RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prehospital Respiratory Early Warning Scores to estimate the requirement for advanced respiratory support is needed. To develop a prehospital Respiratory Early Warning Score to estimate the requirement for advanced respiratory support. METHODS: Multicentre, prospective, emergency medical services (EMS)-delivered, longitudinal cohort derivationvalidation study carried out in 59 ambulances and five hospitals across five Spanish provinces. Adults with acute diseases evaluated, supported and discharged to the Emergency Department with high priority were eligible. The primary outcome was the need for invasive or non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS or IRS) in the prehospital scope at the first contact with the patient. The measures included the following: epidemiological endpoints, prehospital vital signs (respiratory rate, pulse oximetry saturation, fraction of inspired oxygen, systolic and diastolic mean blood pressure, heart rate, tympanic temperature and consciousness level by the GCS). RESULTS: Between 26 Oct 2018 and 26 Oct 2021, we enrolled 5793 cases. For NIRS prediction, the final model of the logistic regression included respiratory rate and pulse oximetry saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio. For the IRS case, the motor response from the Glasgow Coma Scale was also included. The REWS showed an AUC of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.918-0.958), a calibration-in-large of 0.026 and a higher net benefit as compared with the other scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that REWS is a remarkably aid for the decision-making process in the management of advanced respiratory support in prehospital care. Including this score in the prehospital scenario could improve patients' care and optimise the resources' management.
Asunto(s)
Puntuación de Alerta Temprana , Adulto , Humanos , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Estudios Prospectivos , Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Oxígeno , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Information for treatment or hospital derivation of prehospital seizures is limited, impairing patient condition and hindering patients risk assessment by the emergency medical services (EMS). This study aimed to determine the associated factors to clinical impairment, and secondarily, to determine risk factors associated to cumulative in-hospital mortality at 2, 7 and 30 days, in patients presenting prehospital seizures. METHODS: Prospective, multicentre, EMS-delivery study involving adult subjects with prehospital seizures, including five advanced life support units, 27 basic life support units and four emergency departments in Spain. All bedside variables: including demographic, standard vital signs, prehospital laboratory tests and presence of intoxication or traumatic brain injury (TBI), were analysed to construct a risk model using binary logistic regression and internal validation methods. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients were considered. Clinical impairment was present in 14.9%, and cumulative in-hospital mortality at 2, 7 and 30-days was 3.4%, 4.6% and 7.7%, respectively. The model for the clinical impairment indicated that respiratory rate, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, blood urea nitrogen, associated TBI or stroke were risk factors; higher Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores mean a lower risk of impairment. Age, potassium, glucose, prehospital use of mechanical ventilation and concomitant stroke were risk factors associated to mortality; and oxygen saturation, a high score in GCS and haemoglobin were protective factors. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that prehospital variables could reflect the clinical impairment and mortality of patients suffering from seizures. The incorporation of such variables in the prehospital decision-making process could improve patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Aim of the study: To assess the prognostic ability of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) at three time points of care -at the emergency scene (NEWS2-1), just before starting the transfer by ambulance to the hospital (NEWS2- 2), and at the hospital triage box (NEWS2-3)- to estimate in-hospital mortality after two days since the index event.Methods: Prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based, cohort ongoing study in adults (>18 years) consecutively attended by advanced life support (ALS) and evacuated with high-priority to the emergency departments (ED) between October 2018 and May 2021. Vital sign measures were used to calculate the NEWS2 score at each time point, then this score was entered in a logistic regression model as the single predictor. Two outcomes were considered: first, all-cause mortality of the patients within 2 days of presentation to EMS, and second, unplanned ICU admission. The calibration and scores comparison was performed by representing the predicted vs the observed risk curves according to NEWS score value.Results: 4943 patients were enrolled. Median age was 69 years (interquartile range 53- 81). The NEWS2-3 presented the better performance for all-cause two-day in-hospital mortality with an AUC of 0.941 (95% CI: 0.917-0.964), showing statistical differences with both the NEWS2-1 (0.872 (95% CI: 0.833-0.911); p < 0.003) and with the NEWS2- 2 (0.895 (95% CI: 0.866-0.925; p < 0.05). The calibration and scores comparison results showed that the NEWS2-3 was the best predictive score followed by the NEWS2-2 and the NEWS2-1, respectively.Conclusions: The NEWS2 has an excellent predictive performance. The score showed a very consistent response over time with the difference between "at the emergency scene" and "pre-evacuation" presenting the sharpest change with decreased threshold values, thus displaying a drop in the risk of acute clinical impairment.
Asunto(s)
Puntuación de Alerta Temprana , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Ambulancias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lactic acidosis is a clinical status related to clinical worsening. Actually, higher levels of lactate is a well-established trigger of emergency situations. The aim of this work is to build-up a prehospital early warning score to predict 2-day mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, constructed with other components of the lactic acidosis besides the lactate. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, observational, derivation-validation cohort study of adults evacuated by ambulance and admitted to emergency department with acute diseases, between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2021. Including six advanced life support, thirty-eight basic life support units, referring to four hospitals (Spain). The primary and secondary outcome of the study were 2-day all-cause mortality and ICU-admission. The prehospital lactic acidosis (PLA) score was derived from the analysis of prehospital blood parameters associated with the outcome using a logistic regression. The calibration, clinical utility, and discrimination of PLA were determined and compared to the performance of each component of the score alone. RESULTS: A total of 3334 patients were enrolled. The final PLA score included: lactate, pCO2, and pH. For 2-day mortality, the PLA showed an AUC of 0.941 (95%CI: 0.914-0.967), a better performance in calibration, and a higher net benefit as compared to the other score components alone. For the ICU admission, the PLA only showed a better performance for AUC: 0.75 (95%CI: 0.706-0.794). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that PLA predicts 2-day mortality better than other lactic acidosis components alone. Including PLA score in prehospital setting could improve emergency services decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Acidosis Láctica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Ambulancias , Estudios Prospectivos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Ácido Láctico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Poliésteres , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIMS: To assess the prognostic accuracy of comorbidity-adjusted National Early Warning Score in suspected Coronavirus disease 2019 patients transferred from nursing homes by the Emergency Department. DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients transferred by high-priority ambulances from nursing homes to Emergency Departments with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, from March 12 to July 31 2020, were considered. Included variables were: clinical covariates (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, level of consciousness and supplemental oxygen use), the presence of comorbidities and confirmatory analytical diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. The primary outcome was a 2-day mortality rate. The discriminatory capability of the National Early Warning Score was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in two different cohorts, the validation and the revalidation, which were randomly selected from the main cohort. RESULTS: A total of 337 nursing homes, 10 advanced life support units, 51 basic life support units and 8 hospitals in Spain entailing 1,324 patients (median age 87 years) was involved in this study. Two-day mortality was 11.5% (152 cases), with a positivity rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 of 51.2%, 77.7% of hospitalization from whom 1% was of intensive care unit admission. The National Early Warning Score results for the revalidation cohort presented an AUC of 0.771, and of 0.885, 0.778 and 0.730 for the low-, medium- and high-level groups of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The comorbidity-adjusted National Early Warning Score provides a good short-term prognostic criterion, information that can help in the decision-making process to guide the best strategy for each older adult, under the current pandemic. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? Under the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, targeting older adults at high risk of deterioration in nursing homes remains challenging. What were the main findings? Comorbidity-adjusted National Early Warning Score helps to forecast the risk of clinical deterioration more accurately. Where and on whom will the research have impact? A high NEWS, with a low level of comorbidity is associated with optimal predictive performance, making these older adults likely to benefit from continued follow up and potentially hospital referral under the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Casas de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elevated troponin T (cTnT) values are associated with comorbidities and early mortality, in both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the sole utilization of prehospital point-of-care cardiac troponin T to identify the risk of early in-hospital deterioration, including mortality within 28 days. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicentric, controlled, ambulance-based, observational study in adults with acute diseases transferred with high priority by ambulance to emergency departments, between 1 January and 30 September 2020. Patients with hospital diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome were excluded. The discriminative power of the predictive cTnT was assessed through a discrimination model trained using a derivation cohort and evaluated by the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic on a validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 848 patients were included in our study. The median age was 68 years (25th-75th percentiles: 50-81 years), and 385 (45.4%) were women. The mortality rate within 28 days was 12.4% (156 cases). The predictive ability of cTnT to predict mortality presented an area under the curve of 0.903 (95% CI: 0.85-0.954; P < .001). Risk stratification was performed, resulting in three categories with the following optimal cTnT cut-off points: high risk greater than or equal to 100, intermediate risk 40-100 and low risk less than 40 ng/L. In the high-risk group, the mortality rate was 61.7%, and on the contrary, the low-risk group presented a mortality of 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a routine determination of cTnT on the ambulance in patients transferred with high priority to the emergency department can help to stratify the risk of these patients and to detect unknown early clinical deterioration.
Asunto(s)
Deterioro Clínico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Troponina T/sangre , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ambulancias , Área Bajo la Curva , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/sangre , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Intoxicación/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Enfermedades Respiratorias/sangre , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prehospital Emergency Medical Services must attend to patients with complex physiopathological situations with little data and in the shortest possible time. The objective of this work was to study lactic acid values and their usefulness in the prehospital setting to help in clinical decision-making. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal prospective, observational study on patients over 18â¯years of age who, after being evaluated by the Advanced Life Support Unit, were taken to the hospital between April and June 2018. We analyzed demographic variables, prehospital lactic acid values and early mortality (<30â¯days). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was calculated for the prehospital value of lactic acid. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were included in our study. The median age was 68â¯years (interquartile range: 54-80â¯years). Overall 30-day mortality was 9% (25 patients). The area under the curve for lactic acid to predict overall mortality at 30â¯days of care was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.89). The lactate value with the best sensitivity and specificity overall was 4.25â¯mmol/L with a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI: 65.3-93.6) and specificity of 70% (95% CI: 65.0-76.1). CONCLUSIONS: The level of lactic acid can be a complementary tool in the field of prehospital emergencies that will guide us early in the detection of critical patients.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Enfermedad Crítica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Mortalidad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/sangre , Enfermedades Respiratorias/sangre , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , EspañaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the ability of prehospital lactate levels to predict 2-day in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8 points), and mild or moderate TBI (GCS ≥ 9 points). Second, 90-day mortality was also explored. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, emergency medical services (EMSs) delivery, ambulance-based, derivation-validation cohort study developed in 5 tertiary hospitals (Spain), from November 1, 2019, to July 31, 2022. Patients were recruited from among all phone requests for emergency assistance among adults who were later evacuated to referral hospitals with acute TBI. The exclusion criteria were minors, pregnancy, trauma patients without TBI, delayed presentations, patients were discharged in situ, participants with cardiac arrest, and unavailability to obtain a blood sample. The primary outcome was all-cause 2-day in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality in patients with moderate or mild TBI compared with patients with severe TBI. Clinical and analytical parameters (lactate and glucose) were collected. The discriminative power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and calibration curve were calculated for 2 geographically separated cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients were ultimately included. The median age was 58 years (interquartile range: 43-75), and 167 patients were female (32.8%). The primary outcome occurred in 9 (2.2%) of 415 patients with moderate or mild TBI and in 42 (44.7%) of 94 patients with severe TBI. The predictive capacity of the lactate concentration was globally validated in our cohort, for which the AUC was 0.874 (95% CI 0.805-0.942) for the validation cohort. The ability of the GCS score to predict lactate concentration was greater in patients with a GCS score ≥9 points, with an AUC of 0.925 (95% CI 0.808-1.000) and a negative predictive value of 99.09 (95% CI 98.55-99.64) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Our results show the benefit of using lactate in all patients with TBI, particularly in those with a GCS ≥9 points. Routine incorporation of lactate in the screening of patients with TBI could presumably reduce mortality and deterioration rates because of quicker and better identification of patients at risk.
Asunto(s)
Ambulancias , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Ácido Láctico , Humanos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/sangre , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios de Cohortes , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIM: The development of predictive models for patients treated by emergency medical services (EMS) is on the rise in the emergency field. However, how these models evolve over time has not been studied. The objective of the present work is to compare the characteristics of patients who present mortality in the short, medium and long term, and to derive and validate a predictive model for each mortality time. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted, which included adult patients with unselected acute illness who were treated by EMS. The primary outcome was noncumulative mortality from all causes by time windows including 30-day mortality, 31- to 180-day mortality, and 181- to 365-day mortality. Prehospital predictors included demographic variables, standard vital signs, prehospital laboratory tests, and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 4830 patients were enrolled. The noncumulative mortalities at 30, 180, and 365 days were 10.8%, 6.6%, and 3.5%, respectively. The best predictive value was shown for 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.930; 95% CI: 0.919-0.940), followed by 180-day (AUC = 0.852; 95% CI: 0.832-0.871) and 365-day (AUC = 0.806; 95% CI: 0.778-0.833) mortality. DISCUSSION: Rapid characterization of patients at risk of short-, medium-, or long-term mortality could help EMS to improve the treatment of patients suffering from acute illnesses.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A myriad of early warning scores (EWSs) exist, yet there is a need to identify the most clinically valid score to be used in prehospital respiratory assessments to estimate short-term and midterm mortality, intensive-care unit admission, and airway management in life-threatening acute respiratory distress. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, multicentre, ambulance-based, external validation study performed in 44 ambulance services and four hospitals across three Spanish provinces (ie, Salamanca, Segovia, and Valladolid). We identified adults (ie, those aged 18 years and older) discharged to the emergency department with suspected acute respiratory distress. The primary outcome was 2-day all-cause in-hospital mortality, for all the patients or according to prehospital respiratory conditions, including dyspnoea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), COVID-19, other infections, and other conditions (asthma exacerbation, haemoptysis, and bronchoaspirations). 30-day mortality, intensive-care unit admission, and invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation were secondary outcomes. Eight EWSs, namely, the National Early Warning Score 2, the Modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, the Rapid Acute Physiology Score, the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, the CURB-65 Severity Score for Community-Acquired Pneumonia, the BAP-65 Score for Acute Exacerbation of COPD, the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index, and the Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA), were explored to determine their predictive validity through calibration, clinical net benefit as determined through decision curve analysis, and discrimination analysis (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC], compared with Delong's test). FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2020, and Nov 31, 2022, 902 patients were enrolled. The global 2-day mortality rate was 87 (10%); in proportion to various respiratory conditions, the rates were 35 (40%) for dyspnoea, nine (10%) for COPD, 13 (15%) for COVID-19, 28 (32%) for other infections, and two (2%) for others conditions. mSOFA showed the best calibration, a higher net benefit, and the best discrimination (AUROC 0·911, 95% CI 0·86-0·95) for predicting 2-day mortality, and its discrimination was statistically significantly more accurate (p<0·0001) compared with the other scores. The performance of mSOFA for predicting 2-day mortality was higher than the other scores when considering the prehospital respiratory conditions, and was also higher for the secondary outcomes, except for non-invasive mechanical ventilation. INTERPRETATION: Our results showed that mSOFA outperformed other EWSs. The inclusion of mSOFA in prehospital decision making will entail a quick identification of patients in acute respiratory distress at high risk of deterioration, allowing prioritisation of resources and patient care. FUNDING: Gerencia Regional de Salud, Public Health System of Castilla y León (GRS Spain). TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Puntuación de Alerta Temprana , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ambulancias , Estudios Prospectivos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Disnea/diagnósticoRESUMEN
METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based study of adult patients with an acute illness involving six advanced life support units and 38 basic life support units, referring to five emergency departments in Spain. RESULTS: The primary outcome was long-term mortality with a 1-year follow-up. The compared scores included: National Early Warning Score 2, VitalPAC early warning score, modified rapid emergency medicine score (MREMS), Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage Score, Rapid Acute Physiology Score, and Triage Early Warning Score. Discriminative power [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)] and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to compare the scores. Additionally, a Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used. Between 8 October 2019, and 31 July 2021, a total of 2674 patients were selected. The MREMS presented the highest AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.79), significantly higher than those of the other EWS. It also exhibited the best performance in the DCA and the highest hazard ratio for 1-year mortality [3.56 (2.94-4.31) for MREMS between 9 and 18 points, and 11.71 (7.21-19.02) for MREMSâ >â 18]. CONCLUSION: Among seven tested EWS, the use of the MREMS presented better characteristics to predict 1-year mortality; however, all these scores present moderate performances.
Asunto(s)
Puntuación de Alerta Temprana , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ambulancias , Triaje , Curva ROC , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Lactate is an already recognized biomarker for short-term mortality. However, how glycemia and diabetes affect the predictive ability of lactate needs to be revealed. OBJECTIVE: To determine how hypoglycemia, normoglycemia, and hyperglycemia modify the predictive ability of lactate for short-term mortality (3 days). The secondary objective was to evaluate the predictive ability of lactate in diabetic patients. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, observational study performed between 26 October 2018 and 31 December 2022. Multicenter, EMS-delivery, ambulance-based study, considering 38 basic life support units and 5 advanced life support units referring to four tertiary care hospitals (Spain). Eligible patients were adults recruited from among all phone requests for emergency assistance who were later evacuated to emergency departments. OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality from any cause within the third day following EMS attendance. The main predictors considered were lactate, blood glucose levels and previous diabetes. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 6341 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 68 years (IQR: 51-80); 41.4% were female. The 3-day in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5%. The predictive capacity of lactate for 3-day mortality was only significantly different between normo-glycemia and hyperglycemia. The best predictive result was for normo-glycemia - AUCâ =â 0.897 (95% CI: 0.881-0.913) - then hyperglycemia - AUCâ =â 0.819 (95% CI: 0.770-0.868) and finally, hypoglycemia - AUCâ =â 0.703 (95% CI: 0.422-0.983). The stratification according to diabetes presented no statistically significant difference, and the predictive results were AUCâ =â 0.924 (95% CI: 0.892-0.956), AUCâ =â 0.906 (95% CI: 0.884-0.928), and AUCâ =â 0.872 (95% CI: 0.817-0.927) for nondiabetes, uncomplicated cases, and end-organ damage diabetes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that glycemia, but not diabetes, alters the predictive ability of lactate. Therefore, hyperglycemia should be considered when interpreting lactate, since this could improve screening to detect cryptic shock conditions.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The evidence about the use of natriuretic peptides (NP) to predict mortality in the pre-hospital setting is limited. The main objective of this study is to assess the ability of point-of-care testing (POCT) N-terminal portion of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to predict 2-day in-hospital mortality of acute cardiovascular diseases (ACVD). METHODS: We conducted a multicentric, prospective, observational study in adults with ACVD transferred by ambulance to emergency departments (ED). The primary outcome was 2-day in-hospital mortality. The discrimination capacity of the NT-proBNP was performed through a prediction model trained using a derivation cohort and evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic on a validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 1006 patients were recruited. The median age was 75 (IQR 63-84) years and 421 (41.85%) were females. The 2-day in-hospital mortality was 5.8% (58 cases). The predictive validity of NT-proBNP, for 2-day mortality reached the following AUC: 0.823 (95%CI: 0.758-0.889, p < 0.001), and the optimal specificity and sensitivity were 73.1 and 82.7. Predictive power of NT-proBNP obtained an AUC 0.549 (95%CI: 0.432-0.865, p 0.215) for acute heart failure, AUC 0.893 (95%CI: 0.617-0.97, p < 0.001) for ischemic heart disease, AUC 0.714 (95%CI: 0.55-0.87, p = 0.0069) for arrhythmia and AUC 0.927 (95%CI: 0.877-0.978, p < 0,001) for syncope. CONCLUSION: POCT NT-proBNP has proven to be a strong predictor of early mortality in ACVD, showing an excellent predictive capacity in cases of syncope. However, this biomarker does not appear to be useful for predicting outcome in patients with acute heart failure.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico , Fragmentos de Péptidos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , SíncopeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of the quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) for 90-day mortality amongst COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in adult patients transferred by ambulance to an emergency department (ED) with suspected COVID-19 infection subsequently confirmed by a SARS-CoV-2 test (polymerase chain reaction). We collected epidemiological data, clinical covariates (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, level of consciousness and use of supplemental oxygen) and hospital variables. The primary outcome was cumulative all-cause mortality during a 90-day follow-up, with mortality assessment monitoring time points at 1, 2, 7, 14, 30 and 90 days from ED attendance. Comparison of performances for 90-day mortality between both scores was carried out by univariate analysis. RESULTS: From March to November 2020, we included 2,961 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (median age 79 years, IQR 66-88), with 49.2% females. The qCSI score provided an AUC ranging from 0.769 (1-day mortality) to 0.749 (90-day mortality), whereas AUCs for NEWS ranging from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality. At all-time points studied, differences between both scores were statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with SARS-CoV-2 can rapidly develop bilateral pneumonias with multiorgan disease; in these cases, in which an evacuation by the EMS is required, reliable scores for an early identification of patients with risk of clinical deterioration are critical. The NEWS score provides not only better prognostic results than those offered by qCSI at all the analyzed time points, but it is also better suited for COVID-19 patients.KEY MESSAGESThis work aims to determine whether NEWS is the best score for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19.AUCs for NEWS ranged from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality and were significantly higher than those for qCSI in these same outcomes.NEWS provides a better prognostic capacity than the qCSI score and allows for long-term (90 days) mortality risk assessment of COVID-19 patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To characterize phenotypes of prehospital patients with COVID-19 to facilitate early identification of at-risk groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter observational noninterventional study of a retrospective cohort of 3789 patients, analyzing 52 prehospital variables. The main outcomes were 4 clusters of prehospital variables describing the phenotypes. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, admission to an intensive care unit, and cumulative mortality inside or outside the hospital on days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after hospitalization and after start of prehospital care. RESULTS: We used a principal components multiple correspondence analysis (factor analysis) followed by decomposition into 4 clusters as follows: cluster 1, 1090 patients (28.7%); cluster 2, 1420 (37.4%); cluster 3, 250 (6.6%), and cluster 4, 1029 (27.1%). Cluster 4 was comprised of the oldest patients and had the highest frequencies of residence in group facilities and low arterial oxygen saturation. This group also had the highest mortality (44.8% at 28 days). Cluster 1 was comprised of the youngest patients and had the highest frequencies of smoking, fever, and requirement for mechanical ventilation. This group had the most favorable prognosis and the lowest mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with COVID-19 evaluated by emergency medical responders and transferred to hospital emergency departments can be classified into 4 phenotypes with different clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics. The phenotypes can help health care professionals to quickly assess a patient's future risk, thus informing clinical decisions.
OBJETIVO: Desarrollar un fenotipado prehospitalario de pacientes con COVID-19 que permita una identificación temprana de los grupos de riesgo. METODO: Estudio observacional de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico, sin intervención con 3.789 pacientes y 52 variables prehospitalarias. Las variables de resultado principal fueron las cuatro agrupaciones prehospitalarios obtenidos, #1, #2, #3 y #4. Los resultados secundarios fueron: ingreso hospitalario, ventilación mecánica, ingreso en unidad de cuidados intensivos y mortalidad acumulada a los 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 y 28 días desde el ingreso hospitalario (hospitalaria y extrahospitalaria). RESULTADOS: Por medio de una descomposición en componentes principales/correspondencia múltiple de datos mixtos (continuos y categóricos), seguido de una descomposición en agrupaciones, se obtuvo cuatro agrupaciones/fenotipos #1, #2, #3 y #4 de 1.090 (28,7%), 1.420 (37,4%), 250 (6,6%) y 1.029 (27,1%) pacientes, respectivamente. El grupo #4, compuesto por los pacientes de mayor edad, baja saturación de oxígeno e institucionalización es el que presenta la mayor mortalidad (44,8% de mortalidad a 28 días). El grupo #1, compuesto de pacientes de menor edad, con mayor porcentaje de tabaquismo, fiebre y necesidades de ventilación mecánica, es el de pronóstico más favorable con la menor tasa de mortalidad. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes con COVID-19 valorados por los servicios médicos de emergencias y transferidos al servicio de urgencias hospitalario se pueden clasificar en 4 fenotipos con diferentes consideraciones clínicas, terapéuticas y de pronóstico, y permite a los profesionales sanitarios discriminar rápidamente el nivel de riesgo futuro del paciente y ayuda por lo tanto en el proceso de toma de decisiones.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Fenotipo , Respiración Artificial , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the role of prehospital point-of-care N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide to predict sepsis, septic shock, or in-hospital sepsis-related mortality. METHODS: A prospective, emergency medical service-delivered, prognostic, cohort study of adults evacuated by ambulance and admitted to emergency department between January 2020 and May 2021. The discriminative power of the predictive variable was assessed through a prediction model trained using the derivation cohort and evaluated by the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic on the validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 1,360 patients were enrolled with medical disease in the study. The occurrence of sepsis, septic shock, and in-hospital sepsis-related mortality was 6.4% (67 cases), 4.2% (44 cases), and 6.1% (64 cases). Prehospital National Early Warning Score 2 had superior predictive validity than quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide for detecting sepsis and septic shock, but N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide outperformed both scores in in-hospital sepsis-related mortality estimation. Application of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide to subgroups of the other two scores improved the identification of sepsis, septic shock, and sepsis-related mortality in the group of patients with low-risk scoring. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in prehospital care combined with already existing scores could improve the identification of sepsis, septic shock, and sepsis-related mortality.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Fragmentos de Péptidos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Anciano , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Importance: The early identification of patients at high risk of clinical deterioration represents one of the greatest challenges for emergency medical services (EMS). Objective: To assess whether use of the ratio of prehospital oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) measured during initial contact by EMS with the patient (ie, the first Spo2 to Fio2 ratio) and 5 minutes before the patient's arrival at the hospital (ie, the second Spo2 to Fio2 ratio) can predict the risk of early in-hospital deterioration. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, derivation-validation prognostic cohort study of 3606 adults with acute diseases referred to 5 tertiary care hospitals in Spain was conducted between October 26, 2018, and June 30, 2020. Eligible patients were recruited from among all telephone requests for EMS assistance for adults who were later evacuated with priority in advanced life support units to the referral hospitals during the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospital mortality from any cause within the first, second, third, or seventh day after EMS transport to the hospital. The main measure was the Spo2 to Fio2 ratio. Results: A total of 3606 participants comprised 2 separate cohorts: the derivation cohort (3081 patients) and the validation cohort (525 patients). The median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 54-81 years), and 2122 patients (58.8%) were men. The overall mortality rate of the patients in the study cohort ranged from 3.6% for 1-day mortality (131 patients) to 7.1% for 7-day mortality (256 patients). The best model performance was for 2-day mortality with the second Spo2 to Fio2 ratio with an area under the curve of 0.890 (95% CI, 0.829-0.950; P < .001), although the other outcomes also presented good results. In addition, a risk-stratification model was generated. The optimal cutoff resulted in the following ranges of Spo2 to Fio2 ratios: 50 to 100 for high risk of mortality, 101 to 426 for intermediate risk, and 427 to 476 for low risk. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that use of the prehospital Spo2 to Fio2 ratio was associated with improved management of patients with acute disease because it accurately predicts short-term mortality.
Asunto(s)
Deterioro Clínico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Oxígeno/sangre , Enfermedad Aguda/mortalidad , Enfermedad Aguda/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oximetría , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) scores can help identify clinical deterioration. OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive capacity of the NEWS2 at prehospital level for the detection of early mortality in the hospital. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study, in which we compiled a database of observed vital signs between March 1, 2018 and May 30, 2019. We collected demographic data, vital signs (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, supplemental oxygen, temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and level of consciousness), prehospital diagnosis and hospital mortality data. We calculated the AUROC of the NEWS2 for early mortality. RESULTS: We included a total of 2335 participants. Median age was 69 years (IQR 54-81 years). The AUC for mortality within one day was 0.862 (95%CI:0.78-0.93), within two days 0.885 (95%CI:0.84-0.92) and within seven days 0.835 (95%CI:0.79-0.87) (in all cases, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The NEWS2 performed at prehospital level is a bedside tool for predicting early hospital mortality.
Asunto(s)
Puntuación de Alerta Temprana , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to assess whether the use of prehospital lactate (pLA) can increase the prognostic accuracy of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) to detect the risk of death within 48 h. A prospective, multicenter study in adults treated consecutively by the emergency medical services (EMS) included six advanced life support (ALS) services and five hospitals. Patients were assigned to one of four groups according to their risk of mortality (low, low-medium, medium, and high), as determined by the NEWS2 score. For each group, the validity of pLA in our cohort was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In this study, 3081 participants with a median age of 69 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 54-81) were included. The two-day mortality was 4.4% (137 cases). The scale derived from the implementation of the pLA improved the capacity of the NEWS2 to discriminate low risk of mortality, with an AUC of 0.910 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94; p < 0.001). The risk stratification provided by the NEWS2 can be improved by incorporating pLA measurement to more accurately predict the risk of mortality in patients with low risk.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More recently, due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, health care workers have to deal with clinical situations wearing personal protective equipment (PPE); however, there is a question of whether everybody will tolerate PPE equally. The main objective of this study was to develop a risk model to predict whether health care workers will tolerate wearing PPE, C category, 4B/5B/6B type, during a 30-minute simulation. METHODS: A nonexperimental simulation study was conducted at the Advanced Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Valladolid University (Spain) from April 3rd to 28th, 2017. Health care students and professionals were equipped with PPE and performed a 30-minute simulation. Anthropometric, physiological, and analytical variables and anxiety levels were measured before and after simulation. A scoring model was constructed. RESULTS: Ninety-six volunteers participated in the study. Half the sample presented metabolic fatigue in the 20 minutes after finishing the simulation. The predictive model included female sex, height, muscle and bone mass, and moderate level of physical activity. The validity of the main model using all the variables presented an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.786-0.935), and the validity of the model had an area under the curve of 0.725 (95% confidence interval: 0.559-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making in biohazard incidents is a challenge for emergency team leaders. Knowledge of health care workers' physiological tolerance of PPE could improve their performance.