Can MRI Be Used as a Sole Diagnostic Modality in Determining Clinical Stage in Cervical Cancer?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare staging by MRI to clinical staging in patients with cervical cancer and to determine the histological accuracy of staging by MRI and examination under anesthesia (EUA) in early stage disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2010 and 2020 at the Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands. Pretreatment stage (FIGO 2009) by MRI was compared with staging by EUA. Diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value was calculated for MRI and EUA in patients undergoing surgery (early stage disease) with histological results as a reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients were included in the study and MRI-based stage differed from EUA stage in 30.7%. In 12.3% this meant a discrepancy in treatment assignment between MRI and EUA. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in terms of sensitivity and specificity for detecting early stage disease was comparable to EUA in surgical patients. Further analyses showed that premenopausal status, early stage disease and a tumor diameter of <2 cm were associated with improved comparability of MRI and EUA (98%). CONCLUSION: There is still a large discrepancy between MRI and EUA. In patients with suspected early stage disease, diagnostic accuracy of MRI is similar to EUA, especially for premenopausal women with early stage disease and a tumor diameter of <2 cm.

Everolimus does not further reduce polycystic liver volume when added to long acting octreotide: results from a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Polycystic liver disease (PLD) is associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) or autosomal dominant polycystic liver disease (PCLD). The resulting hepatomegaly compromises quality of life. Somatostatin analogues reduce PLD volume by approximately 5% when given for 6-12 months. A pilot trial in 16 ADPKD patients demonstrated that sirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, reduced PLD volume by 26%. The aim of this study was to assess the PLD volume reducing effect of everolimus and octreotide relative to octreotide monotherapy. METHODS: We designed a randomized controlled trial that compared 48 weeks of everolimus 2.5 mg daily, combined with octreotide 40 mg intramuscularly every 4 weeks, to octreotide monotherapy. We included PCLD and ADPKD patients. Exclusion criteria were MDRD-GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and liver volume <2500 ml. Primary outcome was change in liver volume measured with CT-volumetry. RESULTS: We randomized 44 PLD patients (29 PCLD, 15 ADPKD, 89% female) to treatment with octreotide (n=23) or octreotide-everolimus (n=21). Liver volume decreased by 3.5% (p<0.01) in the monotherapy arm, compared to 3.8% with combination therapy (p<0.01). The difference between treatment arms was not significant (p=0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Adding everolimus to octreotide in PLD does not increase the liver volume reducing effect of octreotide.

External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury.

CONTEXT: Two decision rules for indications of computed tomography (CT) in patients with minor head injury, the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) and the New Orleans Criteria (NOC), suggest that CT scanning may be restricted to patients with certain risk factors, which would lead to important reductions in the use of CT scans. OBJECTIVE: To validate and compare these 2 published decision rules in Dutch patients with head injuries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective multicenter study conducted between February 11, 2002, and August 31, 2004, in 4 university hospitals in the Netherlands of 3181 consecutive adult patients with minor head injury who presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 14 or with a GCS score of 15 and at least 1 risk factor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was any neurocranial traumatic finding on CT scan. Secondary outcomes were neurosurgical intervention and clinically important CT findings. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for each outcome for the CCHR and the NOC, using both rules as originally derived and also as adapted to apply to an expanded patient population. RESULTS: Of 3181 patients with a GCS score of 13 to 15, neurosurgical intervention was performed in 17 patients (0.5%); neurocranial traumatic CT findings were present in 312 patients (9.8%). Sensitivity for neurosurgical intervention was 100% for both the CCHR and the NOC. The NOC had a higher sensitivity for neurocranial traumatic findings and for clinically important findings (97.7%-99.4%) than did the CCHR (83.4%-87.2%). Specificities were very low for the NOC (3.0%-5.6%) and higher for the CCHR (37.2%-39.7%). The estimated potential reduction in CT scans for patients with minor head injury would be 3.0% for the adapted NOC and 37.3% for the adapted CCHR. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with minor head injury and a GCS score of 13 to 15, the CCHR has a lower sensitivity than the NOC for neurocranial traumatic or clinically important CT findings, but would identify all cases requiring neurosurgical intervention, and has greater potential for reducing the use of CT scans.

Comparison between local ablative therapy and chemotherapy for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest for the use of local ablative techniques in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Evidence on the efficacy over systemic chemotherapy is, however, extremely weak. In this prospective study we aim to assess the additional benefits of local tumour ablation. METHODS: A consecutive series of 201 colorectal cancer patients, without extrahepatic disease, that underwent laparotomy for surgical treatment of liver metastases, were prospectively followed for survival and HRQoL. At laparotomy three groups were identified: patients in whom radical resection of metastases proved feasible, patients in whom resection was not feasible and received local ablative therapy, and patients in whom resection or local ablation was not feasible for technical reasons and who received systemic chemotherapy. FINDINGS: Patients in the chemotherapy and in local ablation group were comparable for all prognostic variables tested. For the local ablation group overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 56 and 27%, respectively (median 31 months, n = 45), for the chemotherapy group 51 and 15%, respectively (median 26 months, n = 39) (P = 0.252). After resection these figures were 83 and 51%, respectively (median 61 months, n = 117) (P < 0.001). The median DFS after local ablation was 9 months, HRQoL was restored within 3 months. Patients after local ablation gained far more QALY's (317) than in the chemotherapy group (165) (P < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Although overall survival did not reached statistical significance, the median DFS of 9 months suggests a beneficial effect of local tumour ablation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Moreover, compared with systemic chemotherapy more QALY's were gained after local ablative therapy.