RESUMEN
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neuropathologically defined disease reportedly linked to a history of repetitive brain trauma. As such, retired collision sport athletes are likely at heightened risk for developing CTE. Researchers have described distinct pathological features of CTE as well a wide range of clinical symptom presentations, recently termed traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES). These clinical symptoms are highly variable, non-specific to individuals described as having CTE pathology in case reports, and are often associated with many other factors. This review describes the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral changes associated with 1) developmental and demographic factors, 2) neurodevelopmental disorders, 3) normal aging, 4) adjusting to retirement, 5) drug and alcohol abuse, 6) surgeries and anesthesia, and 7) sleep difficulties, as well as the relationship between these factors and risk for developing dementia-related neurodegenerative disease. We discuss why some professional athletes may be particularly susceptible to many of these effects and the importance of choosing appropriate controls groups when designing research protocols. We conclude that these factors should be considered as modifiers predominantly of the clinical outcomes associated with repetitive brain trauma within a broader biopsychosocial framework when interpreting and attributing symptom development, though also note potential effects on neuropathological outcomes. Importantly, this could have significant treatment implications for improving quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Encefalopatía Traumática Crónica , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Encefalopatía Traumática Crónica/complicaciones , Encefalopatía Traumática Crónica/epidemiología , Encefalopatía Traumática Crónica/etiología , Encefalopatía Traumática Crónica/terapia , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Trastornos del Humor/etiología , JubilaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The authors designed a prospective longitudinal study to investigate the hypothesis that advancing age is a risk factor for postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after major noncardiac surgery and the impact of POCD on mortality in the first year after surgery. METHODS: One thousand sixty-four patients aged 18 yr or older completed neuropsychological tests before surgery, at hospital discharge, and 3 months after surgery. Patients were categorized as young (18-39 yr), middle-aged (40-59 yr), or elderly (60 yr or older). At 1 yr after surgery, patients were contacted to determine their survival status. RESULTS: At hospital discharge, POCD was present in 117 (36.6%) young, 112 (30.4%) middle-aged, and 138 (41.4%) elderly patients. There was a significant difference between all age groups and the age-matched control subjects (P < 0.001). At 3 months after surgery, POCD was present in 16 (5.7%) young, 19 (5.6%) middle-aged, and 39 (12.7%) elderly patients. At this time point, the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was similar between age-matched controls and young and middle-aged patients but significantly higher in elderly patients compared to elderly control subjects (P < 0.001). The independent risk factors for POCD at 3 months after surgery were increasing age, lower educational level, a history of previous cerebral vascular accident with no residual impairment, and POCD at hospital discharge. Patients with POCD at hospital discharge were more likely to die in the first 3 months after surgery (P = 0.02). Likewise, patients who had POCD at both hospital discharge and 3 months after surgery were more likely to die in the first year after surgery (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive dysfunction is common in adult patients of all ages at hospital discharge after major noncardiac surgery, but only the elderly (aged 60 yr or older) are at significant risk for long-term cognitive problems. Patients with POCD are at an increased risk of death in the first year after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/psicología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The use of IQ scores and discrepancy formulas for identifying specific learning disabilities (SLD) has been widely discredited by prominent researchers for more than a decade. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of state policies still specify the use of discrepancy formulas, including the simple difference method, which is psychometrically inferior to regression-based methods. This study compares the use of a minimum IQ cutoff score and a simple difference method versus a regression-based method for identifying SLD in a sample of African American and European American full-time college students (N = 117). Replicating the findings from previous studies using typically achieving children, typically achieving adults, and school-age children with SLD, this study adds to the chorus of voices criticizing the use of outdated assessment practices that can have deleterious effects for individuals with SLD. The implications for legislative policy are discussed in the context of the historical overrepresentation of African Americans in all special education categories except SLD and the increased access to higher education that students with SLD have gained during the past decade.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Etnicidad , Pruebas de Inteligencia , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/diagnóstico , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Educación Especial , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/clasificación , Masculino , Psicometría , Política Pública , Valores de Referencia , UniversidadesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular patients with reduced cardiovascular output and capacity such as those with congestive heart failure (CHF) have demonstrated cognitive-related dysfunction. The use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is considered standard care for CHF patients who do not improve despite optimal medical therapy. Cardiac resynchronization therapy may improve neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning in patients by increasing cardiac output and cerebral perfusion. METHODS: A total of 20 patients were examined before and 3 months after CRT device implantation, via administration of standard neurocognitive and psychosocial testing measures. RESULTS: Significant improvements in neurocognitive measures of attention (Digit Span: t[20] = - 2.695 [55.94+/-9.27-62.31+/-10.05], P = 0.015) and information processing (Digit Symbol: t[20] = - 4.577, P < 0.001; Controlled Oral Word Association Test: t[20] = - 3.338, P = 0.004) were demonstrated. Improvements in cardiac-specific quality of life were also significant (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire: t[16] = 3.544, P = 0.005 [55.17+/-18.23-36.75+/-18.00]; The Left Ventricular Dysfunction Questionnaire: t[16] = 3.544, P = 0.003 [63.43+/-23.35-43.29+/-21.62]). CONCLUSION: These results represent clinically significant, qualitative, and quantitative cognitive functional benefits for patients from a neurocognitive and psychosocial perspective. Results suggest that biventricular pacing improves cardiovascular outcome and psychosocial functioning in patients with CHF. The future investigation of a larger sample would be beneficial in establishing the depth and breadth of this improvement.