would be expected for development of osteolysis. OxZi-HXLPE is a durable bearing couple with excellent long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Osteólisis , Humanos , Polietileno , Circonio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Osteólisis/etiología , Osteólisis/cirugía , Falla de Prótesis , Diseño de Prótesis , Aleaciones de Cromo
6.
J Clin Med ; 12(20)2023 Oct 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37892754

RESUMEN

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has in recent years trended toward a younger, more physically demanding patient population. Mid- to long-term studies of all ages of THA patients using highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) have been favorable, but concerns about its long-term failure and wear-related complications remain for young THA patients. In this narrative review, a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases was performed, and we identified six studies with a minimum 15-year follow-up of HXLPE with various femoral head materials. Wear-related revisions were exceedingly low for patients under the age of 55, with variable reports of non-clinically significant osteolysis. Higher activity levels, a larger femoral head size, and femoral head material were not associated with greater long-term wear rates. Young THA with metal or ceramic on HXLPE is exceedingly durable with favorable outcomes at follow-ups of over 15 years.

7.
Arthroplast Today ; 17: 159-164, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36158463

RESUMEN

Background: With hospital inpatient capacity increasingly limited and primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) rapidly transitioning to outpatient settings, the feasibility of outpatient aseptic revision and conversion TJA (rTJA) has been considered. Before the widespread adoption of outpatient rTJA, guidelines must be established to prevent patient harm. To this end, this study describes our initial experience with same-day-discharge (SDD) aseptic rTJA. Methods: All aseptic rTJAs performed between May 8, 2015, and December 30, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Revision indications, patient selection criteria, and outcomes including SDD success rate, predischarge complications, all-cause emergency department visits, inpatient readmissions, and unplanned clinic encounters within 90 days of surgery were recorded. Results: Thirty-five SDD aseptic rTJAs were performed. Conversion total hip arthroplasty (55.0%) and instability (27.3%) were the most common indications for hip revision. Instability (50%) and conversion total knee arthroplasty (20.8%) were most common for knee revision. SDD was achieved in 97% (34/35) of cases. One hip patient failed SDD due to persistent hypoxia requiring an overnight hospital stay and also underwent closed reduction for dislocation in the emergency department within 90 days of discharge. Two additional patients had unplanned clinic encounters within 90 days of the index procedure. There were no hospital readmissions or reoperations within 90 days. Conclusions: Our initial experience suggests SDD aseptic rTJA can be safe and effective when modern perioperative outpatient protocols and surgical techniques are implemented. Future studies should further define patient selection criteria to optimize outcomes and minimize complications in this population.

8.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med ; 12(2): 80-86, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30806899

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: To review the relevant literature surrounding acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries particularly pertaining to overhead athletes. RECENT FINDINGS: The AC joint is a unique anatomic and biomechanical portion of the shoulder that can be problematic for athletes, particularly throwers, when injured. Treatment of these injuries remains a topic in evolution. Low-grade injuries (Rockwood types I & II) are typically treated non-operatively while high-grade injuries (types IV, V, and VI) are considered unstable and often require operative intervention. Type III AC separations remain the most controversial and challenging as no clear treatment algorithm has been established. A wide variety of surgical techniques exist. Unfortunately, relatively little literature exists with regard to overhead athletes specifically. Treatment of AC joint injuries remains challenging, at times, particularly for overhead athletes. Operative indications and techniques are still evolving, and more research is needed specifically surrounding overhead athletes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA